Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rights of women olympe de gouges analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The rights of women olympe de gouges analysis
As Olympe de Gouges was developing The Declaration of the Rights of Woman, France was undergoing major changes. This was the height of the French Revolution, where political and social structures were being criticized and altered completely. Under the Ancien Regime, political power was solely granted through the Divine Rights of Kings and society was divided into three estates: clergy, nobility, and everyone else. This organization was an outgrowth of The Great Chain of Being, a well-established hierarchical worldview. During the time of the French Revolution, ideas and attitudes began to develop that challenged this hierarchically-ordered society and began to understand the human realm as ordered horizontally. It is in this context that the …show more content…
male thinkers in this time period, such as Kant, Hobbes, and Jefferson, were able to denounce their former regimes freely, and advocate for new forms of government. These new ideas fueled the French Revolution. Olympe de Gouges viewed these ideas as inadequate, they strove to obtain rights, but only for the white male.
The idea and value of the woman would not progress under these conditions. Olympe de Gouges’ aim in The Declaration of the Rights of Woman was not only to obtain equal rights for woman, but to reconfigure how womankind was perceived within society. Olympe de Gouges’ woman was not a beautiful plaything, but a strong, opinionated, respected member of the public sphere. In order to demonstrate how Olympe de Gouges sought to obtain rights for women, I will first summarize the passage and define any key terms. I will then define the rights of woman under the Ancien Regime. I will also discuss the parallels drawn between the woman and the slave to illustrate the severe lack of rights women had under the former regime. Next, I will discuss the ideas of her male counterparts and how they are inadequate in her view. I will then go through Gouges’ Rights of the Woman and the Citizeness, and the way in which this bill of rights creates a new prototype of the woman. Next, I will discuss the passage, as a response to Hobbes’ ideas and the implications this piece had on society. I will go on to analyze the passage and discuss its meaning in The …show more content…
Enlightenment. I will finally examine the aims of this text and the goals of Olympe de Gouges in writing The Declaration of the Rights of Woman. Within the passage, Olympe de Gouges discusses the severe lack of rights that women held under the Ancien Regime. A woman simply had to be beautiful and polite to be valued in this society. Even the lewdest of womankind could become honoured, if she possessed these two qualities. If the value of women continues to be measured by beauty and niceties, the revolution was futile. The ownership of a woman by a man – marriage, was regarded as a business affair, but women can no longer be treated in this manner. She goes on to compare the white French woman to a slave. Both of these individuals are owned like material property. Whereas the woman may command her master (her husband), the slave cannot. Although, the slave can be set free and go on to own property, a woman set free past her prime, loses all her value and is left without any rights. The French Revolution has not achieved any real progress, as it has not improved the status of women. Olympe de Gouges uses a variety of symbolism to convey her message within this passage. The use of the phrase, “…saw a hundred fortunes at her feet…”, is to mean valued (de Gouges 127). This value is obtained through marriage and the admiration of men. The term, “…with gold…”, refers to a woman’s beauty (de Gouges 127). She states that, “…the commerce in women was a kind of industry amongst the highest classes…”, meaning marriage and the ownership of women by men is treated as a business transaction (de Gouges 127). When de Gouges references the, “…new situation…”, she is referring to the post-revolution society and government (de Gouges 127). The expression, “…lost all her charms…”, is to mean that a woman has past her prime (de Gouges 127). If a woman becomes, “The plaything of disdain…”, she has become poor, old and of no value to anyone (de Gouges 127). These terms help to further express the way in which women were regarded under the Ancien Regime. In the past, under the Ancien Regime, women were not valued individually. A woman’s value was determined by men. If she was attractive and likeable, she was valued, because she was desirable. “…A woman only had to be beautiful and amiable…”, no other traits were considered to be feminine or needed to be a true woman (de Gouges 127). This type of sexism is unnatural, as all are born free and equal. To gain respect from her society, a woman must be regarded as more than a beautiful plaything. Olympe de Gouges seeks to alter this way of regarding the woman. A woman, in the post-revolution State, should be held to the same standard as men in all aspects of life. Feminism is usually criticized for only seeking out the benefits of equality and disregarding the consequences. In Article Seven, de Gouges blatantly states that she wants all women to be held accountable for their actions in the law, “No woman is exempted; she is indicted, arrested, and detained…”, she will gladly accept the downsides of sexual equality, if it means women will gain the benefits