Brave or Naive Odette Sansom was a World War II spy, who later became a heroine for her work out on the field. Odette is primarily seen as a true heroine to many, but also is seen as a naive woman who does not deserve the heroine title she received. Papers and articles written about her either focus on the bravery she upheld throughout her time being caught by the Germans or focus on the speculation of whether or not she deserved her war heroine titles. “Women who Spied for Britain”, is a book written by Robyn Walker that discusses a handful of women who were spies during the war, including Odette Sansom. Walker’s chapter on Odette was very positive towards her work in the war and depicted Odette as a brave women. On the the other hand, an …show more content…
Once she received news from France that her family had been moved from their home and that her brother was wounded from the war she changed her mind. In an interview in 1986 Odette stated how she felt about the whole situation, “ I felt terrible … I am in England … I am in what I consider the safety of beautiful Somerset with my children, under those lovely trees … Am I going to be satisfied to accept this … that other people are going to suffer, get killed, die because of this war, and trying to get freedom for my children, let’s face it. Am I supposed to accept this sacrifice that other people are making without lifting a finger?” (Walker p.62) After deciding that she wanted to do everything she could do to help, she went on to go through the training to become an undercover agent and later started working out in the field with the code name Lise.
Hastings article on Odette Sansom also started out by giving a little background on Odette’s life and then went into discussing her work during the war. It explained how Odette almost did not even receive her George Cross award for her work because there was so much speculation from others in the SOE who thought there was no reason why she deserved the award. During her training to become an SOE agent, one spectator even went as far to write a report that stated she was “impulsive and hasty in her judgments and has not quite the clarity of mind
…show more content…
While Hastings article “War heroine Odette Sansom was deemed ‘too temperamental’ for spying” deemed that Odette had a lot of speculations against her and her being seen as a true heroine is a debatable topic. Even though both of the authors managed to successfully tell the story of Odette, they each had different opinions and tended to focus on different details. Walker focusing and leaning towards Odette being a brave hero versus Hasting focusing on the accusations all against Odette being a hero and receiving her George Cross award. Each author included important information and reports on Odette Sansom and even though some were good and some were bad she is still seen as a heroine and is known for her bravery during World War
knowing that she needed to do something to support her child. After the war, she
“The war correspondent is responsible for most of the ideas of battle which the public possesses … I can’t write that it occurred if I know that it did not, even if by painting it that way I can rouse the blood and make the pulse beat faster – and undoubtedly these men here deserve that people’s pulses shall beat for them. But War Correspondents have so habitually exaggerated the heroism of battles that people don’t realise that real actions are heroic.”
The letter never made it to her before she died. She did many things for theUnion army when they were basically at her doorstep. She filled their canteens, she baked them bread,and she made them food. She died whilst preparing bread for Union soldiers.
She flirted with the officers and they started telling her military secrets (she used this a lot and it usually worked). She delivered secrets to Confederate Generals Pierre Beauregard and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. One day she was caught by union troops and was told she would sentenced to death, but she wasn’t. Boyd wrote “This didn’t scare me. It only taught me that I needed to find a better way to communicate.”
tyranny and was willing to sacrifice her life for true freedom in her country. She truly deserves to
She has masterly assembled in considerable detail the historical accounts of the story showing acute sensitivity to the intricacies of human relations as dictated by prejudice, bias, power and the passage of
The text was quite and interesting as it presented the views of not only Audrey but of other historians. The text gave me both views of the debate over Leni. It also helped me in determining my standing over the debates surrounding Riefenstahl. I used quotes from the text and used it in my reports.
Although the trial of People v. Sweet was a clear legal victory for Ossian, his wife, his friends and all others involved in the defense, the story as a whole was a heart wrenching and grim calamity for the Sweets. Not to mention the NAACP’s failed initiative to champion the case in hopes that it would foreshadow a bigger, nation-wide residential segregation victory in the Supreme Court and maybe even a civil rights movement. After Henry’s acquittal none of the men spent day in jail for the night of September 9th 1925 but both trials didn’t have the effect the NAACP planned and ended playing an insignificant role in the big picture of residential segregation and minority rights as a whole. After the trial of Henry Sweet, Robert Toms announced the end of the trials, People v. Sweet would never see another day in court. However much relief it was to hear that, it was small victory compared to the permanent damage the trials inflicted on the lives of the defendants, especially Ossian Sweet.
Annemarie is a normal young girl, ten years old, she has normal difficulties and duties like any other girl. but these difficulties aren’t normal ones, she’s faced with the difficulties of war. this war has made Annemarie into a very smart girl, she spends most of her time thinking about how to be safe at all times “Annemarie admitted to herself,snuggling there in the quiet dark, that she was glad to be an ordinary person who would never be called upon for courage.
Howatt, Megan. "Sniper Girls and Fearless Heroines: Wartime Representations of Foreign Women In English Canadian Press, 1941-1943." A Companion to Women's Military History. By Dorotea Gucciardo. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.
Zeinert, Karen. Those Incredible Women of World War 2: The Millbrook Press, Brookfield, Connecticut 1994
Throughout Tennessee William’s play “A Streetcar Named Desire,” Blanche Dubois exemplified several tragic flaws. She suffered from her haunting past; her inability to overcome; her desire to be someone else; and from the cruel, animalistic treatment she received from Stanley. Sadly, her sister Stella also played a role in her downfall. All of these factors ultimately led to Blanche’s tragic breakdown in the end.
Her efforts jeopardized her life entirely, yet she pursued her duties for the benefit of the Allied forces. As time progresses, historians seem to believe Phillips’s efforts had no impact on the war itself and the Allied victory over a totalitarian run Europe. Although there is no debate that the Allied forces would have remained victorious,
In the time of Bourke-White and Dickey Chapelle, it was a man's world and women struggled to be considered close to the status of men. Females were not considered equal and respected until these determined pioneer women came along. “A Life Less Ordinary,” by Dina Modianot-Fox and “Gal Reporters: Breaking Barriers in World War II" by Mark Jenkins are about female journalists who reported during WWII. The author's purpose in the two text have several similarities, as well as several differences. Both authors' purpose was similar.
This was when the French were fighting with the Nazi Germans. She also helped coordinate the Resistance Movement . “Cat” was sent to London and gave highly valuable information on what the germans were doing . She contacted London daily to report new information (chicagotribunearchives).