Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theorists and Their Theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theorists and Their Theories
Paul A. Samuelson, one of the men who made Harvard’s reputation, made various contributions to modern economics. Samuelson brought numerous theories to the table, showing that math is an effective and necessary component of understanding economics. Furthermore, he discovered a new obstacle regarding inflation, known as “cost-push” inflation. But most importantly, Paul A. Samuelson has shown that economic theories can be timeless, however their implementation evolves around the current economic circumstances that are in play.
Samuelson was born on May 15, 1915. It can be inferred that he was intelligent; he enrolled in the University of Chicago at the age of sixteen. The beginning of his love for economics, or as he stated, his rebirth, started at 8:00 a.m on January 2, 1931, when he attended a lecture on Malthus' economic theory. During the lecture, he was astounded by his ability to comprehend economic equations to the point where he suspected that he was “missing out on some mysterious complexity.” (Samuelson)
Following his graduation from the University of Chicago, in 1936 with a Bachelor of Arts, Samuelson attended Harvard Graduate School, where he studied under other budding economists. Samuelson completed his Master of Arts in 1936 and his Doctor of Philosophy in 1941. Both before and after his graduation, Samuelson was a pre-doctoral fellow with the Social Science Research Council from 1935 to 1937, a member of the Society of Fellows at Harvard University from 1937 to 1940, and a Ford Foundation Research Fellow from 1958 to 1959. In addition, he was a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, as well as a staff member at the Radiation Laboratory (Biographic...
... middle of paper ...
... that, “always, I have been overpaid to do what has been pure fun."
Works Cited
"Capital Good." Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com, n.d. Web. 04 Mar. 2014.
"How I Became an Economist". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2013. Web. 25 Feb 2014
"Introduction to Trade Theory." Introduction to Trade Theory. University of Washington, n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
"Paul A. Samuelson - Banquet Speech". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2013. Web. 25 Feb 2014.
"Paul A. Samuelson - Biographical". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2013. Web. 25 Feb 2014.
“Paul Anthony Samuelson.” The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics 2008. Library of Economics and Liberty. 24 February 2014
Ramrattan, Lall, and Michael Szenberg. "Memorializing Paul A. Samuelson: a review of his major works, 1915-2009." American Economist 55.2 (2010): 67+. Biography in Context. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
In Alexander Kern’s “Emerson and Economics,” Kern draws attention to the economical aspects found in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s texts. Specifically, Kern discusses the lack of attention that Emerson’s economical notions receive. Emerson is not associated with being an economist writer, but Kern draws attention to how “he so frequently touched the subject than an understanding of his economic ideas is a prerequisite to the evaluation of his entire thought on any relative or absolute scale” (Kern 678). Kern’s theory that readers must extract the economics out of Emerson in order to comprehend his texts is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the difficult problem of viewing Emerson as an economist, yet he views Emerson as a moral philosopher because of the author’s views towards society. Alexander Kern’s call to view Emerson as an economist is yet to be answered. Moreover, it is crucial to evaluate Emerson as an economist in order to analyze his texts differently. Consequently, using economics to evaluate Emerson’s “Self Reliance” in a new way will show it is meant to be a call for social reformation. More specifically, by considering the economic panic of 1837 and its effects on Emerson’s views towards society, a new way to interpret “Self Reliance” is achieved.
Classical economics as postulated by the 19th century British economist David Ricardo states – in modern economic terms – that an economy will achieve its natural levels of employment (full employment) and reach its potential output on its own without any government intervention. While the economy may undergo periods of less than natural levels of employment or not yet reach its potential output, it will, in the long run do so. If Mr. Ricardo was still alive, his favorite album would be The Long Run by The Eagles (1979). Using modern economic terms to further describe classical economics, an economy will tend to operate at a level given by the long run aggregate supply curve. While many believe that the concepts of classical economics are for
Brue, S. L., Flynn, S. M., & McConnell, C. R. (2011).Economics principles, problems and policies. (19 ed.). New
Despite its size, only 190 pages, the authors address the basic concepts of economics while also applying those politically and for personal finance decision making. Those basic concepts include scarcity, gains from trade, marginal decision-making, profit management, income growth, and Adam Smith’s invisible hand theories are all discussed within the first part of the book; allowing readers to understanding the concepts, Gwartney applies the same concepts to the creation of wealth and the importance of competition, private property, open trade, monetary stability, and lower taxes. This book educates its audience by evaluating our economy and government mechanisms without the overpowering display of charts, formulas, and graphs; which you would typically see in a textbook allow...
