Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the media negatively influenced the oj simpson trial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During any criminal investigation there are several main elements involved in the case. These are known as ‘building blocks’. This involves the scene, collecting evidence, and presenting to the court. For a case to be successful these elements need to be followed. The main elements throughout the trial of OJ Simpson were the bedroom sock, the glove which was the most dramatic moment in courtroom history, the trail of blood, the lab and the white bronco. All these were the key factors that they brought to trial. There were flaws and questions asked and questioned regarding this evidence. It was the evidence that was collected and evidence that was missed which resulted in the outcome of this case. It was known as the trial of the century, …show more content…
It was the OJ Simpson case which should have taken centre stage for scientific evidence. It was the DNA to which was found at the crime scene and in OJ Simpsons home and Ford Bronco to which carried prosecutors beyond motive, means and opportunity to the point where they could say they had direct physical proof that he was the killer. The majority of jurors who spoke publicly about acquitting OJ believed he was innocent although had concern about the investigative elements such as the scientific …show more content…
While news in this era is on non-important celebrity news, many stories that are deemed newsworthy or a priority for viewers are those that are negative such as natural disasters, corruption and murder. One of the things that a news source will assess before airing a story is the simple fact ‘will the audience want to hear it?’. And when it comes to news stories about well-known celebrities, the answer is always yes. One of the reasons the OJ Simpson case received so much media attention was the fact that he was a high celebrity status. Another way in which the media affected the trial was making it a race issue. Questions were asked such as, “Can a black man receive a fair trial?” The media also stepped in and started by publishing stories before the actual fact therefore resulted in misleading the public before the truth. The minor glove scene in the murder trial was also how the media had an effect on the case; it also shows the lasting effect the media can have on history. The famous quote by OJ Simpsons Lawyer Jonnie Cochran, “If the glove don’t fit you must acquit” (Rosenstein, 2003) is actually a misquote portrayed by the media, all to make a better headline for the news story (Rosenstein.,2003).The actual quote is simply “If it doesn’t fit you must acquit”(Rosenstein,
Things only got worse when it was alleged that he transported and planted one the gloves on the Simpson estate, and the defendants legal team stating the officer wanted to frame Simpson because he was black and he disliked blacks an considering the jury was made up of mostly minorities this helped O.JSimpson even more.(2015) The key to winning a case apart from collecting evidence there must be a clear way to paint a picture that the people of the jury can understand whether or not you done the crime one must be convincing. Even though Simpson’s blood was on majority of the evidence collected it was argued that he was framed along with the contamination of evidence even if he had done it his team used all the weaknesses exposed by police involved in the case to paint a picture of innocence to the jury which proves perception of wrongdoing as persuasive to a jury as actual wrongdoing. I am sure with O.J Simpson being acquitted of the charges left a bad taste in the mouth of both police and some people in the legal field. There were too many mistakes made by the people that were tasked with the duty of collecting evidence and also in the department of how the evidence was handled but there are many lessons to be learned in every mistake the obvious one would be to not make the same ones
...on’s blood was found at the scene of the crime. There may be ways to plant such evidence, but it would be rather difficult to draw blood from a man without him realizing it and planting it at the scene of a crime. I also would have expressed that O.J. had a motive to kill his ex-wife, as well as a history of violent outbursts towards her. With all of the evidence that the prosecution had at their disposal, they should have been able to pin the murder on O.J. beyond a reasonable doubt. Everything pointed to O.J. and showed that he was the murderer. The only thing the prosecution was not able to do was fit the bloody glove on O.J’s hand. The only issue is, the glove was made of leather and had been soaking in blood prior to being found. When leather is soaking in a liquid, it tends to shrink. If only the prosecution had realized this, the case would have been theirs.
What went wrong then if so many people thought he was guilty? Well the prosecutors had an extremely strong case, but many people thought they presented their evidence very poorly. They had made a lot of their evidence seem fake, or as if someone was trying to frame O.J., which wasn’t the case. Although they did have some strong evidence it was hard to deny like they had discovered a pair of very rare gloves seemingly identical to O.J. Simpson’s. Although O.J.’s defense was quoted,”If it doesn’t fit you must acquit,” and of course due to the blood shrinking the gloves they couldn’t fit his monstrous hands ("101 PIECES"). In addition they had also found blood spots inside of O.J’s Bronco in which was parked fairly close to the estate (Rice). His defense replied the evidence was unreliable, fake, and planted in order to frame him. Even though this sounds like a weak argument many believed this could be true due to past aggression from police towards Rodney King and the African American community. There was also a lot of key evidence the prosecutors were never able to obtain, such as the murder weapon. They had also spoken to a limo driver that picked up O.J. from Rockingham ("101 PIECES"). At the time O.J. had been seen with more bags then after according to the limo driver and skycap James Williams ("101 PIECES"). He was reported standing by a
Simpson murder trial, there are a couple of things that piqued my interests. One was the notorious car chase down the Los Angeles freeway in a white Ford Bronco driven by AL Cowlings with O.J. Simpson hiding in the back. Robert Shapiro was supposed to surrender his client to the Los Angeles Police Department, but instead it is my opinion that O. J. Simpson lawyers and friends came up with a plan to get publicity and supporters. The second was the most crucial point of the trial is when O.J. Simpson squeeze his hand into the leather glove that was linked to the killings. This led to the famous argument by Johnnie Cochran “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” As the years passed by many untold stories are revealed. A recent new documentary states that “Simpson had stop talking his arthritis medicine two weeks” in advance so his hands would be swollen to persuade the jury of his innocents.
