Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Monopolistic vs oligopoly
Monopolistic vs oligopoly
Pros and cons of copyright laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Monopolistic vs oligopoly
The idea of giving creators a limited exclusive right to their intellectual property began in England in 1710. The “Statute of Anne,” inspired our Founding Fathers and was incorporated into the United State’s Constitution. There are three types of intellectual property. Trademark ™, Copyright ©, and Patents. The last two are more controversial because they both give the creator exclusive rights to their invention/writing for a limited time. They were meant to benefit both society and creator. Unlike copyright, patents further prevents another company from reverse-engineering the product and selling it for less. Patents are also harder to get; To get a patent it has to be approved by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Although the fashion industry has benefited from not having patents; Competitors constantly steal ideas from each other and cost for consumers are lower as a result. The existential U.S. Patent laws we have today are counter productive and slow the process of innovation in other fields.
The fundamental idea of patents is that it is an agreement between inventors and society. The inventor is encouraged to keep inventing to benefit society and as a return the government grants the inventor with a monopoly over its sale. Patents were written about when the Constitution was framed. The Founding Fathers believed they should “Promote the progress of Science and Useful Arts, [by] securing for limited times the exclusive rights to their [invention].” (Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 8) This one clause was originally meant to give an inventor a limited monopoly so that they can make profit, while also the society will benefit from the disclosure of the information about the invention and can build...
... middle of paper ...
...article/58705>.
Roth, Zachary. “The Monopoly Factory.” Washington Monthly Vol. 37, No. 6. June 2005: 12-19. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
Streitfeld, David. “Note: This Headline Is Patented.” Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, CA). Feb. 7 2003: A1+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
Teachout, Terry. “Copyright Protection That Serves to Destroy.” Wall Street Journal. 15 Mar. 2013: D.6. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
“When Patents Attack!” Hosted by Ira Glass. Prod. Ben Calhoun, Jane Feltes, and Sarah Koenig. Episode #441. This American Life. Hosted by Ira Glass. NPR. WGBH, Boston, 22 July 2011. Print. Transcript.
“When Patents Attack... Part Two!” Hosted by Ira Glass and Zoe Chase. Prod. Alex Blumberg, Julie Snyder, and Ben Calhoun. Episode #496. This American Life. Hosted by Ira Glass. NPR. WBEZ, Boston, 31 May 2013. Print. Transcript.
(7) Hall B. Patents and Patent Policy -. 2007. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the Morse H. SETTLEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRIES: ANTITRUST RULES. Allison JR, Lemley MA, Moore KA, Trunkey RD. Valuable patents. Geol.
Monopoly is not just a game that is occasionally played by dysfunctional families all around the United States. It was an entire era filled with scandal and big business brought on by the industrial revolution and the need to control an entire industry. With the technological advances of that time, it is easy to see just how the “ Big Fish” in the industry were able to control the market and just how that inevitably led to their downfall by a ravishingly bold young president. This slice cut out of the history pie goes to show that too much of a good thing can be very bad for everyone.
Monopoly is a board game that came out in 1903, and one of the main goals of the game was to demonstrate that an economy which rewards capitalism is better than one in which monopolists work under few constraints, it also was used to promote the economic theories of “Henry George” and in particular his ideas about taxation. The goal of the game is to bankrupt all of your opponents which is typically done by acquiring complete colour groups mostly known as a “monopoly” and building on them to at least the level of three houses, as this is when rent begins to go up significantly making your opponents to go bankrupt by paying higher rent when they land on a property that you own.
