Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If given the choice to be a peasant in the Tokugawa-era (1603-1868), or a peasant in the Qing-era (1644-1912), I would choose to be a peasant in the Tokugawa-era. Both peasants faced many hardships, including poverty, infanticide, and famine. However, peasants who lived in the Tokugawa-era had slightly more opportunities for economic growth, freedom, and job growth than the peasants who lived during the Qing-era. During the Qing-era, the Chinese population grew from 130 million to 450 million. Peasants in the Qing-era accounted for roughly 80-90% of China’s population. With that, and China being as large as it is, peasants who lived in the northern region of China lived a slightly different lifestyle than those who lived in the southern …show more content…
The Sankin Kotai was established the Shogunate as an alternate attendance system. This system required daimyo to travel to Edo every other year, as a way to keep the daimyo poo and less liable to revolt against Tokugawa. Samurai and daimyo traveled mainly along the Tokaido road, which lay south of Edo. This became a large trading spot for peasants to sell their specialized crops, such as strawberries, to the daimyo and samurai. Peasants in Japan had a slightly more equal family structure than their counterparts in China. While sons were still preferred in Japan, daughters could be sent to work in the city, or like in China, to marry a man in another village. In Japan, families also had the option to try to find a Yoshi, a man who married into families to help keep their fields productive. In China, if no males were born in a family, typically that would be the end of their fields and legacy. While Tokugawa peasants still faced poverty and other hardships, it was the Sankin Kotai and less rigid tenant system that allowed some peasants to be better off than others. In Qing China, many peasants did not have the same opportunities, if any at
... insight into how the peasant judicial system attempted to benefit the peasants but was mostly filled with inadequacies.
The Han Dynasty and the Gupta Empire had intense social stratification and patriarchy during their reigns, which was similar to each other, but also having contrasting differences. During the Han Dynasty in China, the women were viewed as inferior to the men and had very little rights, since their only role in society was to stay in the household and take care of the children as well as to do the housework. This thus makes the Han Dynasty a very patriarchic society. Social stratification in the Han Dynasty had the scholar-gentry as the highest ranking of all the people, besides the emperor, farmers and peasants a rank lower than the scholar-gentry, and merchants being the lowest ranking in the society. In the Gupta Empire, the women were regarded as inferior to the men and had little rights, which made the Gupta Empire a very patriarchal society. Social stratification in the Gupta Empire had the Brahmin at the top, the
One of the reasons the serfs led an uprise against the government in the early 1520s was a wanting for economic equality. In a letter written from a Count to a Duke, describes the attacks the peasants were planning and executing in which they attacked the houses of the nobility (Doc 11). The peasants started with the most wealthy individuals and stealing possessions from wealthy areas (like consuming all that was available in the monasteries) and then continued to attack other rick noblemen is descending order of wealth. This systematic approach of attacking the wealthy, and the wealthiest first, shows the dislike by the peasants for the economic system at the time. In addition, in an article written by peasants, called Twelve Articles of the Swabian Peasants, the peasants demanded better compensations for the services they provided their lords (Doc 2). They believed that they were being severely underpaid and were suffering conditions almost equal of that to a slave. They believe that they are simply demanding what is, in their opinion, just. On another instance, in 1525, in a letter written to the Archbishop of Wurzburg by an unknown source, the peasants demand a wealth redistribution (Doc 8). Lorenz Fries, the chief advisor to the Archbishop, discusses that the secret lett...
The Communist revolution in China was loosely based on the revolution in Russia. Russia was able to implement the beginnings of Marxist Communism in the way that it was intended They had a large working class of factory workers, known as the proletariat, that were able to band together and rise up to overthrow the groups of rich property owners, known as the bourgeoisie. The communist party wanted to adopted this same Marxist sense of revolution, but they realized that there were some fatal flaws in the differences between the two countries. The first was that there was not the same sense of class difference between people, yes there were peasants and landowners but there was not a sense of a class struggle. The other difference was that China was not industrialized like Russia so there was no proletariat group, as defined by Marxism, to draw the revolution from. What the Chinese Communists needed to do is re-define the proletariat for their situation, who they looked at were the peasants.
The bottom part of the society included the peasants which made up 85% of the population, the peasants was divided into sub-classes, and these sub-classes involved the farmers, craftsmen or artisans and merchants (Hackney, 2013). The highest ranking of the peasants were the farmers, farmers who owned their own lands were ranked higher than those who did not. After the farmers, there were the craftsmen or artisans. The craftsmen or artisans worked word and metal and some of them became well-k...
Within this essay, I will be discussing the difference in feudalism between Europe and Japan. Feudalism is the dominant social system in medieval Europe, in which the nobility holds lands from the Crown in exchange for military service, and vassals are in turn tenants of the nobles, while the peasants (villeins or serfs) are obliged to live on their lord's land and give him homage, labor, and a share of the produce, notionally in exchange for military protection. I will be arguing that Japan system with feudalism is much more simple and easier.
