Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages of international market entry strategies
Advantages of international market entry strategies
Advantages of international market entry strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages of international market entry strategies
INTRODUCTION
Compare and contrast the distribution decisions of multinational corporations PepsiCo and Nestlé in India. In particular conduct research and identify significant cultural issues that would be relevant to the development of those strategies.
PepsiCo and Nestle are two similar types of organizations in that they both produce consumables that are not deemed a basic commodity. Although PepsiCo makes primarily a soft drink beverage, Nestle produces thousands of types of snack foods, candy, and chocolate, as well as owning thousands of brands that produce every day items. Both organizations saw the untapped market potential available in India. India has a vast untapped population estimated at over 1.27 billion people, yet both organizations had been delayed in introducing their products to the country (Population, 2014). As both companies attempted to enter the market, they adopted different strategies with common goals.
PEPSICO ENTRY
PepsiCo attempted to enter the Indian market through a classic strategy, by bringing jobs to the region. During the 1980’s, the per capita consumption of soft drinks in India was only three bottles per year (Saylor, 2011). In May 1985, PepsiCo joined forces with one of the leading business strategists in India, the R.P. Goenka group, to begin operations. The organization planned to import the cola concentrate and sell drinks under the Pepsi label. To make this opportunity attractive to the Indian government, PepsiCo offered to help India export juice concentrate throughout its country. The Indian government rejected this offer from PepsiCo on the grounds that they didn’t like Pepsi importing their cola concentrate, as well as the use of the foreign brand. PepsiCo dropped its assoc...
... middle of paper ...
...ehouses around the nation in a network of distribution. Nestle opened itself to using milk from local farmers in order to produce goods. Unlike the government, Nestle paid the farmers immediately, giving them an incentive to produce more milk and increase their own production.
COMPARISON
Nestle and PepsiCo, although different brands and utilizing different entry strategies, both realized that in order to be welcomed to the new emerging market of India they needed to embrace local culture and realize how they could help the nation meet common goals. He cultural issues of India both had them initially struggling to meet these goals, as Nestle is a profit oriented organization. Once Nestle and PepsiCo realized that India was less worried about profits and more worried about Socio-political issues, they were able to meet a middle ground of succeeding in the market.
Pepsi needed a strong regional partner. Pepsi had been falling behind to Coke in Mexican market. However, changes in the regulatory environment had cut Coke’...
focus more on the fun-for-you, major brands: ignore the other two segments, and focus on PepsiCo’s core products. The issue is that it may seem as though PepsiCo is going back on their word and Nooyi’s strategy. As well, PepsiCo might be seen as unethical for pushing their high-sugar, high-calorie drinks and junk food, while Americans and those of other nationalities are facing higher and higher levels of obesity.
Frito-Lay controlled 40% of the USA-market assuring high volume production by increasing internal coordination with PepsiCo developing the Power of One strategy consisting in mixing snacks with beverages and sauces produced by Peps...
Although produced by main market players, soft carbonated drinks cost more than similar products from local and private label manufacturers, consumers are willing to pay an extra price for the name, particular taste, and image. Fierce competition in the CSD industry forces Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to expand into new and emerging markets which present high potential for the company’s development. However, some foreign markets proved to be highly competitive. Coca-Cola Company’s operations in China faced antitrust regulations, advertising restrictions, and foreign exchange controls. iii.
Although Unilever’s Path to Growth strategy involves all components of the general environment, two segments that are especially relevant are the global and sociocultural segments. A major strength of the company’s global environment is its geographic diversification of its major product markets. In 2003, Unilever had sales and marketing efforts in 88 different countries. The key is that it gave decision-making power to its managers in different countries so that they could tailor their products to the market’s specific preferences and consumers’ local tastes. Thus, it was the cross-country preferences of consumers that determined what products Unilever would carry. The global segment provides an enormous opportunity for Unilever. The case states that emerging country markets show the greatest potential for sales growth. Major competitors such as Procter & Gamble and Kraft Foods had sales in roughly 140 to 150 different countries in 2003, and Nestle, Unilever’s main rival, had market penetration in almost every country in the world. If Unilever is able to expand its operations into 50 or more new countries and concentrate its advertising campaign on consumer preferences, it could significantly increase its market share in the global economy.
