Lars Eighner’s essay “On Dumpster Diving” describes his experience of being a Dumpster scavenger. Eighner began his Dumpster diving about one year before he became homeless. Since he needed to support living with his dog, Lizbeth, he not only ran out of his savings but also had to spend his infrequent income on rent. Therefore, he had to obtain and satisfy his daily necessities from the Dumpsters. During his experience as a scavenger, he gained a lot of knowledge from the art of Dumpster diving. He had enhanced his ability in distinguishing what was safe to eat and what wasn’t. Every time he found something in Dumpsters, he always asked himself,“why was this discarded?” He figured out what was a good time to find fresh food, like pizza, and …show more content…
to find good stuff around colleges. Throughout the experience, Eighner learned two deeply meaningful lessons. One of the lessons was to take only what he can fully utilize and let the rest pass by. This is because if he cannot make good use of the thing, then the thing has no value for him. That being said, enough is as good as a feast. The second lesson was that material objects last only a short time. Eighner believes that mental support is much more significant than material support. Also, there was a big change in Eighner’s attitude towards material objects. He used to be a person who had sentimental value for material objects and relied heavily on material objects. However, even though he does not rely on material objects anymore, he still has the sentiments. Overall, his desire towards material objects has been weakened, and the value of objects for him has become low. What’s more, Eighner feels sorry for people who will never find the things that make them happy. From my perspective, I totally agree with Eighner’s view of material objects being less important than mental things. First of all, spiritual support from family or friends plays an essential role in humans’ lives, and it is much more important than material support. In order to keep up and survive in a fast-paced world, the time that parents spend with their children has become less and less because of work. To compensate their children, parents are likely to give their children money or buy anything they want to satisfy them. However, sometimes, material things cannot meet children’s psychological need. Although they acquire everything they want, they might still feel empty. It is due to the fact that they lack adequate care from the parents. They are eager for parents’ love. Additionally, it is a common phenomenon that children who suffer a lack of parental care tend to easily become rebellious or somehow have mental defects. For instance, in rural China, there are many so-called “left-behind children”. Their parents head to a big city to find jobs so that they are able to earn money to support their family. But due to the government restrictions, their children are less likely or even not able to attend schools where they live. Therefore, the only way is to leave their children behind in the villages where they were born. Most left-behind children feel lonely and anxious. Even though their parents buy some gifts for them, they are much happier to see their parents come back from work instead of seeing their gifts. Admittedly, as Eighner mentioned, “mental things are longer lived than other material things”. In addition, life is too valuable to waste chasing material possessions.
There is one slang term, “YOLO,” which stands for you only live once. Since our life is short and time goes by fast, it is extremely important for us to make the most of it. Simply pursuing material possessions is not a smart choice for us because they steal our precious time, energy, and even beloved family relationships. For example, Ellen Goodman’s essay, “The Company Man,” precisely describes a middle-class man, who sacrificed his important family relationships in order to achieve his material success. The company man, Phil, believed that work makes him successful, so he let his work consume his precious time. What’s more, Phil was one of the top ranking vice-presidents, who had a strong possibility to replace the present president of the firm. Therefore, he always set work as a priority, pushed himself so hard, and eventually led himself to death. It was due to the fact that Phil sacrificed a lot of time with his family; his eldest children even did not know what he was like. What an embarrassing situation! Also, his other two children felt awkward with his father, and they had nothing to say to each other when they were together. Phil did not realize the true value of life. As a result, he worked himself to death. Sometimes, material success does not make you valuable because material possessions are temporal; instead, it is our soul that makes us valuable because it lasts
forever. Additionally, material things are useless and disappointing. Some people look on material things as tools to increase their happiness, to enhance their quality and experience of life, and to boost their confidence. Also, they consider material goods as symbols of happiness, joy, and hope. However, these are just artificial symbols created by people. An article written by Celestine Chua, “Materialism Breeds Unhappiness,” best describes the fact that material goods actually cause discontentment. The author, Chua, used to be quite materialistic. She often went shopping with friends and wanted to earn more money in order to purchase more stuff. She believed that material possessions would improve her quality of life, and she felt happier when owning those things. However, she started living more minimally in the past few years because of a book called “The Affluent Society,” which the author Galbraith claimed that materialism bred discontentment. She came to understand his statement and began to question her attitude towards material objects. She realized that the gratification she found in material possessions was usually fleeting. What’s more, she even quit her job to try to break out of the connection between material possessions and happiness, owing to the fact that materialism prevents her from solving inner issues in her life that will lead to real happiness. All in all, material goods can only temporarily deal with unhappiness since they will be discarded in the end. Hence, we should try to achieve happiness without material possessions. In conclusion, Lars Eighner values mental things more than material things. For me, I believe that spiritual things are far more valuable than material things. Our happiness and fulfillment are built on the invisible things of life, such as love, peace, hope, and friends or family relationships. Our life is short, and we deserve better, so blindly chasing material objects is a waste of time. Furthermore, people who experience their lives in pursuit of possession are never content. Therefore, people should adopt a valuable attitude towards material objects.
