What would you actually considered your stuff? Would you consider it being something that you can touch and show to people and prove it is yours. Well, Plato the famous astronomer, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre tell their opinions in what ownership is. For many centuries, prominent thinkers have pondered the relationship between ownership and the development of self identity. People never really think about what they own and what they have, but what do you actually own? What is actually owned what are possessions to people and to others?
Plato argues that owning something can be very damaging to someone’s character. When you own something and have control over it then it may make someone feel like they are different because of that item. “Plato argued that collective ownership was necessary to promote common pursuit of the common interest, and to avoid the social divisiveness that would occur when some grieve exceedingly and other rejoice at the same happenings”(Plato.stanford.edu). In this quote plato is saying that no matter what you got it can upset one person and make another
…show more content…
If you say that something is yours and people don’t believe you than you would have to pull it out or pull out something to prove that you are not lying. When you have it in your hand and you payed for it then therefor it is yours nobody can really take it away from you unless you have made a deal to where someone could do that. Aristotle said that “When everyone has a distinct interest, men will not complain of one another, and they will make more progress, because when everyone will be attending to his own business”(Aristotle, Politics, 1263a). In this quote aristotle has explained how people need their possessions to show who they really are and what they can do. People owning things has been a way to show others what they are like without actually meeting that person
It is often conceptualized that property is the rights of 'ownership'. In common law property is divided into real property, which is the interests in land and improvements there, and personal property, which are interests in anything other than real property. Personal property is divided into tangible property (such as a bike, car and clothse), and intangible property (such as bonds and stocks), which also includes intellectual property (copyrights, trademarks etc). The modern property rights conceive of possession and ownership as belonging to legal individuals, even if the individual is not a real person. Hence, governments, corporations and other collective forms of ownership are shown in terms of individual ownership.
I take ownership to include unrestricted private use of an object. Of course my definition excludes the possibility of owning a
According to Aristotle, ownership of tangible goods can help to develop one’s moral character. I agree with his philosophy. Owning an object or other goods helps one to discover certain virtues, such as responsibility or purpose in caring for what you own. All objects you own, you must acquire, either through purchasing or through gift. Depending on how you acquire the object, defines its value, either monetary or sentimental. These different values help to develop one’s sense of self, as one grows as a person and develops one’s moral character. By learning these important skills, such as responsibility and purpose, one has a better understanding of oneself.
Examples of such viewpoints can be found through the works of many great thinkers throughout the centuries, some dating back to 400 years BCE. A Greek philosopher who developed his viewpoint on ownership was Plato. Plato, being the student of Socrates, was very well educated in philosophical thinking, and he applied his superior knowledge to an analysis of ownership. Plato’s views on ownership entailed the idea that owning objects is detrimental to a person 's character. He believed that the possession of materialistic goods actually damaged a person’s morality. Another Ancient Greek philosopher who would apply his knowledge to the relationship of ownership was Aristotle. Aristotle was Plato’s most successful and intelligent student. Aristotle used the knowledge he had acquired from his mentor to create his own viewpoints which completely contradicted the ideas laid out by Plato. Aristotle said that ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character. In other words, Aristotle believed that the possession of materialistic goods could, in fact, help in the development of one’s moral character. One of the more recent philosophers which will be discussed is Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre believed that ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well. In this way, Sartre is working very closely with the Theory of
middle of paper ... ... The “You Own Nothing.” MasterFILE Complete. EBSCO, Oct. 2013 Web. 24 Feb. 2014
It is one sad existence, to live and die, without discovering, what could have been. The question is often asked, what is the meaning of life? Or even, what is the purpose? There is no clear answer, and yet there is a search in every moment, every breath, and every corner, for a minute hint. In a societal setting, identity is merely determined by the amount of tangible things owned. Society places the ideology on individuals that those who own the most tangible things are above others. An individual can trump all those societal values by owning the self. This brings equality to all, and levels the playing field. This has been true throughout history, however behind all of this, there are individuals learning to conquer themselves. It begs the question, what defines a person, the physical or the metaphysical? There is obviously a compelling relationship between ownership and the sense of self or identity. But, is it ownership that determines the sense of self or is it perhaps, that the sense of self determines ownership. The
In order to decide whether the term "owning" helps develop your moral character, you must first figure out what owning something means to you. To me, "owning something" applies to not only the tangible, like a shirt, but also the intangible, like knowing something so well you own it, or even owning a behavior.
To words meaning two different things have a way of relating to one another to create something new? Many things can be made to describe two simple words like ownership and identity. Ownership can be both tangible and intangible. When looking at how ownership relates to identity, people tend to look at aesthetic instead of how ownership builds moral character that leads to identity.
What is the relationship between ownership and self identity/development? This is a extremely complicated question. There are many theories trying to answer this question, such as, Plato 's claim the "owning objects is detrimental to a person 's character", whereas Aristotle argues that "ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character." To answer this question we must first ask, what is ownership? If this question is asked to friends, relatives, even strangers, we will receive many similar answers to this question. People will say something along the lines of, "the possession of an object" or "to be in control of something". However, we must then dive deeper into the question and ask ourselves, can we really possess an object if it can be taken
Owners of real, intellectual and personal property each have the same rights under the law, whether it is a physical entity or a non-physical entity. “Ownership of real property is typically complicated than that of the personal or intellectual property since the law provides for different forms of ownership, which carry different rights (Roger, 2012). First, real property is regulated by federal and state statutes as well as common law. For example, a fee simple individual that has
Property can include clothing, your car, your jewelry, your books and papers. The right to property is not the right to take it from others; this would interfere with their property rights. It is rather the right to work for it, to obtain non-coercively the money or services which you can present in voluntary exchanges. For example, depriving people of property is depriving them of the means by which they live, the freedom of the individual citizen to do what he wishes in his own life and to plan for the future. Without the right to property, the right to life itself amounts to little.
To Josh, lost property was nothing but materialistic things gathering dust on a wall, in a train station, until he realized just how much these “things” could bring people together, shown by the woman who lost something on her cardigan at the start of the novel. Josh is described to understand how the lady feels once her item was once gathered and found, free and completed. With a chapter showing that even though some items may seem unvalued to others, doesn’t mean they are the same in our own eyes. Josh’s view
"What does it mean to own something?" has been questioned for centuries and there have been many arguments as to how it affects a persons character. As philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre's states, "ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well." is very true and I am in agreeance with it. A person cannot just say that they own something because it's around them, but rather should be because they have learned it thoroughly. Whether this thing be tangible or intangible, a person must have mastered it either in its craft, or just in what the thing is, including oneself. To own oneself is more than just tangible, and sight, but sound. When people own things, it changes the person they are.
One’s personal possessions usually have value to them because they are something that a person can truly claim as his or her own. The most desirable and most valuable possession would naturally be love. With love some, but not all, desire material possessions. Last, everyone desires security to complete the last piece of the puzzle.
A person can be physically identifiable based on the matter they are composed of but their Personal Identity is far more than that. Despite any changes such as mentality and physical change, referred to as qualitatively changes, a person remains who they are. The philosophical question is, What it is to have a personal Identity? There are different theories discussing what is necessary and sufficient to define an individual's personal identity. So is there any theory that has truly capture the essence of what it is like to have a personal identity?