Organ Selling Argumentative Essay

867 Words2 Pages

Most people, when thinking of something that is “wrong” have an immediate definition that leads them to classify that action as criminal. Labels tend to be thrown around with no forethought and definitions of simple words become obscured. To form an effective definition for criminal, one must ask, is that action legitimately “criminal” or is it just, perhaps, frowned upon? The basis of something that is criminal can often be broken up by its risk of punishment by law, its explicit illegalness, and its defiance of societal norms. Organ selling is the action of harvesting human organs and selling them for profit without medical consent, and it is, in fact, criminal. There has been a rise in black-market organ trafficking throughout the past decade. With …show more content…

For these desperate individuals, they can become criminals, or they will die a slow death. The punishment for violating this law in the
United States is five years of imprisonment and/or a 50,000 dollar fine, per the National Organ
Transplant Act of 1984. This punishment is minimal considering the alternative, which drives people even further to become a “criminal” to remain alive.
The most explicit way to identify a criminal activity would be its risk of punishment by law. Having a jurisdiction sanction an act by creating a law against it, there will be no doubt about whether it is legal or not. To discourage people from breaking these laws, enforcement agencies impose punishments for breaking any law that is violated regardless of the reason.
Professors Jung, Ahn-Redding, and Allison (2014) emphasize that “Criminal Code was developed to effectively provide every offense with a corresponding range of sanctions” (p. 342).
CRIMINAL 3
The code can be understood in the sense that its purpose is to provide living guidelines to promote a set behavior. This purpose relates to organ selling in the sense that it goes against our accepted code and it is punishable by

Open Document