Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of eating healthy foods
Effects of unhealthy diet essay
Effects of unhealthy diet essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of eating healthy foods
Waste Not, Want Not
Dumpster diving is a way of life for some, a hobby for others, and a disgust to most. The majority of society either scoffs at the sight of or turns a blind eye to someone rummaging through dumpsters. It isn’t where most people go to retrieve the essentials of life such as food or shoes. But there is a rather healthy percentage of our society who plunge ankle deep into another man’s trash looking for treasure. Many of those who go in search of valuables or food among the trash have noted that searching through the dumpsters at dorms and colleges reveal a surprising amount of perfectly edible food. This can place negative attributes on our nation’s population of college students. But, they aren’t the only ones to blame for
…show more content…
our nations spike in food waste problems and affairs. In the article On Dumpster Diving by Lars Eighner, he describes his life after becoming homeless and how he provides for himself and his dog, Lizbeth.
He shares his knowledge on where to look, what to look for, and how to look for it. Closing time at local pizzerias would often yield Eighner a bounty of fresh pizzas. Whether it was from pranksters calling in fake orders or an error on a pizza’s toppings, among the trash was usually a healthy supply of uneaten, wasted pizzas. Due to their tendency to be careless when tossing out the contents of their refrigerators and pantries, Eighner also frequented dumpsters in the areas where college students lived in order to find provisions. College students can be in the habit of throwing everything out when the semester is over or in preparation for an upcoming holiday. Often the food tossed in with the trash is well within its expiration or sell by date, or have minor flaws. All of this waste is a welcome sight to people like Eighner who count on others to quickly lose sight of the value of things. This behavior is characteristic of a majority of society, where it has been engrained in people’s minds since childhood, the action of “out with the old, in with the new.” An example of this can been seen in technological advances, such as smart phones. Every few months it seems a newer model is released to the public, and without hesitation or consideration of the perfectly good phone in their possession they MUST acquire the new one. …show more content…
This sudden devaluation is sadly even present when it comes to the staples and necessities of everyday life. It is strange how numbers printed on a carton have more of an influence on people than their own God-given senses. A quick smell of the milk that is one day passed the expiration date can easily tell a person whether or not it should be discarded. Eighner gives a specific example of half a jar of nonorganic peanut butter being one of the common items thrown out by students. Peanut butter typically keeps well even when opened and unrefrigerated. Yet, this item is still discarded with the rest of the likely unspoiled food. College students are not in the minority, however. It is the norm to waste food in this manner, and not just the scraps from domestic dinner plates. College dining halls also typically waste huge numbers of meals every day; meals that could curb the hunger pangs of someone like Eighner. Restaurants and businesses are also guilty of this practice. Through research it has been shown that 1 in 6 people struggle to find their next meal. Given this fact alone, college students and everyone alike should be more conscientious regarding their wastefulness. On the surface these students appear to be typical of their generation, exhibiting a level of self-absorption that isn’t surprising.
