Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The odyssey character analysis essay
The odyssey character essay
Coming of age in the Odyssey
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The odyssey character analysis essay
Many people think they can challenge fate, but if one were able to choose when he/she lived or died, would it really be considered fate? Fate is inevitably predetermined; it’s ones destiny. Surely if a person tried hard enough he/she could avoid their fate for a little while, but in the end, he/she will eventually fall to fate. In Homer’s The Iliad, Patroklos attempts to challenge his own fate, but just like everyone else, he too falls victim to his destiny. As proclaimed by Zeus, Patroklos will die, but if Patroklos listened to Apollo, maybe he would not have died when he did. Patroklos let power and honor get to his head when he put on Achilleus’ armor and when he attempted to sack the city of troy, which ultimately lead to his own death. …show more content…
Initially, when Patroklos pleaded to Achilleus for his armor, he had good intentions. At the start of book sixteen, Patroklos ran to Achilleus crying because so many Achaians were dying, and all the best men were injured. Patroklos explained the situation, and knowing that Achilleus would not return to battle, proposed an idea; Give me your armor to wear on my shoulders into the fighting; so perhaps the Trojans might think I am you, and give way from their attack. (XVI.40-42) Achilleus agreed to Patroklos’ proposal under a few terms: You must not, in the pride and fury of fighting, go on slaughtering the Trojans, and lead the way against Ilion, for fear some one of the everlasting g-ds on Olympos might crush you. (XVI.91-94) With these wise words from Achilleus, Patroklos armed himself and prepared for battle. Once Patroklos leaves to battle, Achilleus, along with the readers, believes Patroklos will do as he was told. Although Patroklos does follow some of Achilleus’ rules, he does not follow them all. First and foremost, Patroklos was told to beat the bane aside from our ships; fall upon them with all your strength; let them not with fire’s blazing inflame our ships, and take away our desired homecoming. (XVI.80-82) Patroklos did just that.
He instilled fear in the Trojans as he killed their leader and drove the rest of the Trojans away from the ships. Granted Patroklos is currently following the rules right now, he is still power driven. He let the identity of the armor get to his head. Without the armor, he is Patroklos, but with the armor he is still Patroklos, is he not? The person has not changed, but his actions have. If Patroklos really wanted to do good for the Achaians, he could have potentially used his armor and done the same thing. He could have asked Achilleus for just his men and horses but not his armor. It would have sent the same message to the Trojans. The Trojan men would know they are up against Achilleus’ men, but led by Patroklos. To do what he did, Patroklos needed to wear the armor. He desired the sense of fear around him. Patroklos wanted the Trojans to fear him, but they did not know they feared Patroklos. The Trojans thought they feared Achilleus. Achilleus did not force the armor to Patroklos, Patroklos asked for it. Patroklos yearned for Achilleus’ strength and power and used his armor to attain it. Under all the armor, Patroklos acted as a coward, not a …show more content…
fighter. The armor of Achilleus gave Patroklos all the courage he needed as a fighter. Not only did it allow him to save the burning ships like Achilleus asked, but also allowed Patroklos to kill Trojans like a true, brave fighter. Patroklos wearing Achilleus’ armor and Achilleus wearing his armor are almost the same people on the battlefield, ruthless fighters. Achilleus, known as the greatest Achaian fighter, killed anyone who got in his way, and anyone who got in his way did not die a quick, easy death. Patroklos exhibited the same qualities while wearing Achilleus’ armor. After saving the burning ships, Patroklos [came] close up to [Thestor] stabbed with a spear-thrust at the right side of the jaw and drove it on through the teeth, then hooked and dragged him with the spear over the rail, (XVI.404-06) as if he was trying to prove his power to the rest of the Achaians and Trojans. Patroklos took on Achilleus’ character in war, except without the armor, Patroklos would not have the same courage he did. Wearing the armor gave Patroklos the confidence and power he needed to succeed in the war. The armor of Achilleus did this to Patroklos, but in turn, Patroklos did this to himself. Patroklos asked to wear the armor; it was not forced upon him. This type of confidence and power Patroklos gained from wearing the armor is what will eventually kill him. During Patroklos’ time as Achilleus, the reader learns how all this power can affect ones self. Patroklos does not obey Achilleus’ demand to not continue fighting the Trojans after he stops the ships from burning. Patroklos let’s the power and kleos get to his head, even if they kleos does not really belong to him. The kleos is thought to be for Achilleus. This does not affect Patroklos though; he keeps on fighting. Patroklos defies Achilleus by continuing to fight the Trojans When he had cut away their first battalions, Turned back to pin them against the ships, and would not allow them To climb back into their city though they strained for it. (XVI. 394-96) All of Achilleus’ power got to Patroklos and made him believe he could take Troy by himself, but Achilleus would not advise Patroklos to hold back unless he knew it would be detrimental. Clearly Patroklos thought trying to take the city of Troy was more important than the g-ds intervening in the battle. Patroklos greatly enjoyed having extreme power and control and proved it by not backing down when the Trojans desired to return into their city. Going against the wise words of Achilleus, Patroklos proved the validity of Achilleus’ warning when he Charged with evil intention in on the Trojans. Three times he charged in with the force of the running war g-d, Screaming a terrible cry, and three times he cut down nine men; But as for the fourth time he swept in, like something greater Than human, there Patroklos, the end of [his] life was shown forth. (XVI.783-87) Not only did Patroklos defy Achilleus once, he defied him four times. Apollo allowed Patroklos three tries to amend his wrong, but come the fourth try to charge the city, Apollo realized enough was enough. Apollo took action on what needed to be done and “struck away from [Patroklos’] head the helmet” (XVI.793), and soon thereafter his shield from his shoulders fell, leaving him without any protection. Hektor took advantage of this moment and “stabbed him / in the depth of the belly and drove the bronze clean through (XVI.820-21), killing Patroklos. This is the moment where Patroklos could have decided to stall his fate. Patroklos’ mortality would eventually kill him, but if he had used his brain and listened to Achilleus to not push on the Trojans, Zeus would not have had a reason to send Apollo to the battlefield and Patroklos could have made it back home to Achilleus alive. A mortal being’s fate is death.
