Maryam Syeda Afzal
Blood Relations Essay Outline
Sharon Pollock Dr. A. Rohland-Lê
Wednesday, October 22nd, 2014
I. Introduction: The play, Blood Relations by Sharon Pollock is about a thirty-four-year-old woman, Lizzie Borden, who feels trapped in a late nineteenth century society she feels she does not belong to. Lizzie has been acquitted of the murders of her father, Mr. Borden, and step-mother, Mrs. Borden. The majority of the play takes place through flashbacks as the future Lizzie and her friend, the actress, are acting out scenes from before the acquitting.
Thesis: In Sharon Pollock’s play, Blood Relations, the patriarchal society
…show more content…
in which Lizzie Borden lives, forces women to conform or, as Lizzie does through murder, rebel. Frenzy II. Mr. Borden has expectations of Lizzie which are based on the society that he lives in, and which Lizzie has trouble conforming to. a. Mr. Borden expects Lizzie to marry to Johnny MacLeod and become a mother to his children. He says “a woman of your age would be married, eh? Have children, be running her own house” (Pollock, 37). Mr. Borden wants “what’s best for” Lizzie according to the expectations of the norm (Pollock, 38). b. Lizzie expresses her determination by telling Mr. Borden, “You can’t make me do one thing I don’t want to do. I’m going to keep on doing just what I want just when I want it” (Pollock, 41). She is trying to tell him that no matter how much he tries to persuade her, she will only fight back and give him the equal hard headedness. c.
Lizzie also tries suggesting to Mr. Borden that she could work in his office. Mr. Borden replies, “For God’s sake, talk sensible”, meaning that it is completely taboo and insensible for woman of Lizzie’s status to be working (Pollock, 40). It would also cause a threat to Mr. Borden’s reputation if he is too cheap to hire someone else and instead, keeps his daughter an employee.
d. Lizzie does not want to live the life that her father is trying to convince her to live. She says: “I want out of all of this” (Pollock, 40). Lizzie “wants out” from the society she lives in, part of which includes her father’s expectations of her marriage.
e. Lizzie tells Mr. Borden: “I’m supposed to be a mirror. I’m supposed to reflect what you want to see” (Pollock, 39). The literary technique used here is symbolism, because Mr. Borden represents society since Lizzie is “supposed to” do or “reflect” what society wants so that she can fit into it.
f. When Lizzie does not cooperate with her father and refuses to meet with Johnny MacLeod, Mr. Borden “shoves her to the floor to gain a clear exit from the room” (Pollock, 41). This shows that he will not listen to her and will keep demanding things of her, just as society does.
III. Because Emma does not speak her mind, Lizzie feels that she has no choice, but to stand up for the both of
…show more content…
them. a. Lizzie gets angry and frustrated at Emma when she does not cooperate and tells her: “make him [Mr. Borden] understand that we’re people. Individual people” (Pollock, 53). This still does not convince Emma, and she says: “You know it’s no use.” (Pollock, 53). This passage shows the reasoning behind Emma’s lack of strength. She does not see any use in convincing Mr. Borden that she is a person, because the society she inhabits does not believe so. b. In the last visit to their home, Harry, Mrs. Borden’s brother, tries to get Mr. Borden to sign a property over to Mrs. Borden which upsets Emma and Lizzie. This time when he came, Emma tells Mrs. Borden: “she [Lizzie] may have been a bit upset, because no one told her he [Harry] was coming” (Pollock, 28). This passage clearly shows that Emma is speaking for herself through Lizzie, because she is too scared to actually say how she feels. c. Emma does not want to let go of the farm that Mr. Borden is handing over to Harry, but she is too passive to verbally express her rights. When Lizzie is trying to convince Emma to take action, Emma says: “I…I…have a train to catch.” (Pollock, 53). The fact that Emma does not want to talk about the farm or any action she can take to save it shows she does not have the personal strength that Lizzie does. The literary device used to show the reader Emma’s thoughts and personality is characterization. d. Emma’s inaction upsets Lizzie more when Lizzie yells for Bridget to prepare Emma’s breakfast, Emma tells Lizzie that she could have yelled for herself. Lizzie says, “You could, but you never do” (Pollok, 42). Lizzie means to say that Emma never expresses