Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison and difference from Odyssey and Aeneid
Comparisons between the Aeneid and the Odyssey
Difference between roman and greek gods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison and difference from Odyssey and Aeneid
The Odyssey, Oedipus the King, and The Aeneid are all great literary works with a universal theme that is still being used to teach today. The author of these individual works, just like any author, uses their stories to convey their views on their beliefs, religion, culture and many other things. With each story, the readers are given lessons and get some sort of insight into the lives of the people and their religious beliefs. Each individual work portrays the views of its religious beliefs based on its time period and culture. These portrayal views in The Odyssey, Oedipus the King, and Aeneid sheds light on the differences that culture and time period brings into religious beliefs. The ancient Greek religion has many different beliefs …show more content…
In the very beginning of the story, Homer writes “The other gods / Were assembled in the halls of Olympian Zeus, / And the Father of Gods and Men” (1.33-35). With this quote, Homer portrays the views of the hierarchy among the gods. Homer further depicts the hierarchy among the gods when Zeus orders Calypso to release Odysseus so he can head home, showing that when Zeus orders something it must be done. At the same time, Homer points out the gods vices with Calypso mentioning different relationships between humans and gods. Calypso criticizes that gods take mortal women to their beds but when goddess does the same with mortal men there is always a problem. Also in book 5, Hermes says “The man’s not fated to rot here far from his friends. / It’s his destiny to see his dear ones again / And return to his high-gabled Ithacan home” (113-15). This quote portrays the aspect of the religion that Gods and Goddesses cannot change fate, but they can delay it. In The Odyssey, Oedipus the King, and The Aeneid this aspect of the religion is portrayed. All three plays though from different cultures and time period are all about fate. Odysseus is fated to reach his home, Ithaca, Oedipus is fated to kill his father and sleep with his mother, Aeneas is fated to find a new home for the Trojans. In all three plays, the main characters are fated to do something. Also, in all three plays, the gods …show more content…
In actuality most of the beliefs that Romans had during the time Aeneid was written were the same as Greeks. Probably because Romans took a lot of the Greeks religion when they concurred it in 146 B.C. There are not that many distinctive differences between the Roman and Greek religion except for the names and sometimes in beliefs. In Roman, Zeus is Jupiter, Poseidon is Neptune, Hera is Juno, Aphrodite is Venus, etc. However, Romans did have some gods that were not associated with Greek gods, such as, Janus and Quirinus. The Aeneid and The Odyssey are two great works of a similar story line from different cultures. The fact that The Aeneid and The Odyssey are so similar in their religious aspects is because of the fact that in technicality the two different cultures have the same religion. Although they do have many similarities between the Roman and Greek culture, the Romans did maintain some of their own beliefs such as the household gods. Virgil writes in The Aeneid, “At the heart of the house an ample alter stood, / naked under the skies, / an ancient laurel bending over the shrine, / embracing our household gods within its shade” (2.636-39). Virgil stresses on these household gods especially in Book II: Priam killed in front of the household gods. Another thing about the Roman culture that differs from the Greek is the way they spell names. In this quote: “Even then our soldiers sensed that I was the one, / the target
...se value to the Odyssey as a voice from an antique time aimed at future generations. During the Roman Empire, both the Odyssey and its companion, the Iliad, were considered as foundational texts in education. Small wonder; history, poetry, parable, hymn-such a literary work is its own small cosmos. It deserves to be approached and interacted with as a living entity that still matters in Western civilization. That is possible only if we view such works in the context of the societies that produced them. Religion was a huge component of such a society. Although we now possess technological marvels that might give a Greek deity apoplexy from shame, the ancient Greeks are still Us. Men and women will always feel the need to see the world through fresher eyes than their own.
"You have your eyes but see not where you are in sin, nor where you live, nor whom you
The name “Oedipus” means “swollen feet” in Latinized Greek. His parents, Laius and Jocasta, gave him this name while piercing a metal rod through the ankles of his feet, in order to prevent the fulfilment of the oracle’s prophecy. Despite this heinous act, their efforts were in vain as Oedipus’ free will conquered the theme of fate. In the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, the tragic hero, Oedipus, demonstrates hamartia, a fatal error in judgement, which brings about his own downfall. It was Oedipus’ hubris that was responsible for the tragic ending of this play. Evidence of this statement occurs when Oedipus’ determination towards solving the mystery behind Laius’ death ironically lead to the truth behind the oracle’s prophecies. Additionally, Oedipus’ overweening pride and ego resulted in the murder of Laius, which was a major stepping-stone in the prophecy. He illustrates his error in judgment through his pride, blindness, and foolishness and therefore is at fault.
Homer. ?The Odyssey,? World Masterpieces: Expanded Edition. Maynard Mack ed. Ed. Coptic St.: Prentice, 1995.
In Sophocles’ work, Oedipus the King, Oedipus definitely fits Aristotle’s meaning of a tragic hero which is a man of honorable importance. He is not a usual man, but a man with outstanding superiority and immensity about himself. A man of his own ruins goes for a greater cause or principle. Oedipus conveys many mistakes. In the play Oedipus the King, things really had taken a turn from good to bad. Using Aristotle’s meaning defines will be proven that Oedipus is a 1main example of a tragic hero Nobleness, Tragic flaw, and Hardship are all characteristics that Aristotle described as to what a tragic hero really define as. These are also four features Oedipus proves his well- being of a catastrophic hero.
