Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character traits of chris mccandless essay
Character traits of christopher mccandless
The journey of chris mccandless
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character traits of chris mccandless essay
The Lost and Confused Christopher McCandless
Christopher McCandless, a born hypocrite, was seeking the wilderness’ wild and
untamed freedom to find his true potential. Chris was born in a middle class and loving family.
He had amazing talent and was very bright. His family thought he would have an amazing future,
even when he was a teenager. Yet, Chris abandoned his family and his social life to walk into the
wilderness. Chris searched for a life without the stress of money or government laws. When
Chris went into the wild, he didn’t seem to grasp the freedom or the beauty he was searching for.
McCandless didn’t fit into the society or the wilderness by the way his personality always
contrasted itself, meaning that Chris’s erratic personality
…show more content…
ultimately lead to his tragic death. McCandless’s personality first started to contract when he was a teenager. “Only once did he receive a grade lower that B: an F, in high school physics… lab reports had to be written in a particular format to grading them a manageable proposition. Chris thought it was a stupid rule and decided to ignore it” (p. 104). Chris is an idealistic, bright kid with a lot of potential. Yet, he couldn’t follow this one simple task because he thought it was a stupid rule. He spent all the time doing the lab reports and turning them in, but his pride wouldn't allow five extra minutes to do the reports in the correct format. “Chris had so much natural talent… but if you tried to coach him, to polish his skill, to bring out that final ten percent, a wall went up” (p. 111). Chris had motivation and talent for everything. But, when someone tried to help, he would become stubborn. He was so prideful with his natural talent that he wouldn’t listen to anybody but his intuition. “Chris didn’t understand how people could possibly be allowed to go hungry” (p. 113). Chris would spend his teenage years driving to the poorest area and would pass out food to the homeless. Chris was a Republican, yet most of his social issues are the main social issues that the Democrats are trying to fix within this country; for example, Chris would complain about racism, world hunger, and the inequalities of the distribution of wealth in America. McCandless was a bright , idealistic kid, however, he was also stubborn, selfish, and would express his opposing party topics. Even Chris's journey would show how broken his personality is. “London fervent condemnation of capitalist society, his glorification of the primordial world, his championing of the great unwashedall if it mirrored McCandless’s passions… McCandless conveniently overlooked the fact that London himself had spent just a single winter in the North and that he’d died by his own hand on his California estate at the age of forty, a fatuous drunk, obese and pathetic, maintaining a sedentary existence that bore scant resemblance to the ideas he espoused in print” (p.44) Jack London was a hypocrite; his writings were just works of fictions. Chris idolized that hypocritical liar and went searching for the ‘truths’ that even Jack London couldn’t find.
“McCandless gave his parents’ Annandale address when the arresting officer demanded to
know his permanent place or residence” (p.31). McCandless believed that money and the
government was a corrupt, greedy pig commanding people to obey the rules of society. Yet, he
went against those beliefs and submitted to the officer. “The entries in McCandless’s journal
contain few abstractions about wilderness or, for that matter, few ruminations of any kind”
(p.139). Chris, was seeking the wild freedom, yet when he got there, it seemed to have hardly
phased him. He was mostly recording what he ate or what animal he killed. There was barely
anything about the beauty of Alaska. McCandless spent his whole life imagining there were
more offered in the wilderness; however, once he arrived he wouldn’t live the way he wanted to
truly wanted.
