Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the oj simpson case
Cameras in courtroom argumentative essay free
A summary of o.j. simpson's case summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the oj simpson case
Evaluation For the most part, I think the key messages and PR techniques were successful. This trial was so controversial, not just because Simpson was a celebrity, but because of the ‘insufficient’ evidence, race, and the final verdict. Allowing the cameras in the courtroom was the best way for the key messages to be presented. Everyone watching was able to see the truth of the case. They were able to see the body language and facial emotions of the judge, Simpson, the families or the victims, the jurors, and the witnesses. It is so much more powerful being able to see and hear something so controversial. Everyone was able to form stronger opinions about whether to not they thought Simpson was guilty. Televising the police chase was crucial …show more content…
to a lot of people because they wondered why Simpson was running away if he wasn’t guilty. Seeing this chase live in action generated suspense across America. Although the key messages and PR techniques were successful in my opinion, O.J. Simpson could have done better to improve the situation in which he had gotten himself into. He kept telling everyone he was innocent, so why did he run from the police and not surrender? I am not going to talk about whether or not I think he is innocent or guilty, but if you say one thing, your actions should back up your words. No matter scared or emotional he was, if he wanted to show that he was innocent, then he should have surrendered. This was his first and biggest mistake. His second mistake was that he changed his alibi. At first he said that he was asleep during the murder. It was later said the he was hitting golf balls outside his home (NewsOne Staff, 2016). Another huge mistake he made that did not help his cause was the fact that he wrote a book titled “If I Did It,” where he wrote in detail about how he would have hypothetically killed them. An excerpt from the book reads: “If I had actually done it… I would have brought my good gloves that day. I would have thought it was shame they shrunk when I left them out on the patio, but I would have brought them just the same. They were my lucky gloves, and I would have needed them cause I was going to stab my slut of a wife… hypothetically” (NewsOne Staff, 2016). All of these things make him appear guilty, which was the opposite of what he claimed to be. I do not think that O.J.
Simpson has won back the trust of the public or restored a positive image. As of 2016, there is an all time of people who think that Simpson is guilty. It has been about twenty years since he was found not guilty, yet so many people do not believe this. According to the Washington Post (2016), about 83% of white Americans said that they are ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ sure of his guilt. About 57% of black Americans agreed. These numbers were not as high as when the trial was first happening, or even ten years ago. After the trial, Simpson has had many more legal issues. According to a CNN timeline (2013), Simpson was found liable for damages in a civil wrongful death lawsuit and ordered to pay $33.5 million to Goldman, Nicole Brown Simpson estates. There was an alleged road-rage incident in which he was involved in, in 2001. In 2007, Simpson and five other men were arrested and charged with felonies. A year later, the jury finds hind guilty go kidnapping, armed robbery, conspiracy, coercion, burglary, and assault with a deadly weapon. He was sentenced to nine to thirty-three years in prison at the state prison in Lovelock in Nevada. He’s still a criminal now and getting to trouble, which doesn’t necessarily look good for his
reputation. If I had to describe O.J. Simpson and the trial in one word, I would use the word infamous. I do not want to biased with my own opinion about him and whether to not I find him guilty. I think this is a word that both sides can agree on. As stated before, this was the “Trial of the Century”, and literally everyone paid attention to Simpson, but not in a good way. He was a murder suspect who was found not guilty. The ‘real murderer’ is still unknown to this day.
There is no doubt in my mind that Casey Anthony fascinated people much more than she would have if she had not been an attractive, young woman. While everyone had an opinion on the case, that they felt obliged to talk about, and give the same recycled, regurgitated opinions on, at the end of the day you can't really blame them. The media is really just an extension of the masses. What gets reported is based upon what interests people, and this case sure did interest people. I think this level of exposure oftentimes benefits the defendants because evidence becomes over saturated to a point where it blinds the jury from seeing the basic points of the case, and the foundation for a guilty verdict. Casey Anthony's trial is often compare to the O.J. Simpson trial for reasons similar to this. The trials are among the most high profile cases to take place during the new media era, and the not guilty verdict created public outrage and calls for Anthony to be punished. Media figures discussed why prosecutors failed to convict in what seemed to be a can't-miss trial. One reason the guilty verdict fell through could be the lack of Casey Anthony's DNA or fingerprint evidence at the scene of where the body was recovered. This is known as the CSI effect, and involves a jury's desire for forensic evidence, even when a clear picture of the crime is created, and a logical motive is present (English). Many criticized
The Casey Anthony trial has been arguably the most controversial case since the trial of O.J. Simpson and has been speculated over ever since the verdict had been given in July of 2011. It was decided by a jury of her peers that Anthony was not guilty of murder, for the death of her daughter Caylee. Many believe that Anthony should have been found guilty however, very little Americans actually comprehend the justice system.
The job of a criminal lawyer is quite difficult. Whether on the defense or the prosecution, you must work diligently and swiftly in order to persuade the jury. Some lawyers play dirty and try to get their client off of the hook even though they are guilty without a doubt. Even though the evidence is all there, the prosecution sometimes just can’t get the one last piece of the puzzle to make the case stick and lock the criminal up. Such is the case Orenthal James Simpson.