what she actually has on her mind and that she never stands up for herself. Due to this, when Lizzie yells for Emma’s breakfast, she is actually saying what Emma wants to say. IV. Mrs. Borden gives Lizzie honest advice about conforming to the society in order to survive, but Lizzie rejects this guidance. a. Lizzie does not want to be the care taker of Johnny MacLeod’s children like Mrs. Borden became the mother of Mr. Borden’s daughters, so when Mrs. Borden tries to convince her to change her mind, she responds, “You got stuck so I should, too, is that it?” (Pollock, 42). By “stuck”, Lizzie expresses how she does not want to take this undesirable path of life and instead, wants freedom. She also does not want to be anything like her step-mother. b. Mrs. Borden tells Lizzie: “your father’s not dead yet, your father’s got many good years ahead of him, and when his time comes, well, we’ll see what his will says then” (Pollock, 42). The fact that Lizzie will have to “see” what Mr. Borden’s will will say proves that there is a possibility that Lizzie might not be included in it and that there will nothing left for her after his death. c. Lizzie tries to stand up for herself by saying she has rights to be in Mr. Borden’s will due to blood relations, but Mrs. Borden says: “No, Lizzie, you got no rights” (Pollock, 42). Lizzie’s step-mother is saying she only has what her father has given her and that unmarried women have no rights. d. Bridget tells Lizzie a story of a cook named Mary who spit in the soup she served and cut up her hair for an omelette that she served to people she disliked. Bridget is suggesting to Lizzie to be like Mary and “Smile and get round them [Mr. and Mrs. Borden]”to which Lizzie replies “It’s not…fair that I have to” (Pollock, 43). Therefore, the literary technique used here is an epiphany, because Lizzie comes to a realization that she now has to take situations into her own hands, because she can no longer stand the situation that she is put into. This means she might have to even kill for her rights and privileges. V. Lizzie uses her pets and love of animals as a means to express her true self. When these pets are destroyed by Mr. Borden, she feels unhappy and lashes out at him. a. Lizzie describes herself in her pigeons as “grey, a dull grey…but …when the sun struck their feathers, I’d see blue, a steel blue with a sheen” (Pollock, 29). At first, Lizzie might appear “dull” which means nothing special, but after she is given “the sun” meaning a chance to show her true self, she will appear “blue” which signifies her inner beauty. b. Lizzie says “They [the pigeons] were…hiding I think” (Pollock, 29). The fact that the pigeons “were hiding” shows what Lizzie must hide her true self to conform to the society. The literary device used here is symbolism since the pigeons represent Lizzie’s true self. c. Lizzie feels abandoned by her mother, but she sees reason as why her mother might have died and perhaps the death was not caused by child birth. Lizzie says: “Perhaps she just got tired and died. She didn’t want to go on, and the chance came up and she took it. I could understand that…Perhaps she was like a bird, she could see all the blue sky and she wanted to fly away…she saw a way out and she took it” (Pollock, 58). Getting “tired” and not wanting “to go on” are Lizzie’s feelings to how she can no longer put up to the society’s expectations anymore. She feels her mother must have been trapped in the same way. Lizzie also feels that her mother and she are like birds which represent freedom. They cannot be trapped or else they will need to find a way out. d. Lizzie describes one of her pet puppy families she had on the farm in which one of the puppies got sick and the puppy’s family “ignored it, that puppy didn’t exist for the others…I think inside it was different” (Pollock, 49). The sick puppy represents Lizzie and how she is different on the inside from the rest of her family. e. Lizzie also says that “papa [Mr. Borden] took it [the puppy] and drowned it. That’s what you do one a farm with things that are different.” (Pollock, 49). The farm represents society and how it forces individuals to conform. In this case, the puppy did not and it was therefore, killed. f. Mr. Borden also chops off the heads of the pigeons which symbolized him taking away Lizzie’s freedom since the pigeons represented her independence. The literary technique here is a foreshadowing to the murder Lizzie commits by killing Mr. Borden. g. As Lizzie is describing her dream of carousel