More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis for organic farming vs. conventional farming
Thesis for organic farming vs. conventional farming
Book review on the omnivores dilemma
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In today’s society, the puzzling question of how to help our environment and better our health comes with challenging answers filled with ethical questions and contradicting advice. In The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals, by Michael Pollan, Pollan uncovers the truths of the real meaning of words like nutritious, healthy and organic. The entire book leads back to one simple truth, eating is an act full of ethical issues. Pollan tries to make the public aware of how reliant they are on particular types of food, solely based on its easy accessibility, cheap cost, and quick consumption; despite our knowledge of what is actually in this food or where it came from. He writes on the idea that cheap means of producing foods have …show more content…
evolved into producers modifying the product and relying on fossil fuels rather than solar energy and a list of other problems resulting in what Pollan calls "the industrial food chain." Pollan looks at the food choices we, as the American people, make.
You can put our ideas of a “meal” in comparison with the French culture’s idea of a meal. This comparison truly shows the morals that perhaps got lost along the way. American eating habits have developed throughout the years to make the whole process of eating easier. For hundreds of years, the preparation and consumption of food was something people enjoyed and took pride in. The American culture of food now is that we no longer have a culture: we eat whatever is fastest and easiest, with no regard for the traditions and expectations that have for so long surrounded mealtimes. It is rare if we have the leisure time to sit down and interact with friends and family over our meals. On the other hand the French do not hold as busy of a schedule, allowing themselves to sit down and share their meal together eating and enjoying each other’s company. They prepare their food allowing themselves to have a better understanding of what goes into their meals and how it is prepared. As Americans, we are content with the cheeseburger we purchased at the drive-through for a cheap cost. A quick meal to tide us over until we are on the run for the next one. These quick, cheap meals play a huge role in the reason why Americans struggle with overconsumption. A United Nations report in 2000 stated there are more people who are considerably over-fed than there are malnourished. Pollan shares this disturbing factor when
discussing obesity, although there are many contributing factors, it undeniable that these fast food meals and microwaveable dinners play a huge role. Costs are low, they are quick, easy, and accessible, but do we ever stop to think that this food must be modified in some way in order for it to be available to us for such a low price? It easy for one to overlook the impact their food choices have. Most people have been persuaded that eating from the "industrial food chain," is acceptable. Many farmers have had to modify their way of farming in order to stay in business and keep up with competition. They are forced to compete with other farmers whose focus is now based on, “the quality of sheer quantity.” No longer able to make a fixed number of products that hold great quality but rather make a surplus amount of a modified product in order to allow large corporations to buy and sell them for cheap to keep our busy lifestyles happy. The US government, Pollan says, ensures that "the cheapest calories in the supermarket will continue to be the unhealthiest.” Pollan begins to uncover the truth behind words such as “organic.” He suggest a change back to grass fed cattle and a more natural approach rather than industrial such as he describes Joel Salatin’s Polyface Farm to be. However, even "organic" farming has largely become industrialized as farmers struggle to survive otherwise. Although “organic” farms are much better than strict industrial ones, its reliance on fossil fuels, makes it almost a contradiction when using the word “organic.” So we are now forced to ask ourselves, has the meaning of the word changed or have our own morals and views as to what we think it is changed? As he continues to explore ethical eating, Pollan discusses vegetarianism and ultimately wonders whether vegetarians actually realize how many small animals are killed when grain is produced. He suggests that simpler practices could even possibly re-introduce vegetarians, who refrain from meat for ethical reasons, to meat-eating because they could be assured that they are eating animals “with the consciousness, ceremony, and respect they deserve.” Pollan addresses the idea that the ethical issues instilled in the government, farmers, corporations, and even us as consumers, all play a huge factor in eating and the production of the food that we eat. I completely agree in saying that eating is as morally weighty as Pollan suggests throughout his book. It almost leaves one feeling hopeless and depressed to find out how degraded the production of our food has become to simply fit the needs of a cheap, quick lifestyle and to benefit large corporations. These ethical issues will be the down fall of our health, social interaction during meal time, and our environment.
