Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of globalization on people's way of life
Consumerism and the environment
Effects of globalization on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of globalization on people's way of life
What do you think of your living environment? Is it clean? Is it safe? Is it always having waste food? If it is, have you ever found any values in it, or just some trash, expired milk and decayed fruit? I have. When I was young, I had found many interesting toys in the nearby dumpster and always shared with my friends. We did a lot of experiments on toys.
Not only we have done this kind of things, but also some scavengers are doing. One of which is Lars Eighner. In the article On Dumpster Diving, Eighner describes the period when he was homeless and was being a scavenger. At first, he did not know the “Dumpster” at all. When he has experienced a lot, he found so wasteful people are. Eghtner assumed a plenty of methods that make the best use of the resources
…show more content…
whatever it was discarded because of bacterial or expired. Interestingly, there are three principles to distinguish the food safety. Eghtner also has stayed near pizza shop and observed student’s wasteful behavior because the majority of students don’t know how to store foods and some other reasons. In addition, Eghtner holds the view that the scavenger owns many values and happiness. During that period, Eghtner has collected many useful tools to earn his livings. He can found many stories from the dumpster either. Eighner thinks that experience is valuable. In my point of view, I definitely agree with Eighner’s environmental protective behavior. However, it exists many potential safety hazards as well. First of all, we cannot deny that it brings many merits to us. “Dumpster Diving” can be very helpful for using limited resources especially the land. As Eighner mentioned, student’s always “throw food away around breaks because they do not know whether it has spoiled or will spoil before they return.” (p.57) When they throw, scavengers can reuse and will not cause unnecessary waste. Although I see the advantages, it’s not extremely helpful and sometimes may even more difficult to deal with. As far as I am concerned, dumpster diving is more dangerous than what we can imagine.
I hope you can imagine a scene that a scavenger has eaten the poisoned food which contains transmissible viruses because he doesn’t have tools to heated or the viruses are not being wiped out because of some unknown reasons. Then he was sick. Suppose that he goes to store to buy food while you also stayed there for a while, which you may get infected at that time. Gradually, you also feel uncomfortable. Following the step one by one makes all people or animals sick. Can you image how horrible at that time? The world is gray. All the people are afraid of the disease like SARS.
Furthermore, there are more methods that we can use in our daily life to prevents the resources from wasting. We can “buy less use more”. Reducing the unnecessary expenses and always have cleaning plates campaigns and so on. Additionally, we should not only care about using resources but also the severe pollution. In the article Tune of the Tuna Fish, Sandra Steingraber depicts the image that mercury-poisoned tuna fish. If mercury really poisons the brain, it will be so terrible because various kinds of edible fish are poisoned by mercury in the
Ocean. In conclusion, we should take more measures to make the best use of every resource. “Dumpster Diving” is a good approach but not good enough from safety’s perspective. We also can reduce the expenses in unnecessary objects and plant more trees to protect the environment. The government can establish the policies to prevent the industry pouring the industrial raw materials into river or ocean which leads to the severe environmental problem. As long as all human beings can determine to protect our Earth and take actions, Earth must be getting better and better, or all resources will run out after hundreds of years or even may be several decades! Are you willing to donate your power to construct a beautiful, clean world for yourself and your children’s future?
He starts by giving a lot of personal examples (Pizza shop example), then talks about other people who try it (The stages of beginning to dumpster dive), and explains how dumpster diving is a lot better than the more accepted picking up of cans (comparison to a wino). He then delves into the ethics behind dumpster diving (looking at prescription bottles and such), and then if one, presumably the reader, wanted to try it how they would do so (pole with hook on it). He ends with some deep insights into dumpster diving and his way of life. I think that the way he organizes his essay, and his overall tone, are to convince the reader that dumpster diving is not as bad as everyone things, and to make people actually interested in trying it. He first
Lars Eighner uses the appeal of ethos the most prominently in his book to prove he is credible, followed by an appeal logos by applying logic and pathos using stories.
In the past decades, the booming housing market has caused the prices of real estate to dramatically increase causing the issue of homelessness to be on the rise. Many people who do live on the streets, resort to dumpster diving and finding trash to call theirs. In his article: "On Dumpster Diving" Lars Eighner, goes into depth about his experiences while dumpster diving. Eighner found many items in the dumpster that were still edible or somewhat useful. He began diving a year before he became homeless and has continued while he wrote his piece of work (Eighner 673). Eighner enlightens us with many instances of his journey dumpster diving while he was homeless.
The author, Lars Eighner explains in his informative narrative, “On Dumpster Diving” the lifestyle of living out of a dumpster. Eighner describes the necessary steps to effectively scavenge through dumpsters based on his own anecdotes as he began dumpster diving a year before he became homeless. The lessons he learned from being a dumpster diver was in being complacent to only grab what he needs and not what he wants, because in the end all those things will go to waste. Eighner shares his ideas mainly towards two direct audiences. One of them is directed to people who are dumpster divers themselves, and the other, to individuals who are unaware of how much trash we throw away and waste. However, the author does more than direct how much trash
Didion and Eighner have different styles of writing, but they both created writings with an instructional component. In both pieces of literature, they guide the audience like a mother to child, guiding us step by step in order to perfect the outcome. Joan Didion’s “On Keeping a Notebook” teaches the reader on how to keep note of the past through a notebook. “On Dumpster Diving” written by Lars Eighner, teaches the reader how to successfully dumpster dive and survive. However, Eighner’s piece included many details, whereas Didion’s ideas used examples by flowing from one top to another. It could also be said that Lars Eighner’s piece creates a more thorough analysis on how to dumpster dive. In spite of the fact that the pieces of literature
Homelessness is increasing every year and effecting Americans of different age, ethnicity and religion. In Lars Eighner “On Dumpster Diving” he explains what he went through while being homeless. He describes how and what foods someone should be looking for and to always be conscious of what one is eating because there is always a reason why something has been thrown out. He continues to go into detail about other items that can be found in the dumpster like sheets to sleep on and pieces of paper to write on. Things that can keep him busy through the day. Eighner carefully explains to his readers how being a dumpster diver has become a life style for the homeless and this is how they survive. It’s a way of living and they are comfortable doing it. “I began dumpster diving about a year before I became homeless” (Eighner 713). He tries to bring us into the world of being homeless. It is hard to imagine what it would be like in that situation, and how could surviving as a dumpster diver be a way of survival? As a dumpster diver, Eighner is able to tell us what is ok to eat and have and what is not ok for your health. His essay starts by uttering some guidelines of what is and is not safe to eat. “Eating safely from the dumpsters involves three principles: using common sense for evaluating the food, knowing the dumpsters of the given areas and always ask, “Why was this discarded?” (Eighner 714).
