Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women in a patriarchal society
The role of women in patriarchal society
Patriarchal societies today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of women in a patriarchal society
The patriarchal system was used by Europe to govern the people. This system was one in which the males had absolute power over the women and children . The idea of male dominance stemmed from the Bible, medicine, and law. It was thought that women were weak and vulnerable. Therefore, women needed to be ruled in order to stay away from witchcraft. These women of the sixteenth century had very little opportunity to possess items such as land. They worked for their husbands and took care of the children. In this essay, I will address women’s work, education, marriage, family life and childbirth during the period of the patriarchal system. To begin, the domestic service of women played a key role in the success of the society. While …show more content…
If one was to marry, she would gain a sense of security, property, and support from her husband. The typically age for marriage was in the late twenties usually around age twenty five. The way marriage was determined was different depending upon the social class which one was a part of. Most upper class women had their spouses chosen for them, because family relationships were important. These relationships were dependent on the dowry, which was the piece of land, money or household item which was given to the husband in exchange for taking the wives hand in marriage. This dowry was used to tie the two families together. The husband was then responsible for taking care of his wife and the upholding their political status. Unlike elite women, the middle and lower class women had more freedom to choose which man they wanted as their husband. Their dowry was usually a piece of land or household item, as they could not afford to provide their spouse with a huge portion of money. These women would take on the role of being a housewife, while their husband would gain more political rights and more prestigious employment within the community. The females with no means stayed unmarried. The unmarried women would become nuns and live in convents. These unmarried individuals had more freedom within the convent. They learned to read and write and they could voice their opinions through …show more content…
Childbirth in the sixteenth century was very traumatic for women. Women had a vast amount of pressure on them to produce a baby boy that would inherit the land from their father. Without technology and much medicine, labor was painful. Labor often ended in tragedy either to the baby or the mother. For example, three out of the four wives of Phillip ΙΙ pasted away from unforeseen complications during the birth of their child. Before having a child it was especially important to have a menstrual period. The blood required purification in order for a healthy baby to be born. During the birth of a child, the father would not be present. Instead, the mid wife would be there to take care of the mother throughout the entire process of labor. Mothers were very affectionate with their children even though most of the births ended in still born babies or miscarriages. Along with pregnancy comes abortion. Abortion was against the law during the sixteenth century even if you were unmarried. There were severe consequences if one were to have an abortion of her baby. One of the punishments included being drowned to death. All abortion was illegal; many mothers still managed to escape the work of breastfeeding. After the birth of an infant, the mother would typically hire a wet nurse. These wet nurses were extremely sought after, because they would allow the mother to be free from the work of
Wealth and family status was a determining factor upon marriage. Women were expected to have a dowry from their family that would allow them to be auctioned off to suitors. The marriage market was much like the stock exchange in that it allowed
During The Second Great Awakening, the legal rights of men and women were greatly influenced by gender and race. Paul Johnson and Simon Wilentz’s book, The Kingdom of Matthias, describes the life of two young women, Isabella Van Wagenen and Isabella Matthews Laisdell, both of whom men’s power effected. During the nineteenth century, men were the “backbone” of the family; the men made the money, supported, and provided for the family. Throughout the era, women were nothing more than housewives. A woman’s daily job was to cook, clean, and care for the children. The views of motherhood changed over time as the mothers began bearing fewer children. This alteration was made with the intentions of showing each child more attention with the hopes that the family would rise in social standard and class. There are extreme cases of women's social and spiritual roles changing in The Kingdom of Matthias (Kelly, Dustin). The rising market shaped the rights and freedoms of the women in society. Matthias thought that the increasing rights of women degraded his rights as a man and as a laborer (Fiorini, 3/27).
In this time having a cesarean was very dangerous for the mother and the baby. In some cases, a cesarean would lead to
Although it can be said that seeing as women had no rights during the time period, why not have them serve their husbands as a primary goal. Women usually were less educated, had restrictions on trades that they may practice and limited job opportunities. (S.V. Rosser, 2008 p23) They also were considered to be too young at the time of marriage to know what is best for them so their parents chose their suitor. In fact, one could say if the girl is too young to know what is best for he, should she marry at that age in the first place? Although work was not always strenuous for wives of wealthy suitors, they should have their own lives within the marriage like their husband and not have to constantly please them and have their own lives dictated to...