Michael Pollan, an American author, journalist, activist, and professor of journalism at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism (Michael Pollan), writes in his book In Defense of Food, the dangers of nutritionism and how to escape the Western diet and subsequently most of the chronic diseases the diet imparts. In the chapter “Nutritionism Defined” Pollan defines the term nutritionism. Pollan’s main assertion being how the ideology of nutritionism defines food as the sum of its nutrients, and from this viewpoint Pollan goes on to write how nutritionism divides food into two categories, with each macronutrient divided against each other as either bad or good nutrients, in a bid for focus of our food fears and enthusiasms. Finally, Pollan concludes that with the relentless focus nutritionism places on nutrients and their interplay distinctions between foods become irrelevant and abandoned.
Many families in America can’t decide what food chain to eat from. In the book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan lists four food chains: Industrial, Industrial Organic, Local Sustainable, and Hunter-Gatherer. The Industrial food chain is full of large farms that use chemicals and factories. Industrial Organic is close to it except it doesn’t use as many chemicals and the animals have more space. Local Sustainable is where food is grown without chemicals, the animals have freedom and they eat what they were born to eat. Lastly, Hunter-Gatherer is where you hunt and grow your own food. The omnivore's dilemma is trying to figure out what food chain to eat from. Local Sustainable is the best food chain to feed the United States because it is healthy and good for the environment.
Moreover, this system of mass farming leads to single crop farms, which are ecologically unsafe, and the unnatural treatment of animals (Kingsolver 14). These facts are presented to force the reader to consider their own actions when purchasing their own food because of the huge economic impact that their purchases can have. Kingsolver demonstrates this impact by stating that “every U.S. citizen ate just one meal a week (any meal) composed of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we
In the book The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan challenges his readers to examine their food and question themselves about the things they consume. Have we ever considered where our food comes from or stopped to think about the process that goes into the food that we purchase to eat every day? Do we know whether our meat and vegetables picked out were raised in our local farms or transported from another country? Michael pollen addresses the reality of what really goes beyond the food we intake and how our lives are affected. He does not just compel us to question the food we consume, but also the food our “food” consumes.
There are many different beliefs about the proper way to eat healthy. People are often mislead and live unhealthy lifestyles as a result. Both Mary Maxfield and Michael Pollan explain their own beliefs on what a healthy diet is and how to live a healthy lifestyle. In the essay, “Escape from the Western diet” Michael Pollan writes about the flaws of the western diet and how we can correct these problems to become healthier. In the essay, “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, Mary Maxfield criticizes Michael Pollan’s essay about eating healthy, and explains her own theory on how to be healthy. She believes that Pollan is contradicting himself and that what he is stating is false. Mary Maxfield ponders the
In the Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan talks about 4 different models that we consume, purchase, and add it to our daily lives. Michael Pollan travels to different locations around the United States, where he mentions his models which are fast food, industrial organic, beyond organic, and hunting. I believe that the 3 important models that we need to feed the population are fast food, industrial organic, and beyond organic. Fast food is one of the most important models in this society because people nowadays, eat fast food everyday and it is hurting us in the long run. We need to stick to beyond organic or industrial organic food because it is good for our well being. Ever since the government and corporations took over on what we eat, we have lost our culture. In the introduction of the Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan states that we have lost our culture:
Michael Pollan and David Freedman are two reputable authors who have written about different types of food and why they are healthy or why they are damaging to our health. Michael Pollan wrote “Escape from the Western Diet” and David Freedman wrote “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”. Imagine Pollan’s idea of a perfect world. Everything is organic. McDonald’s is serving spinach smoothies and Walmart is supplying consumers with raw milk. The vast majority of food in this world consists of plants grown locally, because almost everyone is a farmer in order to keep up with supply and demand. How much does all this cost? What happened to all the food that is loved just because it tastes good?
