Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Motivation within organizations
Motivation theory for employees in practice
Motivation theory for employees in practice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Motivation within organizations
First Break All the Rules
What does it take to keep talented employees in your company? This valid question is not one that begs a fast, ready, and consistent answer. As a supervisor myself, it is one I have pondered often as I strive to keep and develop the best staff. Effective leadership involves not only the active and reflective supervision of your staff, but also modeling, openness, and a genuine appreciation for the work that your employees put in and the potential they have to grow within and contribute to the organization as a whole.
Buckingham and Coffman’s First Break All the Rules (1999) chronicles the research conducted by the Gallop Company to determine what the best managers do and how this impacts employee retention. The questions and scenarios presented in the novel are a basis for implementing strengths based leadership practices in an organization. They show that being effective is not a simple equation, but rather, involves a way of being and a reciprocal supervisor—employee relationship.
Buckingham and Coffman (1999) suggest that the successful work environment is judged on a measuring stick composed of 12 questions: (1) Do I know what is expected of me at work? (2) Do I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right? (3) At work, do I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day? (4) In the last seven days, have I received recognition or praise for doing good work? (5) Does my supervisor, or someone at work, seem to care about me as a person? (6) Is there someone at work who encourages my development? (7) At work, do my opinions count? (8) Does the mission/purpose of my company make me feel my job is important? (9) Are my co-workers committed to doing quality work? (10) Do I have a be...
... middle of paper ...
...he company which suggests that if you examine managerial styles and work to improve employee satisfaction there will be a correlational increase in productivity and retention. It suggests that perhaps people leave companies not because they are unsatisfied with their work or pay, but rather, because they are unsatisfied with their manager. While this idea might seem brash, it is a significant point being made that suggests that in order to see improvement you need to revamp a program or company from the top. Having worked as both an entry level worker and a managerial supervisor, I can testify to the importance of manager support, appreciation, and feedback and how this impacts your role in the company. Seeking out the strengths in employees, though it seems so obvious in theory, is a revolutionary way to transform the work environment and employee morale.
"First, Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently” was written by Marcus Buckingham and Court Coffman. It’s based on in-depth interviews by the Gallup organization of over 80,000 managers in over 400 companies to help managers as well as talented employees who have the potential and plan on eventually becoming great managers. The book is mainly branched into "four keys" that are vital to proclaim the potential and perplexity of human resource development in organizations of all sizes. These keys consider the capacity of a manager to select the optimum personnel based on talents, results, strengths, and fit. It’s an excellent book that turns the conventional wisdom about managing people upside down and provides great insight on how to assess the performance of an organization in general.
Satisfaction and productivity will be improved when the manager and employees understand each other through improved relationships and understanding of one another.
High satisfaction with one's direct supervisor leads to lower levels of employee turnover. In other words, employees who are highly satisfied with their direct supervisor are less likely to leave an organization than employees who are dissatisfied with their
Dr. Sutton highlights what it takes to be a good boss. People that work for a good boss are 20 percent less likely to have a heart attack (Sutton, 2010). Dr. Sutton wrote that teams with stronger leaders cost the company less money and achieved their work better (Sutton, 2010). Engagement and performance of employees were based upon their direct boss and not if the company was good or bad (Sutton, 2010). Most bad bosses have employees who have check-out: actively disengaged, and undermine their co-workers accomplishments. Managers have to find the balance between performance and humanity to be successful. Performance is about doing everything possible to help followers do great work; while humanity is about employees experiencing dignity and pride. Treating managerial work as an endurance race instead of a sprint race with small wins will lead one to becoming a good boss called grit by Sutton. Sutton believes that good bosses walk a constructive line between being assertive and not assertive enough with guidance, wisdom, and feedback that he called Lasorda’s law (Sutton, 2010).
...itz, 2003). So, my research will firstly focus on what a manager can do on a day to day basis to develop their talent and that of their employees. First, I believe a leader needs to feed his/her people and let them grow. The leader must have an interest in what happens in the lives of people and have genuine interest in the individual employees: who they are and what they want. Ethics should be the bed from which you operate, first you have to give respect , in order to get it. High-quality management of people leads to longer employment , which leads to confidence , which leads to more work. A leader should thus provide a pleasant and friendly environment. I believe that the more fun you can make it for your employees to work, the more profit you will make. The real challenge is the willingness to bet on the long run and not get carried away by short-term pressure.
