Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How gender and sexuality are socially constructed
How gender and sexuality are socially constructed
How gender and sexuality are socially constructed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How gender and sexuality are socially constructed
After selecting a clip entitled “Oh What a Night” for the hit TV show, “The Game”, the characters Derwin and Melony intriguingly displayed verbal and non-verbal communication. During this particular conversation the characters discussed their first sexual encounter. Melony, who is the fiancé’ of Derwin, utilized a less demanding form of communication when she conveyed her ideas about their first physical interaction. Melony used more relaxed language and had a very calm tone. Her body language was very welcoming as she remains seated during most of the conversation. Derwin demanded Melony to stay and she was submissive in her actions by staying to hear more of what he had to say. There is a point in the conversation where Derwin initiated a kiss with Melony and she is receptive to it. He then picks her up and puts her down after being told too. Afterwards he tells her to be quiet and she does. From this interaction it can be concluded that Derwin was more aggressive and assertive in his communication style. He used more demanding language that seemingly directed action and …show more content…
results. His language displayed his dominance and self-concept which is derived from social constructs and societal norms of how women and men should interact. Based on this video women seem to be more intrinsic when communicating ideas where as men seem to be more extrinsic and result oriented. Based on my experiences with communicating with women and with watching male role models in my life communicate with women I was not surprised by the interaction between Melony and Derwin given that women seemingly have a deeper regard to communicating with men. Due to the context of Derwin’s and Melony’s relationship I think that the submissive and assertive behavior displayed by both of the characters was established based upon their roles as spouses.
If Derwin and Melony were friends their behavior would have been less intimate and more report and rapport based in terms of surface based communicational styles. My point here is that because Derwin and Melony are in a relationship they are more in tuned with one another and interact with open verbal and non-verbal interactions. Derwin’s communication was encoded and decoded with the two culture theory in mind. This theory highlights the rules and norms of communication for men and women in a particular society. There were moments in Derwin and Melony’s communication when codability was established. For example Derwin refers to their favorite snack by its nickname and Melony interprets this
concisely. When communicating with my 16 year old brother I noticed that I listened more to understand his perception than I actually sought out for him to understand my views. I often summarized what I thought that he meant to say and questioned his statements to gain a full understanding of his views before I commented about my own views. There were a few moments where I ended his statements early due to the conveying of my own which can be potentially worked on to sharpen my ability to effectively communicate. Through this experience I realized that often when we communicate we can miss the entire point of what is being communicated from the other individual. As a remedy it is important to actively listen and to ask questions to seek understanding before assumption. Selective listening can be a potential problem when aiming to establish an effective line of communication. As an older sibling the dynamics of our communication was centered around our relationship and that could have potentially lead to why I controlled most of the conversation through questioning
still fighting for his equal rights after all these years. Cecil wants him to understand, that he has to accept that the circumstances for the black population will always be the same.
Key terms will be pointed out and highlighted, as well as described in relation to the examples extracted from the film. To begin with the film started out with a communication climate that was both tense and without verbal communication. This was mainly due to the variance in membership constructs of the characters involved. The character's included the brain Brian, Andrew the athlete, the criminal Bender, the princess Claire, and the basket case Allison. There was a great deal of interesting nonverbal communication taking place between these people. Their reactions and responses to each other demonstrated perceptual errors, which would be shown as the story progressed.
Communication is something important in any kind of relationship, but not conversations that degrade one another. Ron and Sarah had a hard time engaging in meaningful conversations. “When he returns to the kitchen, the woman is putting away her groceries, her back to him. ‘You sure are quiet today Sarah,’ he says in a low voice. ‘Everything ok?’ Silently, she turns away from the grocery bags, kisses his mouth, rolls her torso against his hips” (11). They’re always uncertain of what to say to each other. They feared they would run out of things to talk about, so instead they would fornicate. Since they started of with sex, Ron saw nothing more. “‘ Friendship you owe me. And respect. Friendship and respect. A person can’t do what you have done with me without owing them friendship and respect’” (14). Sarah did only want friendship she wants to have the p...
Communications generally occur in body languages: how the individuals interpret each other. Her essay is an event that is reoccurring more and more lately. The event results in a failure in marriage. In today’s society more and more people are splitting up or having divorces due to miscommunications. The essay, “Sex, Lies and Conversation,” that Deborah Tannen wrote is much use of today because it explains where miscommunications happen and she has her own studies and research to back it up. The essay goes into depth about her ideologies that cause miscommunications. Look at a miscommunication twice and do not be quick to judge because it will save plenty of
Steven Pinker distinguishes the difference between talking to man and women. Pinker showed a lady that was comfortable talking to another lady and the lady became angry when her talking to a man, not women (Pinker 2007 .p112, 113). People used intricacies method to achieve their needs and emotion instead of saying what they need to say directly. (Pinker 2007 .p113) Furthermore, even in a sexual situation, people twist and turn around and turn around their words. For example, “would you like to come up and see my etching?” (Pinker 2007.p113) Moreover, people use a kind word to order something from someone else without making a demand to the receiver or using indirect speeches to avoid a problem that may happen by mistake. (Pinker, 2007
In the introduction of Deborah Tannen’s “Conversation Style: Talking on the Job”, she compares and contrasts the ways men and women communicate. This reminds me of what I tell people that are struggling in their relationships. Women and men express themselves differently. Women think, but men act. If you can’t wrap your head around this, being in a relationship with anyone is going to be hard. Yet, this is such a basic way of looking at this issue. Not only are the genders vastly different, but each person relates to the world around them in a certain way. He or she also needs to be related to in a specific way. Looking at personalities and personal histories can give a better look at the way we communicate with each other. Tannen examines
I will begin by selecting a scene from the movie and using it to explain what interpersonal communication is. The interpersonal transaction I chose to isolate was the scene where we see Bender and Claire going through each other’s wallet and purse. Claire inquires about the pictures of girls in Bender’s wallet and Bender asks about the number of items in Claire’s purse. This scene shows that interpersonal communication is a dynamic process. In previous transactions between the two characters, they are hostile towards each other and self-disclose minimally. In this conversation, Claire calmly asks Bender personal questions, although Bender is still watchful of what he self-discloses. Interpersonal communication is inescapable. While Claire is asking these questions, no matter how Bender responds, he is still sending Claire a message about himself, which is a form of communication. Interpersonal communication is unrepeatable, in that Claire probably wouldn’t ask the same kind of questions after realizing Bender’s disbelief in monogamy. The conversation couldn’t be reenacted exactly the same. Interpersonal communication is also irreversible. After this interpersonal transaction, it would be impossible for Bender to argue that he believes in monogamy or for Claire to argue that she doesn’t. Even if they were to say they didn’t mean what they said, the transaction would still have some sort of effect on both of them. Interpersonal communication is complicated because Claire must take everything she knows about Bender in consideration before she forms her questions. When she asks Bender why he doesn’t believe in monogamy and Bender doesn’t respond, Claire doesn’t take into consideration the fact that Bender likes to disclose very little about himself. This scene also shows that interpersonal communication is contextual. If Bender and Claire weren’t in detention together, they wouldn’t even b...