Published In his article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”, David Freedman begins by talking about how misinformed people are about wholefood restaurants and stores. These stores are run by so-called health food experts. Freedman makes himself distinguishable himself from the position of Michael Pollan and his adherents. His adherents are known as Pollanites. They are the people who believe that processed food is the reason we have health and obesity issues.
When we think of our national health we wonder why Americans end up obese, heart disease filled, and diabetic. Michael Pollan’s “ Escape from the Western Diet” suggest that everything we eat has been processed some food to the point where most of could not tell what went into what we ate. Pollan thinks that if America thought more about our “Western diets” of constantly modified foods and begin to shift away from it to a more home grown of mostly plant based diet it could create a more pleasing eating culture. He calls for us to “Eat food, Not too much, Mostly plants.” However, Mary Maxfield’s “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, argues differently she has the point of view that people simply eat in the wrong amounts. She recommends for others to “Trust yourself. Trust your body. Meet your needs.” The skewed perception of eating will cause you all kinds of health issues, while not eating at all and going skinny will mean that you will remain healthy rather than be anorexic. Then, as Maxfield points out, “We hear go out and Cram your face with Twinkies!”(Maxfield 446) when all that was said was eating as much as you need.
Nutrition and health have become more popular in today 's society. Our generation is becoming more and more indebted to the idea of being healthy and eating nutritious meals. However, in “The American Paradox,” by Michael Pollan he argues that our unhealthy population is preoccupied with nutrition and the idea of eating healthy than their actual health. He also mentions the food industry, nutrition science and how culture affects the way we eat and make food choices. While Pollan is right about all these factor that affect our eating habits, there is more to it than that. Convenience, affordability and social influence also affects our food choices making them inadequate.
“Food as thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating,” is an article written by Mary Maxfield in response or reaction to Michael Pollan’s “Escape from the Western Diet”. Michael Pollan tried to enlighten the readers about what they should eat or not in order to stay healthy by offering and proposing a simple theory: “the elimination of processed foods” (443).
Michael Pollan’s purpose of writing Omnivore’s Dilemma came about when he realizes that society is unbelievably unhealthy due to the abundance of food. The two conflicting logics that Pollan introduces are the logic of nature and the logic of industry; these two logics are reflected through various ways of raising livestock animals. The logic of nature consists of raising livestock animals in a pastoral environment where animals interact with one another and avoid the use of artificial chemicals; whereas, the logic of industry settles on raising livestock animals unnaturally. Growing cattle through the use of corn has allowed meat to be produced in large quantities and in a short time as described in the chapter “Feedlot: Making Meat”
In Wendell Berry’s “The Pleasures of Eating,” this farmer tells eaters how their separation from food production has turned them into “passive consumers” who know nothing about the food they eat, or their part in the agricultural process (3). They are blindsided by a food industry that does not help them understand. Berry argues that the average consumer buys available food without any questions. He states consumers that think they are distanced from agriculture because they can easily buy food, making them ignorant of cruel conditions it went through to get on the shelf. Humans have become controlled by the food industry, and regard eating as just something required for their survival. Berry wants this to change as people realize they should get an enjoyment from eating that can only come from becoming responsible for their food choices and learning more about what they eat. While describing the average consumer’s ignorance and the food industry’s deceit, he effectively uses appeals to emotion, logic, and values to persuade people to take charge, and change how they think about eating.
Michael Pollan discusses two categories of food: one is real food (the kind our great-grandmother would recognize), while the other is “edible food-like substances”. The category that needs defending according to Pollan is the real food. This category of food is minimally processed, fresh (will eventually rot), and includes mostly things that are taken straight from the source (the ground, tree, etc.). When one walks into a store, they should look for and pick the foods that are more “quiet”such as fresh produce than the ones that have more labels that say they are more healthy, or better for you.
In the book, In Defense of Food, Michael Pollan explores the relationship between nutrition and the Western diet, claiming that the answer to healthy eating is simply to “eat food”.