Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rise of organized crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As we look at criminal cases that are prolific, and make us wonder I became enamored with the Whitey Bulger case. This was a criminal case that go my attention because of the fact James Joseph Bulger Jr. evaded law enforcement for so many years. But the reason behind that would grasp my attention even further. Organized crime has always been an interest to me because of the secrecy and the loyalty behind the Cosa Nostra. I specifically picked Whitey Bulger for the simple fact he wasn't the typical mobster we see in film. Also the fact the Federal Bureau of Investigation was compromised due to the fact their agents were bought and were a large part in why Whitey Bulger was able to evade law enforcement for so long.
During the seventies Whitey
…show more content…
Bulger was an informant for the FBI. This gave Whitey Bulger the tenacity to do what he pleased without getting in to any trouble with the local and federal law enforcement. This gave him the power he needed to further his ventures and create a sort of double agent in which he played both sides of the card. This was crucial for Whitey Bulger in order for him to have a vast network of informants that would tip him off on what he was being investigated on. Whitey Bulger had a FBI handler who was in charge keeping Whitey Bulger from double crossing law enforcemtn. But this ended up going a lot deeper then one would think. The FBI handler by the name of Special Agent John Connolly who was the FBI’s star agent with an impeccable record. Bulger ended up joining up with Connolly and creating a fake type of front that would leave the FBI on wild goose chases. Whitey Bulger was involved in 32 plus counts of extortion, rackettering and violations of the RICO act. He was also implicated in at least 19 murders. Bulgers crime goes as far back as a young as fourteen years old where he would create a reputation of being a hardened criminal who would not be crossed. As time progressed Whitey Bulger did time in 1956 in an Atlanta Penitentiary for armed robbery and hijacking. John Connolly was an upstanding FBI agent who was supposedly in charge of handling Whitey Bulger as an informant.
This would prove to be Connolly’s turning point because he ended up being the informant who aided Whitey Bulger with cases that were being brought forth to bring Bulger down. Having an inside man left Bulger to be untouchable. Connolly met Bulger after a failed attempt by another agent to lure in Bulger to become an FBI informant. In 2009, John Connolly was sentced to 40 years in prison for his involvement in the 1981 murder of World Jai Alai executive Roger Wheeler in Oklahoma. Bulger was persuaded to have Wheeler killed because of skimming of money off the World Jai Alai profits and wanted to keep the thefts secret and possibly take over the business. This was not the first time that Connolly was linked with the Bulger gang. In 2002, he was sentenced to ten years for federal racketeering charges for protecting Whitey Bulger and Stephen Flemmi, who happened to be his long term informants, while they remained free to continue their long criminal rampage which included homicides in different …show more content…
states. In trade for the valuable tips Bulger provided, Connolly and other agents helped the mobster escape the law by tipping Bulger off to pending investigations and protecting him from prosecution. Flemmi and Bulger then built the criminal empire that would become the greatest of its day. This is only because of the fact that they found a way to temporarily beat the system. But after John Connolly retired from the FBI in 1990 the FBI dropped Bulger and Flemmi as informants and began to pursue them, once this started to get the ball rolling it came to the FBI’s attention what was really going on between Bulger and Connolly. This was very emabarassing to the FBI once they found out the relationship between Bulger and Connolly. Connolly informed Bulger to flee before their 1995 racketeering indictment, and he also lied to the FBI about his efforts to help Bulger beat the charges that they took so long to pin on Bulger. This goes to show that even the most respectable of law enforcement could be turned and could easily become as crooked as the criminals that they’re supposed to protect civilians from.
Whitey Bulger since then has been sentenced to life in prison for his crimes. He was also ordered to pay $19.5 million in restitution to his victims and to forfeit another 25.2 million to the government. This case marked the end of a tumultuous saga that stretched over the span of fifty years and a multitude of homicides. Bulgers lawyers are quoted as saying that they will be “appealing the verdict” on the grounds that he did not get a fair trial because he was prevented from presenting his claim that a deceased former federal prosecutor gave him immunity for his crimes decades ago. The defense spent a lot of time trying to refute the FBI’s admittances that Bulger was an informant from 1975 to 1990. Bulgers lawyers mentioned that John J. Connolly fabricated Bulgers informant file to cover up the fact he was taking bribed from Bulger and leaking information to
him. Now that Bulger is in his late 80’s I personally feel it is to late for him to acutally feel remorse for his crimes. This is because he lived a good life even though he was evading law enforcement the entire time. And the simple fact that the family of the slain will never get there loved ones back. The FBI should have a better system of checking on agents with these kinds of missions. The only count that Bulger was not found guilty of was the alleged extortion of Kevin Hayes, a ticket broker, who had mentioned that he was warned in 1994 that he had to give “payoffs” to Bulger in order to operate. So Bulger was collecting taxes from the criminal underworld. Bulger did decline to take the stand to testify in his defense, saying that he outside jusry’s presence, that the whole trial was made to incriminate him even though be had an immunity deal with federal authorities in the past. This goes to show that even the FBI could be part of crimes and that no one is immune to the law. Which is a good way of looking at it. Whitey Bulger just got lucky that his FBI handler happened to cross over to the bad side of crime. Now knowing what really happened in Boston, we can take a look into other cities with the potential for this level of crime and it makes you wonder whether other law enforcement officers are involved. We as Americans need to create a system that allows us to monitor our law enforcement. If we don't it could prove to be detrimental to not only civilians but to other law enforcement officers to. After this entire aftermath John Connolly claims that he is entitled to a judgment of acquittal on the RICO charge because the government failed to present sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt two essential elements of the RICO charge. But to no avail the courts affirmed the conviction because of his stature as a law enforcement officer. The Supreme Court repeatedly indicated that the courts should take a “natural and commonsense approach” in assessing the Whitey Bulger case. I found that interesting because I constantly see criminal cases get destroyed because of decisions made on emotion and not on evidence.