horses, she imagines herself riding “with no hands” (Pollock, 44). This represents her dream to be free and for no higher power, in this case, society, to be controlling her. h. She also imagine herself wearing a “white mask” which represents lies that she must tell or show about herself in order to fit into society. i. The carousel represent the emotionally paining cycle that Lizzie is going through between the reality of the unsuitable world she lives in and her fantasy of the happy world she wants to be in. j. Also, in a carousel, the fact that the horses are fixed to a pole represent Lizzie’s desire for freedom, the carousel, which is trapped, by the pole. VI. Lizzie commits the murders due to many reasons leading up to the crime that had piled up and caused the homicides. a. Lizzie realizes her worth when Dr. Patrick tells her: “All life is precious and unique.” (Pollock, 61). The literary device used here is an epiphany because this is the first time Lizzie has given herself real value. b. Lizzie begs Emma to stay, but when Emma does not listen and begins to leave, she says “That’s right, Go away! I’m sorry for all the things I told you! Things I really felt!” (Pollock, 53). This passage shows how desperate and lonely Lizzie feels after even Emma has isolated her. c. When the actress accuses Lizzie of committing the crime, Lizzie says, “I didn’t” and then look at the audience and says, “You did” (Pollock, 70). This shows that the murders were not Lizzie’s fault, but society’s. The literary technique used here id symbolism, because the audience represents society. VII. Lizzie has been acquitted of the murders of Mr. and Mrs. Borden, because of the need to keep society under control. a. In court, Lizzie’s defense lawyer says: “do you believe Miss Lizzie Borden capable of wielding the murder weapon” (Pollock, 36). He means to say that women are not capable of such strength. They are, instead, weak and cannot commit such murderous act. The literary device used here is imagery, because the reader imagines Lizzie using an axe after reading this passage. b. The lawyer asks the jury: “If this gentlewoman is capable of such an act [murder]…Which of you can plump your pillow, nudge your wife, close your eyes, and sleep?” (Pollock, 36). The fact that even people’s sleep will be disturbed by such an act done by a woman shows that this act could lead to women becoming more powerful, which is not a thought approved by a male dominated society. c. Lizzie’s lawyer also says, “Lizzie Borden is not mad. Gentlemen, Lizzie Borden is not guilty”, meaning that women who are “not mad” or have a perfectly normal mental state are not capable of such acts (Pollock, 36). VIII.
After Lizzie has committed the murders, she still does not receive the freedom she had desired, because even though she got rid of Mr. and Mrs. Borden, she still has not changed the society.
a. Even after being acquitted, people around Lizzie, such as Emma and the actress, still ask her, “Lizzie, did you?”, showing their suspicion that even the court ruling could not take away (Pollock, 19).
b. The actress tells Lizzie about the kids playing outside the theatre and singing the rhyme: “Lizzie Borden took an axe. Gave her mother forty wacks. When the job was nicely done, she gave her father forty-one.” (Pollock, 16). The fact that Lizzie has gained publicity due to her crime and a rhyme was even created because of her shows that she will have to live with people suspecting her as a criminal entire life.
c. After Emma forbids the actress from entering their home, Lizzie says, “Do you?” to which Emma replies after “backing down, softly”, “It’s…disgraceful” (Pollock, 69). Emma sudden change tone shows how even though she is not sure if Lizzie committed the murders, she will still be scared of her due to suspicion. The literary device used here is dynamic characterization, because of Lizzie went from being someone people would not give special attention to, to the one everyone is afraid
of. IX. Conclusion: Lizzie Borden, in Sharon Pollock’s play, “Blood Relations”, takes matters into her own hands and commits a crime when the society in which she lives, forces her to live a life she cannot. Lizzie had thought that would have gained her independence and freedom if she killed her father and step-mother, but the crimes lead to consequences. Lizzie Borden is now known and accused for this even after the court acquitted her. She does not take responsibility and instead puts the blame on society for leading her to commit the murders.