too (de Gouges 125). Gouges’ new woman is well-educated and able to form her own opinions on matters of the State. The Enlightenment thinkers placed a high degree of importance on education, as it is needed to have reason and logic. Olympe de Gouges uses this to her advantage, “…let us see if our wise legislators will think sanely about the education of women”, as she advocates for the education of women (de Gouges 127). A woman who is able to have reason – is educated, must be well respected in the public sphere. The post-revolution woman is an advocate for herself. She asserts her own human rights and fights against the systems used to keep her simple. Olympe de Gouges encourages women to be strong, “…Whatever barriers set up against you, it is in your power to overcome them; you only have to want it”, but she cannot force their action (de Gouges 127). If womankind does not wish to assert their rights and advocate for themselves, they will always be regarded as accessories to men. Olympe de Gouges’ new women is an individual that is respected, educated, advocates for herself and asserts her own rights, under the new regime. Olympe de Gouges wrote this text as a response to the ideas of the male thinkers of The Enlightenment period, those who powered revolutions. It is the direct response to Hobbes’ The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, as this piece is entitled, The Declaration of the Rights of Woman [and CItizeness], and follows his format. Hobbes’ text was supposed to be a declaration of universal rights, yet only ensured rights for the white male citizen. The rights of women, Jews, people of colour and poor people without property were excluded. When France adopted The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen into their constitution, de Gouges sought to expose the failures of the French Revolution in recognizing equality among the sexes. She hoped to improve the status of women in the State, but she ultimately failed to create a lasting impact on the French Revolution. Although, after the revolution, many aspects of society started to be questioned. If in this new state everyone is born free and equal, then slavery, the exclusion of people of colour, women, Jews and peasants cannot occur. Olympe de Gouges began a dialogue on what it is that makes one a citizen deserving of rights. In this passage, Olympe de Gouges conveys her message that women are citizens deserving of equal rights to men. In a society where a woman’s value is only measured by her beauty, anyone could possess value. Women need to be held accountable for their actions, judged by their character and taken seriously, being held to the same standards that men are. If the value, status and rights of women do not improve in the post-revolution society, the revolution was wasted. The only way women could gain wealth or own property was through men, under the Ancien Regime. Man is in the way of all that a woman should be able to achieve and obtain individually. The parallel drawn between the slave and the white woman illustrates the lack of rights of women. A slave set free obtains more rights, than a woman left by her husband. The passage demonstrates a lack of respect, accountability and value placed on females in The Enlightenment period. The text discusses how women have failed to notice the injustices they face and assert their own rights, “Women wake up… recognize your rights” (de Gouges 126).
Gouges also claims that women have been impeded by the will of men. In marriage and familial affairs, women require a man to give them rights, wealth, and property. If a husband chooses to leave his wife, there is no consequences for him, yet the wife will be left with nothing, “Marriage is the tomb of confidence and love” (de Gouges 128). The Declaration of the Rights of Woman criticizes the French Revolution. Olympe de Gouges creates a bill of rights for the female citizen and encourages females to assert their own rights. She also constructs an entirely new take on the social contract of marriage, where women will be left with equal wealth to that of her male counterpart. Olympe de Gouges’ aim in publishing this text was to inspire a sexually equal society in France, “…female representatives of the nation ask to be constituted as a national assembly” (de Gouges 124). Although her goal was not ultimately achieved, she succeeded in creating a feminist dialogue in the early modern period. Olympe de Gouges would be extremely content with the modern woman, although her wishes for the rights of womankind have still not been fully incorporated into public society, the modern woman is well-educated and unafraid to assert her
rights. Olympe de Gouges’ ideal woman of the State is an educated, accountable and independent citizen. This woman has the exact same rights as a man, where her value is determined individually, not through her relations with men. Under the former regime, if a woman was beautiful and likeable, she did not need to be anything more. Gouges’ women should be held accountable for their actions in the eyes of the law. Though, she needs to be educated to understand her rights and overcome any barriers in her way. This text is a direct response to Hobbes’, The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, yet de Gouges failed to achieve the same impact. The French Revolution was an ineffective venture, if the status of women did not improve. Olympe de Gouges’ ideas were well beyond her time, and in some ways, have still not been achieved thus far, in the modern age.
