Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Scripture analysis
When studying biblical texts from the bible it is important to analyze and break down the passage to fully understand what is being said and the lesson it is trying to convey. When analyzing a passage, it is important to locate the persons involved in the passage, any time indications within the passage, as well as where it takes place and the main problem and message the passage intends to transmit. The passage 1 Kings 3:1-15 is a historical account describing how King Solomon came to be so wise. This passage takes place in the city of David, where he first brings his new wife, daughter of Pharaoh, and later in Gibeon where Solomon goes to offer sacrifice at the high place. It is on this altar that Solomon sacrifices a thousand burnt offerings …show more content…
Solomon’s dream in which God grants him a listening heart is a clear example of the moralistic approach to God because it emphasizes Solomon’s request to distinguish between good and evil. The Deuteronomist focuses on this moralistic approach because God is the ultimate ruler who we seek judgement from for ourselves. Therefore, God is pleased with Solomon’s request because he asks for something that will benefit his people who go to him for counseling. God is also pleased with Solomon because he is a loyal servant like David, his father, “The narrative framework, depicting the extravagant sacrifices at Gibeon (v 4) and Jerusalem (v 5), has a double effect: it attests to the king’s generous devotion to Yahweh, and it presages the transfer of the center of worship from the high places to the temple.” In the passage, Solomon also expresses his desire to “finish building his own house, and the house of the LORD, and the wall around Jerusalem.” (1 Kings 3:1) Once again this emphasizes the focus of the Deuteronomist on Jerusalem and the land of Israel as Solomon hopes to accomplish these things during his reign. It also serves as a foreshadowing of the temple of God that David wanted to build, but that Solomon will end up building
...ticle, Solomon has an unpleasant attitude of blaming others and complaining about the issue without proposing any real solutions. It also seems that he divides people into two categories: readers (good) and non-readers (bad), and he look down upon those who do not read. This will cause the readers to be emotionally uncomfortable and to reject his arguments and opinions because of the bias behind it.
As what critics had said regarding this novel, Song of Solomon is an allegory to God's relationship with his chosen people, the Israelites, as they try to live their lives as the most beloved people of God. Song of Solomon is a love story that tells us the discovery of a young man regarding the ancient history of his past and the experiences that he had gained to become a better person he was before. Song of Solomon is a story that had entirely told the readers about the complexity and difficulties that each of the characters had experienced with regards to true identity and ancestry (Bloom 35).
The book of 2 Samuel tells the story of King David and his rise to power, as well as reign- the good and the bad. The focus here will be on 2 Samuel, chapters eleven through thirteen, which depict some of the darker times in David’s rule.
We see from this passage that Solomon is a loving devoted husband and father. He understands the relationship between a father and his children. Solomon appears through this writings to have been a good father.
"Bible Gateway Passage: Ephesians 1:15-23 - New International Version." Bible Gateway. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 May 2014.
This phrase is later repeated three more times, in Judges 18:1, 19:1, and 21:25. Since the phrase is repeated several times, it emphasizes the need for a king to govern the people and lead them in better ways. The Davidic covenant also exemplifies this positive view, since God showed favor on David and his descendants. God said that King David’s descendants are God’s sons, and that the LORD will establish a “royal throne forever”, as in a line of kings until the end of time (2 Sam. 7:13). God also promises to give David “rest from all your enemies” (2 Sam. 7:11) and a place for his people to live (2 Sam. 7:10). Just like Abraham, King David is promised descendants, blessings, and land. Hezekiah, another good king of Judah, was also viewed favorably. In the LORD’s sight, Hezekiah did what was right, just like David (2 Kgs 18:3). 2 Kings 18: 5 also states that “and neither before nor after [Hezekiah] was there anyone like him among all the kings of Judah.” Unlike Solomon, Hezekiah observed the commandments and thus, “the LORD was with him, and he succeeded in all he set out to do” (2 Kgs 18:7). Therefore, the Deuteronomistic History looks favorably upon kings, since the need for a king is stated multiple times in Judges, and kings like David and Hezekiah are looked upon with favor by God and the people
...hard to understand fully because of its comprehensive metaphoric language and the difference in culture from present day. It is also sometimes hard for us to understand God's actions because we think of him simply loving and caring rather than ruthless and violent. We need to understand that the creation of mankind is taking place in the recordings of these scriptures and so things may not be as customary as we would like to think. I believe that God has a plan for everyone. And, in the case of Saul, he had a plan to take away his kingdom in order to pass it on to David so the formation of history could continue. I also think this passage, like many other passages from the Bible, has a message linked to it, a lesson to the story if you will. The lesson is to prove that God's unlimited power must never be taken for granted or there surely will be hell to pay.