“…and on the charge that the prisoner did with others to conspire to destroy the lives of soldiers in the military service of the United States in violation of the laws and customs of war-Guilty” were the words that soared out of Wallace’s mouth at the end of the trial. It was then that Henry Wirz was found guilty. Why? Why was he found guilty? This decision was based on the emotional aspect of the witnesses, and not by the actual guilt. Not only my defense, but also the defense of Wirz’s attorney, Baker, the testimony of the defendant, Henry Wirz, shows that Wirz should not have been found guilty.
During the time that O.J was on trial for the murders of Nicole and Ronald, everyone who was following the hearing had a deep sense of fear and pity. They were fearing that the man they once adored and aspired to be like was actually capable of committing such an inconspicuous crime. Also, due to the accusations of the murder, the viewers were also feeling in the sense of pity, in both sadness and disappointment. The acts that O.J Simpson was accused of caused the audience to feel disappointed in his actions, as well as sadness towards his family. The accusations developed about O.J left people who didn’t even personally know him in tears. People were so sad about his downfall. The accusation led to the fact that O.J left his family with no mother and technically no father, as he’d be spending time in prison. Furthermore, since he was found not guilty, there was a large part of the audience that felt a sense of release and emotion, and some felt bad that he was ever accused of this, but rather he just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Due to the fact that O.J and Nicole were separated for a couple years before she died, Nicole had made new friendships, and there was no proof that someone new that she met could have caused this crime and tried to frame Simpson, due to his past accused abuse
O.J Simpson should have been found guilty due to his violent actions on June 12th, 1994. There were many actions or causes that led up to his violent act. The main and most known cause of Simpson’s act was “infidelity”. Simpson’s wife Nicole Simpson had been spending too much time with a man by the name of Ronald Goldman. When O.J became suspicious, he took immediate action.
Mostly the people who supported R. Kelly information was selected for the news media and the information from the nonsupporters were not selected by the news media. In this case the information was bias to supporting R. Kelly even though he had film a sex tape urinating on a fourteen year old girl. It was ironic that the people would still support R. Kelly after such an incident, but his case was viewed on a racial manner rather than having sex with an underage teenager. The news media was able to view the lawyer sly ways of dealing with the jury to help R. Kelly win his case.
A great deal of people viewed Simpson as a role model and someone they desired to be. Not for one second did any of those people even think about the thought of a man that “has it all” being on trial for murder. When most people view celebrities like Simpson, they imagine them with no flaws, but they only observe a glimpse of the person’s life. Some would say a majority of Americans prefer watching someone else’s life than pursuing their own, some Americans would even say that they have an infatuation with celebrities.
In a case that has spanned more than 20 years and drew so much media attention, there is just as much intrigue today as it then. Did he do it or did he not do it? The entire world was captivated by the case. It took over a year for a trial and a conclusion that stunned the world with the verdict (Boyes). They were many household names that came out of this trial (Pitts).
The Jodi Arias trial captured American attention very rapidly and soon become nearly the only thing on television news networks. The trial nearly monopolized Fox News for several months. There are several murders that happen every day in the United States, so how did this murder case gain so much attention? Because it contains many themes that are enticing to the American population. According to Elliott McLaughlin at CNN.com, “It's rife with sex, lies and digital images, many of them naughty, and the dueling attorneys are lively -- nay, bombastic -- in their arguments...
The New York Times bestseller book titled Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the O.J. Simpson Case examines the O.J. Simpson criminal trial of the mid-1990s. The author, Alan M. Dershowitz, relates the Simpson case to the broad functions and perspectives of the American criminal justice system as a whole. A Harvard law school teacher at the time and one of the most renowned legal minds in the country, Dershowitz served as one of O.J. Simpson’s twelve defense lawyers during the trial. Dershowitz utilizes the Simpson case to illustrate how today’s criminal justice system operates and relates it to the misperceptions of the public. Many outside spectators of the case firmly believed that Simpson committed the crimes for which he was charged for. Therefore, much of the public was simply dumbfounded when Simpson was acquitted. Dershowitz attempts to explain why the jury acquitted Simpson by examining the entire American criminal justice system as a whole.
The trial was highly publicized due to the sheer ridiculousness of the sentencing and the defendants’ reaction to the trial itself. The initial trial is significant because it shows a clear picture of how the government treated the rising counter culture of the late sixties and seventies. Ultimately, the trial acts as a marker of how the justice system can be corrupt. After the arduous process of the court trial, all seven men came out of the ordeal with minor infractions and minimal jail-time.
On June 12,1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered. Their bodies were discovered outside Nicole Simpson's condominium. Nicole Simpson was the estranged wife of the famous football player and T.V. star O.J. Simpson.
...this day justice has still not been served. If OJ didn’t do it then somebody did. Although some people might say that OJ has been dealt the wrath of karma, because he does indeed sit in prison for an unrelated crime.
Fairchild, H. & Cowan, G (1997). Journal of Social Issues. The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and Society.