During the nineteenth century and The Second Great Awakening, the rising market and the changing of women’s roles in society began affecting everything around society. Before the growth of the women’s roles, Matthias and the rest of the men in the community had control over the women, but as the women began gaining freedoms, the men lost their complete control over the ladies, and Matthias began to feel as if his rights as a man and as a laborer had been taken away (Fiorini, 3/10). The book’s has a strong relation to women’s rights during the era of The Second Great Awakening and the equality between men and women during the nineteenth century.
During this time period women were not respected at all and were belittled by all med in their lives. Even though men don’t appreciate what women they still did as they were told. In particular, “Women have an astoundingly long list of responsibilities and duties – th...
The French Revolution was a tumultuous period, with France exhibiting a more fractured social structure than the United States. In response, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen proposed that “ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities, and of the corruption of governments” (National Assembly). This language indicates that the document, like its counterpart in the United States, sought to state the rights of men explicitly, so no doubt existed as to the nature of these rights. As France was the center of the Enlightenment, so the Enlightenment ideals of individuality and deism are clearly expressed in the language of the document. The National Assembly stated its case “in
The Founding Fathers created the Declaration of Independence with the intention of establishing a country based on equality. Despite this intention, women were purposely left out. The first few lines of the Declaration of Independence show inequality instantly: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…” (“Declaration of Independence”). The usage of “men” immediately disregards the whole other half of the population—women. What happened to them? Why were they deliberately excluded? As students, people learn that the American Revolution brought Americans independence and equality, but it is conspicuous that it did not bring everyone equality. Despite the Seneca Falls Convention and the fact that women have
In its first article, it states “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good (emphasis mine).” The first part of the paragraph does not exclude any person (while it can be disputed that it is ambiguous with the status of women) and serves the equalization of all people, regardless of the birth. It disposes any assumed privileges of the nobility, and if read in conjunction to the sixth article, is not shy from stating that the source of power or the imperatives of the government rests at the hand of the public. The second part limits the occasion if there is to be one, in that without the great justification, there would be no official distinction that will lead to the faction of the society. Considering France had the aristocracy and the king, it is the biggest shift in power yet to come, in that the mass now controls the steering wheel, which is rarely seen during this period of
As the years dragged on in the new nation the roles of men and women became more distinct and further apart for one another. Women were not allowed to go anywhere in public without an escort, they could not hold a position in office let allow vote, and they could only learn the basics of education (reading, writing, and arithmetic). In law the children belonged to the husband and so did the wife’s property and money. The only job women could think about having was being a ‘governess’ which would give other women education.
In this paper I will be discussing women's rights in the book Of Mice and Men compared to now.
The rights of women have expanded tremendously in the United States over the years. Women 's rights are a lot more flexible. They are allowed to be independent. While these new milestones are a big step forward for woman 's rights in the United States there are still things that need to be corrected. While in other countries women 's rights have not changed at all. There are women in some countries who are denied the right to go to school. They are also not considered equal to men. I will be comparing women 's rights within marriage as well as the justice system in the United States to those of women in other countries in the justice system as well as being married in the Middle East.
The French Revolution was a period of time in which France underwent many changes, many which could be considered revolutionary. France’s whole system and way of being was completely changed. New ideas were proposed everyday. An idea is revolutionary when it is a new idea, when it is something that has never been thought of before. The Declaration of the Rights of Women written by Olympe de Gouges on September 1791, was one of the ideas proposed to the National Assembly (Hunt, Web 1). The document proposed that since the French Revolution was all about finding equality for all people, women should be equal to men and therefore, should have the same rights as men did. Women at the time live in terrible conditions. They had little access to education, and therefore could not enter professional occupations that required advanced education, were legally deprived of the right to vote, and were not considered citizens (Class Discussion Notes). If equal rights were not given to women, the French Revolution had not reached its full potential, according to Gouges. She expressed this idea in her document, saying, “This revolution will only take effect when all women become fully aware of their deplorable condition, and of the rights they have lost in society” (Gouges, Web). Anyone that questioned the Revolution was immediately put to death (Class Discussion Notes). If Gouges’ document and ideas were important enough to catch the attention of the National Assembly and for her to be put to death, her ideas could be considered important and revolutionary (Britannica, Web 1) But, the document was not revolutionary. The Declaration of the Rights of Women was not a revolutionary document because its ideas were taken from other people and were no...