In the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, Oedipus is depicted as a morally ambiguous character; neither purely evil or purely good. Oedipus runs from his fate initially to prevent himself from pursuing what he believed was his fate; however, he is lead straight towards his real fate. He kills his biological father as he is headed to Thebes, where he takes the throne. Once he has taken the throne, he begins to try and save his city from the plague by looking for the murder of king Laius. However, what he does not know is that the prophet has told him who has slew the king; therefore, he presents his ignorance as a leader. Not only does his ignorance create the flawed character inside himself, but it also causes him to run from his fate. The significance of Oedipus being a morally ambiguous character is that he cannot run from his fate
The idea of fate has baffled mankind for centuries. Can humans control what happens to them, or is everyone placed in a predestined world designed by a higher power? The Epic of Gilgamesh and Oedipus The King highlight on the notion that no matter what, people cannot control what is destined to occur. Interestingly enough, many other distantly connected cultures had, and have similar gods or goddesses who play a role in the fate of individuals. Oedipus, King of Thebes, was told by the Oracle at Delphi that he would one day kill his father and marry his mother. Determined not to let this prophecy verify his fears, Oedipus does all in his power to prevent this from happening, yet fails. Similarly, Gilgamesh, king of Uruk, attempts to obtain immortality, but fails as well. Gilgamesh's and Oedipus's intense fear and ignorance cause them to try to interfere with their fates, leading to their failures and realization of the futility of trying to control destiny.
The Virgilis Aeneid and the Odyssey are ancient poems. The first thing to keep in mind is that the two epics are written from two opposing points of view: the victorious Greeks (for Homer) and the defeated Trojans (Virgil) who are destined to become united. The Virgilis Aeneid follows a legend of the Aeneas from the impeding last days of Troy to the Aenaes’ Victory. It also reflects on the synthesis of the Trojans and the Latinos to be united. On the other hand, the Odyssey talks of the Greek respected hero Odysseus and the long journey to his home with the impeding collapse of Troy. As a result, this paper bit by bit tries to compare and contrast various aspects of the two poems. More evident is the use of book six of the Aeneid and Book eleven of the Odyssey.
Oedipus, by Sophocles, was written around 441 B.C. Sophocles’ story is considered a Greek tragedy. Aeschylus is the person who coined the term, but “it was Sophocles who brought it to perfection” (Struck). Oedipus is one of the most famous classical dramas, and it is because of Aristotle the story reached that status. Aristotle stated his opinions in his book Poetics, which made it popular (Thorburne 384). In the story, Oedipus displays hubris when he defies the gods and runs away from his true fate which leads to his downfall.
There is overwhelming evidence corroborating the notion that the perplexity as well as bewilderment underlying man’s destiny along with his deeds is what may qualify Sophocles “Oedipus” as a real human tragedy in the sense that the whole story is about mysterious and enigmatic inquiries about truth as well as human tragedy.
Tiresias, from “Oedipus the King” by the Ancient Greek playwright Sophocles, is a blind prophet and whilst he is only on the stage for a little time he plays a major role by what he does and what he represents. Tiresias enters the play after being summoned by Oedipus to tell him of the murderer of Laius, the recent King. Tiresias for the sake of Oedipus does not tell him the truth at the start saying that “what will come will come. Even if I shroud it all in silence”. In is conversation, Sophocles, uses Tiresias as a turning point in the plot as it is the beginning of Oedipus’ downfall. As well as that Sophocles uses Tiresias to represent many of the key ideas in the play. Tiresias represents the idea of fate and how
In the play, Oedipus Tyrannus, Sophocles, illustrates how fate and free will could determine one 's destiny. Sophocles is a well-known tragedian who wrote more than one-hundred Greek dramas for Greek festivals. While his plays entertained countless people in Greek carnivals in his plays also made his intended audience to become acquainted with Athens’ government, social forms as well as its’ religion. In this play the main character, Oedipus, is represented as a man of sudden action, honest, and great insight. Oedipus unintentionally had fulfilled his own fate, stating that he will kill his father and marry his mother. While both fate and free will had resulted in Oedipus’ fate, the choices Oedipus made in his own
Oedipus did not have a fair start in life. His father, Laius, heard prophecy that Oedipus would one day kill his father and sleep with his mother. In order to prevent this, Laius gave Oedipus to a shepherd to be killed. Fortunately, through a string of events, Oedipus's life was saved, and he even went on to become the honored king of Thebes. Despite this feat, Oedipus still managed to make several decisions that ultimately fulfilled the original prophecy told to Laius, and inevitably sealed Oedipus?s fate.
The play, Oedipus Rex, expresses the two themes of fate and persistence throughout the plot. The play was written by Sophocles in the Greek era. Oedipus Rex is included in what is known as the Oedipus collection of plays. These plays were performed in Greek theaters around 420 BC and beyond. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_the_King). Throughout the story, fate and the choices that Oedipus makes allows him to change into a new person by the end of the story. The themes of fate and persistence play a large role in the outcome of the play.
Aristotle, in his work The Poetics, tries to delineate the idea of a tragedy. Throughout his work Aristotle says that the hero, or at least the protagonist in a tragedy must be substantially good, almost godlike. This hero must bring upon themselves their downfall, due to their fatal flaw. If the hero is not at a high point, an audience will not care about them, and won’t notice their fall. One must fall a long way in social class in order for it to be noticed by the outside man. Oedipus perfectly exemplifies a tragedy, in relation to modern society, effectively showing how too much pride can often lead to downfall or doom.