He starts by giving a lot of personal examples (Pizza shop example), then talks about other people who try it (The stages of beginning to dumpster dive), and explains how dumpster diving is a lot better than the more accepted picking up of cans (comparison to a wino). He then delves into the ethics behind dumpster diving (looking at prescription bottles and such), and then if one, presumably the reader, wanted to try it how they would do so (pole with hook on it). He ends with some deep insights into dumpster diving and his way of life. I think that the way he organizes his essay, and his overall tone, are to convince the reader that dumpster diving is not as bad as everyone things, and to make people actually interested in trying it. He first
Eighner writes, “Long before I began Dumpster diving I was impressed with Dumpsters, enough so that I wrote the Merriam research service to discover what I could about the world “Dumpster”. I learned from them that “Dumpster” is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempsey Dumpster company.” He was so fascinated with Dumpsters, that he learned the definition, which is a fact. A definition can be adjusted; however, it is not completely revised. Definitions are definite. Eighner states, “Eating from the Dumpsters involves three principles: using the senses and common sense to evaluate the condition of the found materials, knowing the Dumpsters of a given area and checking them regularly, and seeking always to answer the question, ‘Why was this discarded?’” He uses his senses to analyze the condition of the things he finds logically. Dumpster diving requires the ability to critically think about what can and can not be eaten. Eighner writes, “Although very rare with modern canning methods, botulism is a possibility. But botulism is almost certainly fatal and often the first symptom is death.” He uses knowledge to understand what the expectations of some foods, especially canned foods, should be. While Eighner uses all three persuasive appeals in his writing, ethos is the most
Although Eighner reveals that his chosen lifestyle was to live on another's refuge, he kept in accordance with his acts of superiority and snobbishness by excluding himself from the term "Dumpster Diving." Instead, he preferred to be called a "scavenger because of its frankness in the term." (Eighner, 1993). Furthermore, Eighner, explains that there are rules to abide by when successfully "scavenging" through dumpsters, "using the senses…knowing the dumpsters of a given area…. [and] Why was this discarded?" It is the explanation of the three guidelines Eighner asserts to be superior to 'can scroungers' (Homeless people who rummage through the dumpsters for money). The author further elaborates his snobbishness by revealing that he has tried the heinous lifestyle of "can scroungers," and deduced that only a few dollars could be obtained. Moreover, Eighner states, "one can extract the necessities of life from the dumpsters directly with far less effort than would be required to accumulate the equivalent of cans." (Eighner, 1993). The author stereoty...
The reader learned about what exactly one would eat or wouldn’t eat while taking a dive in a dumpster. “Raw fruits and vegetables with intact skins seem perfectly safe to me” and “For myself, I avoid the game, poultry, pork and egg-based foods, whether I find them raw or cooked.” are examples that prove his experience with dumpster diving. He explains how negligent college students are when he inspects their garbage. “A typical discard is half a jar of peanut butter. In fact, non-organic peanut butter does not require refrigeration and is unlikely to spoil in any reasonable time.” (Eighner 676) Since college students live on “Daddy’s money” they throw away what could be valuable to another, the peanut
The author, Lars Eighner explains in his informative narrative, “On Dumpster Diving” the lifestyle of living out of a dumpster. Eighner describes the necessary steps to effectively scavenge through dumpsters based on his own anecdotes as he began dumpster diving a year before he became homeless. The lessons he learned from being a dumpster diver was in being complacent to only grab what he needs and not what he wants, because in the end all those things will go to waste. Eighner shares his ideas mainly towards two direct audiences. One of them is directed to people who are dumpster divers themselves, and the other, to individuals who are unaware of how much trash we throw away and waste. However, the author does more than direct how much trash
Didion and Eighner have different styles of writing, but they both created writings with an instructional component. In both pieces of literature, they guide the audience like a mother to child, guiding us step by step in order to perfect the outcome. Joan Didion’s “On Keeping a Notebook” teaches the reader on how to keep note of the past through a notebook. “On Dumpster Diving” written by Lars Eighner, teaches the reader how to successfully dumpster dive and survive. However, Eighner’s piece included many details, whereas Didion’s ideas used examples by flowing from one top to another. It could also be said that Lars Eighner’s piece creates a more thorough analysis on how to dumpster dive. In spite of the fact that the pieces of literature
Homelessness is increasing every year and effecting Americans of different age, ethnicity and religion. In Lars Eighner “On Dumpster Diving” he explains what he went through while being homeless. He describes how and what foods someone should be looking for and to always be conscious of what one is eating because there is always a reason why something has been thrown out. He continues to go into detail about other items that can be found in the dumpster like sheets to sleep on and pieces of paper to write on. Things that can keep him busy through the day. Eighner carefully explains to his readers how being a dumpster diver has become a life style for the homeless and this is how they survive. It’s a way of living and they are comfortable doing it. “I began dumpster diving about a year before I became homeless” (Eighner 713). He tries to bring us into the world of being homeless. It is hard to imagine what it would be like in that situation, and how could surviving as a dumpster diver be a way of survival? As a dumpster diver, Eighner is able to tell us what is ok to eat and have and what is not ok for your health. His essay starts by uttering some guidelines of what is and is not safe to eat. “Eating safely from the dumpsters involves three principles: using common sense for evaluating the food, knowing the dumpsters of the given areas and always ask, “Why was this discarded?” (Eighner 714).
