Captivity can occurs behind closed doors, outside the view of the general public. Even in plain sight it remains unseen as it hides behind something generally perceived as beautiful. This makes it easier to continue, overlooked and justified. Paul Laurence Dunbar speaks up for the misunderstood captives around the world and throughout history through his poem, “Sympathy.” This poem brings to light the nonsensicalness of believing a caged bird’s song to be representative of anything short of a broken spirits prayer for freedom. Dunbar wishes for his audience to stop admiring the song of the caged bird and to set it free. In “Sympathy,” Dunbar uses the imagery and controlling metaphor of a caged bird to describe the reflected perspective between …show more content…
the imprisoned bird and Dunbar himself and how their plight has been frosted over by their imprisoners. Dunbar’s graphic imagery paints the gravity of disillusionment the captor must possess to be so easily blinded by the pretty sounds and miss the meaning behind them. He does this by progressively describing the bird’s longings, to its merciless injury, to the hopeless cry. The first stanza describes what the bird longs for, as though it were merely a listless longing. In line two Dunbar writes, “When the sun is bright on the upland slopes.” “Bright sun” and up “land slopes” describe opportunity, and endless possibilities. The picture Dunbar paints here is the bird’s memory of being free, exposed to direct sunlight and bright spacious lands. Dunbar allows his audience to see what ought to be the bird’s reality. He could have easily painted a dark and cloudy day to describe a hopeless defeat. Instead he chose to describe a hope forever out of reach. He describes the sunny day and a new and higher horizon the bird once claimed as his own. The memory of an unbroken spirit. The time when the caged bird had not yet realized the gravity of his situation. This hopeful little creature’s aspirations are soon tested in the second stanza. “Till its blood is red on the cruel bars.” The word “blood” is almost out of place. This fragile creature should not have needed to beat himself severely enough to draw its own blood from a crazed attempt at regaining freedom. Although the pronoun “its” is used indicating the bird as the subject, the violence of this verse suggests a higher focus on Dunbar’s desperation rather than the little song bird. A peaceful, happy bird would have to be driven mad before it could cause such harm on its self. It provokes a tragic image of a tender creature flying desperate and mindlessly at the bars of its cage seeking freedom and finding only bleeding bruises. The final image of the caged bird Dunbar leaves us with is one of defeat. In lines 17 and 18 of the third Stanza he writes “When he beats his bars and he would be free; it is not a carol of joy or glee.” The song of birds in cages sounds no less beautiful than the songs of birds perched in trees outside one’s window. A carol is a familiar, celebratory song sung when blessings are being counted and loved ones are close. “Joy” and “glee” speak of happiness. Rejoicing signifies the end of a difficulty and the relief that follows. Glee is the feeling one gets when they receive a long desired gift or are reunited with a treasured friend or lover. Dunbar says “not” to all these happy, familiar senses. He says it makes no sense to see this animal “beat his bars” and think any sound that may come out of him would speak of anything happy or celebratory. The bird’s difficulty remains unconquered; there is nothing to rejoice. All the things the bird once called familiar, as highlighted in the first stanza, “bright sun,” “upland slopes,” “soft wind” “springing grass,” are beyond its reach. Lines 17 and 18, suggest a claim to shame. He calls out the madness the listener must be in to see the small birds struggle, hear its cry, and then describe the cry as a “carol” or to sound of “joy or glee” Dunbar places shame on the happy listener of an imprisoned singer. Like vulgar lyrics set to a catchy beat, the meaning behind the bird’s joyous tune is tainted by the beat of his wings against the bars. The meaning is a meek plea; a final and persistent attempt at achieving the freedom he no longer calls home. Dunbar uses imagery to explain the listeners misunderstanding of the bird’s plight, his plight. The use of the controlling metaphor of a caged bird brings clarity to the masked bondage with which Dunbar struggles.
It is evident that Dunbar is the one relating to the caged bird as indicated on the first line, “I know what the caged bird feels alas” The captive’s experience is one both man and bird share intimately. In order for Dunbar to have sympathy for the bird he must have known a similarly disguised entrapment. He compares his own woe to the birds. In line 15, Dunbar proclaims “I know why the caged bird sings, ah me.” This is the only time the word “me” is used in the poem. It is placed as punctuation as if to exclaim, ‘I know why I sing!’ The use of metaphor to portray a misunderstood captivity, throughout the poem, is a repeated habit of beginning and ending each stanza with “I know,” and filling up each middle with “him” and “his.” Within the poem, the pronoun “he” is in reference to the bird, where “I” is referencing Dunbar. This repetitive back and forth grant the illusion that Dunbar and the bird are interchangeable. This also aids with the understanding that like the bird, Dunbar’s ill contentment with his situation has been misread. The captor is a third party to this poem, though not mentioned directly within. The captor is the intended audience to the poem, as though Dunbar were the bird’s interpreter. Line 20 begins with an indent and reads “But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings.” He is correcting the misinterpretation, and restating it as it was …show more content…
meant to be heard. The captor has a tendency to view the bird’s situation in a falsely positive light. The bird is typically a symbol for freedom, and singing is typically associated with joy. But because the bird is caged and its wings bruised, it becomes a symbol of Dunbar’s hapless captivity. Even though Dunbar repeats his phrase “I know why the caged bird,” its uses in each stanza have a different meaning.