Chris’s personality affected everyone around him: his parents, friends, and even
himself. Walt McCandless said, “How is it that a kid with so much compassion could cause his
parents so much pain?” (p.104). Chris had a wonderful family, however he abandoned them
when all they ever wanted to do was to help him. They, Walt, Billie, and Carine, only wanted
Chris to be happy and wished him the best. Chris wrote in a letter to Ronald Franz, “You
are wrong if you think that Joy emanates only or principally from human relationships… My point is that you do not need me or anyone else around to bring this kind of light in your life” (p. 57). Franz finished the letter and drastically changed his life; all because of Chris. Chris thought that joy comes from everything around him; for example, the outdoors, living on his own, and wandering freely without restrictions. However, before Chris died he realized the truth, “Happiness only real when shared” (p.189). Happiness is not found in material things or the outdoors. Happiness is bringing joy to one’s friends and family, having fun with people, and growing up surrounded by loved ones. Chris searched for happiness when he had it all around him but he never realized it. Chris, was a lost soul. He went out looking for the truth and pleasure in nature's beauty, yet he never grasped the blissful people that surrounded him; Jan Burrus, Mr. Westerberg, Ronald Franz, Chris’s parents, and Cairine all loved Chris. People make mistakes but Chris would be stubborn and wouldn’t forgive them. He, once, was a child filled with wonder and hope, although, when he grew up he lost that hope and turned against society. Chris didn’t fit in society or the wilderness; his pride overtook everything he did. He thought he was smarter and wiser than everyone in high school and college. In the wilderness, he believed he was prepared for anything that came in his way. In the end, Chris realized that people aren't the criminals, people bring exilation and great pleasure to one’s life.
Chris McCandless was a young man who did everything in his power to try and represent that freedom he was searching for. McCandless had everything before we went out but he decided to go out and travel by choice. He was considered a selfish man because when someone offered him to help him he rejects it in a nice way since we wants to do things himself. In the book Into the wild he states that,"You don't need to worry about me. I have a college education. I'm not destitute. I'm living like this by choice."
Kleinfeld tries to categorize Chris McCandless as a hero, dumb jerk, or soul searcher. She uses pathos as well as blatantly stating her opinion to achieve her goal. In Jon Krakauer’s book Into the Wild we see many aspects of Chris McCandless that both support and contradicts these categorizations given by Kleinfeld. Jon Krakauer shows us every aspect of Chris McCandless’s journey as well as his life before, by doing this Krakauer shows Chris McCandless is not just one category, he is not any category at all. Kleinfeld’s condescending tone expresses the lack of heroism she sees in McCandless. (Adjust thesis to fit new purpose).
Chris was unique compared to others, but he was not insane in any sense of the word. He led a journey to Alaska based on emotional reasons and motivations. Chris went into the wild looking for freedom and answers to his questions. Ultimately, Chris found what he was looking for emotionally and went to leave the wild, but in an unfortunate turn of events and a lack of preparedness, Chris mistimed his departure and was stuck in the wild. Eventually, because of his lack of local knowledge and resources, Chris never left the Alaskan wilderness
Although it may be true that Chris McCandles was stubborn, people should consider that he had family problems, he loved nature and he also had an adventurous spirit. I believe that the motives that led him to the wild were family problems and emotional damage as well as his love of nature and his adventurous spirit. In Chris’s journal it seemed like he had lived for 113 days in that “magic bus” but in his last days he had written that “death looms” and that he was “too weak to walk out”. There are many evidence that connect with family problems as well as his adventurous spirit. As I go on with this essay I will state my theory on why Chris was led into the wild as well as evidence that support my claim.
Throughout Into the Wild, Krakauer portrays Christopher McCandless as an infallibly eager young man hoping to distance himself from the society he so obviously loathes, to "live off the land," entirely independent of a world which has "conditioned [itself] to a life of security." Chris, contrarily to this depiction, is disparagingly viewed by some as a "reckless idiot" who lacked the sense he needed to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This derogatory assessment of Chris's mindset is representative of the society he hopes to escape and contains all the ignorance that causes him to feel this way. Nevertheless, he is misjudged by these critics, allowing Krakauer to hold the more accurate interpretation of Chris's character, his goals, and his accomplishments.
“Don’t judge a book by it’s cover, it’s what’s inside counts” This quote reminds people about how they should not judge other people from the outside but look deep into their true personalities. Looking from the appearance and how Chris lives, everyone would assume that Chris is a crazy, foolish person and does everything without thinking. If people try to know more about Chris, they would have different perspective. Chris is intelligent, determined, independent and follows what he believes. He went into the wilderness to escape from the society that tries to suppress him and look for the meaning of life.
Ultimate freedom is an odyssey everyone, at least once in their lifetime, tries to conquer. Chris McCandless did everything in his power to try and capture that freedom he was searching for. He ultimately gave up his own life during that quest. Did he find what he was searching for? We may never know. Very many people have diverse opinions on this character. Chris McCandless was not selfish. He was a young, well-educated boy. His parents handed him everything on a silver platter; he wanted to prove not only to himself but to everyone else he could do things on his own. His possessions did not define who he was as a person. He thought towards everyone else he was just another brick in the wall, a pretty rich boy, and that did not “fly” with him. He had to prove his worth.