In today’s complex management environment, I believe that the mindset of a manger weigh the same as their views and attitude on the job. Certainly, Jonathan Gosling an established scholar and the director of the Centre for Leadership Studies at the University of Exeter provide an excellent view on the diverse talent requirements in effective management. The main issue identified by the author is the connection between leadership and management. Separation of management and leadership is impractical. However not all good leaders are good managers and vice versa. Gosling, and Mintzberg (2003), argues that management without leadership promotes uninspired behavior, which hinders business activities. On the other hand, leadership devoid of management results in disconnect of actions and ideas. I concur with the author’s argument on the relationship between management and leadership. I believe that good managers should be good leaders too. However, most organizations do not enjoy both the benefits of effective leadership and management. In particular, most organizations lack either of these ...
A person’s behavior at one specific point in time usually controls their attitude at that time. Managers must be able to understand these basic needs of their workers. If these needs are not dealt with in a certain correct way than workers will not reach their maximum potential. If the lower order of needs is not met than people are not happy. The same can be said of the higher order.
Thereby, management would have to be supportive, reinforce tangible ideas while acting as a role model, mentor and trainer to help the employees (Davis &n Goetsch, 2010). Empowerment will allow the managers to be involved but not the only ones making every decision. In addition, it’s about empowering employees to make changes that will enhance the quality thus leading to total quality management (Reza, Gholamreza, Hasan Aarei &Nasrin, 2010). Furthermore, if more managers delegate more responsibility to the employees they will see it as a sign of appreciation and trust in their performance which will boost their self-esteem and motivation to perform while employee-supervisor relationship will become positive along with job satisfaction thereby leading to increased productivity (Gomez & Rosen, 2001). I would then ask the managers to envision a day where employees did not ask the managers to solve every issue/problem but developed solutions and found better ways of performing their duties. In addition, I would ask the mangers how many times daily were they requested by employees to fix a problem that was within an employee’s job duties and how would they be more effective leaders if employees were committed to the company
As a conclusion being a manager who has all the knowledge and skills not only to motivate but also keep the motivated and professional staff work for him will make the organization excel.
According to research there are three reasons that managers should be attentive towards the job satisfaction of their employees:
Additionally, employee satisfaction are directly correlated to employee commitment and the loyalty which again directly related with the business and work productivity (Papazisi, Raidén, and Sheehan, 1995). Smart leaders knows that keeping their employee satisfied and motivated are essential for their organization (Sher, Bakhtiar, Muhammad &Ali, 2010).
The goal of nearly every company or organization is to motivate those involved towards a unified vision and or goal. When an organization is able to identify the major individual variables that influence work behavior, they can offer an atmosphere that is healthy. Typically, all organizations experience the direct relationship between job satisfaction, and performance. In an effort to maximize the performance of staff within a system it is important to develop an optimal interpersonal chemistry. In order to be most effective, leaders in an organization must have a clear understanding of their employees,
Job satisfaction is important to both workers and the organization. For an organization, high levels of job satisfaction of its employees make for a workforce that is motivated and committed to high-quality performance. Research shows that an increase in employee happiness has a direct impact on productivity, which in return is a direct connection to a successful business. However, job satisfaction does not come automatically to an organization; it need...
Organizational effectiveness is directly related to the leaders within the organization, who have the innate ability to achieve the vision, mission, and values through developing high performance and influence of the employees. Research suggests that effective leadership can impel the process improvement of performance, maintain a viable gain and is a powerful foundation of organization development (Jing, & Avery, 2016). The heart of leadership begins with the personal qualities, beliefs, and influence of the leader. Effective leaders create strong relationships with their employees which increases their influence to develop successful organizations (Aleksic, 2016). Throughout the years, there has been and continues to be extensive research
Managers often wonder why some people work a lot and do their job correctly, they feel loyalty to the company and achieve results as if they work for themselves, while others come to work and do their working hours just because they have to, with no visible results in the end of them as an individual. The question is whether management can influence the behavior and performance of their people in work and how? The success at work encourages employee satisfaction, which today is largely driven by direct or indirect relationship of manager towards them, and just that greatly affects the performance of employees. The answers to these seemingly simple questions can be found in the demanding field of motivation, its understanding, and that is expected from the good manager. Preventing or mitigating the threat of dissatisfaction is achieved by properly selected motivational techniques, which are largely dependent on the employee, his past achievements, ambition, sense of loyalty to the company… As a product of motivation come quality work, greater creativity, and ultimately what every employer strives, a higher efficiency of the entire