He begins and ends the second stanza with “I know why the caged bird beats his wing.” The use of the word “know” here, is almost in answer to a halfhearted secret. As if in response to an idle wonder as to why a bird might fly against the bars of its cage. Perhaps a wonder of a captor as to why its prey attempts escape at its own peril. This question hangs idly for the captor because it is clear that the bird’s attempts to fly through the bars cannot succeed. Dunbar ends by declaring the heart of the miscommunication between bird and captor. The concept of man and bird being one is sealed as the third stanza again repeats the metaphor. “I know why the caged bird sings.” When he says “know” a third time he is more declaring that the captor does not choose to know. The captor prefers to see the bird rejoicing in its condition, rather than admitting to himself as Dunbar demands, that the bird’s song is a lamentation towards the freedom to which the bird knows it belongs. These three phrases not only reaffirm Dunbar’s oneness with the bird but simultaneously describe the movement from longing for freedom to beating wings to singing as one in the same. The caged bird, like Dunbar, feels his wings beaten and can do little more than sing, as Dunbar might pray for assistance. The metaphor of a caged bird representing Dunbar’s masked bondage can be seen through the
progression and continued repetition of sympathizing with the caged bird and its actions. The discomfort and woe attached to the captive is not always as apparent to be as present as it is. There constant plea for help, forever begging to be set free can be worse than ignored. Their desperation can be enjoyed. Dunbar relates to those who are captive on a level perhaps his own in his poem “Sympathy.” He describes how the sweet and gentle innocence of a small bird’s song masks the wrong that entrapped it. Dunbar’s use of controlling metaphor and graphic imagery inform the reader of how evils especial related to bondage and entrapment are masked by beautiful covers, like a cage bird’s song.
Many writers begin writing and showing literary talent when they are young. Paul Laurence Dunbar, born and raised in Dayton, Ohio, was already editor of a newspaper and had had two of his poems published in the local newspaper before he’d graduated from high school. His classmate, Orville Wright, printed The Tattler which Dunbar edited and published for the local African American community. After graduating from high school, he was forced to get a job as an elevator operator which allowed him spare time for writing. He finally gained recognition outside of Dayton when, in 1892, he was invited to address the Western Association of Writers and met James Newton Matthews who praised his work in a letter to an Illinois newspaper. In 1892, he decided to publish his first book of poems entitled Oak and Ivy and four years later his second book of poems Majors and Minors was published. People began to see him as a symbol for his race, and he was thought of artistically as “a happy-go-lucky, singing, shuffling, banjo-picking being… in a log cabin amid fields of cotton” (Dunbar, AAW 2). Dunbar’s poems, written alternately in literary and dialect English, are about love, death, music, laughter, human frailty, and though Dunbar tried to mute themes of social protest, social commentary on racial themes is present in his poetry.
The tile of the poem “Bird” is simple and leads the reader smoothly into the body of the poem, which is contained in a single stanza of twenty lines. Laux immediately begins to describe a red-breasted bird trying to break into her home. She writes, “She tests a low branch, violet blossoms/swaying beside her” and it is interesting to note that Laux refers to the bird as being female (Laux 212). This is the first clue that the bird is a symbol for someone, or a group of people (women). The use of a bird in poetry often signifies freedom, and Laux’s use of the female bird implies female freedom and independence. She follows with an interesting image of the bird’s “beak and breast/held back, claws raking at the pan” and this conjures a mental picture of a bird who is flying not head first into a window, but almost holding herself back even as she flies forward (Laux 212). This makes the bird seem stubborn, and follows with the theme of the independent female.
While reading, I felt a sense of sadness for the caged bird, as its undeniable determination was persistent and valiant. Along with the message of the poem, I also appreciated Angelou’s unique sense of “unstructured verse” and her non-traditional poetic approach. It is clear that the caged bird represents African Americans and the free bird represents the white population, however, the poem is well written which sends this implied message of African-American suppression in a poetic, yet clear,
Paul Laurence Dunbar depicts this idea in his well-known poem “Sympathy” (one of my favorite poems!), describing a caged bird that longs for freedom. Dunbar establishes his knowledge of the bird ’s feelings, his desire for freedom (his motive of rebellion). Dunbar draws empathy from the audience as he describes the bird’s integrity in the descriptive lines: “I know why the caged bird beats his wing Till its blood is red on the cruel bars.” The caged bird goes to a dangerous extent to be heard, as he bleeds on his prison bars, for he is willing to do anything for his freedom— this shows his integrity and confidence in his values.