Bad blood is a book that was written James H. Jones who is an associate professor of History. The book narrates on how the government through the department of Public Health service (PHS) authorized and financed a program that did not protect human values and rights. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment which was conducted between 1932 and 1972 where four hundred illiterate and semi-illiterate black sharecroppers in Alabama recently diagnosed with syphilis were sampled for an experiment that was funded by the U.S Health Service to prove that the effect of untreated syphilis are different in blacks as opposed to whites. The blacks in Macon County, Alabama were turned into laboratory animals without their knowledge and the purpose of the experiment
Imagine being wrongfully trialled for the murders of your father and stepmother. Well, this was Lizzie Borden’s reality in the notorious 19th century case. In August, 1892, the gruesome murders of Andrew and Abby Borden took place in a small town named Fall River. Because Lizzie Borden was believed to have a lot to gain with the murders of her parents, she was the only one accused of being the murder. With this case, I believe the council was right for pleading Lizzie as innocent. The public and police tried to use theories against her in court to prove she was guilty. With the whole public against her, Lizzie still stood strong and was proven innocent for the murders.
Eliza’s blatant disregard for the concern of those around her contributed heavily to her demise. Had she listened to her friends and family when they told her to marry Mr...
Lizzie was well aware of the disadvantages of being a woman condemned to a narrow societal image and used her unrecognized intelligence to her advantage. By murdering her father and stepfather she was able to gain everything she could have wanted; a large house on the hill, tremendous wealth, and rid herself of a detested stepmother. Although it is a morbid circumstance, Lizzie Borden proved herself to be a clever women of her era. She played the male system, knowing that regardless of what the facts say, the male ego was much more powerful. To question moral, innocent Lizzie meant the men in power must question their ways of thinking and everything they had worked so hard to create, the perfect woman.
On a hot morning on august 4, 1892, Mr. Andrew Borden and his wife, Abby Borden, were brutally murdered. A daughter of the victims, Lizzie Borden was arrested, tried and acquitted of the crime. “ She was a woman of spotless character and reputation, and more than that she was educated, refined and prominently connected with the work of the Christian church in the Fall River”(Gates 2).The town and the country were divided in their opinions of who could commit such horrifying murders. Many theories have been made to explain that day; the finger has been pointed in every direction- even a Chinese Sunday school student of Lizzies. To this day people are unsure as to weather or not Lizzie brutally murdered her parents.
The Lizzie Borden case has mystified and fascinated those interested in crime forover on hundred years. Very few cases in American history have attracted as much attention as the hatchet murders of Andrew J. Borden and his wife, Abby Borden. The bloodiness of the acts in an otherwise respectable late nineteenth century domestic setting is startling. Along with the gruesome nature of the crimes is the unexpected character of the accused, not a hatchet-wielding maniac, but a church-going, Sunday-school-teaching, respectable, spinster-
The Characters in the play are the childhood acquaintances of Lizzie Bordon, each aged around twelve years old, though due the era they would probably be less mature than modern day twelve year olds. Each character has a different attitude towards Lizzie which becomes apparent as the play continues. The children Ann Dorothy Barbara Irma Jo and Kathy all bully Lizzie, while Christy and Georgina pity her. The character Rachel Brayton is a very quiet character, possibly younger than the other children present in the scene and therefore more fearful towards Lizzie. The set in the scene that we performed consisted of some steps to represent the schools steps and a pair of curtains to represent doors.