Because Simpson was the prime suspect, the judge legally ordered searches on O.J’s house as well as the crime scene. The goal was to find proof that he did commit the crime, by finding DNA or items. Shortly after the searches and tests began, evidence was found. DNA from the crime scene matched the DNA of O.J. Although proof was found, Simpson continued to plead not guilty. Surprisingly enough, O.J st...
O.J. Simpson, a great football hero, made the mistake of his lifetime that becomes the most notorious criminal case ever. Growing up on the West Coast wasn’t serene for Simpson because he was surrounded by gangs. In his high school and college years he quickly rose to be a great football player. During his time he played football in college, he was awarded the Heisman Trophy. After he became an elite athlete in college, he was drafted by the Buffalo Bills. He stayed with them for eight years, then transferred to the San Francisco 49ers (Knapp 1). Simpson met Nicole Brown at Daisy, an upscale Beverly Hills club. The two fell head over heels for each other and got married on February 2, 1985. During their marriage, Simpson inflicted many
After a lengthy two hundred and fifty-two-day trial “not guilty” were the words that left the world in shock. O.J Simpson was your typical golden boy. He had it all, the nice car, the football career, and his kids. Unfortunately, this all came to an end when two bodies came to be spotted deceased in Nicole Browns front yard and was a gruesome sight. O. J’s ex-wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman both found with brutal stab marks. Unfortunately, all his glory days now brought to an end, he went from playing on the field to begging for his freedom when becoming the main suspect of their murders. Since this trial has not only altered the way Americans viewed celebrities, but it also racially divided society,
The defense succeeded at instilling reasonable doubt in the jurors’ minds. A major difference between the defense and prosecution, as stated by Dershowitz, was that the defense relied on factual evidence and scientific experts while the prosecution utilized witnesses that casted a shadow of doubt upon the whole jury (Dershowitz 97). Dershowitz claimed the prosecution knew they had falsities in their case, but kept them in order to win the case (Dershowitz 96). In all, though many people viewed Simpson as a guilty man, the allegations of police perjury and investigative errors allowed the defense to exploit and capitalize on the faults carried out by the prosecution and ultimately implant reasonable doubts in the minds of the jurors.
My opinion about this case is that O.J. Simpson is guilty. The defence tries to say there was all this conspiracy to frame O.J. but I don't think they proved any of this happened. The defence said Furhman was a racist but this does not prove that Simpson didn't commit the crime. They say the blood samples were contaminated but I don't think every single one was. The prosecution proved he was an abuser and I think something finally snapped inside him and he killed Nicole and Goldman. The gloves the killer wore were the same type O.J. wears. When they say O.J. tried on the gloves and they didn't fit I think he tightened his hand up so the gloves would be hard to put on. The shoeprints at the crime scene were the same style and size he wears. Bloody clothes or a murder weapon have never been found but neither has the missing laundry bags from O.J.'s hotel room. I have to wonder why O.J. lead the police on a big chase if he is so darn innocent. My opinion is that O.J. Simpson would have been found guilty a long time ago if it wasn't for all the publicity surrounding the case and the fact that he's famous.
The collective memory of OJ Simpson is difficult to judge because many people today feel he should have been found guilty and others do not. It is important to say that the OJ Simpson murder trial was one of the largest media frenzies in history and it has been shown throughout history that the media can have a lot of power on our collective memory of events and people as shown by the American Revolution, Vietnam and various other events.
A crime being committed is the first event to initiate our criminal justice system. On June 12th 1994 a double murder was reported at the residence of Nicole Brown Simpson the ex-wife of the then beloved Orenthal James (OJ) Simpson. It was discovered that Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman had been brutally murdered and the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) began their investigation, this being the second step in our criminal justice system.
The show CSI first appeared in the early 2000s and gained major popularity. Over time the show increased the expectations of viewers. The biggest expectations were the abilities of the crime scene investigators to always provide proof of evidence, as well as their methods used in gaining results from that evidence. Legal specialists anticipated the effects the show would have on the views of the legal system and how it would affect the juror process. This development is now referred to as the “CSI Effect” (Shelton, 2007). This effect explains that jurors were making decisions based off of what they saw on TV. This paper will analyze a specific episode of the show CSI: Miami. To be analyzed are the realistic and non-realistic actions taken
Fairchild, H. & Cowan, G (1997). Journal of Social Issues. The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and Society.
For the most part, I think the key messages and PR techniques were successful. This trial was so controversial, not just because Simpson was a celebrity, but because of the ‘insufficient’ evidence, race, and the final verdict. Allowing the cameras in the courtroom was the best way for the key messages to be presented. Everyone watching was able to see the truth of the case. They were able to see the body language and facial emotions of the judge, Simpson, the families or the victims, the jurors, and the witnesses. It is so much more powerful being able to see and hear something so controversial. Everyone was able to form stronger opinions about whether to not they thought Simpson was guilty. Televising the police chase was crucial
It was the night of June 12, 1994, a woman and her long time male friend are murdered in cold blood. The victims, Nicole Brown Simpson, her neck cut so savagely it was almost severed from her body and Ronald Goldman, stabbed repeatedly, nearly 30 times. The accused, her ex-husband and football star, Orenthan James Simpson, better known as O.J. Simpson. During the trial, a trial that consisted of 150 witnesses, lasted 133 days and cost in the ball park of 15 million dollars, there were many questions asked and even more questions left unanswered (Douglas).