Their wasting of food is just another facet of college life, ranking up there with excessive partying. This may come from the newfound freedom of living on their own with their own set of rules, or it could be because there is no value in what they didn’t have to pay for themselves. Many college students rely on parents or other sources to pay their way through college, including footing the grocery bill. In situations like this where a young person doesn’t have an abundance of real world experiences, an undeniable chunk of appreciation is lost if work isn’t required to get something (like a stocked fridge) in return. Free things can void responsibility for many people and the consequences can have lasting effects no matter how minimal. In this case, food waste among colleges and their students has reached a point where it is no longer a choice to ignore. Studies have shown that the average college student contributes in excess of 140 pounds of food waste per year. That number is astounding and should be an indicator that a solution must be found for both the environment and its
inhabitants. It can be easy to put the blame on the immaturity of young minds; however, food waste is a problem of all generations and economic classes. Eighner shares his pity for those millions of people whose hunger for materialistic things prevents them from living full lives because of the objects blocking their view of the world around them. But this materialism isn’t a problem contained to our nations young adults; It is a problem shared by everyone. The old proverbial saying, “waste not, want not” possesses so much wisdom in four simple words. Much like in the medical world, it is easier and more cost efficient to prevent than to diagnose and treat. That also goes to say that it benefits more than just the individual in the long run. The time and resources that could be saved if this concept were taught more often are absolutely invaluable. Many organizations have been formed after the need of a more economical way of getting rid of leftover food had been recognized. Different colleges around the country have begun implementing programs which save and reduce the number of discarded meals in their dining halls. Meals which would have otherwise been tossed in the garbage have been, in essence, recycled and freely given to those with empty stomachs. However, few individualized programs have been established where the focus is on a more domestic, rather than institutional, level. Solutions to an individual’s food waste must come from the individuals themselves, and a desire to be more mindful of the value of the things they are lucky to possess. In conclusion, this brand and level of waste among college students is alarming. In a generation where trends are set and generally followed, it seems reasonable to believe that positive gains in this aspect could be met. Our students cannot be blamed for what they do not see changing in their own world. Young people follow by example, and if the example set is one of a wasteful, materialistic lifestyle an undesirable outcome is predictable. Change is possible, and the most logical place to start is with those emerging into the real world and no longer sheltered under the wings of parents. But, this is not a burden they bear alone. College students are merely the squeaky wheel or whistleblower on a much broader issue. Gaining the ability to recognize the gravity of the issue, making the masses aware, and forming a feasible solution to nationwide food waste is where the focus should be. Lars Eighner was correct in his feeling of pity for those who fall on the spectrum between homelessness and extreme wealth. Somewhere between pure self-reliance and having the world at your fingertips the act of sustentation is lost and tossed away in the form of food in an overused landfill.
Eighner writes, “Long before I began Dumpster diving I was impressed with Dumpsters, enough so that I wrote the Merriam research service to discover what I could about the world “Dumpster”. I learned from them that “Dumpster” is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempsey Dumpster company.” He was so fascinated with Dumpsters, that he learned the definition, which is a fact. A definition can be adjusted; however, it is not completely revised. Definitions are definite. Eighner states, “Eating from the Dumpsters involves three principles: using the senses and common sense to evaluate the condition of the found materials, knowing the Dumpsters of a given area and checking them regularly, and seeking always to answer the question, ‘Why was this discarded?’” He uses his senses to analyze the condition of the things he finds logically. Dumpster diving requires the ability to critically think about what can and can not be eaten. Eighner writes, “Although very rare with modern canning methods, botulism is a possibility. But botulism is almost certainly fatal and often the first symptom is death.” He uses knowledge to understand what the expectations of some foods, especially canned foods, should be. While Eighner uses all three persuasive appeals in his writing, ethos is the most
Although Eighner reveals that his chosen lifestyle was to live on another's refuge, he kept in accordance with his acts of superiority and snobbishness by excluding himself from the term "Dumpster Diving." Instead, he preferred to be called a "scavenger because of its frankness in the term." (Eighner, 1993). Furthermore, Eighner, explains that there are rules to abide by when successfully "scavenging" through dumpsters, "using the senses…knowing the dumpsters of a given area…. [and] Why was this discarded?" It is the explanation of the three guidelines Eighner asserts to be superior to 'can scroungers' (Homeless people who rummage through the dumpsters for money). The author further elaborates his snobbishness by revealing that he has tried the heinous lifestyle of "can scroungers," and deduced that only a few dollars could be obtained. Moreover, Eighner states, "one can extract the necessities of life from the dumpsters directly with far less effort than would be required to accumulate the equivalent of cans." (Eighner, 1993). The author stereoty...
According to Mayberry (2009) Lars Eighner, a graduate of the University of Texas, became homeless in 1988 and again in 1995 (p. 351). Some of the accounts from Travels with Lisbeth (1993), a book by Lars Eighner, depicted what he went through and what he found during his homeless state. A homeless person must eat and sleep but may not know where or when this might happen next. The human will to survive enabled Eighner to eat food from a dumpster, reach out to other for handouts, and sleep in places other than a bed with covers.
