Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self identity and ownership
Self identity and ownership
Self identity and ownership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self identity and ownership
Ownership is a claim living things make which expresses possession. It is a natural instinct to stake your claim, or in other words ‘mark your territory’, thus the action is highly visible in our lives. Ownership is commonly thought of in relation to possession of physical objects, but it can also relate to the possession of skills or ideas, a concept contemplated by philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. The phenomenon of ownership has varying outcomes; in some cases possession brings forth unpleasant greed and malice. But at other times claiming objects or ideas increases personal pride, and increases ability, knowledge and camaraderie. Aristotle agrees with this, and theorizes that owning something positive boosts personal character. Contrastingly, …show more content…
Plato feels possession harms character when it relates to tangible objects. Bringing forth greed and intensifying materialism, possessive ownership hinders life.
The desire to claim items and ideas brings forth egotistical and territorial qualities. Prioritizing the need to achieve ownership of materials above other aspects of life is detrimental to one’s character. In Into the Wild Chris McCandless’ parents devote their lives to earning money, molding them into greedy and short-tempered individuals. Over time this contributes to Chris’ disappearance. The sole objective of gaining wealth overtook them, preventing a fully balanced lifestyle. The innate need for possession, or more specifically money, leads to the surfacing of anger and greed. If ownership was not emphasized in society, these qualities would not be present. Not only does establishing dominance over resources cause hostility, but it deters from alternate aspects of life including family, community, education, and overall well-being. Obsessing over ownership promotes unhealthy greed. During the Space Race, countries competed to claim galactic objects. Creating enemies, hostilities, and anger, this battle forced nations to focus only on themselves rather than maintaining a global outlook. Focus shifted from serious issues of poverty and hunger to the
unnecessary desire of earning the coveted ‘first in space’ title. People become so fixated on claiming their own ideas and items that nothing else in their lives has any significance. This craze induces selfishness, being that ownership is mainly personal. Greed through ownership has existed since the beginning of mankind. Adam and Eve supposedly began the widespread obsession with possession. Adam was told not to eat from a certain bush but, wanting to own what he wasn’t supposed to, ate from the forbidden bush. Highlighting innate human evil, this biblical tale expresses the instinctive egotism resulting from the need to claim objects for yourself. Humans express negative qualities when ownership is emphasized due to worry that their possession may be taken away. When one’s ownership is threatened, undesirable qualities emerge due to a sense of entitlement and fear of losing the claim to an object or idea. American society promotes materialistic ownership, distracting from the righteous purpose of existence. Although abstract ownership exists, that of literal objects is more prevalent. The nationwide need for possession has occurred unendingly since our country was formed. A period exemplifying worthless ownership is the 1920’s. The novel The Great Gatsby depicts this era and the negativity associated with tangible ownership. Jay Gatsby, the protagonist, lives a lavish lifestyle consisting of much excess; he hosts over-the-top parties, owns an opulent mansion and many vehicles. Socially, he is a desirable man, but he ultimately comes to represent the meaningless significance of wealth. An infatuation with wealth is considered the proper lifestyle according to societal norm, but will yield no truly rewarding results. Nevertheless, the United States continually focuses on tangible ownership. In today’s society, young people feel pressured to fit in, and material possessions are the ticket to popularity. Kohler is no exception; here kids must wear the hippest clothing, have the most high-tech cell phone and, if they are really desperate, utilize alcohol and drugs to find friends. These are all physical objects which overtake the lives of young people and distract them from school, family, religion, and even personal health. Corruption in society stems from a desperate need to have the same as, or more than, what others have. In today’s world the technology, clothing, and general surplus of materials is the most sought after. Unlike a majority of American youth, Christopher McCandless frowned upon ownership of materials. Into the Wild details his story; Chris ridded himself of his possessions, including his guitar, money, and car in an effort to live off the land rather than rely on anything manmade. Chris protested the material dependence and need for possession which consumes our society. American lives revolve around