The Qing Dynasty prospered well into the 20th century despite the numerous problems the administration faced. However, during the early days of the 20th century, civil disorders continued to grow in such unmanageable factions that the administration was pushed to do something about it. The high living standards of the previous century had contributed to a sharp increase in China’s population, there was approximately 400 million people living in China around the nineteenth century. This spike increased population density, it also created a surplus of labour shortages, land shortages, inadequate food production and several famines. As an attempt for a solution, Empress Dowager Cixi proclaimed a call for proposals for reform from the generals and governors. There were three reform movements between 1860-1911, “ the Qing court and Chinese provincial officials had tried to adapt a wide range of Western techniques and ideas to China’s proven needs: artillery, ships, the telegraph, new schools, factories, chambers of commerce and international law” (Spence, 234). The first reform being the Self-strengthening Movement the second was the Hundred Days Reform and the last is regarded as the Late Qing reform. These three reforms were similar in the fact that the main objective was to strengthen China. However, there were multiple reasons for the failed plans of the reforms. Analyzing certain individuals and events during the late Qing dynasty will help determine if the Manchus would have been viable leaders for modern China.
In order to discuss and understand peasant revolts, the peasant’s lives and their dwellings must first be understood to show how life was from their perspective. As mentioned earlier, the daily lives of these peasants were filled with physical labour on the farm. Life on the farm meant that life revolved around the seasons. A bad summer crop meant that there would be food shortages in the winter. Houses were very simple, with minimal amounts of furniture. The houses themselves were usually made out of stone, and had straw roofs. Mattresses for beds was made from straw, if at all, as some houses were recorded having beds with no mattresses. It has also been noted that out of all furniture found in a sixteenth and seventeenth century French farmer dwelling, chairs were seldom found .
The social structure of village life changed as the the economy became more complex because it allowed for classes to form. Some people had better jobs than others, and higher authority, which allowed them to make more money and therefore live a wealthier life.
Many Chinese social changes occurred during the Han dynasty. Nuclear families became more common due to the free peasantry that developed in China. However, joint families also remained common throughout the countryside. Women in China continued to be less dominant than men in society. They were expected to be selfless, humble, diligent, and courteous. Advanced cities increasingly developed along trade routes and rivers, despite many Chinese people persistently living in rural regions. The biggest and most extravagant of these cities was Chang’an, the capital.
Living in England in the late sixteenth century, people were dependent on status and occupation; the rich lived luxuriously while the poor were subjected to low wages, scare resources, diseases, and famine. “The gap between the rich and the poor seems to have widened in the 1570s and 1580s; wealth and power are concentrated in the hands of the few, and many people can’t even find a job” (Papp and Kirkland 4). Agriculture was the most important industry in the Elizabethan economy. The majority of people in the 16th century lived in the country, and were dependent on harvest and farming. Men were farmers and women were subjected to household duties such as domestic work and spinning wool to make clothing. As a farmer men were responsible for the fieldwork, plowing, weeding, mowing, herding animals, and harvesting agricultural products. People were financially deprived despite their occupation in farming and spinning; income was at its lowest:
In the primordial times of the Heian period, Japan procured and practiced matrilineal systems within their isolated society for over 2,000 years. During the Heian period, situated in 12th century A.D., women were given the privileged of inheriting, managing, and retaining property of their own (Kumar, 2011). It was not until Japanese culture adopted the Confucian ideas of China that the society began to integrate a patriarchal system. Confucian ideals had a prominently drastic impact and influence in Japanese society. The Confucian ethical system stressed the utopian idea of a society in which a hierarchal structure is maintained. The hierarchal structure’s foundation is based upon the subservient and submissive idea of subordinates’ obedi...
According to Bentley et al. “scholar-bureaucrats and gentry received favorable legal treatment and enjoyed immunity from corporal punishment as well as exemption from labor service and taxes” (460). This clearly shows that society expects peasants to be the wealthiest that helps stabilize Japan instead of the working class. However, this may not be the case. Though scholar-bureaucrats have a lot of benefits economically and politically from the government, they are no match for merchants. In the social class merchants are considered the poorest, but studies show that they are “individuals of enormous wealth and influenced [despite the fact that they are] ranked at the bottom of the Confucian social hierarchy” (461). These people has shown their ability to be equivalent to the privileged classes. In Japan, the ruling elites: daimyo and samurai warriors were recognized as the most privileged people in society, whereas rice dealers, pawnbrokers and sake merchants were listed as the least privileged. Despite the fact that the upper classes has a lot of advantages, they spent money recklessly which caused them to have financial problems and ultimately resulted in poverty. However, the Tokugawa era was able to bring Japan back to
allowed to have important jobs, and the peasants forced to dig in the dirt for back breaking
Who Revolted?: Many low class people revolted against the Qing Dynasty mainly because their leader, Hong Xiuquan, believed in a more communist society, his ideas “attracted many famine-stricken peasants, workers, and miners,” along with many religious people, because his main stance was to enforce christianity, proclaiming his new dynasty, and renaming it Tianwang or “Heavenly Kingdom of Great Peace” (Britannica). The people believed in his beliefs, thus following his orders,and decisions. By the end of the rebellion there were thousands of citizens in the rebellion. The people of the rebellion liked Hong Xiuquan's ideas, mostly because they are saw as “good” ideas today in this society his belief were to “ ban slavery, men using concubines, arranged marriages, opium use, foot binding, torture, and the worship of idols and He wanted women to have more equality in society” (China). These beliefs are very appealing which is why lower class and middle class citizens followed him.Hong main followers such as “Yang (charcoal burner), Feng (village schoolteacher), Hsiao (poor