The reader learned about what exactly one would eat or wouldn’t eat while taking a dive in a dumpster. “Raw fruits and vegetables with intact skins seem perfectly safe to me” and “For myself, I avoid the game, poultry, pork and egg-based foods, whether I find them raw or cooked.” are examples that prove his experience with dumpster diving. He explains how negligent college students are when he inspects their garbage. “A typical discard is half a jar of peanut butter. In fact, non-organic peanut butter does not require refrigeration and is unlikely to spoil in any reasonable time.” (Eighner 676) Since college students live on “Daddy’s money” they throw away what could be valuable to another, the peanut
The author, Lars Eighner explains in his informative narrative, “On Dumpster Diving” the lifestyle of living out of a dumpster. Eighner describes the necessary steps to effectively scavenge through dumpsters based on his own anecdotes as he began dumpster diving a year before he became homeless. The lessons he learned from being a dumpster diver was in being complacent to only grab what he needs and not what he wants, because in the end all those things will go to waste. Eighner shares his ideas mainly towards two direct audiences. One of them is directed to people who are dumpster divers themselves, and the other, to individuals who are unaware of how much trash we throw away and waste. However, the author does more than direct how much trash
Didion and Eighner have different styles of writing, but they both created writings with an instructional component. In both pieces of literature, they guide the audience like a mother to child, guiding us step by step in order to perfect the outcome. Joan Didion’s “On Keeping a Notebook” teaches the reader on how to keep note of the past through a notebook. “On Dumpster Diving” written by Lars Eighner, teaches the reader how to successfully dumpster dive and survive. However, Eighner’s piece included many details, whereas Didion’s ideas used examples by flowing from one top to another. It could also be said that Lars Eighner’s piece creates a more thorough analysis on how to dumpster dive. In spite of the fact that the pieces of literature
Homelessness is increasing every year and effecting Americans of different age, ethnicity and religion. In Lars Eighner “On Dumpster Diving” he explains what he went through while being homeless. He describes how and what foods someone should be looking for and to always be conscious of what one is eating because there is always a reason why something has been thrown out. He continues to go into detail about other items that can be found in the dumpster like sheets to sleep on and pieces of paper to write on. Things that can keep him busy through the day. Eighner carefully explains to his readers how being a dumpster diver has become a life style for the homeless and this is how they survive. It’s a way of living and they are comfortable doing it. “I began dumpster diving about a year before I became homeless” (Eighner 713). He tries to bring us into the world of being homeless. It is hard to imagine what it would be like in that situation, and how could surviving as a dumpster diver be a way of survival? As a dumpster diver, Eighner is able to tell us what is ok to eat and have and what is not ok for your health. His essay starts by uttering some guidelines of what is and is not safe to eat. “Eating safely from the dumpsters involves three principles: using common sense for evaluating the food, knowing the dumpsters of the given areas and always ask, “Why was this discarded?” (Eighner 714).
Eighner writes, “Long before I began Dumpster diving I was impressed with Dumpsters, enough so that I wrote the Merriam research service to discover what I could about the world “Dumpster”. I learned from them that “Dumpster” is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempsey Dumpster company.” He was so fascinated with Dumpsters, that he learned the definition, which is a fact. A definition can be adjusted; however, it is not completely revised. Definitions are definite. Eighner states, “Eating from the Dumpsters involves three principles: using the senses and common sense to evaluate the condition of the found materials, knowing the Dumpsters of a given area and checking them regularly, and seeking always to answer the question, ‘Why was this discarded?’” He uses his senses to analyze the condition of the things he finds logically. Dumpster diving requires the ability to critically think about what can and can not be
A) Lars Eighner, in “On Dumpster Diving”, portrays the waste that is accumulated due to modern consumerism and materialism. He also demonstrates the issue of the wage gap. Consumers of the modern age spend too much and therefore waste too much. In the essay, Eighner describes life as an scavenger and demonstrates how people are able to live by the minimal resources. “Scavengers” are able to survive on the waste of the consumer. Eighner presents this scenario as a contrast to the life of a modern consumer, in order to portray it’s unnecessary wastefulness. Mainly, food seems to be taken lightly by society, as Eighner as a scavenger finds “a half jar of peanut butter”,
Seifert reaches out to chains such as Trader Joes Grocery to ask and they refused to answer these questions. However, they had locked dumpsters to prevent anyone from taking what they consider to be trash. Lots of foods and meats that Seifert and his team find are indeed salvageable. Seifert’s teammate explains, “if one egg is broken, take it out and save the rest.” This is the attitude that most dumpster divers have.
