More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about cause and effects of organ trafficking
Essays about cause and effects of organ trafficking
Issues surrounding the trafficking of organs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
We are occupants of a progressive age, one where the impossible inches to being possible. We as a species, are innovators who strive toward bettering ourselves and our way of life. Currently, we reside in a society with a magnitude of advances, especially medical advances. We have harnessed the ability to conduct organ transplantation, one of the grandeurs of modern medicine. The sad truth is, the number of patients who require these transplants surpasses the amount of organs available. For instance, in the United States, the amount of Americans waiting for transplants compared to the available organs is about four to one. Right now, there are 122,306 people on the waiting list for an organ (organdonor.gov). All of these people are residing It is clear that this method isn’t working with the amount of organs available being shadowed by the high number of patients in need. By providing a financial incentive, we would be encouraging people to donate their own organs by providing them something in return. For one, organ transplants don’t happen for free. Doctors need to get paid, hospitals need money to provide surgical facilities and recovery rooms, and the transfer of the organs themselves add to that cost (cato.org). Through this, the organ and tissue business makes a pretty big sum, along with the companies that use the organs to produce the medical products used during surgery. With this, it is evident that everyone is getting paid except for the actual people providing the organs. It is no surprise that people don’t donate their organs, because they feel cheated. The financial incentive will motivate people to contribute to the supply of organs significantly. In fact, organ sales are legal in the Philippines as long as the donor recipient is native (forbes.com). Iran uses a free market system in which the “donors” sell their organs to the government, who pays them and also gives them a year of free health insurance (forbes.com). This system has shortened the waiting list tenfold. Therefore, having a system that is completely based on altruism is harmful rather than helpful. Waiting for people to donate organs out of There are some who dwell in the hope that scientific advances will allow us to develop organs in the laboratory. But that day isn’t here. That day might not be here in the near future. Meanwhile, there are thousands of patients waiting to be rescued, to be saved. The death rate of these patients will continue to mass. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, there are about 123,000 people on transplant waiting lists in the US with about 300,000 people in China (Standford.edu). It is practically inhumane to put our hope into future technology while there are people around the world dying. Something has to be done. There has to be a change. The best way to stop this and increase the supply of organs available is to create a system in which the donors are provided some type of payment. In a live debate by NPR over the placement of this system, “those who favored buying and selling organs went from 44 percent to 60 percent. But those opposed inched up only 4 points, from 27 to 31 percent” (npr.com). Therefore, being able to save thousands of lives through the legalization of organ marketing overshadows the risks that come with it. And because of this, one person probably died waiting for an organ while this essay was being
There are many arguments against it; organ sale is extremely dangerous, there will never be enough supply for the demand, whether legal or not, the black market will still exist, it is immoral, etc. In the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Radcliffe Richards, a philosopher, says “living organ donation is now so safe that many surgeons actively recommend it, and they would hardly do that if they expected a string of dead or damaged donors” (Wilkinson, 2011). As for the black market, “the best way of avoiding harm to organ vendors is not to criminalize and drive sale underground but rather to accept and regulate it” (Wilkinson, 2011). Prohibition is a good example of how the government banned alcohol and then realized that people were going to drink it anyway. Instead of pretending that it was not happening, prohibition was lifted and laws were put in place to regulate the sale and consumption. Although it will be a difficult process, the same can happen for organ
The argument for organ donor system reform is compelling and strong. Satel supports her thoughts with facts and opinions from prominent authorities. As well as the argument being documented, there are a few weaknesses. While attempting to support her thoughts that having the body “for sale” would be socially acceptable, the author uses a source that could be seen as detrimental to her own argument. Stated in the text, “a recent poll by researchers in Pennsylvania found that 59 percent of respondents favored the general idea of incentives, with 53 percent saying direct payments would be acceptable.”
It is clear that a large demand for organs exists. People in need of organ donations are transferred to an orderly list. Ordinarily, U.S. institutions have an unprofitable system which provides organs through a list of individuals with the highest needs; however, these organs may never come. A list is
It’s important to realize that many Americans believe organ donation should simply be just that, a donation to someone in need. However, with the working class making up roughly 60% of society it’s extremely unlikely that a citizen could financially support themselves during and after aiding someone in a lifesaving organ transplant. The alarming consequence, says bioethicist Sigrid Fry-Revere, is that people waiting for kidneys account for 84 percent of the waiting list. To put it another way Tabarrok explains, “In the U.S. alone 83,000 people wait on the official kidney-transplant list. But just 16,500 people received a kidney transplant in 2008, while almost 5,000 died waiting for one” (607). Those numbers are astronomical. When the current “opt-in” policy is failing to solve the organ shortage, there is no reason compensation should be frowned upon. By shifting society’s current definition regarding the morality of organ donation, society will no longer see compensation for organs as distasteful. Citizens will not have to live in fear of their friends and family dying awaiting an organ transplant procedure. A policy implementing compensation would result in the ability for individuals to approach the issue with the mindset that they are helping others and themselves. The government currently regulates a variety of programs that are meant to keep equality and fairness across the
Organ donations are crucial for people in emergency situations. For years organ donations have saved the lives of millions. The problem with people needing organs is that there are not enough organs to be supplied to everyone who needs it. There are many people who die because they are not able to obtain lifesaving organs. The need for organs exceeds the supply given. Thus, leading me to ask this essential question, “Should organ donation be a part of the market?” To support this question I have prepared three supportive claims, but since my answer is no my reasons will revolve around this argument. First, I will state why I do not agree with such a thing, and then I will support my claim by stating why it is so bad, and to end my paper I will state what place(s) legalizes trade.
