Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conflict between India and Pakistan
Impact of the cold war on the third world countries
Cold war and india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conflict between India and Pakistan
Stanley Wolpert is an American academic, Indologist and author who is considered one of the world's leading authorities on the political and intellectual history of modern India and Pakistan. Wolpert has written many fiction and nonfiction books on the topic and taught at the University of California, Los Angeles from 1959-2002.
In his book “India and Pakistan – Continued Conflict and Cooperation?”, Wolpert gives his latest analysis by briefly tracing the history of the conflict and by emphasizing on the issue of Kashmir for which, after more than six decades, there is no solution in sight. He also mentions the various national and international initiatives to solve this conflict and explains why these initiatives have always failed. The most realistic and pragmatic solution to the problem, according to Wolpert, is for Pakistan and India to agree on the current Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir as International border, because he believes that no attempt to hand over
…show more content…
until recent days. The author says that “when the Soviet tanks and troops moved into Kabul” (Wolpert 2010) and placed their puppet Amir Babrak Karmal as a ruler it was an act that alarmed the U.S. and Islamabad. But India, on the other hand, was ambivalent because of a signed “treaty of friendship with Moscow” (Wolpert 2010). After the Soviet invasion, Pakistan’s Zia, who was a fundamentalist Muslim, welcomed the four million Afghan refugees that came to Pakistan and procured them with food, shelter and arms from Islamabad’s leaders with the massive U.S. military aid and money. India knew that all these arms were aimed “to do as much damage as they possibly could to Indian Kashmir.” (Wolpert 2010) This action was of course considered as part of the Cold War that was ongoing between the U.S. and the
It is a beautiful day in the area modernly known as southern Mississippi. The birds are chirping, the plants are growing, and the sun is shining. The day starts off like any other in this Native American community. The women began to tend the fields and the men are preparing for the next hunt. Suddenly, many strange figures appear at the entrance of the village. These figures appear to be men but these men are far different from any Native Americans they have seen. In the beginning, these men appear to be friendly and even exchange gifts with the local groups. Not for long these relationships began to change these white men began to disrespect the local chiefs and began to dominate the lands. Interaction of this kind was common along the Native Americans and the European settlers, however, it is not exact with every Native American group.
In chapter 2, of Essentials of the U.S Health Care System, Shi and Singh both talk about focusing on determinants to improve health. Having adequate health insurance for everyone is a great start to improving one’s health, but the bigger issue is addressing the needs of the people who have low income or the needs for different ethnic groups. In the documentaries, Bad Sugar, Becoming American, Collateral Damage and In Sickness and In Wealth, they all touched on social determinants. It did not matter if you lived in the United States, a third world country or a reservation, they all expressed a need the can better their health.
John Knowles, the author of “A Separate Peace” novel, was born in 1926 in West Virginia, Fairmont to be specific. The book was first published in 1960. Though it was Knowles’ first book, surprisingly the novel won great awards and hence lots of audience in the United States of America. The story is centered on a teenager named Devon, schooling at Phillips Exeter Academy. He writes: “But, of course, fifteen years before there had been a war going on. Perhaps the school wasn’t as well kept up in those days; perhaps varnish, along with everything else, had gone to war” (Knowles 1). The essay will expound that the novel A Separate Peace by John Knowles centers its foundational theme on the
On December 24th 1979, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. On that day began a war which wreaked incredible havoc and destruction on Afghanistan for 10 long years. The Soviets stormed in with thousands of troops at the request of the troubled Afghan Communist regime. The Russians believed this be a neat surgical military operation. They were wrong.(Boggs) The only resistance to the Soviet invasion were men known as the "mujahideen" known to many as freedom fighters. They are multinational; some even from America, doing everything in their power to repeal the Soviet horde. The Soviet invasion frightened neighboring countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, so they unofficially allied with the United States. The U.S. provided the weaponry, training, etc., Saudi Arabia recruited the fighters (mujahideen) which were sometimes based in Pakistan. They all agreed on the need for armed resistance against the Soviets. The U.S. decided to tap the religious vein of the rebels, creating a zealous religiously driven guerrilla organization; well armed and trained by CIA officers with the goal of returning Afghanistan to Islamic purity.
In A Separate Peace by John Knowles, Gene, Finny, and Leper fear recognizing their own flaws and learning about the harsh realities of a world at war because it affects their decision making causing them to make poor decisions, such as severely hurting one another, more frequently.
The primary focus of this tension arises from a common area – Kashmir/Jammu. The conflict in this region can be accredited to the differences in religion. The conflict in Kashmir stems from 1947. This was the year the partition of the Indian sub-continent occurred. However, this partition of land was based on approximate religious lines created by the British empirical rule, when they allowed the princes of 650 states to choose which country they would join. In theory, these princes had the option of remaining independent, but that option was stamped out due to the revolts of the people living in those states. Kashmir was ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh. Because of its location, it could choose to join either country; however, Hari Singh remained neutral. His choice was eventually ignored in 1947, when Pakistan deployed Muslim tribesmen to capture the capital. At this point, Hari Singh freaked out and asked India for military assistance against Pakistan. In return, Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession and ceded Kashmir to India on October 26, 1927. As we can see, the main reason for this conflict is religion. There are some non-religious reasons for this conflict; however, those reasons eventually tie back to religion in one way or another. One of these "non-religious" reasons relates to the recent development of nuclear weapons in both India and Pakistan. While nuclear weapons add to the terror in the area, their development was a result of conflict between India and Pakistan. This conflict has a...