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. Edwin Cannan. 1904 ed. London: Methuen, 1776. Library of Economics and Liberty. Web. 4 May 2014. .
New Ideas from Dead Economists Lukas Fricke In this class we constantly talked about the free market place and how it truly made a government different. How it made a country different. How it made a people different. Today, we are going to explore the ideas of economics and how the economic greats, Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keyes, and Milton Friedman changed the ways we would forever do business.
"Adam Smith." Adam Smith. Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008. Web. 4 Feb. 2011. .
Milton Friedman, a supporter of free market, was born in 1912 in New York. 4th child to a Jewish family that had emigrated from Ukraine. Although he was interested in pursuing mathematics after graduation, the horrible stare of the national income motivated him in taking...
Many people view economics as a dry and uninteresting subject. In the book Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, co-authors Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner shows that the tools of economic research can be put to use in the study of almost anything. Levitt explains, “ since the science of economics is primarily a set of tools, as opposed to a subject matter, then no subject, however offbeat, need be beyond its reach.” (Levitt & Dubner 14) In Freakonomics, Levitt and co-author, Stephen Dubner, show how “Freakonomics” can be applied to some of the most interesting research topics that Levitt has tackled during his career. The authors
Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus have all greatly influenced how people thought about modern economics, especially in areas relating to markets, in terms of the economy and whether certain things affected population rates. In this essay I will cover each of the three topic areas and how each economist interpreted these areas in order to explain why certain phenomena occur within British economics, most of which are still widely accepted today.
Classical Economics is a theory that suggests by leaving the free market alone without human intervention; equilibrium will be obtained. This theory was the first school of thought for economists and one of the major theorists and founders of Classical Economics was Adam Smith. Smith stated, “By pursuing his own interest, he (man) frequently promotes that (good) of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I (Adam Smith) have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.”(Patil) Classical Economic theory assumes three basic ideas: Flexible Prices, Shay’s Law, and Savings-Investment equality. Flexible prices in Classical theory suggests prices will rise and fall as needed but is not always true, due to, the interference of government agencies including unions and laws. Smith stated in the Wealth of the Nation (1776), “Civil government, so far it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.” (Patil) Shay’s Law implies supply creates its own demand and demand is not based on production or supply.
Economists Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo. Although differences of opinion were numerous among the classical economists in the time span between Smith’s Wealth of Nations (1776) and Ricardo’s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817), they all mainly agreed on major principles. All believed in private property, free markets, and, in Smith’s words, “ The individual pursuit of private gain to increase the public good.” They shared Smith’s strong suspicion of government and his enthusiastic confidence in the power of self-interest represented by his famous “invisible hand,” which reconciled public benefit with personal quest of private gain. From Ricardo, classicists derived the notion of diminishing returns, which held that as more labor and capital were applied to land yields after a certain and not very advanced stage in the progress of agriculture steadily diminished.
Sullivan, A., & Steven M., (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Pearson Prentice Hal
Economics is probably the science that arguably has had the most impact in today’s times. In fact it can barely be called a science in a strict sense, since human behavior is not governed by laws of nature unlike other non living objects, which makes the prediction and forecasting stock prices, economic conditions all the more difficult. In recent decades economists have tried to give a more structured and mathematical explanation to their theories concerning how human beings make their decisions. However these theories have come under immense criticism as they don’t hold true in real time. In reality, human beings rarely behave rationally which is the basic assumption in many of the economic theories; rather we make a lot of our decisions based on our intuition and limited knowledge available to us. When the financial crisis of 2008 came upon us, a lot of questions were raised on the apparent predictive abilities of the various economic theories. Merely 12 economists were able to foresee the massive crisis which now shows signs of deepening into a double dip recession.
Lord Lionel Robbins was born in 1898, and was one of the many great economists of our time. Robbins was known for his contributions to economic policy, methodology, and the history of ideas, but made his name as a theorist. Robbins was made famous for his definition of economics, "Economics is a science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses." (The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics 2007) Robbins was able to change the Anglo-Saxon thought economics off its Marshallian process and onto the Continental train of thought.