The main constructs that they used include action mimicry, voice modulation, and responsiveness. Action mimicry is when a person copies another’s movement to make the conversation smoother. For instance, Francesca had the habit of touching her face a lot so Robert is sometimes inclined to do something similar to make her comfortable. Mimicry is important because it communicates one’s desired social distance - an increase in mimicry means that there is a desire to have greater affiliation (Farley, 2014). Voice modulation occurs when people change their voice so they sound more pleasant and romantically interested (Farley, 2014). Francesca modulates her voice at the beginning when she flirtatiously told Robert that she was “going to make some iced tea and split the atom, but that can wait” (Eastwood, 1995). Robert also modulates his voice when he picks flowers for Francesca to make her feel appreciated. Voice modulation enabled the two to charm each other. Gottman (2016) stated that “undivided attention is a powerful aphrodisiac,” and it is true since the responsiveness that Robert and Francesca had for each other led to them falling in love. Talkative people are perceived to be more attractive due to their openness and tendency to also be responsive in the conversation (Wheeless et al., 1992). Robert and Francesca start to fall in love with each
Tannen believes that men and women are cross cultural when it comes to conversation. While analyzing basic conversation, Tannen primarily focuses on married couples and marriage, in general. Whether implied or not, Tannen fails to deliver enough credible scientific research to inform the audience of her opinions and viewpoints. Tannen begins her argument explaining a personal experience with a married couple which she invited to a group meeting that she held. Tannen uses this dependable experience to confirm that American men talk more than women in public, and usually talk less at home. Tannen uses the word “crystallizes”, to display the accuracy of her research through this personal discovery. Tannen states, “This episode crystallizes the irony that although American men tend to talk more than women in public situations, they often talk less at home” (239). Tannen presents research as if a female is the only gender to, “crave communication” in a relationship, giving no background information to support this theory. Deborah Tannen gives numerous personal accounts of issues married couples seem to have, but hardly giving actual scientific
Communication is a vital component of our world and yet 65% of that communication is nonverbal. I will discuss the different types of verbal and nonverbal communication in this paper based off of an episode of Doctor Who. This episode is about Matt Smiths first time playing The Doctor and the different types of communication that he uses throughout the episode. Matt Smith’s performance in this episode shows me that he a mastery of both verbal and nonverbal communication when he is playing The Doctor.
Two Meals, Two Lives Woolf contrasts two passages in the first chapter of “A Room of One’s Own” to illustrate the inequality between the treatment of men and women and how this inequality leads to less success for women. Woolf does this by comparing two meals. One meal is a feast of beauty at the all men Oxbridge University and the other is a bleak dinner served at the women’s college. Woolf’s use of diction, syntax and tone exemplify the inequalities and their impacts.
Adler, R. B., Rosenfeld, L. B., & Proctor, R. F. (2013). Interplay The Prrocess of Interpersonal Communication. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
My Best Friend’s Wedding is a romantic comedy about a woman who realizes she is in love with her best friend just as he is about to marry someone else. This movie is filled with great examples of what to do--and more often--what not to do in relationships. In this paper, we will look at several communication techniques and terms and how they relate to this movie and are used throughout the film.
I am Laura Waters. As producer of Summer Heights High, I am well placed to give some advice on this matter. I am writing to reply to your request for advice which you had put onto the ABC blog. Before you decide whether or not you believe your child should watch this show, I will outline the key things to consider. One of the main concerns is the offensive language used throughout the show. More important features to recognise is the behaviours and values shown throughout.
Bruess. Contemporary Issues in Interpersonal Communication. Los Angeles: Roxbury, 2005. Print.), is something at which I have always excelled. However, I have not been able to categorize these actions until I having taken this course. Over the course of my relationship with Trish, my fiancée, we have developed many idiosyncratic terms to describe situations, call attention to a situation, or to just have fun. I always knew it was fun but the textbook also notes that idiosyncratic communication “builds the strength and character of a culture.” Upon reading this, I have tried to include some of these “inside jokes” in other relationships I am starting or relationships I would like to grow. In my experience, it has been helpful to create or refine our interpersonal culture with new and interesting