There is no way to escape it, but there are ways to steer clear of it for a while. One way is to not go around with a death wish written across ones face, as did Patroklos. Patroklos challenged his fate the minute he clothed himself in Achilleus’ armor. Patroklos imagined himself as if he were actually Achilleus, but in reality he was still Patroklos, he was just hiding behind a mask. Just as children on Halloween think they are whom they dress up as, Patroklos did the same. Once out on the battlefield he acted as the greatest fighter alive, and maybe he did have the skills to be one the greatest, but he lacked the critical thinking which is crucial to a strong fighter. A strong fighter knows when it is time to back down from a fight, which Achilleus shows the reader when he tells Patroklos what he should and should not do. Patroklos does not listen and in turn fights with anger and gets himself killed. From the start, Patroklos knew putting on Achilleus’ armor would give him the strength he needed to help the Acahians, but he also knew people would fear him. He used that fear to do more than what he was told to do, thus killing him. Achilleus clearly informed Patroklos on what do and not to do, but Patroklos was too blind sided to listen. Patroklos took advantage of the power of the armor and tried to do more than what was required of him. He challenged fate and lost. Patroklos alone holds the responsibility of his
death.
The idea that one’s destiny is already determined is both comforting yet brings dismay because it leaves a feeling of powerlessness which is fine for the lazy but painful for the proactive. This idea is surely a failure among principles but even so the role of fate is not completely limited to these terms and ideas. Fate in the book was seen more as a mission that Aeneas had in life, and it would only happen on his obedience to his tasks. This type of belief that “actions determine fate” is actually quite healthy for a society to follow. During Aeneas’ journey there were several times that he faced difficult temptations that tested his obedience
In the Hero’s journey, The Odyssey, the main protagonist, Odysseus, changes in a way which helps him gain self-knowledge. Odysseus ' experiences transformed his personality from how he was in the beginning to the end, by leading him through a heroic journey, also known as a quest. The real reason for a quest never involves the stated reason, and this is no different with Odysseus. As the story developed, many of Odysseus’ sides were exposed through the challenges he faced. Out of the countless dangers and obstacles every step back home, him and his crew have only acquired minimal character changes. Even though they are minimal, they are those which take many decades to achieve.
Though the reader is inclined to see Penelope and Odysseus as a more favorable pair, a marriage between Nausicaa and Odysseus would have been very beneficial. Nausicaa is a powerful catalyst, but after her moment of glory, she is quickly forgotten. Because The Odyssey is crafted so that the audience cheers for the hero, Odysseus, many do not consider any other wife for the hero than his faithful Penelope. The noble Odysseus has made many decisions that have shaped his travel home, such as deciding to go to the underworld on Circe’s advice, but one should consider how the decision to marry the young Nausicaa instead of moving on from the Phaecians would have affected many events in a constructive manner.
Throughout the Odyssey, there are many relationships that represent love between two people. These relationships show loyalty, compassion, and the wanting to be near one another. Two of these kinds of relationships are between Odysseus and Telemakhos, and Odysseus and Penelope.
Fate has a place in the Greek world but its place is not the same as it is in other scenarios or worlds. It is important to understand the word before we discuss it. Fate as far as Greek mythology goes is not just fate. By most standards fate means that things occur for an unknown reason that no one has any control over. However, in the world of Greek Mythology fate does not just happen. The gods engineer fate and they interfere to make things happen that might not otherwise have happened. Since the players do not always know of the gods' involvement, things may actually appear to be fate but in reality be engineered happenings.