For more than a century now, two major companies of soft drinks Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have been battling. Both companies have very long history in inventing, advertising, and selling their soft drinks.
The transnational corporation Nestle Company founded in 1886 based in Vevey, Switzerland, sells its products in 189 countries and has manufacturing plants in 89 countries around the world, boasting an unmatched geographic presence. The company started off as an alternative to breastmilk and initially looked into other countries for an increase in global opportunities. It founded its first out of country offices in London in 1868, and due to the small size and inability of Switzerland to compensate growth manufacturing plants were built in both Britain and the United states in the late nineteenth century. A large portion of Nestlé’s globalization came in the 1900s which was when it first moved into the chocolate business after
Our company has a long-term commitment to rural development and the use of local raw materials rather than imports. We intend to significantly expand our business in Africa by developing local food resources for our factories. Nestle has built a huge network in African continent. In 2011, this network includes 27 factories and dozens of other warehouse and office facilities serving all 54 African nations. The Company employs approximately 15,500 people in Africa, and around 50,000 additional jobs have been indirectly created through the supply and distribution chain. It has built this business by establishing national and regional companies through consistent investments over many decades, despite often challenging economic circumstances. Thus, in this way Nestle got benefits through mergers and acquisitions in the last decade and thus, expanded
Pepsi Cola Marketing Strategy PEPSI COLA For Pepsi Cola Ltd, marketing opportunity analysis is a continual and ongoing process. Pepsi have used the new product strategy to realise their ambitions to both defend their current market position, and reinstate their position as a product innovator. Pepsi wishes to create a clear cola that is 100% natural, low in sodium, caffeine-free, and still maintains the flavour of its original cola. They will call it Pepsi Au Naturel.
The purpose of this report is to evaluate Nestle Company industry based on the case study and comprehend how the company develops strategic intent for their business organizations following the strategic factors and approaches. I will analyze the strategic management process as firm used to achieve strategic competitiveness and earn above-average returns. I will critically examine the strategy formulation that includes business-level strategy and corporate-level strategy. It also aims to identify market place opportunities and threats in the external environment and to decide how to use their resources, capabilities and core competencies in the firm’s internal environment to pursue opportunities and overcome threats.
The marketing campaigns must be tailored to meet the foreign markets’ demands, by respecting the consumers’ culture and flavor preferences. Furthermore, in the foreign markets the local brands must not be underestimated as these present high competition for Coke and Pepsi, therefore in order for the kings of the soft drink industry to expand their reign globally they must partner with the local soft drink firms and customize soft drinks with local tastes.
Nestle recognizes its position as a global leader in food and beverage company and the unique role it
3. Nestle’s first mover strategy. The writer makes a comparison to enterprises during the industrial revolution. These companies had to invest in infrasture that are almost negligible in todays commerce activities, to start off production. Nestle had to engage in activities with a potential high risk such as their milk collection process in china.
Nestle is a Swiss food and beverage Multi-national corporation headquartered in Vevey, Switzerland. It is the largest food company in the world measured by revenues with about 500 factories in more than 80 countries. The company consists of a powerful portfolio of brands that is driven by unrivalled research and innovation, an aim to contribute to improving the quality of consumers’ lives and a clear commitment to consistence excellence. The company succeeded in accomplishing its mission of “Good Food, Good Life” by making the use of globalization in the areas that are as follows-
To conclude culture is a very broad term, which can be defined in many ways. India and the USA share some of hofstede’s dimensions in common with each other, Such as masculinity and uncertainty avoidance. But also differ greatly when it comes to power distance and individualism dimensions. Coca-Cola does customize its operations to a certain degree, mainly concerning packaging and marketing in different countries. However this customization is next to nothing when looking at how extensively different fast food menus are in different countries. Coca-Cola has faced issues while operating in India, which they have taken measures to correct and improve.