The Importance of Organ Donation Each day approximately 6,300 people die and what makes this haunting is that presently there are 83,513 people waiting for organs to be donated, yet each day 17 people die because they do not receive a transplant (http://www.donatelife.net/facts_stats.html). These statistics show that people who are waiting for organ transplants have a good chance at being saved and get what they need. The sad truth is though, because of the lack of people willing to donate organs, many people will continue to wait for organs to save their lives. ? Waiting lists of patients for organ transplants become longer as the need for transplantable organs increases? (Sheehy 1).
You are all in luck. Becoming an organ donor, you are entitled to be able to say, “I will save a life”.
Back in 1954 Dr. Joseph Murray and Dr. David Hume preformed the very first successful organ transplant that utilized a living donor ("History of Organ Donation & Transplants | New York Organ Donor Network," 2015). That miraculous event shows how far medical miracles have gone, and are continuously going. Organ transplants are permitting people to live longer and healthier lives. The only issue is that there is just not enough supply to meet the amount of demand. People should become organ donors, and be allowed to donate if they choose, because it can save lives and help to put an end the black market on organ sales.
Nadiminti, H. (2005) Organ Transplantation: A dream of the past, a reality of the present, an ethical Challenge for the future. Retrieved February 12, 2014 from http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2005/09/fred1-0509.html
Organ sale will be helpful in the lives of society and should be legal. The selling of human organs will give the individual a better financial life for them and their family, create a safer environment for those who will sell their organs, and to save the lives of many. By making organ sale legal the United States of America will be able to regulate organs properly through a system in which the people waiting on a list to be saved will decrease. The legal sale of organs will create an environment where people will want to save
One of the most important and prevalent issues in healthcare discussed nowadays is the concern of the organ donation shortage. As the topic of organ donation shortages continues to be a growing problem, the government and many hospitals are also increasingly trying to find ways to improve the number of organ donations. In the United States alone, at least 6000 patients die each year while on waiting lists for new organs (Petersen & Lippert-Rasmussen, 2011). Although thousands of transplant candidates die from end-stage diseases of vital organs while waiting for a suitable organ, only a fraction of eligible organ donors actually donate. Hence, the stark discrepancy in transplantable organ supply and demand is one of the reasons that exacerbate this organ donation shortage (Parker, Winslade, & Paine, 2002). In the past, many people sought the supply of transplantable organs from cadaver donors. However, when many ethical issues arose about how to determine whether someone is truly dead by either cardiopulmonary or neurological conditions (Tong, 2007), many healthcare professionals and transplant candidates switched their focus on obtaining transplantable organs from living donors instead. As a result, in 2001, the number of living donors surpassed the number of cadaver donors for the first time (Tong, 2007).
In the United States, there are over one hundred thousand people on the waiting list to receive a life-saving organ donation, yet only one out of four will ever receive that precious gift (Statistics & Facts, n.d.). The demand for organ donation has consistently exceeded supply, and the gap between the number of recipients on the waiting list and the number of donors has increased by 110% in the last ten years (O'Reilly, 2009). As a result, some propose radical new ideas to meet these demands, including the selling of human organs. Financial compensation for organs, which is illegal in the United States, is considered repugnant to many. The solution to this ethical dilemma isn’t found in a wallet; there are other alternatives available to increase the number of donated organs which would be morally and ethically acceptable.
First of all, selling organs shouldn’t be legal for two main reasons, which are saving lives and stop people from selling organs illegally in the black market. The world should understand that in many cases if someone didn’t get the organ they need they will suffer and have to die in some cases. This doesn’t means that the donors will have to give up their lives but, they can and will live healthy. For example if someone is dyeing and in need of a kidney and there is no chance for that person to live unless he gets one. Legalizing selling organs will saves this person’s life because he would easily buy an organ and complete the rest of his life without and problems. But in the case of that kidney that is in need, other people could sell theirs without having and problems that would affect them. Humans have two kidneys and one kidney that wills saves other person live is going to kill this person or even hurts.
...nts will die before a suitable organ becomes available. Numerous others will experience declining health, reduced quality of life, job loss, lower incomes, and depression while waiting, sometimes years, for the needed organs. And still other patients will never be placed on official waiting lists under the existing shortage conditions, because physical or behavioral traits make them relatively poor candidates for transplantation. Were it not for the shortage, however, many of these patients would be considered acceptable candidates for transplantation. The ban of organ trade is a failed policy costing thousands of lives each year in addition to unnecessary suffering and financial loss. Overall, there are more advantages than disadvantages to legalizing the sale of organs. The lives that would be saved by legalizing the sale of organs outweighs any of the negatives.
The topic I am going to pick for bioethical issue on should parents have another child for organ donation to save their other child. I do not think they should have the other child for organ donation. I think it wrong to have a baby just for the organs. Some doctors would recommend parents to have another child to save the other their other child. Siblings are the best match for transplant and person that get organ transplant from sibling have better chance to live. I can understand if it bone marrow transplant because bone marrow is not organ and would not hurt the child. A bone marrow is more like a blood transplant. I do not think it wrong for a parent use child bone marrow but not all the time. The parents need to find someone else. I