Participation Trophies Send A Dangerous Message Summary

957 Words2 Pages

Imagine finishing in second place or not even making it into the quarterfinals, and then someone is handing out trophies to everyone anyway. This would give these people the wrong idea that they don’t need to win, since they’ll get rewarded either way. In the article, “Participation Trophies Send a Dangerous Message” by Betty Berden, she lists the cons of distributing participation trophies to younger people such as reducing competition, making winning less important, and giving off the misunderstanding that everyone is a winner. These are important factors to consider when deciding if it should be practiced. But according to some people, the only definitive positive is that handing out these awards grants a boost in self-esteem for younger …show more content…

Previously mentioned, participation awards being handed out to everyone cause winnings to diminish in value. The entire point of winning a tournament or any competition is to be rewarded with a trophy or award that is tangible to a specific person. If everybody were to receive a trophy regardless of the circumstances, this would reduce the incentive for winning. To put into perspective, these participation trophies are being “handed out like candy to every child” and as such it causes kids to not hold any attachment to the trophy because it is not special. They will lose admiration for a trophy; it will not evoke any memorable moments or major accomplishments because it is just a useless trophy for losers. Since every competitor receives awards whether they win or lose, it “makes winning not as important.” As such, this practice can be very damaging to the competitive aspect of these youth tournaments. Furthermore, these prizes mislead younger competitors into thinking they are also winners despite being losers. Some …show more content…

Kids need to compete and aim for first place, and when they lose, they must hold accountability. This is a natural element everywhere in the world because competition is what drives people to surpass and innovate. Without an incentive for competition, evolution will come to a halt. If the competitive nature were to be removed, it would be the same as robbing the kids of the brighter future they would have achieved by overcoming obstacles. Even though “self-esteem is a big part of one’s childhood”, kids should also be taught to perform under conditions where they are not always confident or energetic. During later stages of life, people don’t always operate at a hundred percent every day, and it is not expected of them either. Despite this, people still get up and start their shift or they get up and head to early morning classes. Emotions should not be a factor that determines how a person performs, and the youth should be taught this earlier on to prevent a future wall. In addition to this, people also argue that participation trophies are given out as if it’s “acknowledging their effort”, and it is supposed to make kids feel like they haven’t done this all for nothing. This logic is flawed because even if someone attended university for ten plus years and obtained a master’s degree, they

Open Document