Their argument comes to a head when Agamemnon questions, “Are you to keep your own prize [geras], while I sit tamely under my loss and give up the girl at your bidding?”(The Quarrel of Achilles and Agamemnon, 130) He then moves to take Achilles‘ war prize, Briseis from him. This, however, is much more than robbing Achilles of his hard won prize, it is a blow to his honor, something that Achilles will not stand for. He is also quick to remind the king that many victories come from the edge of his sword, saying “You forget this, and threaten to rob me of the prize [geras] for which I have toiled, and which the sons of the Achaeans have given me. Never when the Achaeans destroy any rich city of the Trojans do I receive so good a prize as you do, though it is my hands that do the better part of the fighting.” (The Quarrel of Achilles and Agamemnon, 160-165) Achilles, with some guidance from Athena, quells his anger, but refuses to swallow his pride. He accepts that Briseis is no longer his, but explains to the king that he and his myrmidons will withdraw from the war and set a course for home as soon as possible. In a situation where his honor has been damaged and no retaliation can be executed, Achilles‘ only option is to remove himself from the situation with as much pride and dignity as possible. Similarly, Achilles urging Agamemnon to return Chryseis is taken as challenge of authority to
The Iliad and the Fate Of Patroclus Throughout The Iliad Of Homer, the constant theme of death is inherently. apparent. The snares are not. Each main character, either by a spear or merely a scratch from an arrow, was wounded or killed during the progression of the story. For Zeus' son, a king.
The idea of fate has baffled mankind for centuries. Can humans control what happens to them, or is everyone placed in a predestined world designed by a higher power? The Epic of Gilgamesh and Oedipus The King highlight on the notion that no matter what, people cannot control what is destined to occur. Interestingly enough, many other distantly connected cultures had, and have similar gods or goddesses who play a role in the fate of individuals. Oedipus, King of Thebes, was told by the Oracle at Delphi that he would one day kill his father and marry his mother. Determined not to let this prophecy verify his fears, Oedipus does all in his power to prevent this from happening, yet fails. Similarly, Gilgamesh, king of Uruk, attempts to obtain immortality, but fails as well. Gilgamesh's and Oedipus's intense fear and ignorance cause them to try to interfere with their fates, leading to their failures and realization of the futility of trying to control destiny.
In Greek mythology the oracles or gods are rarely wrong in their predictions of the future. Yet the characters still try to fight the predictions. Do their personalities and traits decide their future, or does fate take its course no matter what? Oedipus was a shrewd man furnished with wit and intellect, yet his lack of insight (the ability to see and understand clearly the inner nature of himself) and his arrogance led to his demise, not fate.
What is required of Achilles is that he carry out his role of hero and finish the war for his countrymen. His character is, therefore, mostly tentative throughout the Iliad. The quality of his character, which is ambiguous throughout the Iliad, is ambiguous because Achilles was unwilling to fight in the war. In the end, of course, after the fall of his best friend, Patroclus, Achilles fulfilled his prophetic role and won the war”().
Odysseus, known as an iconic Greek king and warrior of Ithaca, has all of the traits that a mighty king would have. His tale and reputation are one that would continue to live on long after his passing. This fame and reputation is known as kleos. Kleos, in Greek, means renown or honor, it symbolizes what you hear about someone through another person. Kleos is a common theme in Homer 's epic, the Odyssey, the main example being that of Odysseus and his son Telemachus, who is concerned that his father may have died a pathetic and pitiable death at sea rather than a reputable and gracious one in battle. Kleos has proven to be very important to Odysseus time and time again. From the way he is introduced, to his actions, to the way he is viewed
In conclusion, Homer’s the Iliad shows denial of fate being something that is enforced by the gods and as an unchangeable path to be taken by humans. While most of the characters in the Iliad do not know what fate has in store for them, they continue to fight, aspiring to have a glorified death, the type of honorable death that gives life meaning and makes warriors go down in history such as Achilles and Hector. The Iliad is quick to refer to fate when speaking of the action that unfolds, however, these perfect circumstances that combine to create the classic Homer epic cannot give all the credit to simply fate.
Webster defines fate as a “ a power thought to control all events and impossible to resist” “a persons destiny.” This would imply that fate has an over whelming power over the mind. This thing called fate is able to control a person and that person has no ability to change it.
Too late, he found his maturity and priorities. Patroklos’ death gives deep insight and perspective into the webs that are woven by one person’s actions. Those who read the Iliad do not have to lose a friend to learn that acting rashly and without thinking could have disastrous results in the life of someone close to them. Oftentimes one will act without thinking, “how will this affect those I don’t know? How will this affect those I do know?” The lesson of Achilleus and Patroklos teaches a valuable lesson: act with others in mind. Many people were affected by Achilleus’ selfish actions. Many were killed because of him. If he had the lives of others in mind, he would have put himself aside and swallowed his pride. Many factors go into a person’s death. Patroklos’ own actions may have been the Franz Ferdinand of his own demise, but Achilleus’ actions were the driving force behind
The death of Patroklos touched Achilles in many ways that changed and shaped his character. Many emotions were a result of his death such as love, loss, anger, and sadness. Patroklos was a dear friend to Achilles and when a mix of divine intervention and Hektor cut Patroklos down grief and the desire to avenge his dear friends death consumed Achilles. This switched his anger from King Agamemnon to Hektor, the man who slew his dear friend. This anger drew Achilles to avenge the death of his friend, to kill Hektor.