Old Earth Proofs

1270 Words3 Pages

In Conclusion to all Scientifically Based Arguments:
Old earth proofs: Most scientists accept these indicators, and many more like them, as proof of an old earth and universe. However, those scientists are forced to make a basic assumption: that naturally occurring processes and fundamental constants in the past behaved in the same way as they do today. For example:
The speed of light has remained more or less constant.
The number of cosmic rays hitting the earth has not changed much over time.
Space dust has accumulated at about the same rate over many thousands of years
The rate of growth of coral is similar in the past to what it is today.
Responses to Attempted Rebutals (The following are responses to “The New Answers Book” by Ken Ham …show more content…

Response: (The chapter pointed to the evening and morning given after each day along with the number given with each day, and finally the relation of yom to the heavenly bodies.) This proves nothing, though, as in Psalm 90:5-6 Moses says “You sweep them away as with a flood; they are like a dream,like grass that is renewed in the morning: in the morning it flourishes and is renewed; in the evening it fades and withers.” This is in relation to grass which has a lifetime of several weeks or months and not 24 hours. Though this Psalm is using figurative language, it proves that day even with evening or morning does not mean day. Next, the Creation account is unique and the Hebrews would have had no other way to describe an age aside from yom, it is argued that they could have used olam or qedem. They could not, though, as olam means eternity, or forever and qedem means east or old, but it is never used to denote a period of time. Also the position of the days of creation being ages means percisely that, if the days were eternal, (accept for the seventh day) then we would not exist.
Claim: The genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 make it clear that the creation days happened only about 6,000 years ago. Response: First, the Hebrew word for son is ben, it does not just mean son though. The relationship between Seth and Adam or the creators of this document and Adam is ben. Likewise, the Hebrew word …show more content…

See the below rebuttal of why Romans 5:12 does not conflict with day age. In short, it opened humans to death, but in no way does it affect animals or plants. Adam was not perfect and would have died regardless of his and Eve’s choice to disobey God.
Myths about an old earth
There is a widespread misconception among Christians that big bang cosmology is some kind of "kissing cousin" to naturalism and Darwinian evolution. The reality is: teaching that the universe has a beginning—which is precisely what big bang cosmology does—is not only consistent with Scripture, it greatly limits the time window allowed for natural process evolution to operate.
Doesn't acceptance of a billions-of-years-old universe contradict a literal interpretation of the Bible?
In a word, no. The Hebrew word for "day" (yôm) has three literal definitions: 12 hours, 24 hours, or an indefinite time period.
Does plant and animal death before the fall of Adam contradict Romans 5:12?
A careful examination of Romans 5:12 shows that Adam's sin introduced death to all humans, not to all life-forms on Earth. Passages like Psalm 104 and Job 38–41 also make clear that plant and animal death in no way attributes evil or cruelty to the Creator.
Isn’t using “secular” equipment to test ages unreliable because it is not from

Open Document