what ‘things’ will improve one’s personal image, taking away from more substantial topics such as improving the environment, mental health, or diminishing violence. The action of claiming something as your own includes the real or imaginary. Possessorship helps and hinders humans. Unfortunately, the bad outweighs the good. Ownership of visible and invisible matter deteriorates personal character, restrains success, and damages society altogether. The American infatuation with material objects consumes lives, taking away from more meaningful causes. Seen especially in adolescents, tangible possessions are required to lead a socially acceptable existence. Gatsby’s superfluous lifestyle is worshipped by members of society, but he lacks any true purpose. Chris McCandless denounces material ownership, allowing him to live a more fulfilling existence. Life should be spent concerning yourself with personal happiness, beliefs, the needs of others, and cultural issues rather than achieving more substance than others simply for bragging rights. Competition stemming from possession generates self absorption and animosity. The Space Race occupied national interests, causing hostilities and taking away from global tragedies. Chris’ McCandless parents spend their lives accumulating wealth; this quest brings forth aggression and harms their loved ones. The story of Adam and Eve symbolizes the greed resulting from the accumulation of possessions and the territorial nature associated with it. The human need to acquire and retain items as well as knowledge overtakes a personality, creating unhealthy selfishness and malice. It is human nature to desire and covet ownership of the tangible and intangible, even if the consequences are undesired. Earning possession is something that cannot be prevented. Ownership and its grim repercussions will always be part of society, no matter what.
Although it may be true that Chris McCandles was stubborn, people should consider that he had family problems, he loved nature and he also had an adventurous spirit. I believe that the motives that led him to the wild were family problems and emotional damage as well as his love of nature and his adventurous spirit. In Chris’s journal it seemed like he had lived for 113 days in that “magic bus” but in his last days he had written that “death looms” and that he was “too weak to walk out”. There are many evidence that connect with family problems as well as his adventurous spirit. As I go on with this essay I will state my theory on why Chris was led into the wild as well as evidence that support my claim.
Throughout Into the Wild, Krakauer portrays Christopher McCandless as an infallibly eager young man hoping to distance himself from the society he so obviously loathes, to "live off the land," entirely independent of a world which has "conditioned [itself] to a life of security." Chris, contrarily to this depiction, is disparagingly viewed by some as a "reckless idiot" who lacked the sense he needed to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This derogatory assessment of Chris's mindset is representative of the society he hopes to escape and contains all the ignorance that causes him to feel this way. Nevertheless, he is misjudged by these critics, allowing Krakauer to hold the more accurate interpretation of Chris's character, his goals, and his accomplishments.
government was a corrupt, greedy pig commanding people to obey the rules of society. Yet, he
Why is that money and power can changes an individual’s personality? Well, when some humans see something desirable and valuable that doesn’t belong to them, they will go to a great extent to have it. Whether, that is stealing, lying or even killing loved ones. This is simply described as greed. Greed and ambition is a common theme in both Shakespeare’s tragic play, Macbeth and the movie “A Simple Plan”. They both share the concept of wanting something and committing crime after crime to achieve it. Similarly, the main characters in both stories become greedy after finding something valuable and their spouse encourages them further. Once in control, the main characters are willing to do anything to keep possession, even if it means to kill love ones.
It is like a tag on a shirt that keeps bothering your tender skin, it is the reason why you rip the tag off and make your own choices while walking into the unknown land of the wilderness, striving for the adventure that has dire consequences if executed improperly. Walking the unknown land of Hades abyss might have taken the sensitive life of one man, but it was done in a blaze of glory with no regrets. This man of course is Christopher McCandless in the book, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, which is based on a true story. In the book, McCandless strives for the cold Alaskan journey into the wild to satisfy his final thirst for the wilderness but tragedy strikes and it ends by him losing the most valuable thing to him, his life. Chris McCandless had exceptional reasons for vacating the life he lived which are also justified; he was also was not foolish for leaving that life and the outcome of his journey was a triumph and not a tragedy.