I agree with his assessment about society’s throw away mentality due to the fact that I have seen it myself first hand. Recently I helped my sister move out of her dorm room at NAU and I was horrified to see all the things and edible food she was just dumping and what was worse, she wasn’t the only one. All of the kids were getting rid of perfectly good items in the dumpster, so it’s no wonder that dumpsters near college campuses are one of Eighner’s favorite places to scavenge. In his article on page 3, Eighner elaborates on student’s wasteful habits, “but in the case of discards from student apartments, the answer may be that the item was discarded through carelessness, ignorance or wastefulness.” I believe agree with Eighner that some people have a pack rat mentality while others just throw it away. My parents are a good example of this and I think it has something to do with the way that they were raised. My mom is a pack rat, holding on to everything as long as possible and giving away to charity what she doesn’t want anymore. She squeezes every last drop out of a toothpaste tube or a shampoo bottle, while my dad will throw it away half empty. My mom was raised in a single parent household, where money was tight and you used what you had… my dad however, was raised in a more affluent home and money flowed more freely. In fact, my mom does her own dumpster diving fairly regularly in our garbage can by rescuing stuff out of the garbage that my dad has thrown away, including belts, pants, shirts and hardly worn tennis shoes. She doesn’t keep the goods, but instead gives it to Goodwill or the church clothing drive. My dad is her antithesis and is definitely part of the throw-away society. My dad has little sentiment attached to stuff and like Eichner mentioned on page 6, “knows there is plenty more where what we came from.” After reflecting on
It is of no surprise to anyone that people in general, particularly Americans, tend to be overly-enticed by materialistic things and ridiculous ideals, placing more emphasis on them than things of sentiment. In “On Dumpster Diving,” author Lars Eighner develops on his experiences as a homeless man not in an attempt to defend the art of Dumpster diving, but instead to build upon the idea that a majority of people spend too much time and money on things that will not matter in a few years—they should instead focus on things that will never lose their value. Throughout the essay, he is attempting to persuade his audience that they should change their regular way of thinking and let go of materialistic things in order to live a better, more sound, and overall healthier life. To develop this purpose, Eighner utilizes juxtaposition, exemplification, and definition.
This story explains the science behind dumpster diving and the different techniques people use to scavenge for treasures that was once other people's trash. The author, Lars Eighner, talks about the pros and cons of searching through dumpsters to find food or other items that could be useful when you do not have much money to spend on essentials. Lars Eighner told multiple stories of crazy things he would find that people would just throw away. He Explains why a college campus is one of his favorite places to scavenge through dumpsters because of all of the spoiled kids who are very wasteful and just throw stuff away. He says, “Students throw out canned goods and staples at the end of the semesters and when they give up college at
We chose to use the concept of self-awareness tested by Beaman et. al in 1979. They tested children's transgressions while trick or treating by placing a mirror behind a bowl of candy with the goal of making them see themselves, while either following the rules posted to take one piece or not. This study found that children who saw themselves in the mirror while taking candy followed the one-piece rule, compared to those who didn't have the mirror to make them self-aware did not follow the one-piece rule. We decided to test this concept because making people see themselves before they discard their recyclables will make them consciously aware to be sure to recycle what is meant to be recycled.
People should know the negative impact throwing away a water bottle or newspaper, purchasing meat from the grocery store or consuming gasoline has on the environment, and many do not. By informing society about how their decisions affect the environment, we can help save our planet and change our attitude toward the land we live on, the water we drink and the air we breathe” and truly show respect for the stuff that we depend on. The United States produces “about 8.25 billion tons of solid waste each year” (Russell 1). People do not realize the impact they have on our planet and the environment. When people throw anything in the trashcan, they are contributing to the destruction of our planet.