There are plenty of articles that discuss in great detail the conditions and many aspects of dumpster diving, but there is a fundamental difference between diving for survival and diving for profit. Lars Eighner, the author of “On Dumpster Diving”, tells stories of multiple instances of his dumpster diving experience. Eighner also explains exactly what it’s like to be homeless and to rely on scavenging through garbage to survive in order to get your next meal. On the other hand, in the article “Dumpster Divers: Scavenging is About More Than the Trash” by Elana Dure, she discusses that dumpster divers believe to think they are scavenging for treasure, not just for pleasure and enjoyment, but for profit. Both are “making a living”, but one group
Eighner writes, “Long before I began Dumpster diving I was impressed with Dumpsters, enough so that I wrote the Merriam research service to discover what I could about the world “Dumpster”. I learned from them that “Dumpster” is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempsey Dumpster company.” He was so fascinated with Dumpsters, that he learned the definition, which is a fact. A definition can be adjusted; however, it is not completely revised. Definitions are definite. Eighner states, “Eating from the Dumpsters involves three principles: using the senses and common sense to evaluate the condition of the found materials, knowing the Dumpsters of a given area and checking them regularly, and seeking always to answer the question, ‘Why was this discarded?’” He uses his senses to analyze the condition of the things he finds logically. Dumpster diving requires the ability to critically think about what can and can not be
A) Lars Eighner, in “On Dumpster Diving”, portrays the waste that is accumulated due to modern consumerism and materialism. He also demonstrates the issue of the wage gap. Consumers of the modern age spend too much and therefore waste too much. In the essay, Eighner describes life as an scavenger and demonstrates how people are able to live by the minimal resources. “Scavengers” are able to survive on the waste of the consumer. Eighner presents this scenario as a contrast to the life of a modern consumer, in order to portray it’s unnecessary wastefulness. Mainly, food seems to be taken lightly by society, as Eighner as a scavenger finds “a half jar of peanut butter”,
Eighner begins his essay by stating that he "began Dumpster diving about a year before [he] became homeless," showing that he has ample knowledge on this practice of scavenging. He talks about how scavenging is a "niche,"
Seifert reaches out to chains such as Trader Joes Grocery to ask and they refused to answer these questions. However, they had locked dumpsters to prevent anyone from taking what they consider to be trash. Lots of foods and meats that Seifert and his team find are indeed salvageable. Seifert’s teammate explains, “if one egg is broken, take it out and save the rest.” This is the attitude that most dumpster divers have.
In the text “On Dumpster Diving”, by Lars Eighner is about a man who speaks of being a homeless man joined by his pet, named Lizbeth. Not exclusively does he clarify his procedures living out of dumpsters, yet in addition the lessons he has learned as a scavenger. Above all I think the genuine message he was attempting to get cross over is that we waste more than we think we do, and it's in our nature as humans. He had built up a great deal of involvement in recognizing on what was protected to eat and what wasn't. He specified eating from a dumpster is the thing that isolates the dilettanti from the experts. Eighner passed by three standards, presence of mind, knowing the Dumpsters and checking them consistently, and looking for dependably
Reaching the top of the world is a kind of glory and success, but people sacrificed their life to reach the summit of Homologumena was foolish and selfish. They never think about how much their family and friends love theme. “what good will it be for a man if he gains the whole world and glory themselves , yet forfeits his soul?” that is Bible talk me. People don’t know what is the most important things when they only see the theirselves. They always be too hard on themselves to show their ability, and the arrogance of human, those make people be difficult to letting go, but people never think it in another side of giving up. Sometimes giving up doesn’t mean you are weak, you just try your best, never put over yourself, and you may have a better result that you deserve. [50 Quotes to Help You Let Go and Live. ]
Step 3: 1. Eighner introduces his arguments through the use of narrative stories and his own personal experiences. He uses this technique to let the reader see firsthand how some people are able to survive off what is carelessly thrown away by others who take what they own for granted. Eighner illustrates this point on page 1, “The necessities of daily life I began to extract from Dumpsters. Yes, we ate from Dumpsters. Except for jeans, all my clothes can from Dumpsters. Boom boxes, candles, bedding, toilet paper, medicine, books, a typewriter… I acquired many things from the Dumpsters.”