Justice was served after 36 years when the FBI finally tracked down the masterminds behind the biggest bank robbery in New York's history, the Lufthansa Heist. The FBI believes that this is a lesson to be learned for the thousands of criminals today. No matter how long, even decades, like the Lufthansa Heist, you will be found and your time will be served. Even though the mobsters were captured, the man who thought of the entire scheme, James Burke, still carried out plans to continue their "business" in recent months of the year. There were many different assets to this very critical plan that the crime family had prepared for, but they did not know that sooner or later they were going to get caught.
sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison. The case against him was largely
As an individual committed to social justice, human solidarity, and the liberation of the people, this case is of great interest to me since it is a prime example of the rights of a human being trampled on and completely violated.... ... middle of paper ... ... The idea that some FBI agents might be lying or covering up something, or even just being far too zealous and unprofessional, is rejected as a priori because of the cognitive dissonance it causes in the individual that believes in the FBI.
The more notorious the case, the greater the number of prospective informant. They rush to testify like vultures to rotting flesh or sharks to blood. The are smooth and convincing liars(George Carlin, p.1).” Jailhouse informants are a major factor to convicting innocent people. Using informants makes an unjust and unfair trial. The Thomas Sophonow case used jailhouse informants to convict Sophonow of a crime he did not commit. Thomas was convicted of murdering Barbara Stoppel at the Ideal Donut Shop in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Thomas has a highly suspect and was brought to jail. Three informants claimed that Thomas has confessed to them that he had murdered Barbara. All three informants lied on the stands. Mr. McQuade who was one of the informants testified under duress. Two police officers had told him that if he did not testify against Thomas voluntarily, the Crown was going to exposed him of being an informant. Another informant was Mr. Cheng who was charged with 26 counts of fraud. He hoped if he testified against Thomas his charges were to be dropped and luckily for him they were. The last informant was Mr. Martin who was described as “a prime example of convincing mendacity of jailhouse informants. He seems to have heard more confessions than many dedicated priest(Sarah Harland-Logan, p.1).” There were other 11 informants who were eager to give false testimony
New York case, a suspect named Vignera was picked up by the New York police in which Vignera was connected to a robbery of a dress shop that happened three days before Vignera was picked up. He was taken to several precincts and police headquarters before going to trial. He first went to the 17th Detective Squad Headquarters, then the 66th Detective Squad. At the 66th Detective Squad, he orally admitted to the robbery and was arrested formally. He later went to the the 70th Precinct and was questioned by an assistant district attorney in the presence of a court reporter, who typed the questions and answers from the questioning. When the trial began, the reporter gave out the transcript of the questioning to the jury and along with the oral confession. Vignera was found guilty of robbery of the first degree and was sentenced to 30-60 years in prison. The conviction was affirmed without the opinion of the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals ( United States Courts,
NEW YORK, Apr. 2, 1992 -- The infamous “Teflon Don,” John Gotti, former head of the Gambino family, was convicted and sentenced to life in prison today without possibility of parole. He was convicted on 5 counts of murder (Castellano and Bilotti, Robert DiBernardo, Liborio Milito and Louis Dibono), conspiracy to commit murder, illegal gambling, loan sharking, racketeering, extortion, obstruction of justice, bribing a public official and tax evasion (Goodstein, 1992). Acting as boss, John Gotti was believed to have made the Gambino family more than $500 million in revenue from illegal gambling, drug trafficking, extortion, and stock fraud (“John Joseph Gotti Jr”, 2014). During the trial, the judge ordered that the jurors stay anonymous, identified only by number, in order to avert a repeat of the jury tampering that occurred involving previous trials with Mr. Gotti (FBI, 2007).
