Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Overcrowding in school
What is the main reason that schools are overcrowding
What is the main reason that schools are overcrowding
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Overcrowding in school
Open lunch, a waste of money and a risk of your student’s life. It is safer to be at the school rather than be out roaming the town. If a student was late to get back they would hurry and perhaps make poorer decisions then they would if they weren’t in a hurry. They could easily get hurt by a car or have a collision with another vehicle. What I believe would happen if we opened the open lunch up to more people, they would hurry and eat fast and start to mess around. They could vandalize or something else. They could even get involved in drugs like smoking marijuana or some other drugs. Every kid knows that they could never do drugs in school they would be caught almost instantly. So they would just wait till lunch and then do them. Plus we …show more content…
This security is weakened when more people are allowed to leave the school. They could go out and bring stuff back into the school like weapons or drugs/paraphilia. They could fight or do other things detrimental to their health; also the kids whose family couldn’t afford to let them go out to eat open lunch, the other kids would tease them and make fun of them. The traffic would also become a lot worse; students could get hit trying to cross the street. It would also arise anger in nearby residents like in Amarillo, Texas. “The decision came after area residents complained students were clogging the streets during lunch, creating a hazardous situation for drivers and students,” reports Jennifer Wilson. Even though they would get exercise and fresh air, should sophomores and juniors be allowed open …show more content…
Money for a high school student Is kind of a hard thing to come by. So I mean eating out every day, even if just gas station food, is still expensive. Even if just a dollar here a dollar there, It adds up almost exponentially then if you look back at all the money you’ve spent you realize you’ve spent quite a good chuck of change. Money in which you could’ve put fuel in your car, purchase new supplies, or fix your laptop. Maybe, though god forbid, you actually save it. Put it in a savings account for college, or to move out. As a high school student I know how hard it is to not spend money. But if you take how much you spend every week on food and cut down like half, I mean do you really need an extra-large? You take the money saved and put it in a savings account after a few months you’ll realize how much money you’ve actually been spending and I don’t think sophomores and juniors will realize this and spend a lot of money where then in their senior year they may need the money a lot more. Even though they would get exercise and fresh air, should sophomores and juniors be allowed open
To begin, the high school principles and the school district can put restrictions on who’s allowed to leave the campus for lunch. The student’s parents make the ultimate decision of whether they will allow their child to go off-campus for lunch. In order for students to go off-campus, they will need to have a written consent slip filled out by their parents and handed in to the office, as well as a pass when leaving campus. The students who are continuously tardy or absent should not be allowed to have this privilege. If the students are allowed to have off-campus lunch, so should the staff members. Although they’re staff they shouldn’t be treated any different, they should at least have a pass for leaving campus. Most importantly the students of Oak Creek High School should be at least 16 years of age, and must have good grades with a GPA of at least 2.8 or higher. Plus the school resource officers (SRO) may stop and question the students, at any time.
The right to the student should be guaranteed to open campus lunch. We are living in a failed experiment, that is the government controlling the school lunch. It is time to step out of the failed experiment and do another experiment, only this time successful. Student should be allowed to have open campus lunch.
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
On the other hand, having open campus lunch would force students to learn time management and teach them what future responsibilities for college and employment. Students would have thirty minutes to get where they would choose to eat and back while remaining punctual. Some students would receive tardies, some would be early, some would be right on time, and some would not return. Since high school prepares students for college, having open campus lunch would be a great thing for students to get
Which can be having armed officers walk though halls, making sure the school is safe from any harm that could potentially happen.
Every student in all grades were able to leave during the time a scheduled class did not occupy. (Saslow, Linda. “Schools split on “open campus” NYtimes.com). Open campus lunch is the allowance of high school students to leave off the premises to a local restaurant for the duration of lunch. School districts in America have opposed open campus lunch benefits due to common knowledge and concern for potential student endangerment. A reason why schools should change educational environment would be to accommodate what students’ need to create comfortable working conditions. Old school methods included the repetitive process of helping students through daily material every day of the week with one break. Off campus school lunch was an unknown factor to high schools back
Lamorte explains how schools are trying to establish the “proper balance between an individual student’s right to Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search and the duty of the school officials to provide all students with a safe and secure school environment” (Lamorte
As time goes on, each class of students gains and loses freedoms. An open campus freedom would not only just let students go where they please; it would also give the students a responsibility to manage their time. Many administrators on the board of education do not think that a high school student should have such a responsibility. They would tell us that we are too immature to be able to manage time during the school day. I think that students are mature enough to have such a freedom placed within their grasps. I can anticipate that the opposition will be outraged by all students receiving this freedom and responsibility. If such a concept as open campus could be arranged, there surely would be rules and regulations placed in effect to ensure that the school will not have liability of the student once off school ground.
Lunch time is a time to take a break from the day and recharge for the rest of the day. In elementary schools it is also a time to meet up with your friends and socialize. Lunch time is not only time to eat. It is important for the mental, social, and emotional health of the children as well. Children need them chance to unwind and destress, which is promoted by socializing with friends. “Lunch should be an enjoyable part of the school day for students, offering a break from classroom work and a place to relax, socialize, and become nourished.”("The Cafeteria: Creating a Positive Mealtime Experience", 2013) Lunch time should be done in a setting where
The way the school is set up now, gives way to almost anybody to just walk up on campus, but having fences would make it a little bit harder for people to go on and off the school property due to limited entry. After opening hours the gates should be locked so that the students feel safe to learn without having to worry about strangers wandering around the school. This should then, should in force all visitors to be directed to the main office/central gate hand over an I.D for an identity in order to get a badge before reaching any students or teachers. Also having a security on property would be another way to keep unknown people of the the property and to supervise the campus or even just the parking lot to see who oncoming
We should not have longer school lunches. Longer school lunches has a great impact on everyone in school, it makes this issue worse. Students need what is best for them, which they already have. Short school lunches helps improve learning skills and lets students comprehend better. Our lunches are good as they are right now. We should not allow students to leave during school lunch.
Not only could a longer lunch period allow students to spend more time with their family, but it would also allow students more time to work on schoolwork and retake tests. According to
Home lunches should be allowed because kids might not like the food that they are serving. From Chicago School Bans Home Lunches it says, “I don’t need them eating junk or throwing away food I was forced to pay a lot for because they do not like it” I think home lunches should be
According to Desroches, “Schools in West Hartford built something called "mantraps," vestibules with locking doors on either side. They glazed their windows so they can't be smashed in. There are panic buttons linked to the police and 300 security cameras. And they made sure that classroom doors can be locked from the inside — they traditionally locked only from the outside.” All of this proves that having armed guards in schools would help the kids and adults be and feel safer because if schools were to build obstacles, then the attacker would have a harder time getting in.
Why is this a problem? Cafeteria food is often cheap, bought in bulk, high in calories, malnutritious, and microwaved. Student polls and opinions prove this. Therefore, this leads to a suggestion: Healthier, tastier foods and a better, more advanced lunch system should be implemented. First of all, students aren’t motivated to eat unhealthy, not-tasty food.