Patrick Henry's Speech 'Liberty Or Death'

272 Words1 Page

Patrick Henry was a Virginian patriot who was well known for his skill in persuasive oratory. One of his most famous speeches was titled "Liberty or Death" after it was delivered to president Peyton Randolph at the Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775. This speech was very much persuasive in its nature and delivery. The speech lacks much, if any, actual facts to back up Henry's opinions which suggested that it was formulated on his feet without much reseach or preparation. The body of the speech is expressing Henry's views on the American Revolution and his desire to separate from Great Britain. It is important to note that vocalizing such views while the colonies were still considered to be subjects of the British crown was considered to

Show More
Related

  • Patrick Henry Rhetorical Analysis

    288 Words  | 1 Pages

    Patrick Henry’s effective diction emphasizes how much the British had suppressed the colonists and that it was time to fight for their freedom. Henry displays this through his strong use of pathos, logos, and ethos. His rhetorical questions really appeal to the logic and ethics of the colonists and leaves the no choice but to join him and rebel.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Strategies Used In Patrick Henry's Speech At The Virginia Convention

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the “Speech at the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry tries to persuade colonists to fight a war against the English; he uses several main rhetorical strategies such as; parallelism, metaphor, and rhetorical questions.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry's Speech To Virginia

    330 Words  | 1 Pages

    At the Virginia convention in 1775 Patrick Henry spoke out anonymously about standing up to the British monarchy and gaining independence. His simple use of language and emotionally captivating passages inspired many to fight for a republic. Persuading the devout and loyal colonies to pull away from their mother country took courage.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry

    1064 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are few speeches in the American history that compel us towards great acts of patriotism. Patrick Henry's speech in the Virginia Provincial Convention of 1775 is a prime example of one of these great speeches. During the debates on whether or not to compromise with Great Britain, Patrick Henry proposed the idea to his fellow members of the First Continental Congress to declare war on Great Britain. A reason why the speech was so powerful was the rhetorical strategies of the diction of slavery, the appeal to God, and the appeal to logic, that he deftly employed.

    Read More

  • What Are The Rhetorical Devices In Patrick Henry's Speech

    514 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the mid 1700’s the new found America was struggling for independence from the British. This undetermined notion whether or not to declare war led to the Virginia Convention where, Governor Patrick Henry enforced our nation to engage in war. “Patrick Henry’s Speech in the Virginia Convention” emphasizes the importance of fighting for independence for the American nation, because we shouldn't be treated like slaves of the British. He persuades them to join the war effort enforcing a sense of patriotism to the members by using the rhetorical appeals of parallelism and repetition.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Patrick Henry And Patomas Paine

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    He addressed the cruel taxes and policies that have been placed upon the American people. He also, speaks of the tiring efforts of the colonies to overcome the impossible British policies. Henry begins his statement with the numerous actions taken by people in response to the British approach to limit their freedom. Writing in the statement, Henry complains that many actions have been taken in an effort to achieve freedom but have failed. Henry himself writes, “In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation?”. In making this comment Henry urges the British to be prepared for them. After overcoming the stamp act , Henry urges the British to be ready for revolution if freedom is not given. This exactly, Henry points out, if basic privileges are not given to men and women, there will be a war. Henry himself writes. “give me liberty, or give me death!”. Basically, Henry is warning that if freedom is not given, he is willing to fight until it is. Patrick Henry’s statement is crucial to the American cause in the War for Independence. He led the fight against the stamp act, after being elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1765. Also, he proposed his argument for going to war was in an effort to live as free men and fight. His speech inspired men to join the cause and fight for

    Read More

  • A Driving Force in the American Revolution, Patrick Henry

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ak, act, and fight the people’s liberty (Godfather). When he gave that speech in March 1775 he was trying to arouse the passions of colonials who still felt usefully disposed toward Britain despite the growing threat of military force against the colonies (Godfather). In March 1775 Patrick Henry urged his fellow Virginians to arm in self-defense, closing his appeal with the well-known words: “I know not what course take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death” (History). The colonies faced growing taxations from Great Britain. For years the colonies had complained to Great Britain, but nothing was done.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Patrick Henry And Benjamin Franklin

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many speeches have shaped the nation we live in today. Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Speech in the Convention” are two of the most prominent speeches that have assisted in the forging of our new nation. The “Speech in the Virginia Convention” serves to encourage those that listened to take arms against the British and fight the injustice being done to them. The “Speech in the Convention” admits to the imperfections of the Constitution but supports its ultimate purpose. Both Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin believe leaders must do away with compromise and lead when it’s best for the people as a whole. However, Patrick discourages any future compromise, while Benjamin Franklin feels that future

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry: Fight against the Constitution