Eighner writes, “Long before I began Dumpster diving I was impressed with Dumpsters, enough so that I wrote the Merriam research service to discover what I could about the world “Dumpster”. I learned from them that “Dumpster” is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempsey Dumpster company.” He was so fascinated with Dumpsters, that he learned the definition, which is a fact. A definition can be adjusted; however, it is not completely revised. Definitions are definite. Eighner states, “Eating from the Dumpsters involves three principles: using the senses and common sense to evaluate the condition of the found materials, knowing the Dumpsters of a given area and checking them regularly, and seeking always to answer the question, ‘Why was this discarded?’” He uses his senses to analyze the condition of the things he finds logically. Dumpster diving requires the ability to critically think about what can and can not be
A) Lars Eighner, in “On Dumpster Diving”, portrays the waste that is accumulated due to modern consumerism and materialism. He also demonstrates the issue of the wage gap. Consumers of the modern age spend too much and therefore waste too much. In the essay, Eighner describes life as an scavenger and demonstrates how people are able to live by the minimal resources. “Scavengers” are able to survive on the waste of the consumer. Eighner presents this scenario as a contrast to the life of a modern consumer, in order to portray it’s unnecessary wastefulness. Mainly, food seems to be taken lightly by society, as Eighner as a scavenger finds “a half jar of peanut butter”,
Step 3: 1. Eighner introduces his arguments through the use of narrative stories and his own personal experiences. He uses this technique to let the reader see firsthand how some people are able to survive off what is carelessly thrown away by others who take what they own for granted. Eighner illustrates this point on page 1, “The necessities of daily life I began to extract from Dumpsters. Yes, we ate from Dumpsters. Except for jeans, all my clothes can from Dumpsters. Boom boxes, candles, bedding, toilet paper, medicine, books, a typewriter… I acquired many things from the Dumpsters.”
This story explains the science behind dumpster diving and the different techniques people use to scavenge for treasures that was once other people's trash. The author, Lars Eighner, talks about the pros and cons of searching through dumpsters to find food or other items that could be useful when you do not have much money to spend on essentials. Lars Eighner told multiple stories of crazy things he would find that people would just throw away. He Explains why a college campus is one of his favorite places to scavenge through dumpsters because of all of the spoiled kids who are very wasteful and just throw stuff away. He says, “Students throw out canned goods and staples at the end of the semesters and when they give up college at
Eigner, Lars “ On Dumpster Diving” 50 Essays: A Portable Anthology Ed. Samuel Cohen. Fourth Edition Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2014. Page 139-151. Print.
If everyone recycled think of how much more space there would be in landfills across the world. There is only so much room on this earth and we are using a huge portion of it for our trash. Clearlake, California alone on a busy day can bring in 80,000 pounds of trash to the local dump. I know this because I work at the local dump in Mckinleyville. I also see a lot of people that throw away their recycling for the simple reason of being too lazy to sort it. I watch bag after of bag of plastic, aluminum, and glass get thrown into the bin which we haul straight to a landfill in Anderson, California. If everyone in Mckinleyville recycled there plastic, aluminum and glass they could save thousands of pounds a day from going to the landfill. I think people are not informed that waste is a big problem in this world. But in fact conservation is an issue, and resources and energy aren't too plentiful. Someday these resources are going to run out. But the more we recycle the longer we can make these resources last.
The amount of waste the average person produces on a daily basis is staggeringly high at 7.1 pounds. I have noticed that there are rarely ever recycling bins next to the trash bins at gas stations, therefore people could not recycle even if they wanted to. Whenever people go on road trips and are emptying out the trash that has been accumulating in their car, there is no way
The environment today is not in a good condition, Climate change is evident, and oceans are getting polluted. Rainforrest's are decreasing in size due to deforestation and illegal logging. Animals are getting extinct due to the destruction of their habitats. Natural resources are being consumed at very large amounts, and get wasted. There are different ways these problems can be addressed, one option is environmental management. Environmental management focuses on conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats, and impact of humans on the environment. Conservation of natural resources is the smart use of the world's resources by humans, through this waste production is limited, and there will be less garbage in the world. By conserving
Are you aware of the detrimental impacts that we have had on our environment? Every second, the Earth is being polluted by poisonous gases, waste products and due to human activities, the world’s climate is dramatically changing. In other words, these impacts do not only harm our environment but also our health. It has been scientifically proven that air pollution causes respiratory diseases and cancer, due to the inhalation of all the harmful chemicals. Water pollution can also lead to typhoid, diarrheal diseases and other waterborne disease, due to the intake of bacteria and parasites. Many people have died due to these health-related illnesses. So why are we still living in this awful condition? Air sustains us and water is a basic necessity, so we should do what we can to prevent pollution. In short, we should protect our environment to ensure a healthy life a...