Intellectual property is an incredibly complicated facet of the law. In the United States, we have many laws in place to control and limit profiting from others intellectual property. The issue is not only profiting from others intellectual property, but not purchasing the property from the originator as well. We will discuss why it is important to protect this property as well as why it is tremendously difficult to regulate all these safe guards. “Intellectual Property has the shelf life of a banana.” Bill Gates
Pharmaceuticals are arguably one of the most contentious of all goods and services traded in the market. While medicines are as much a necessity as foods and water, they require more technical expertise and official approbation in the manufacture. Above all, they carry a moral weight that most market products do not (The Economist, 2014). This idea of moral can be linked to the recurring debate over whether a good health (which is represented by medicines, in this case) should be considered a basic human right, or just a normal commodity. A large portion of such controversy actually lies in an existence of drug patents: should we promote for longer-lasting patents or should we have their duration shortened?
Abstract: In 1995 Lance Rose and Esther Dyson wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing polarized views on the future of copyright law and copyright infringement. This essay reviews those articles, analyzes each article's accuracy as defined by current trends years later.
Intellectual Property Law used to only protect art, music, and literature, but because of technological development, Intellectual Property Law now also protects a greater variety of innovations including designs, inventions, symbols, discoveries, and words. The phrase “intellectual property” was first known to be used in the late 1700’s; however, it was not widely talked about, nor was the Intellectual Property Law in actuality commonly implemented. Intellectual Property Rights slowly gained more attention by mid-1800’s after the Industrial Revolution had taken place: more companies were created, competition between corporations became fiercer, and owning unique innovations were crucial to winning the competition. However, as Intellectual Property
When assisting inventors or entrepreneurs with trademark and patent searching, other questions may arise, e.g. business information. As a matter of fact, business resources overlap often with such library research consultations. To apply a real world scenario, you are assigned to watch any single episode of the SharkTank reality television series. Ideally it should be a re-run and not the current weekly prime time network broadcast. This promotes each student to view different episodes to get differing scenarios for the assignment. In addition, part of the rubric for this assignment is student originality. As this course is entrenched in the
While some will call Rastafarianism a religion, others will say that Rastafarianism is a kind of spiritual consciousness because the Rastas lack a great deal of what is central for other religions while still retaining a belief in a God. There aren't too many organised Rasta 'churches', and the closest thing you would come to a church will probably be Rasta organisations like 'The Twelve Tribes of Israel', the 'Nyabinghi Order' and especially the 'Bobo Dreads'. Rastafarianism also lacks a confession of fate, which most other religious systems will have. So the question will remain open if this is a religion or a spiritual consciousness where everyone calling him/herself a Rasta will be more or less free to believe in what they like.
Copyright Law of the United States of America. (2013). Retrieved from Copyright United States Copyright Office.
Posner, R.A., (1975) The Social Costs of Monopoly and Regulation, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 807-828, The University of Chicago Press
Intellectual property (TV programs, movies, etc…) is an incredible source of growth for the American economy. Intellectual property is not only America’s largest trade export, but it is creating new jobs at triple the rate of the rest of the economy, and is responsible for more than five percent of the GDP. The movie industry alone has a surplus balance of trade, something no other American company can lay claim to.
Because of its intangible nature, and particularly the increase of the digital domain and the internet as a whole, computers and cyber piracy make it easier for people to steal many forms of intellectual property. Due to this major threat, intellectual property rights owners’ should take every single measure to protect their rights. Unless these rights are either sold, exchanged, transferred, or appropriately licensed for use in exchange for a monetary fee, they should be protected at all cost. In order to protect these rights, the federal and states governments have passed numerous laws and statutes to protect intellectual property from misappropriation and infringement. “The source of federal copyright and patent law originates with the Copyright and Patent ...
The World Intellectual Property Organization, Intellectual property is the ‘products of the mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, any symbols, names, images, and designs used in commerce’. Intellectual Properties such as Patents, designs, trademarks and copyrights are protected by laws. The US government offers different types of protection for these properties. The Lanham Act (15 U.S.C.A. Section 1051 et seq., also known as the Trademark Act of 1946, provides protection for trademarks. A trademark is defined as a name, word, symbol, or device or any combination thereof, adopted and used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its goods and distinguish them from those manufactured and sold by others.