Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the United Peacekeeping Force
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of the United Peacekeeping Force
I. Introduction
One of the greatest threats to peace is the actions of belligerent actors in a state, who thrive on breeding conflict and espousing chaos. It is imperative, then that such intrastate and interstate conflicts can be focused on to bring about peace and ultimately a successful resolution to these issues. Following such conflict, the need for peacekeeping is apparent. How effective the peacekeeping actually is, is a topic that all of the authors discuss. Peacekeeping can be an effective tool when properly employed and with adequate resources and backing. In proving its effectiveness, successes and failures can serve to show how best to employ it and the effects of changing post-war, volatile regions into peaceful ones.
The size, number and scope of peacekeeping missions worldwide have increased substantially in the last several decades. Around the globe, international personnel have been deployed to maintain the peace in war-torn regions. Virginia Page Fortna in Does Peacekeeping Work? contends that in the time periods following civil wars since the Cold War, the most severe conflicts require peacekeeping missions to rebuild and not to lose their footing. Expounding on this notion, Kyle Beardsley offers further introspect into peacekeeping operations in his Peacekeeping and the Contagion of Armed Conflict. Offering still another targeted view of peacekeeping, authors Karen A. Mingst and Margaret P. Karns focus on the relevancy of the United Nations in this endeavor while Jeni Whalen similarly examines the legitimacy, power and success of the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI).
II. Summary
According to Fortna, peacekeeping is used for both peace operations of consent-based and enf...
... middle of paper ...
...ures to better tailor and adapt their methods to enact peace and increase the duration of peace following periods of violence or war.
Bibliography
Beardsley, K. (2011). “Peacekeeping and the Contagion of Armed Conflict.” The Journal of Politics 73(4): 1051-1064. Southern Political Science Association.
Fortna, V.P. (2008). “Does Peacekeeping Work?: Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mingst, K.A. and Karns, M.P. (2007). “The United Nations and Conflict Management: Relevant or Irrelevant?” In C. Crocker, F. Hampson & P. Aall (Eds.), Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World (pp.497-520). Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Whalan, J. “The Power of Friends: The Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands.” Journal of Peace Research 47(5): 627-637.
Canadians strongly believe that peacekeeping is about trying to protect people from extreme harm, a way of providing hope in situations that seem hopeless, and a good method of bringing peace and justice to war-torn countries or failed states. Canadians backing soldiers in their peacekeeping role has been so strong for such a long time that it has generated into their national identity. “Canadians cling to the mythology, born of the 1956 Suez Crisis, that we are a nation of peacekeepers, interposing between belligerent forces bent on war but, even though Canadian government officials and media of the 1990s called the operations in Bosnia and Somalia “peacekeeping missions,” they were something very different from Cold War-era peacekeeping.” Accordingly, over the past several decades, Canadian peacekeeping operations involving their military forces has shifted from a Pearson perspective based on humanitarian intervention to peacekeeping missions entailing massive violence. Therefore, my research paper will focus on how peacekeeping in the Canadian context has changed over the past several decades owing to the Canadian use of its military (internationally) force for extreme violence during peacekeeping missions. I wish to discuss this topic extensively within my research paper by focusing on vivid examples from UN Peacekeeping missions.
"Peacekeeping and Peacemaking." Reading and Remembrance . N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Jan. 2014. . (tags: none | edit tags)
The system the UN currently has offers some perspective on the idea of conducting and participating in war. But...
Rethinking Violence: States and Non-state Actors in Conflict. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed April 22, 2014).
Thompson, William R and Rasler, Karen A., ‘War and Systemic Capability Reconcentration’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 2, 1988, p. 337
The United Nations General Assembly 36-103 focused on topics of hostile relations between states and justification for international interventions. Specifically mentioned at the UNGA was the right of a state to perform an intervention on the basis of “solving outstanding international issues” and contributing to the removal of global “conflicts and interference". (Resolution 36/103, e). My paper will examine the merits of these rights, what the GA was arguing for and against, and explore relevant global events that can suggest the importance of this discussion and what it has achieved or materialized.
...ities to come together, and causes people to re-evaluate their relationships with one another, all toward ensuring that, on the whole, peace continues into the future.
Consequences of intervention can include the loss of lives from an otherwise uninvolved country, the spread of violence, and the possibility of inciting conflict over new problems, just to name a few (Lecture, 11/15/16). For example, John Mueller considers the potential negative consequences of intervention prove that they are insignificant to the cause of humanitarian intervention as a whole. Moreover, with intervention into ethnic conflicts, the outcome, no matter how positive, is overshadowed by a gross exaggeration of negative consequences (Mueller). In both Yugoslavia and Rwanda the solution, to Mueller appeared simple, a well ordered and structured militarized presence was all that was required to end the conflict (Mueller). If this is the case, when discussing whether or not intervention is necessary the political elite must not over-exaggerate the difficulty.
1. As far as peace keeping methods go, the reputation of the United Nations is very pitiable. This is not only because they have not been doing their job to it’s fullest extent, but also because the member states on the security council haven’t given the UN the power it needs if it is to be a successful force in peace keeping methods.
It should be noted that intervention usually ends up with militaristic campaigns but it is stressed that militaristic actions should be the last resort; the international community should try to place sanctions on the sovereign state like trade embargos and other diplomatic options as a first response. Part of this diplomatic approach is “conflict prevention refers to a set of policies adopted at an early stage of a conflict, prior to violent escalation or after ceasefire/settlement has been negotiated to prevent resumption of violence. Conflict prevention aims at channeling conflict into non-violent behavior by providing incentives for peaceful accommodation and/or raising the costs of violent escalation for conflict parties.” In addition to diplomatic actions can allow for “fact finding missions” allowing the international community to become aware of exactly what is happening and why so the UN can come up with a plan to rectify the situation.4 This comes from the perspective of “A political scientist” specializing in the management of contemporary security challenges, “especially in the
Wallis, J 2006, ‘A ‘helpem fren’ in need… Evaluating the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands’, Security Challenges, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 81-98.
The League of Nations was an Intergovernmental Organisation which persisted from 1919 up until 1946 where it was formally replaced with the United Nations towards the end of the Second World War. Many consider the League as one of the International Systems greatest failures due to it being widely regarded as an ‘ineffective instrument to tackle aggressors’ (Catterall, 1999, p. 52) and its inherent failure to prevent international conflict. However,
Weiss, T. G., 2009. What's Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix it. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
...who have specialist knowledge, experiences, and skills in working on comprehensive peace processes can advise and leverage the support from other sectors of government on behalf of developing a sustainable outcome.
IOs and states play a critical role in maintaining world peace and security. The United Nations (UN), in particular, is the centerpiece of global governance with respect to the maintenance of world peace. The UN provides general guidelines for all the states on how to solve potential conflicts and maintain international o...