Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canada's pension system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Canada's pension system
Another reason to support the ORPP is that, historically, pensions in Canada have played a major role in promoting equality. According to Marier and Skinner (2008), the alternative to pensions is unattractive, a position based on the circumstances in Canada prior to World War 2 when older people had to work late into life of rely on the generosity of family members, something that is decreasingly likely today as an option given that older people for the first time have more money than the taxpayers who are supporting them. As Marier and Skinner (2008) note, the Canadian pension system has “its track record in combating inequality. Despite spending relatively little on old age pensions, Canada succeeds, through its basic and earnings-related …show more content…
As Friedberg and Webb (2005) write, “defined benefit pension plans have become considerably less common since the early 1980s, while defined contribution plans have spread.” (p. 281). Defined contribution plans are those where the employee and company both make regular contributions into individual account s that are established with the pension payout being whatever is in those accounts. The problem with this sort of set up is that the actual future benefits are of an unknown value because they depend on whether or not the money in the accounts was invested wisely. In this sense, they are pensions to a large extent in name only. With the ORPP, it may be more prudent for some companies to shift from defined contribution plans to the government option due to the fact it offers greater …show more content…
For instance, Tufts and Fairbanks (2011) write that “The Ontario Teachers ' Pension Plan (OTPP) has $107.5 billion in assets to fund 295,000 teacher pensions ($366,000 per retiree)” (p. 1). At the same time, the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), which is responsible for 18 million Canadian workers, has only $148 billion which is just $722 per retiree (Tufts and Fairbanks, 2011, p. 2). Looking to the private sector, Nortel in 2011 had a pension deficit of $2.4 billion. For Air Canada, the figure is $2.1 billion. U.S. Steele which was formerly known as Stelco, cut pensions by 15 percent. While the government tax base is being used to prop up public sector pensions, the same is not true for those in the public sector. It is little wonder that so much demand has been made for
San Diego has an unfunded pension liability of $2.1 billion. There was the choice of either cutting public goods and services or raises taxes in order to pay for them. There are three events that played a significant role in the pension crisis. The first of these being Proposition 98.
The push for Congress to pass legislation protecting the rights of employees and their retirement was inevitable. Retirement plans are extremely important for all working individuals. Having funds to keep or exceed ones current standard of living and to enjoy one’s life beyond expectations after retire...
Patrick, C 2004, The Guardian: Australia may hold key to pensions, 12 October 2004, retrieved 21 July 2006
The liberals introduced an old age pension for people over seventy years old and with no other income. They also introduced a married couples pension. Pensions were not a new thing but the most radical thing about these pensions was that they were entirely government funded. The pension was not incredibly large and the average working class person did not live to be 70 but for those who did the pension made them independent. In the year after the introduction 80000 people stopped claiming relief from charities.
Investment opportunities with pension plan members to offer them additional services (cross-over), as well as to reinvest their pension plan earnings after they retire (roll-over). Competitors are fleeing the under one (1) million dollar segment, which represents 8.9 million households. New opportunities for online transactions, which are low cost and easy to use.... ... middle of paper ... ...
There are many social welfare programs designed to provide income support for Canadians, mostly for those with little to no income. Some may criticize these programs as too generous or an incentive to be lazy, however, welfare rates are below the poverty line, and most of the people receiving benefits cannot find permanent employment or are disabled. In fact, 68% of food bank users receive some form of social assistance. Studies done at the University of Manitoba have shown that guaranteed income programs reduce hospital visits caused by work injuries, domestic violence, and mental health issues, which would save billions of dollars in healthcare and prison costs annually. Extending welfare to the bottom 10% of Canadian would cost approximately $10,000 per person (not taking into account savings in the healthcare system a...
The Australian government will increase the age pension from 65 to 70 by 2035(Australian Department of Human services [AU]). This announcement has lots of challenges for Australian people who are under 50; some people support the rise and find it beneficial for the future economical life. However, others are against the announcement as it has lots of concerns for their future plan, as they have to work longer to save more for their retirement. The current population ageing put pressure on the young workers who support retirees and their families, at the same time it affect the economic development. So the rise of pension has advantages and disadvantages on the future life standard of most Australians. It is beneficial decision from the government to provide a productive and qualified future life.