Thesis Statement: Men and women were in different social classes, women were expected to be in charge of running the household, the hardships of motherhood. The roles that men and women were expected to live up to would be called oppressive and offensive by today’s standards, but it was a very different world than the one we have become accustomed to in our time. Men and women were seen to live in separate social class from the men where women were considered not only physically weaker, but morally superior to men. This meant that women were the best suited for the domestic role of keeping the house. Women were not allowed in the public circle and forbidden to be involved with politics and economic affairs as the men made all the
Wertz, R., and Wertz D. Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America. New York: Free Press. 1997
It was also common for richer families to marry off their daughters sooner than poorer families. This was because poorer families needed as much help doing work as they could. Women had no choice in deciding who they got married to, and once married they would be controlled by their husband (Trueman, “Medieval Women”).
the life of the women, therefore marriage was often viewed as imprisonment and a burden. The
The wife 's desires for a girl also can be unselfish in their eyes by saying they are protecting them from a life of poverty since they had not yet had a son who could provide their prosperity. “Dowry deaths” are also an age old tradition that is a custom for the religion. But with the heavy problem of gendercide, the government outlawed the use of a dowry. But since tradition is so heavy and rich it still happens. The families want to live up to expectations and even if it is not “required” it still looks good for a family to compensate the other in a social standing. The problem with this is that they still see females as burdens even though there is no requirement to provide a dowry. It is the age-old tradition to give a dowry that is hurting the females. The old ways need to be adapted, and the culture itself needs to understand that it is okay not to provide a dowry. This is the only way change for females can come and ensure them a success and longevity in their
However, the methods for dealing with these things were completely different than ours and some were rather harsh. Marriage could be ended just as easily as it began, and a wife could expect her full dowry back, along with her independence. A wife could also expect full protection from her father, as well as complete support from her family. This is similar to families in our time period today because most families stand behind their daughters/sons through the hard times of divorce or any other family problems. Granted, marriage in this day in age doesn’t require the bride to provide property or money to the husband on their day of marriage. Most couples split their assets fifty fifty when getting a divorce, instead of the wife getting everything back that she provided the husband with. If there was suspicion of a wife committing adultery, she would be taken to a special court known as the, “quaestio” and if she was found guilty she would have to sacrifice her half of the dowry that the husband was supposed to give back when a divorce occurred. If a husband was accused of adultery, the law didn’t recognize it because it was a, “man’s world.” This is very different from families in our society because if a spouse is accused of adultery, both are to be recognized and face the consequences. Along with that, a man could easily divorce his wife if she did not give birth to a son. So, if a
Women “were expected to bear children, stay home, cook and clean, and take care of the children” (Cobb 29). They were expected to be weak, timid, domestic, emotional, dependent, and pure. Women were taught to be physically and emotionally inferior in addition morally superior to men. During this time, women were ostracized for expressing characteristics and wants that contradicted those ideals. For women, the areas of influence are home and children, whereas men’s sphere includes work and the outside world” (Brannon 161).
Women in different societies around the world, during the Middle Ages, experienced different hardships and roles. These hardships and roles helped shape how they were viewed in their society. Some women were treated better and more equal than others. In Rome, Medieval England, and Viking society, women’s legal status, education, marriage and family roles were considered diverse, but also similar. In certain nation’s women have more or less power than women in other nations, but none equal to the power that women have in America today.
Women did not control her own wealth, so therefore, a woman’s family wealth, was controlled by her father or her husband. Law 128 in the Code of Hammurabi states, “If a man take a wife and do not arrange with her the (proper) contracts, that woman is not a (legal) wife.”1 (Hammurabi 45). A woman would receive a dowry once she was married and left her family. A dowry is a financial gift such as money, property, or goods, which was a gift to her husband once they got married. Once a man married a woman, he then had access to the family’s dowry and the property, money, or goods were then, controlled by him. If the man were no longer married to the woman and if the woman died childless, then the dowry returned back to the father of her family. If the father has already passed away, then the dowry was returned to the woman’s brothers. If the woman had any children that were boys, then the boy, or brothers, would share equally2 (“WOMEN…”). If women wanted out of the marriage, then she would take the dowry with her and go back to her father’s house. The father would then receive the dowry back. Law 138 in the Code of Hammurabi says, “If a man would put away his wife who has not borne him children, he shall give her money to the amount of her marriage settlement and he shall make good to her the dowry which she brought from her father’s house and then he may put her away.”3 (Hammurabi 49). In reality
In the subject of marriage a woman’s main purpose is to conceive children and remain as a “property” of her husband (Suite101 1). A woman’s marriage is mostly based on her dowry and wealth. If a woman owns a high dowry, most likely she would marry a man of a high status; a woman who lacks a proper dowry would in turn marry a man of a lower status. Consequently, marriage during the Renaissance is generally based on prosperity rather than the love between couples (Essay911). A dowry is like a “ticket” for a marriage because without a dowry it is almost impossible for a woman to obtain a husband. When a couple confirms a dowry the husband sends a receipt to the wife’s parents in order to finalize their marriage. This symbolizes the bride as a purchase or a product that can be bought in...
Parents would arrange their daughter marriage due to poverty. The bride’s family would receive a dowry, basically trading girls for money. Again, girls were burdens and the parents used child marriage as a relief... ... middle of paper ... ... irls a bright future.