Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics in police
Ethics within policing
Ethical behaviour in the police
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Officer Taylor’s thoughts on “those people” should not affect her decision-making skills. It is not fair to judge someone on the color of the skin or race. That thought process is garbage and needs to be fixed. At that point Officer Taylor’s mindset is not using facts. Officer Taylor wants to stop crime but locking the wrong person up doesn’t help anything. You must have evidence or probable cause. The definition I got off the Webster website says Evidence that gives someone a reason to think that a crime has been or is being committed. Officer Taylor is acting off suspicion.
Officer Taylor made the stop due to a broken tail light on the vehicle. At this point she has a cause to pull a person over. A broken light is a safety violation.
…show more content…
Officer Taylor is doing the right thing and chases after her. The suspect is not being cooperative and is breaking the law at the same time. The suspect is putting others’ lives at risk. The suspect would not have driven away if she wasn’t hiding something. Officer Taylor has made the right call not letting this person get away.
Yes, the gun was in plain view. Plain view is the method that they used to retrieve the gun. Officer Taylor knew what a gun looked like so it was pretty much cut and dry. Having the gun in the glove compartment or sealed in the dashboard is not plain view. If the officer did open the glove compartment to locate the gun, that evidence would be thrown out of court. After the arrest the car will be impounded. It’s at that moment they do a full search of the vehicle and find more evidence in a controlled environment. The marijuana bag would ne inadmissible evidence. Officer Taylor illegally searched her purse. The reason she went into her purse was to try to identify the suspect. She should have waited for the EMT’s or backup to identify her and make that call. This Information I got from the Miranda Rights webpage It says It Must be able to show the chain of custody from the original document creator to the person who now holds it. That means If Officer Taylor opened the purse that means she would have write down how she got the item proving it to thrown at in
When the cops impound a vehicle they have to take an inventory of what is in the vehicle for protection, legal responsibility, and usefulness. An impounded vehicle is in the police’s possession, and they move it to a safe location such as a garage, or the police lot.
While reading “ Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, many opinions can be formed of Chris McCandless. One, in particular, was the author's opinion which he blatantly stated on page 85. He didn't think that Chris was some reckless foolish insane idiot. He believed that competent otherwise he wouldn't have lasted so long. I agree with Krakauer, things Chris did on this journey did not show signs of some careless person. Chris was just an adventurer looking to get away from the expectations society had of him to see the world for what it really was.
Imagine being a police officer doing your daily routine job. You are in a patrol car on the highway, watching the cars and trucks drive by. You are also looking for speeders to warn them to be more careful and maybe you’ll ticket them. It has been a very boring day for you, since you have only been called on your radio once, and it was for an accident (fender bender). Almost at the end of your shift, a blue car drives by going ninety miles an hour, but you know the speed limit is only fifty-five miles an hour. You pull the patrol car out of the gravel area that you had been sitting in and you start to follow the car. You put your lights on and catch up to them. After a few minutes you pull the person over. You get out of the car and start walking over towards the blue car. You are right about to talk to the driver and he drives off, leaving nothing but dust in your face. Now, the adrenaline is pumping in your body, but what should you do? You could call for backup or follow the blue car. Anything could happen. How far should you actually go? This is the question that will be answered in this paper. I will explain what police pursuit is and some different things officers do during a pursuit. I will also give some statistics about the fatalities that have happened in a police pursuit. I will also illustrate my opinion about how far police pursuits should go.
At the core of the stop and frisk policy as utilized by the New York Police Department is racial profiling. Racial profiling has a significant and often controversial place in the history of policing in the United States. Racial profiling can be loosely defined as the use of race as a key determinant in law enforcement decisions to stop, interrogate, and/or detain citizens (Weitzer & Tuch, 2002). Laws in the United States have helped to procure and ensure race based decisions in law enforcement. Historically, the Supreme Court has handed down decisions which increase the scope of discretion of a law enforcement officer. For example, traffic stops can be used to look for evidence even though the officer has not observed any criminal violation (Harris, 2003). Proponent's for racial profiling reason that racial profiling is a crime fighting tool that does treat racial/ethnic groups as potential criminal suspects based on the assumption that by doing so increases the chances of catching criminals (Harris, 2003). Also, it is important to note, law enforcement officers only need reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk, probable cause is not required as in other circumstances (Harris, 2003). It is because of this assumption that the New York Police Department’s stop and frisk policy is still a relevant issue.