    515 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry's persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas. Even though Henry didn't serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution. This argument went on for three weeks. Henry was aware that the new government had to be strong, but felt that the Constitution made the central government too powerful. He thought that the power should lay in the hands of the states. "What right had they [the group that wrote the Constitution] to say 'We the people,' instead We, the States?" he demanded.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry Led Early America with his speeches

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    In March of 1775, the words of Patrick Henry rang in the ears of his fellow Virginians. He stood in St John’s Church, located in Richmond, made an audacious public speech containing his opinions in relation to the colony’s next step of action in the war. This was not the first time that Henry stood in front of an audience to present a speech. Henry was known for speaking messages that people did not forget. Prior to this speech, Patrick Henry had made his name known by writing the ‘Virginia Resolutions’ against the despised Stamp Act. In the view point of this specific speech however, Henry spoke his opinion of the war starting and what he believed as truth. Virginia was the largest American Colony, with the House of Burgesses that was the longest-serving legislature that Virginia proudly claimed. Patrick Henry was also previously known for his incredible words and messages he had shared in the past. This speech went over the top compared to former speeches. As a known Christian man, Henry referenced an array of Biblical subjects throughout his speech “Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death”, in which his audience could take time to deeply digest. During this era, most Americans were Christians, making it easy for Henry to never quotes scripture directly, but imply it for his audience to grasp.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry's Famous Speech

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    'Give me liberty or give me death.' These famous words were uttered by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775, as a conclusion to his speech delivered to the Virginia House of Burgesses. Within his speech, he uses the three rhetorical appeals (ethos, logos, and pathos) to convey a feeling of urgency toward the changes occurring in policy within the Americas implemented by the British government. He cleverly uses these appeals to disrupt the paradigm that Great Britain is going to let the American people have any liberty.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Speech To Virginia Convention And The Declaration Of Independence

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    These two speeches were written in a time of distress and loads of pressure. The American colonies were starting to take a stand against the British reign and become independent. Thomas Jefferson and Patrick henry were one of the most influential voices of this time period. However “The Speech to Virginia Convention” was written to get the people on board to fight and in this way, written more persuasive than “The Declaration of Independence”.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Patrick Henry's Speech to the Virginia Convention

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Give me liberty or give me death!” This statement from Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention,” delivered to the House of Burgesses, has been quoted by many, becoming almost cliché. However, the declaration is truly understood by a select few. The unjust Stamp Act passed by the British crown in 1765, brought fame and notoriety to Henry as he spoke out against the unjust taxation without representation. Ten years later on the eve of revolution, Henry calls upon the Colonial government of which he is part, to act for the betterment of the people. Patrick Henry attempts to persuade the House of Burgesses to revolt and declare war against Britain by logically convincing them that it is their natural right to be free and calling on their patriotism and pride as leaders of colonial America.

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass’ Fourth of July Speech

    1397 Words  | 3 Pages

    On July 5th of 1852, the Ladies Antislavery Society of Rochester requested that emancipated slave, Fredrick Douglass, speak for their celebration of the United States’ national independence. Douglass accepted this request and presented a powerful speech that explained and argued his true beliefs and feelings concerning this event. He considered their decision to request him as a speaker on that day to be a mockery of his past and of the ongoing status of blacks as slaves in America at the time. Nevertheless, Douglass skillfully constructed his speech utilizing various methods that forced his audience to take him seriously and think twice about the issue of slavery in America. His passion about the subject, his ability to captivate his audience, and his persuasive skills combine to form a clearly effective speech that continues to be studied to this day. Douglass warmed up his audience by commending the moral and patriotic excellence of their forefathers. He then delivered the argument of his speech which cleverly criticized the hypocrisy of the institution of slavery and those who tolerated or supported it. Yet, to conclude his speech, Douglass asserts that there is still hope for the young nation so as not to leave the audience completely discouraged. The way in which Douglass constructed and delivered this speech had a lasting impact and left his audience with an effectively argued point to consider.

    Read More

  • Four Freedoms Speech And Kennedy's Inaugural Address

    816 Words  | 2 Pages

    “American power remains today what it was in the Second World War and the Cold War: the greatest force for freedom in the world” a quote from a man in the U.S named Elliot Abrams. Elliot Abrams was in fact a man who supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House. Having the guts to represent the people and stand for a side America didn’t care for, like Roosevelt and Kennedy. Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy’s Inaugural Address spoke about how freedom is important and as a country we need to help our country and others at our own sacrifice. However Roosevelt's speech was asking people to abandon the neutrality policy and send supplies and other aid to U.S allies. Whereas Kennedy’s speech wanted people to not use nuclear war and to consider the options. For freedom should be free to everyone, but men will use force than peace to gain power.

    Read More

More about Patrick Henry's Speech 'Liberty Or Death'

Open Document