... every aspect of his life whether it be his education, physical endurance, or making it through the Alaskan wilderness with nothing more than a rifle, a backpack, and a road map. Chris was aware of his differences and that he did not fit into society. He fully embraced that and and chose to lead his own path. Chris led a happy life according to one of his last journal entries he wrote, “I have had a happy life and thank the lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!” (Krakauer 199). Chris was willing to risk everything to gain that happiness. His ambition to enter the wilderness, in the end, took his life but that did not stop him. He would have rather died a happy man than lived a miserable one. Chris ventured out into the wilderness and found himself; a tragic story for a tragic hero.
Living in the wilderness is difficult, but understanding the meaning of such lifestyle is even more difficult. One of the Christopher’s admirable qualities was that he was well aware of what he was doing. He knew about the difficulties and dangers that he would face into the wilderness, and was mentally prepared for that. Author Jon Krakauer says that “McCandless was green, and he overestimated his resilience, but he was sufficiently skilled to last for sixteen weeks on little more than his wits and ten pounds of rice. And he was fully aware when he entered the bush that he had given himself a perilously slim margin for error. He knew precisely what was at stake” (182). McCandless was an educated youth, who loved nature and dreamed of living in the Alaskan wilderness. Although he ignored to take many necessary things with him on this
To begin with, McCandless’s decision to walk into the wild was acceptable because he wanted to become an inspiration and an individual. Emerson states, “There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance: that imitation is suicide” (Emerson). Chris McCandless left to shun the conformist society that he could feel changing him. Chris wanted the chains that bound him to be broken. Society takes the individual and locks it up and destroys it. According to Emerson, “It is easy in the world to live after the world’s opinion: it is easy to in solitude to live after our own: but the great man is he who in the midst of the crow keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude” (Emerson). McCandless left his materialistic family to be his own person ad to be unique. The world’s opinion does not make the man wh...
was and found happiness in his life. In general, Chris knew that the only way he could
Chris McCandless was still just a young man when he decided to drastically alter his life through the form of a child’s foolishness. However, Chris had not known at the time just how powerful his testimony against his father’s authority, society, or maybe even his own lifestyle was going to be revolutionary throughout not only Alaska,not even the lower 48, but the world. The story of Chris McCandless is a much talked about debate on topics of safety and preparedness in the wild, these things forever associated with the boy who was a little too eager for a death wish. Today, Chris is remember as a fool or a hero. The fool, a boy who allowed himself to be drowned in a fictional world inspired by his readings,dying because he ignored he was just a normal human being or the hero who set out to become something more.
All in all, it is interesting how the trials of life can lead a person into an awakening that inspires millions. Many people believe that walking “into the wild” to live off the land and find himself alone in nature was arrogant, foolish and irresponsible. Chris lacks of knowledge about the wild was a major factor in his death. Chris did not plan how he will survive in the wilderness without proper equipments. He misunderstood that he would have no problem in setting in the wild. Chris immature manner and decisions lead him to starvation and ultimately death. If he planned it out in the beginning he would have saved his life.
2. On page 107, “He could be alone without being lonely.” Chris adored being alone, away from other people. It seems rational that this attitude was a basis of his later journey where he was unaccompanied for months. On page 109 “Chris was fearless even when he was little.” Chris wouldn’t have lived alone in the Alaskan wilderness for that long if he was frightened. At
...e wilderness.” Krakauer stats this in the book to explain what Chris was up against walking into the wilderness. No ordinary man would do this to survive out on his own facing the wilderness. Kleinfeld made an extraordinary remark in her article “McCandless: Hero or Dumb Jerk” “Jon Krakauer's best seller "Into the Wild" immortalizes this young man, who walked into the wilderness with no map, no ax, no mosquito repellent and no first aid equipment.” She makes a good statement about his bravery because not many men would go out with no supplies to make them survive. He went out by himself, no supplies and try to pull off to live in the wild.