Assessment of the Statement that Property is a Power Relationship Between People Property is the right to possess, enjoy or use a determinant thing, and includes the right of excluding others from doing the same. The concept of ownership or property has no single or widely accepted definition. Like any other concept it has great weight in public discourse and the popular usage varies broadly. Property is frequently conceived as a 'bundle of rights and obligations.' Property is stressed as not a relationship between people and things, but a relationship between people with regard to things.
I take ownership to include unrestricted private use of an object. Of course my definition excludes the possibility of owning a
According to Aristotle, ownership of tangible goods can help to develop one’s moral character. I agree with his philosophy. Owning an object or other goods helps one to discover certain virtues, such as responsibility or purpose in caring for what you own. All objects you own, you must acquire, either through purchasing or through gift. Depending on how you acquire the object, defines its value, either monetary or sentimental. These different values help to develop one’s sense of self, as one grows as a person and develops one’s moral character. By learning these important skills, such as responsibility and purpose, one has a better understanding of oneself.
Chris McCandless left his mark on the world and should be respected for being brave enough to challenge himself like this. McCandless went to Alaska searching for adventure and to live off the land. He wanted something more in life. When he went into the Alaskan wilderness , McCandless overcame so many obstacles than the average person wouldn't be able to handle. He was prepared and had all the skills he needed to survive in the wild. McCandless kept fighting against all odds and never gave up on fulfilling his dreams. He deserves more respect and admiration than he got.
Christopher McCandless of Jon Krakauer’s into the wild was a complex character with very strong convictions. Christopher stood very firmly by his beliefs no matter what people thought of him or his ideas. Christopher felt very strongly about social issues and not getting caught up in material wealth, not letting the things you own control your life and how you live it. A quote from Christopher McCandless that shows how strongly he felt about it is. “So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation because they are conditioned to a life of security, conformity, and conservatism, all of which may appear to give one peace of mind, but in reality nothing is more damaging to the adventurous spirit within a man than a secure future.”
It could be assumed that having is the normal orientation in which people live their life by in the modern societies of Europe or North America. Erich Fromm stated, "To acquire, to own, and to make a profit are the sacred and unalienable rights of the individual in the industrial society" (From 1976:57). Fromm is clearly explaining that to have and to own is the dominant norm and having is related to an individual. Being individualistic is inherent to having because only one can have ownership. If having is shared, it loses its individualistic characteristic. The having orientation is the belief that to be fulfilled in life is sole ownership over a physical object(s) or in-tangibles such as ideas, thoughts or in some cases people. To further explain, the having orientation of physical property, ownership over objects is the ability to hold, possess, and be in control of. Ownership of intangibles is more an abs...
What does it mean to own something? The book definition of "own" is, "something belonging to oneself or itself." (Dictionary) Ownership is a common part of life today in many forms. We own all kinds of stuff and continue to get more. But what does it really mean to own something? Does it mean you payed for it so therefore it's yours? Does it mean you have some kind of connection to that certain thing so you believe to have ownership over it? Or does it even mean that by using the tern "ownership", you own something? People believe ownership to mean many different things. Personally, I believe that it means it is something close to you that belongs to you. I also think that ownership has a lot to do with how you feel about that certain thing. People have many different views and ideas of ownership today.
...lue and having artificial value really changed the amount of power they felt. Research from Stanford shows that the more money people have, the more addictive it is. This causes a problem when people try to obtain items with emotional value, but end up getting caught up in money.
...y are bombarded from birth that they should desire and pursue money, power, fame, and success. Without achieving these goals they are seen as failures. Strain theories have shown that placing too much emphasis on individual success and the pursuit of happiness through the accumulation of power and wealth, can lead to an increase in crime.
While some extremists do claim to neither own nor desire any material possessions, humans usually tend to feel the need to have many. The need for material wealth has to do with the need to show off one’s accomplishments. In other words, when a person has lots of material wealth, it usually means that he or she has an important job position that pays well enough for he or she to afford these items. For example, a dishwasher at a fast food restaurant could not afford a flashy sports car while a lawyer or doctor could probably afford a couple of them. Owning material possessions basically makes people feel good about themselves because it gives them a way to compare their accomplishments with others.