The appellate court held that the vehicle search incident to Davis’ arrest violated his Fourth Amendment rights under Arizona v. Gant. However, the Eleventh Circuit held that the gun was admissible evidence because the police officer had conducted the search in good faith, and
The Turn of the Screw by Henry James has been the cause of many debates about whether or not the ghosts are real, or if this is a case of a woman with psychological disturbances causing her to fabricate the ghosts. The story is told in the first person narrative by the governess and is told only through her thoughts and perceptions, which makes it difficult to be certain that anything she says or sees is reliable. It starts out to be a simple ghost story, but as the story unfolds it becomes obvious that the governess has jumps to conclusions and makes wild assumptions without proof and that the supposed ghosts are products of her mental instability which was brought on by her love of her employer
On October 3, 1974 Gillenwater,2015) , there was a call of a prowler. The caller stated that her neighbor was out of town and that she heard noises and thrashing about in the home. Officers Hyman and Wright arrived at the neighbors home, while Officer Wright was speaking to the neighbor, Officer Hyman went to the back of the house to investigate. It was at that time a young black male, thought to be between 17 and 19 years of age ran from the house.While instructing the suspect to stop, he stopped at a approximate 6 foot fence at the back of the yard, crouched down. The officer instructed him to halt, however, he did not and attempted to jump the fence. Officer Hyman at that time fired what he thought was going to be a warning shot toward the suspect. The shot hit the suspect in the back of the head, he later died from his injuries ( Gillenwater, 2015). At this time, the officer was acting in accordance to procedure and Tennessee law. At that time Tennessee law in 1974 justified and authorized all deadly force to stop a felony suspect ( GIllenwater, 2015).
I looked inside the vehicle and saw that Suspect Davis tucked his right hand along the inner passenger side door and out of my view. Davis also had his left hand out of view. I was unable to determine if Davis was reaching for a firearm or any other type of weapon. I upholstered my firearm and held it at a low ready along my right side. I also activated my patrol unit’s Watch Guard Camera (unit #30). Davis continued yelling, “Fuck you, Motherfucker, don’t point that fucking gun at me. Do you know who I
Kansas recognizes the plain view doctrine as an exception to the search warrant requirement. An officer may seize evidence of a crime in plain view when (1) the officer is lawfully present and (2) the evidence is immediately and apparently incriminating. The intrusion that initially places the officer in plain view of the evidence may be supported by a warrant or by any other exception to the search warrant requirement. Thus, when an officer conducts a search of a vehicle incident to the driver’s arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and happens to see a glass pipe in an unzipped makeup bag, the plain view doctrine permits him to seize the pipe. On the other hand, once it becomes clear that an apartment’s occupants are not in
A Terry Stop is an act of the law enforcement officers/ police momentarily detain an individual under reasonable belief of involvement in criminal activity as derived from the case Terry V, Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (Gardner & Anderson, 2015). The Supreme Court established that law enforcement officers may carry out a restricted search of the suspect’s outer clothes if there is reasonable suspicion that the individual may possess weapons that are dangerous. The bottom-line is to make such stops based on the fact the suspect is involved or is about to commit a crime as opposed to his past conduct/ record (Gardner & Anderson, 2015). Given contrabands, specific legal provisions allow for related seizures during a routine frisking exercise.
Her field training officer Vaughn does not like getting involved with dangerous calls sticking to mostly writing tickets. When Vaughn is told the Watch Commander is riding on their job and they are not where they are supposed to be. Vaughn turns on the lights and sirens and speeds in excess of 60 miles per hour but he fails to see a car pulling out of a parking space and they crash. Gallo’s seatbelt malfunctioned and she ends up through the windshield while she is recovering at the hospital Vaughn reminds her of the most important rule to cover your
Furthermore, Mr. Seaver acknowledges how there may be a “connection” made between their new book, Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher, and the drink, Coca Cola, after reading Mr. Herbert’s letter. He points out, with a sarcastic attitude, that Coca Cola might benefit from the use of their slogan when he writes, “Those who read our ad may well tend to go out and buy a Coke rather than our book” , but the representative does not guarantee that Coca Cola will benefit (Seaver 3). He is being sarcastic for the most part, and takes the issue lightly, but admits that if the brand did benefit, they would “be happy to give the company the residual benefit” (Seaver 3). However, in the end, Mr. Herbert is more persuasive because he established a plausible
This case took place right after a major disaster that came through New Orleans, Hurricane Katrina. The Police Department was in a state of chaos, and during this time the Police Officers were desperately trying to take back their city (Bohm, Haley, 2014). Even though this could be used as a reason as to why the New Orleans Police did what they did at that time it does not excuse it. It had not been long since this disaster struck and any effective antipolice corruption strategies that could have been used are usually a long term reform, and these strategies should take into account the society the police serves (Gutierrez-Garcia, Rodriguez, 2016), and at that time the society in which the New Orleans Police Department serves was in an uproar.
In the federal and State courts, evidence illegally obtained by law-enforcement officers cannot be acknowledged in a criminal court for prosecution, should the accused objects to its admission (Paulsen 1963). In my humble opinion, the exclusionary rule should be applied to any evidence or person obtained illegally. As a police officer, we must respect all the laws of evidence whether we like them or not.
Throughout my years of school many teachers have helped lead me to what I plan on becoming, but Mr. Seal has inspired me to become a political journalist. While taking his AP Government and Politics class I grew to love politics. He was extremely passionate towards what he taught and even related government to things that we would know of.