Olivia Butler writes in the afterword of “Bloodchild” that it’s not a story of slavery, and evidence from close reading can be used to support this statement. Butler uses the human form as a vehicle for defamiliarization to show the mechanical functions readers serve themselves and others. Furthermore, this process is able to reveal their passive nature and ultimately highlight the human allowance for manipulation. She brings light to these behaviors by showing a lack of respect for human life, an unbalanced power relationship between the Tlic and the humans, and Gan’s stripped cognitive process.
In court, testifying, Elizabeth has the fate of her and her husband at stake. After her husband, John Proctor, had had an affair with Abigail, she was asked if her husband had turned from her. “No, sir” (Miller, 113). Once knowing that she had lied in court the judge exclaims “She has spoken. Remove her!” (Miller, 113). The woman who never told a lie had lied to protect her husband’s reputation not knowing that John already confessed. Only because of Abigail’s lies, Elizabeth was sent to sit in the jail cell until it became her time to hang. Abigail’s lies affected almost everyone in the town including a woman named Sarah
"Was this what it all meant--utter, intact separateness, obscured by the heat of living?" Elizabeth is questioning the reason for living. Particularly, she is wondering at her own existence. Her life seems to have no meaning and she does not connect with any one, especially her husband.
Madame Bovary offers a scathing indictment of the oppression of females in the nineteenth century. Emma Bovary's life is used as an example to illustrate how women's lives were circumscribed and dictated to by the men surrounding them. Emma is presented as an average woman with fantasies of love and luxury in her heart. These fantasies are never fulfilled due to her early marriage (dictated by her father) and her middle-class lifestyle (dictated by her husband). Her dreams are trapped between the wills of the two men in her life and though she tries, in her own way, to break free from them, she does not find fulfilment in her life, leading to her eventual unhappiness and demise.
The play by Meg Braem entitled Blood:A Scientific Romance, presents a cautionary tale about the negative effects of human experimentation. Dr.Glass researches on the bond between the sisters, Angélique and Poubelle. He provides them with the essentials for their survival but not for their well being. Dr.Glass’ science experiment does not pursue the ethical principles of research, which brings upon dangers to the twins. Dr.Glass’s vigorous studying on the twins leads hims to ignore his morals and the safety for them. Additionally, the outside influence of Dr.Street brings dire consequences to the twins and inevitably leads a tragedy.
Emma's personality is largely shaped by the nature of her upbringing. Emma had no motherly figure guiding her as she grew up, due to the fact that her mother passed away at a young age, and her governess, Miss Taylor, became her best friend instead of an authority over her. At the start of the novel Miss Taylor gets married to Mr. Weston, leaving Emma with her despondent and hypochondriac father, Mr. Woodhouse. Although Mr. Woodhouse often confines Emma to the house because of his paranoia of her being harmed, he gives her little guidance. Emma becomes accustomed to being the "princess" of her house, and she applies this role to all of her social interactions, as she develops the ability to manipulate people and control them to advance her own goals. Emma views herself with the highest regard, and feels competition and annoyance with those who threaten her position. Emma has much resentment toward Mrs. Elton, as Mrs. Elton becomes a parody for Emma's mistakes and interactions. Mrs. Elton's attachment to Jane Fairfax is much like Emma's attachment to Harriet Smith; both Mrs. Elton and Emma attach themselves to young women and try to raise their...
to abide by it. In the novel, Emma meets a pitiful doctor named Charles Bovary.
Caryl Phillips' The Nature of Blood. On its most immediate level, Caryl Phillips’ The Nature of Blood narrates several stories of the Jewish Diaspora, using the familiar Shakespearean character Othello to provide a counterpoint to the others’ experiences of displacement. The Nature of Blood thus initially seems to fit awkwardly among texts by other West Indian authors who use the Caribbean as the setting of their work or incorporate West Indian characters into their work. Through his multi-stranded narrative, however, Phillips creates a geographical setting that mirrors the multi-regional influence of the Caribbean.