The Drama of Shakespeare: Act 3, Scene 1 There are many techniques in which Shakespeare uses in order to make Act 3 Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet dramatic. This scene is dramatic as there is a case of two deaths of young men. The scene opens with Mercutio in an argumentative (belligerent) mood because Romeo had abandoned them at a Capulet's party in a previous scene which he had become agitated by and tries to aggravate Benvolio into a fight. Shakespeare uses the weather to indicate the dramatic atmosphere.
King David secured the beginnings of a prosperous Israelite empire; he made Jerusalem its capital and brought the Ark of the Covenant there with the hopes of building the First Great Temple for his people. However, it would be his son, King Solomon who would be the one to accomplish this. The Great Temple housed the Ark of the Covenant and also had places to make offerings. Having been nomadic, this temple finally gave the Israelites a stabile place to worship. In fact, the text World Religions by Mary Pat Fisher says that the Israelites looked at this Great Temple as “a central stationary place where God would be most present to them” (Fisher 250). This Temple was a beacon of hope and a place to go where they knew that they would be closer to God.
Moses is the speaker now, and he says that God made a covenant with them at Horeb. Additionally, he says that last time they would not go up the mountain because they were afraid of the fire. Then, Moses repeats the Decalogue to the Israelites, and he explains that they were written on two stone tablets. Here the third commandment differs from Exodus. Instead of Remember the Sabbath, it states “Observe the sabbath day and keep it holy as the Lord your God commanded you.” (Deut 5:12). In comparison, observe has a more commanding connotation. Furthermore, at the end of the first line of the commandment the text adds as “your God commanded you” (Deut. 5:12,). This sets a more domineering tone and implies that the Israelites will not follow unless commanded. Another key distinction occurs when the texts are describing why one must follow the Sabbath commandment. The text reminds the Israelites that they were once slaves in Egypt and that “God brought [them] out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm” (Deut 5:15). Here God is guilt-tripping the Israelites into following the Sabbath by reminding them of what God did for them in their relationship. Thus, it seems that in Deuteronomy God is attempting to invoke fear in order to convince the Israelites to follow. Nonetheless, Deuteronomy is not only based on the Israelites following God out of fear. It also states that they will change their reasoning to aspire to be similar to God, like Exodus. For instance, when asked what would they tell their children when asked why they follow the Decalogue, they should say that if we follow it “as he has commanded us, we will be in the right.” (Deut 6:25). This indicates that after they followed out of fear that they changed their reasoning to be aspirational. Moses concludes with how they should follow the commandments
In Gibeon the LORD appeared to Solomon in a dream by night: and God said, Ask what I shall give thee.
1 Samuel is presented in the form of a narrative account of the life and contributions of Samuel. Like most of the bible, scholars have tried to determine the author, date of writing, purpose of the text and the historical and chronological order of events. The author is unknown. Some scholars believe Zabud, son of the prophet Nathan, a priest and the “personal adviser'; to King Solomon, wrote the text shortly after Solomon’s death. Others believe Samuel himself wrote the text, while some scholars believe the priest, Ahimaaz, was the author. Most do agree that the composition and editing took place in several stages over a considerable period of time.
This is because the Judean and Assyrian kings were against the work of Deuteronomists, which was the central focus of Joshua in his efforts to make one “central shrine” in Jerusalem where all could gather to worship the Lord. Joshua had to wait until the kings fell out of power before his work could be available. Joshua and the Deuteronomists determine that the shrine will be located in Jerusalem, whereas the The Book of Deuteronomy does not make reference to a central shrine being located in Jerusalem. This inconsistency caused for the higher critics to determine that the central shrine would have already been created when the author was writing this because the Deuteronomy or any books before it do not
In his interpretation of the reading the tribes of Israel come to David and want him to take over their home and say he has been the “one” even when Saul was king. David then soon becomes king and in his reading he omits the scenes of Jerusalem being overruled. Brueggemann’s writing rather suggests that the ending of the narrative is already known. On the other hand McCarter’s writings do fit within the boundaries of Deuteronomistic history. He refers to it as a single event and compares David’s rise to an Deuteronomistic expansion from old narratives. It is opposite of Brueggemann’s talk of David’s reign under a monarchy, because periods of monarchies was not part of the original framework of Samuel and Kings. Also as told in DtrH David’s home is found in Hebron and that is where they came to him, opposed to his new home being
The bible recounts the story of the great King Solomon, the son of the notable King David. By following God and his commandments, David had built his empire into a legacy, which was then passed on to Solomon. Soon after Solomon’s reign began, the Lord appeared to him in a dream, offering him anything he desired. Solomon’s request was wisdom and knowledge, so that he may govern his people fairly, and know the difference between good and the bad.