The book A Separate Peace by John Knowles has a well defined explanation of the theme.
The Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) in northwest Pakistan serves as a sanctuary for the Taliban (“Afghanistan And Pakistan” 10). Although within Pakistan’s borders, the federal government does not exert actual control of the region, rather local Pashtun leaders govern the area and the region is believed to be home to many radical Islamic training camps and hideouts (Kurtzman 308). Moreover, the Pakistani ISI (think CIA of Pakistan), provides “logistics assistance” to the Taliban (“Afghanistan And Pakistan” 10) and the CIA even believes that the ISI provided support to the Taliban in a 2008 bombing of an Indian embassy in Kabul (Feisal 172). Multiple agencies, such as the Center for Strategic and International Studies and U.S. General Accountability Office, have concluded that the ISI provides significant support for the Taliban (Feisel 172). With all this mind, the Pakistan government chooses to support the Taliban (although they will not directly admit it) because of their strained relationship with Kabul, self interest to spread radical Islam rather than Pashtun nationalism, and their rival, India, supports an anti-Pakistan government in control of Afghanistan (Feisal 173). By Pakistan empowering the Taliban, this creates the opportunity to have a pro-Pakistan government in Afghanistan if the Taliban were able to control the country once again (“Afghanistan And Pakistan” 9). By spreading radical Islam, Pakistan is diverting Pashtuns attention from their ethnic culture to the religion of Islam; they do this because empowered Pashtuns might want to form a “Pashtunistan” which would require Pakistan to give up some of its land to a new nation (“Afghanistan And Pakistan” 9). Furthermore, Pakistan is rivals with India which wants an anti-Pakistani government in Kabul and Pakistan has tried to empower the Taliban in order to prevent
President Obama first attempted to address this Afghanistan-Pakistan problem by committing 17,000 troops to safeguard the integrity of Afghanistan’s presidential election. After the election, US troops
When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan on December 1979, the goal was to help Afghan communist forces set up a communist government. The Soviet Union felt Afghanistan had key resources and a foothold in the Middle East to spread communist ideas. The result would be a war that the Soviet Union wishes it never got involved in and likened to their “Vietnam War”, meaning winning a number of battles but not the war like what happened to the U.S. in Vietnam. The background of the war, outcome of the war, and impact on the United States are key to understanding the Soviet-Afghan War.
Mohsin Hamid is a Pakistani writer and self-confessed “transcontinental mongrel”. Born in 1971 in Lahore, Hamid shifted to the United States at the age of eighteen. He attended Princeton University and Harvard Law School and worked briefly as a management consultant in New York. After living in London for a few tears, he moved back to Pakistan and currently lives in Lahore with his wife and daughter.
When the Taliban started the attempt to take over Afghanistan, the people were tired of all of the fighting. The people just wanted an end to all of the craziness and chaos. When the Taliban, finally took over, the people were so relieved. Rahim Khan describes this relief with “When the Taliban rolled in and kicked the Alliance out of Kabul, I actually danced on that street...And believe me, I wasn’t alone” (Hosseini, 200). The Afghani people put their trust in the Taliban. Then, the Taliban took advantage of the trust that was entrusted in them. They did many morally wrong acts. Arguably the most horrifying act was the ethnic cleansing of Hazaras in some areas. They treated everyone horribly and turned Afghanistan to an awful place to live. This situation is another great example of betrayal. The Taliban people hurt the Afghani people, their friends and family, people who trusted them by doing morally wrong things. A lesson that Hosseini is trying to teach readers here is to be grateful for the freedom they have, and be mindful to others who may not have the same freedom as
The Prince of Kashmir chose India but Pakistan invaded the province soon after and have occupied part of Kashmir since then. Controversy still surrounds the province today because naturally, Muslims want to control it. While many Muslims relocated to Pakistan and the Hindus to India, half of the Muslim population was left in India and their relations did not improve after being partially separated.
The United States has a long history of almost one hundred year involvement with Afghanistan. The two nations have a very strong and friendly strategic partnership. (“Index Of Indian Thought Leaders”). United States and Afghan relations can be traced back to Nineteen-Twenty-One (Bond). This means that for the last almost one hundred years, the United States and Afghanistan have been involved with each other. Their relationship had improved for a while but then declined after the September Eleventh attacks. The United States and Afghan became important during The Cold War. “President Harry S. Truman commented that the friendship between the two countries would be "preserved and strengthened" by the presence of senior diplomats in each capital.”( In Small Things Remembered » The first American expedition to Afghanistan). This shows that at the time of the developing relationship between the two nations, President Truman believed that the relationships could be strengthened by the presence of a senior
Following the January 2004 Islamabad-new Delhi rapprochement , and with the resumption of composite dialogue covering Kashmir and other unresolved issues, one hopes the Kashmir history may turn full circle soon. However, for this to happen, the Indian leadership has to show some courage and boldness in responding sincerely to Pakistani leadership's recent overtures on Kashmir. The roadmap for peace that the foreign secretary level talks in February produced includes a schedule for discussing siachen letter in the year. A Siachen settlement, for which a precedent in the shape of an accord is already available, will surely serve as a catalyst for the Kashmir settlement. In Kashmir’s' context, the only solution that should be ruled out is doing nothing. Time will not heal the Kashmir problem. Time has made things worse in Kashmir.