Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ownership and the development of self
Ownership and self identity
Ownership and self identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ownership and the development of self
An intense relationship exists between ownership and sense of self. For many years, philosophers have explored what ownership means. Does it include only tangible goods or does it extend beyond items to include tangible things as well? As twentieth-century philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre proposed, I also believe that ownership of intangible things such as one’s actions, thoughts, ideas, and skills are more directly involved in developing one’s sense of self. Humans are constantly changing beings. Therefore, one’s true identity cannot be found through what they physically own; it can only be discovered from what goes through their head and their heart each day. I take ownership for my choices, my skills, and my beliefs because they reflect my …show more content…
However, there are certain things that will always tell me who I am becoming if I am ever unsure of myself. I have an intense passion for helping others. Towards the end of last year I decided to act upon this passion, and with the help others, I started a project to raise money for a library to be assembled in Malawi, Africa. I truly believe in helping those that are less fortunate. My belief in this project has taught me that helping people is part of who I am. I now view it as a very important part of my identity that I believe has been gained through the ownership of my beliefs and actions. To own something is to be confident in your choices, actions, beliefs, and passions. As Sartre argued, taking ownership of these things is what leads to the development of self identity. When I am confident in my choices and actions, I am confident that I know who I am, but when my confidence wavers, my sense of self falters as well due to the intimate relationship between the two. I have discovered through this relationship that because I take ownership of my choices and actions, the only true way to tell who I am becoming is to reflect upon
This is our home … . This is your house, Golden One, and ours, and it belongs to no other men whatever as far as the earth may stretch. We shall not share it with others, as we share not our joy with them, nor our love, nor our hunger (91).” In this scene, Equality realizes for the first time the meaning of property and possession. It had always been taught to him that everything of his was his brothers’ as well, but now he discovers that he can, in fact, lay claim to things that belong to no others. Why should he share his joy? It is his, for he worked strenuously to make it his. Why should he share his love? It belongs to no other man, for the “Golden One” loves him for who he is, not who his brothers are. This fundamental value of owning is something that is essential to freedom, as Equality later describes. He says, “there is nothing to take a man’s freedom away from him, save other men (101),” meaning that as long as a man is bound to other men, he will never be truly free. To Ayn Rand, freedom of thought, speech, emotion, and behavior are essential to the human experience, and the only limits on these freedoms are the limits that men force upon them. In this way, a man that is free from his brothers possesses all other freedoms because there are none to snatch them from his eager
ownership as a "sacred trust and a great privilege" in which the owner had responsibilities
It is one sad existence, to live and die, without discovering, what could have been. The question is often asked, what is the meaning of life? Or even, what is the purpose? There is no clear answer, and yet there is a search in every moment, every breath, and every corner, for a minute hint. In a societal setting, identity is merely determined by the amount of tangible things owned. Society places the ideology on individuals that those who own the most tangible things are above others. An individual can trump all those societal values by owning the self. This brings equality to all, and levels the playing field. This has been true throughout history, however behind all of this, there are individuals learning to conquer themselves. It begs the question, what defines a person, the physical or the metaphysical? There is obviously a compelling relationship between ownership and the sense of self or identity. But, is it ownership that determines the sense of self or is it perhaps, that the sense of self determines ownership. The
There are countless people who aspire to help people in their lives. However, if you think about it, nearly every career helps others in some way, shape, or form. Teachers, scientists, policemen and various other careers aid people in different ways. I, like many others, have always known that I’ve wanted to help people. Yet, I also want to do more than that. I want to help others, but also save others- emotionally or physically, mentor others, inspire others, and be there for others during their most vulnerable times. This is who I am- and I have always been this person. In first grade, I ran a lemonade stand at my school for the Make-A-Wish Foundation; I got my third grade class to raise money for starving children; and I put up with bullying throughout middle school because I befriended a girl who had trouble making friends on her own. The quality of pure selflessness and care for others that I have always possessed would allow me to do something great with my life- it just took me some time to figure out what.