...derly at work places and at home will improve their mental and social wellbeing. The aging population will affect every single citizen in Canada. Not one citizen wants a raise in taxes; however, if there is not any strategy setup to combat the aging population issues, Canadians will see raises in taxes causing frustration. Implementing these strategies will not only keep the elderly happy, but it will keep them healthy. The healthier an individual is, the less medical expenses, so why not get started on investing on this project which can save citizens several tax dollars. The results obtained in the primary research reinforce the support of the strategies presented. Majority of the participants understand the possible economic and health care issues the aging population will bring, thus getting started on this matter sooner will be beneficial for Canada’s future.
Recent budget controversy in Congress and the media has once again brought to the forefront the pressing desire for fiscal responsibility in the United States Government. Although Congress came to a compromise over the budget in the proverbial eleventh hour, the extra attention afforded to the budget issue has reignited a lingering controversy: is the current system of transfer payment programs a financially viable one, or should these programs be recognized as an economic burden? As new waves of retirees stream into the system, it has once more become necessary to consider whether or not the U.S. Government can truly afford to keep the implicit promises it has made, and if the next generation to reach retirement age will see the benefits that it pays for current claimants to enjoy.
The White House, along with the politically biased Social Security trustees’, argue that Social Security is facing a crisis in that “the currently legislated structure of revenues and benefits, the system will eventually be unable to meet its financial obligations” (Bethel University, 2006, p.344). At its inception in the 1930’s, “there were more than sixteen workers to support each Social Security recipient. Today, there are about three, and in 2031, that number is predicted to dwindle to about two (Driscoll & Konczal, 2009). And the number of retirees is expected to nearly double from about 37 million to around 73 million (Driscoll & Konczal, 2009). So how to pay for this? The White House’s proposed solution is to establish individual retirement accounts which would be gradually phased in for younger entrants into the workforce allowing them “to build a “nest egg” for retirement…” (Bethel University, 2006, p.347) while maintaining the existing structure for those 55 or older. Other seemingly attractive features are ownership and control, the ability to in...
Social Security is on the verge of taking care of the baby boomers generation. This means that it will be paying more benefits than taxes it receives. In lay-man’s terms it means it will be spending more money than it is making. I think that you should pay into your own private retirement account for you to reap the benefits in the future. Not for you to pay into a cluster of workers money for current elders to benefit from. You need to take care of your own future and not rely on other people’s responsibility. “…people began to think retirement funding as a right…and so…started saving less” (Klay & Steen). That being said, people of a certain age should be “grandfathered” into this meaning, people of the age of say 40, still get the normal social security retirement money but anyone younger must start abiding this new reform. If you get married, keep paying into your own unless your spouse is not working. If that is the case then pay the same amount BUT put half into your own and half into your spouses. If the other spouse is working however, they should pay into their own account and you into your own.
Maynard, Michelle. “Detroit Is Eligible For Bankruptcy, And City Pensions Are At Risk.” Forbes. Forbes. 3 December 2013. Web. 4 December 2013
The subsequent paragraphs contain a general analysis as well as a description of the legal questions and principles that were raised in the age discrimination case of Mckinney v. University of Guelph. This case raised the issue of whether a company or organization (in this case, a post secondary institution for education) should have jurisdiction over the age at which an individual must retire. Additionally, this document contains an analysis of the laws of mandatory retirement and how they are still currently in effect in countries such as China. Along with the aforementioned is a description of how mandatory retirement is imperative to population management,
Personal Differences. In this case, Dan Richardson, a partner in Educational Pension Investments (EPI), founded EPI with a philosophy of maintaining low-risk investment portfolios with moderate income; a philosophy that has been in place for 50 years. This risk adverse philosophy found Dan considering the merits of a more aggressive investment approach to offset the fact that EPI’s growth has not kept pace with other investment opportunities. (Whetten & Cameron, 2011)
Retirement comes early for most people. Early meaning that we are not ready for what comes with it. Most people would love to retire today, but unfortunately it is nearly impossible. It takes a lifetime for a person to become financial stable and adequately equip with assets that have been gained throughout someone’s life. Everyone must start young, in fact the sooner the better. Any money, or savings that can be applied today will always come with an enhanced future. So is it worth it to work harder and save now in order to possibly access a pleasant retirement? With out effort now we will be dependent on other sources in our retirement years, sources that may not come through for everyone who needs it. There are three ways to help Americans be better prepared now. These methods include saving money now, and investing in sources with returns. Do not become one of the millions of Americans who fall into government assisted retirement plans by lack of preparation and planning.