The Poet by Paul Laurence Dunbar Before we pass on from this world, it would be nice if we had left our mark, given our contribution, made our claim in the history of human civilization. Wouldn't it be wonderful to achieve such a goal? Wouldn't it be horrible to have attained that level of recognition and yet be recognized for things you deemed inferior? In the poem "The Poet", Paul Laurence Dunbar expresses his remorse at having written superior Standard English literature and yet only be known and praised for his Dialect works. The first way Dunbar achieves this meaning is through his use of language.
On the surface, "life" is a late 19th century poem by Paul Laurence Dunbar. The poem illustrates the amount of comfort and somber there is in life. Unfortunately, according to Paul Laurence Dunbar, there is more soberness in life than the joyous moments in our existence. In more detail, Paul Laurence Dunbar demonstrates how without companionship our existence is a series of joys and sorrows in the poem, "Life" through concrete and abstract diction.
Moore begins the last stanza with an ambiguous “So”. Although one has a heightened awareness of mortality, one “behaves,” one keeps the ego disciplined. This is the same concept as that of the caged bird who, though held captive in a cruelly small space, continues to sing with all his heart. Despite the bird's lack of “satisfaction” because of his loss of flight and freedom, he knows “joy”.
Initially, the poem appears to be about an observer forming a connection with a blackbird that he encounters many times. Then the reader realizes that the poem is by Stevens and something else must be going on- and they are correct. In order to see the entire picture, it is very important to look at the bits and pieces that create it. The meaning of each individual part, the setting, the usage of literary devices such as distinct symbolism, and versatile thematic messages are all very important in creating a clear understanding. The path has been laid out, now it is time to shred this work into pieces!
To continue, Paul Laurence Dunbar, Maya Angelou, and Alicia Keys have utilized various forms of literary devices in their works to fully explain and emphasize their main theme and opinions. For example, in Dunbar’s poem, ‘Sympathy,’ there is a strong use of metaphors, which is a phrase or word that represents another object or idea that it would not normally be related to. In the poem, the author uses a caged bird to somewhat symbolize racially oppressed African Americans in the 1800s. The poem includes, “I know why the caged bird sings, ah me…” “When he beats his bars and he would be free; It is not a carol of joy or glee, But a prayer that he sends from his heart’s deep core…” By using the symbol of the caged bird in the poem, the author
There are many different ways someone is considered to be free, the direct definition is to enjoy personal rights or liberty, this can be interpreted in different forms. In their poems “Caged Bird”, and “Sympathy”, Maya Angelou and Paul Laurance Dunbar use caged birds to represent what it means to be free. They both use birds to convey a better image for the reader. Birds are used in both poems of “Caged Bird” and “Sympathy” as a central image because the caged birds are metaphors for true freedom and hope.
Dunbar does this by allowing the reader to mentally picture everything that is taking place throughout the poem. For instance, when Dunbar said “and he raised his hand to the sky; but the beat of hoofs smote on his ear, and the steady thread drew nigh.” The reader is able to vividly picture the man hands being in the air and his dangling feet kicking on the Oak as he fights to survive while the rope gets tighter around his neck. Likewise in stanza eleven the reader is able to picture the people the Oak tree describe as the judge that wore a mask of black , the doctor who wore white and a minister with his oldest son. These characters are who we assume are the ones who were in charge of the hanging of the guiltless man. This conclusion is made because the Oak tree uttered, “oh, foolish man, why weep you now? ’Tis but a little space, and the time will come when these shall dread the mem’ry of your face. This meant that they will suffer from guilt for the wrong they
The novel I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings goes through the childhood of Maya Angelou as she faces the difficult realities of the early South. This novel does not do a very good job at portraying the hardships of the blacks because she
bird as the metaphor of the poem to get the message of the poem across
She is comparing a free white person, the free bird, to a black slave; the caged bird. Angelou uses rhymes and repetition to show the meaning of her poem and to prove the point that she is making to her readers. This poem is all about the inequality and the violation of civil rights that black slaves had to go through (“Angelou, Maya. Caged”;“Skinner”;“Hagen”). Angelou often writes about inequality, but not just the inequality for African American people, but for women as well and the stereotypes that they face. This is potraied in Angelou 's “Phenominal
I chose these three poems because the subject matter appealed to me and I believe that the poems convey their meaning very effectively. Upon researching the poems, I discovered that Caged Bird was in fact inspired by Sympathy, which accounts for the similarities in language and imagery, as outlined below. All three poems deal with the subject of freedom using the imagery of birds; On Liberty and Slavery is narrated as a human plea for freedom, and makes reference to birds in that context, whereas Caged Bird and Sympathy both use the imagery of caged birds to explore the theme of loss of freedom. The symbolism of birds is used to depict freedom, as birds are essentially without constraints; in comparison to the limitations of humans, they have limitless possibilities. When a bird is caged, however, it loses that potential and is restricted not by its own limitations, but the limits set by another.