They fought for the same causes - suffrage and human rights. “For half the population, voting marked a crucial step toward equality” (Baker). They both fought to protect the basic rights of women and minorities and knew that this step could only lead to more progress for suffrage and equal rights. They both, also, had a government against them. “The prosecutor drew up formal accusations and de Gouge was held for trial. She was found guilty and condemned to death according to article one of the new constitution” (“Marie-Olympe de Gouges”). Olympe was arrested for criticizing the “New Government” and fighting for an unpopular cause. She paid the ultimate price, and could only hope her actions would inspire others to step up and become heroes, like herself. Alice Paul, the radical reformer that she was, also went to jail for her cause. She made a statement that, since she was not considered a part of lawmaking, she was not subject to it (Baughman). Although this statement may seem ridiculous, it made an impact on politicians, who got scared of a revolt and started making progress. Alice Paul and Olympe de Gouges opposed what was considered “normal” and fought for what they believed in; because of this, they were punished and Olympe de Gouges even lost her life, which inspired others, like Alice Paul, to be ambitious and fight for what they believe in, not just what is
The very first time women began to ban together for the same rights that men have was during the French Revolution. Everything was being questioned in France then, and for the first time, women were doing some of the questioning. Why couldn't women vote? Why couldn't women hold public office? Why were women expected to tend to the kids and the house all day? Unfortunately, the male leaders during that time period took it that anything pro-female had to be anti-male, and they did their best to keep the women down.
Inspired by the Declaration of” The Rights of Man and Citizen” in which the women had been excluded, Olympe drafted this document advocating for the civil liberties of women. Through the declaration of the rights of women, Olympe de Gouges demanded the right of women to education, the right to vote, and above all, the right to freedom of expression. Unfortunately, the declaration did not get a favorable acceptance. Despite being written in a historical moment in which social democracy was advocated and the fact that women contributed so much to the French revolutionary process, the declaration of the rights of women was
Out of all the assigned readings, Olympe De Gouges’ The Rights of Woman is my favorite because of the progressive ideas for women in such a conventional society. In her writing, Gouges did not hesitate to speak against laws because she believes that women should have their natural rights to life. She actively stood up for free and equality for women by taking the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and changing some ideas in the way that it benefits both men and women. I am honestly very impressed by Gouges’ ability to defy traditions and to commit to her strong and modern beliefs because I, unfortunately, am not aware of many female figures who were able to perform these actions during the 1700s. I also agree with her ideas
The Ancien Régime was arguably a more equal society when it came to the roles of men and women. The revolution gave men liberty and equality, but this was taken away from women with the end of the Ancien Régime. During the reign of the monarchy women could occupy the same political space as men in court and in salons (Rose 257). Noblewomen and widows had the most freedom and could be elected to sit in the Estates-General (Abray 237-238). Though their seats would be few, they were present for important decisions and represented the perspective of women. Through these venues, they had some influence over political opinions and could discuss their views with some integrity intact. In the Second Estate, particularly in the royal court, women could exercise influence over powerful men. Madame de Pompadour was the mistress of King Louis XV and wielded considerable influence in
At the start of the revolution, in 1789, France’s class system changed dramatically (Giddens, 2014). Aristocrats lost wealth and status, while those who were at the bottom of the social ladder, rose in positions. The rise of sociology involved the unorthodox views regarding society and man which were once relevant during the Enlightenment (Nisbet, 2014). Medievalism in France during the eighteenth century was still prevalent in its “legal structures, powerful guilds, in its communes, in the Church, in universities, and in the patriarchal family” (Nisbet, 2014). Philosophers of that time’s had an objective to attempt to eliminate the natural law theory of society (Nisbet, 2014). The preferred outcome was a coherent order in which the mobility of individuals would be unrestricted by the autonomous state (French Revolution). According to Karl Marx, economic status is extremely important for social change. The peasants felt the excess decadence of the ancient regime was at the expense of their basic standards of living, thus fuelling Marx’s idea of class based revolutions and the transition of society (Katz, 2014). This can be observed, for example, in novels such as Les Liaisons Dangereuses, a novel that had a role for mobilizing the attitudes of the