The gangsters we know and love today are much different from what they were 40 years ago. From the way they talked, dressed, and went about their business, the idea of a gangster has changed a lot. But they have one thing in common and this is the fact that they both had and have a huge impact on our society. One gangster in particular, Henry Hill, contributed to a huge turning point in the methods of American criminals. Henry Hill’s accomplishments as a mobster and an FBI informant helped change the ways of organized crime and how the government tried to stop them.
The time was late in the reign of Capone. His operations in the 1920s through the 30s led the FBI getting involved in his antics. Capone would have signs of his work all over the place, but he could never be caught. Whether it was bribing a jury, or even just serving small time and getting out for good behavior. Capone could not have the book thrown at him, he was just too sly. The mob was always hard to catch due to lack of evidence and the fact that people could be either paid off or scared off. In 1931, the time would come and the Eagle would finally catch the snake. Capone was found guilty of tax evasion on bootlegging money. In a article on History.com, states that, “On June 5, 1931 the U.S. government finally indicted Capone on 22 counts of income-tax evasion…. When the judge in the case declared that he would not honor the agreement, Capone quickly withdrew his guilty plea, and the case went to trial. During the trial Capone used the best weapon in his arsenal: bribery and intimidation. But at the last moment, the judge switched to an entirely new jury. Capone was found guilty and sent to prison for 11 years” (History.com). Capone was finally sentenced to true jail time. The judge he faced was not entertaining his bribery and his corruption in his courtroom. Capone had finally been caught and sentenced to eleven years
Alphonse Capone was born on January 17, 1899, in Brooklyn, New York to Gabriele and Teresina Capone. He grew up in a rough neighborhood and was a member of two gangs; the Brooklyn Rippers and the Forty Thieves Juniors. Alphonse did well at school until the 6th grade when he was expelled for retaliating against a teacher who hit him. He was fourteen at the time. He became part of the Five Points gang in Manhattan and worked in gangster Frankie Yale's bar, the Harvard Inn, as a bouncer and bartender. While working at the Inn one night, local gangster Frank Gallucio was drinking with his sister at the Harvard Inn. Capone approached the girl to compliment her, and Gallucio took offense to him started a fight. Gallucio pulled a knife and cut Capone's face three times. That is how "Scarface" came to be.
most horrific crimes you could visualize. He was later released and didn’t serve a day in prison.
white-collar crime” (Shapiro, S. P.). It is no surprise to anyone that positions of trust regularly decentralize to corporations, occupations, and “white-collar” individuals. Nevertheless, the concept of “white-collar crime” involves a false relationship between role-specific norms and the characteristics of those who typically occupy these roles. Most of the time, it is the offender that is looked at more than the crime itself and assumptions about the individuals automatically come into play. It has be to acknowledged that “ class or organizational position are consequential and play a more complex role in creating opportunities for wrongdoing and in shaping and frustrating the social control process than traditional stereotypes have allowed” (Shapiro, S. P.). The opportunities to partake in white-collar crime and violate the trust in which ones position carries are more dependent upon the individuals place in society, not just the work place. The ways in which white-collar criminals establish and exploit trust are an important factor in truly exploring and defining the concept of white-collar crime.
Why does white collar and corporate crime tend to go undetected, or if detected not prosecuted? White collar and corporate crimes are crimes that many people do not associate with criminal activity. Yet the cost to the country due to corporate and white collar crime far exceeds that of “street” crime and benefit fraud. White collar and corporate crimes refer to crimes that take place within a business or institution and include everything from tax fraud to health and safety breaches. Corporate crime is extremely difficult to detect for many reasons.
Jon Venables and Robert Thompson of Liverpool, England, made international headlines in November of 1994, when they were convicted of murdering James Bulger, age two. The two boys, both ten at the time of the slaying, lured James away from his mother in a shopping mall, took him to a nearby railroad track, beat him brutally and left him to be cut in half by a train (Seifert 56).
In 1994, Byron de la Beckwith was convicted of murdering civil-rights leader Medgar Evers in 1963. Then, just last year, the FBI reopened the 1955 Emmett Till case after finding that as many as 10 more people may have been involved in his abduction and murder. And now Killen will likely go to prison for the rest of his life for his part in the brutal 1964 murders of civil-rights activists Michael Schwerner, Andrew Goodman and James Chaney.
This case illustrated that there were real consequences to white collar crime. In addition to paying the fifty million dollar fine, he relinquished another fifty million dollars of his illegal trading profits. (He still had millions remaining, however, from his illegal gains.) His actual prison sentence was three years, yet he served only twenty-two months in the federal prison at Lompoc, California, which was known to have a “country-club” atmosphere.