This essay has covered the concept of practical identities and their unique characteristic of contingency as well as the foundation of all value in our actions that all rational beings have- moral identity. Reflecting on these ideas, one can relate to the conception of practical identities or moral identity. However, the suggestion of their contingency or non-contingency and their importance in one’s life is questionable. One is led to wonder what the real source of value in one’s action is and the real weight of practical and moral identities in one’s
In order to decide whether the term "owning" helps develop your moral character, you must first figure out what owning something means to you. To me, "owning something" applies to not only the tangible, like a shirt, but also the intangible, like knowing something so well you own it, or even owning a behavior.
Ownership is the act, state, or right of possessing something. Many people believe taking ownership is parallel to taking responsibility. In some cases, taking responsibility can be rewarding, but in other cases, it can be very self centered. According to Aristotle, ownership of tangible objects leads to develop moral character, even though it is not stated whether those morals are good or bad. Plato exaggerates how disparaging ownership can be to one's character and life. The affect ownership obtains on moral character is intensely detrimental.
Ownership is a claim living things make which expresses possession. It is a natural instinct to stake your claim, or in other words ‘mark your territory’, thus the action is highly visible in our lives. Ownership is commonly thought of in relation to possession of physical objects, but it can also relate to the possession of skills or ideas, a concept contemplated by philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. The phenomenon of ownership has varying outcomes; in some cases possession brings forth unpleasant greed and malice. But at other times claiming objects or ideas increases personal pride, and increases ability, knowledge and camaraderie. Aristotle agrees with this, and theorizes that owning something positive boosts personal character. Contrastingly,
It could be assumed that having is the normal orientation in which people live their life by in the modern societies of Europe or North America. Erich Fromm stated, "To acquire, to own, and to make a profit are the sacred and unalienable rights of the individual in the industrial society" (From 1976:57). Fromm is clearly explaining that to have and to own is the dominant norm and having is related to an individual. Being individualistic is inherent to having because only one can have ownership. If having is shared, it loses its individualistic characteristic. The having orientation is the belief that to be fulfilled in life is sole ownership over a physical object(s) or in-tangibles such as ideas, thoughts or in some cases people. To further explain, the having orientation of physical property, ownership over objects is the ability to hold, possess, and be in control of. Ownership of intangibles is more an abs...
To be responsible for the decisions that one makes and to choose the path one takes sounds like a great wish to be granted. However, Sartre believes that within this wish lies a deep curse in which we are condemned to the aftermath of what freedom of choice gets us. “We are left alone, without excuse. That is what I mean when I say that man is condemned to be free. Condemned, because he did not create himself, yet is nevertheless at liberty, and from the moment that he is thrown into this world he is responsible for everything he does” (Sartre). Every decision we make after being thrust i...
The concept of self-ownership was developed when philosophers such as John Locke began contemplating about human rights. The concept states that individuals are entitled to and in control of their own bodies. This is significant because it means that no one should be a slave. “By nature we are free and independent beings, not subjected to parental authority or the divine rights of kings. Since we are by nature all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and be subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent.”(Right Thing To Do, pg. 214) Owning one’s body means that the person can do what he or she desires with their abilities and talents. “According to this argument, all citizens have a duty to serve their country.” (Right Thing to Do, pg.
...being able to control ourselves can allow us to “lead a free and fulfilled human life” (p.86).
...may be the sole means of holding on to one's identity and receiving true freedom.
The general focus of this paper is to examine this notorious ‘possession’ adage, particularly in relation to the title or ownership of choses in possession, that is, tangible items of property. More specifically, this paper will define and analyse the true meaning of the phrase ‘possession is nine-tenths of the law’ and how it currently fits into current property law. Furthermore, this essay will examine the different categories of possession leading on to the common law of ‘finder’s keepers’ discussing competing claims of ownership and superior possessory right to choses in possession. Finally, this paper will look at the policy justifications that underscore the decisions of the law of ‘finder’s keeper’s’.
What one owns should be theirs legally and rightfully. Their ideas, their creations, inventions, models, any designs modeled by them should rightfully belong to them and this is enabled through various forms of intellectual property rights including patents, industrial design rights, copyright, trade dress, trademarks, and geographical indications.