Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Female employment discrimination
Female employment discrimination
Female employment discrimination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Female employment discrimination
The article titled Distaste or Disability? Evaluating the Legal Framework for Protecting Obese Workers by Jennifer Bennett Shinall takes a look at obese people in the work place and whether they are discriminated in the workplace due to distaste or actual physical disability. The article also examines the situation from a gender discrimination point of view, and whether or not gender plays a factor in employers discriminating against obese workers.
Back in 2008, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was amended by Congress. The amendment expanded the scope of medical conditions that it covered which has resulted in lawyers using this amendment to argue that obesity is now considered a disability and that firing an employee or not employing
…show more content…
Title VII is a federal law that prohibits employers from using sex, race, color, national origin, and religion to discriminate against employees. Using the sex discrimination aspect of Title VII might be the best option for obese women. There has already been many cases in where obese women have used Title VII in this exact way, a lot of which are against Airlines. Back in 1970 there was a case, Gerdom v Continental Airlines, Inc., in which a weight requirement was imposed on only female flight attendants, not male. The company tried to argue that it was part of their grooming requirements. “The Ninth Circuit held that even grooming requirements would violate Title VII if they failed an equal burdens analysis--that is, if grooming requirements were not "even-handedly applied to employees of both …show more content…
Continental, as a result, had violated Title VII.” Title VII was able to help obese women in flight attendant positions in large part because these airline companies had explicit rules and guidelines in place regarding their weight. This made it easier for the plaintiffs to challenge these rules because they were written down and obvious that they were being enforced. However, in most jobs, this is not the case. There are no written rules that state employees must be a certain amount of weight. In a lot of these instances the employers are still not hiring obese women workers, and not because of safety reasons, like it could be argued in the airlines cases. They are not being hired because of employer taste. They don’t want these obese women employees working for them especially if they are out in the field interacting with customers and representing their company on a daily basis. So choosing to not hire, give raises, or promote obese women that are qualified and deserving is something that employers have a lot easier time getting away with. There is no documentation stating their reasoning and they’re not going to openly admit their decisions to not hire an obese woman because of her weight, so it is almost impossible to prove. Another issue for using Title VII is it really
This is an essay written in the MIT Sloan Management Review that presents the correlation between businesses and the issue of obesity in order to persuade businesses to take action in regards to preventing the issue. Therefore, its target audience is anyone who currently works in business or plans to do so in the future. In this review, the author begins by citing four internal and external reasons for which businesses should care about obesity: self-preservation, public criticism, employee productivity, and opportunity. The author proceeds by providing an idea as to how businesses can assist in reversing the trend. In order to do so, he analyzes what he considers to be the two sides of the obesity problem: physical activity and food consumption.
The pros of an airline implementing a policy that bigger customers need to buy a second seat is that the weight capacity regulations will be followed to. As well as the cons of an airline implementing a policy that larger customers need to buy a second seat would result in a bigger people who travelling will not uses that airlines anymore, airlines would be glowered on by family or relatives of larger customers, airline’s policies could be vigorously monitored for discriminatory actions against overweight persons. As mentioned in the book there are no federal laws prohibiting discrimination against obese individual, although there are some places such as Wisconsin, DC, and California provide legal protection. (Harvey & Allard , 2012, p. 234)
This country places great value on achieving the perfect body. Americans strive to achieve thinness, but is that really necessary? In his article written in 1986 entitled “Fat and Happy?,” Hillel Schwartz claims that people who are obese are considered failures in life by fellow Americans. More specifically, he contends that those individuals with a less than perfect physique suffer not only disrespect, but they are also marginalized as a group. Just putting people on a diet to solve a serious weight problem is simply not enough, as they are more than likely to fail. Schwartz wants to convey to his audience that people who are in shape are the ones who make obese people feel horrible about themselves. Schwartz was compelled to write this essay,
We need to acknowledge that our methods to control overweight and obesity may commence, but must not conclude with individual accountability. Only a number of diseases require a general approach, other than the effort to hold and decrease the levels of overweight and obesity, and in few places are the stakes higher. Employers seem to have accepted this and are attempting to develop programs to address it.
I found that in all of these reasons, Smith only says that they (the oppositional side) are discriminating against "fat" people, but she refrains from going deeper to present why they do it. Sadly, there are some people do discriminate against the “people of size.” Although just because something is done, like a policy revision or disqualification to a job, due to a person’s weight, one should look deeper into the reason why it is done. Do not always misinterpret this as discrimination, because it could possibly be done to benefit that person in the end. Maybe even ensure his or her safety in a time of crisis.
Fat does not equal lazy; fat does not equal bad; fat does not equal overeating; fat does not equal ugly. Fat oppression is something so prevalent in our society, yet Americans refuse to recognize it as a problem or even an issue. After hearing an amazing woman named Nomy Lamm speak this weekend, I could not longer let this issue be ignored. (Lamm is a fat oppression activist and has been published in Ms. magazine). Fat oppression exists in this society and we all must recognize the damage it does to everyone, especially fat people.
Pinfitore, R., Dugoni. B. L., Tindale, R. S., Spring, B. (1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 909-917.
As for the gender that is most likely to suffer from morbid obesity is the female gender. As a treatment for now the first step is surgery to try and reduce the obesity also some medical surgeries also involve is minimizing the size of ones stomach. Also according to the panel, FDA guidelines for approval of obesity drugs might well be altered to give less importance to metabolic biomarkers (blood pressure, triglycerides, cholesterol) and more to the loss of adipose tissue itself or particular deposits of adipose tissue that have deleterious effects on many physiological functions (Allison, 2008).
Interest in the social aspects of obesity is nothing new. Jeffrey Sobal has written extensively about the social and psychological consequences of obesity , including the stigmatisation and discrimination of obese and even overweight individuals (Sobal 2004).
Discriminating against a person because of one's weight can be a seriously hurtful and demeaning thing. Many people assume that the causes for being overweight are eating all day and rarely exercising. Some people call overweight people slobs or lazy, when in most instances this isn't the case. Some have health problems that lead to being overweight, like a kidney disease or malfunction, or the person may even be suffering from a birth defect.
Orbach, Susie. “Fat as a Feminist Issue.” They Say I Say. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein, Russel Durst. New York. W.W. Norton, 2009. 200-205. Print.
In discussion of should there be a fat tax for overweight people, one controversy has been that they should be taxed since they are obese. Some argue that people should be taxed if they are obese and that we should tax people based on their weight like Samoa Airlines did. On the other hand, they should not be taxed on being overweight since we do not know the circumstances they are going through. My own view is that they should be helped and encouraged to live a better life style that benefits their life instead of being taxed. Our job is to encourage and help them not tax them for being
Obesity is a serious condition that has generated a discussion on whether or not to be classified as a disease. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), obesity is the body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, which is calculated based on the person’s height and weight. For years, our society has been facing the obesity challenge, which can be extremely costly once it leads to several diseases. Thus, because of the constant increase of percentage of people with obesity, the American Medical Association (AMA) proposed in June 18, 2013 to classify obesity as a disease. Their argument was that obesity increases the risks of countless health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension etc. Moreover, it increases morbidity and mortality. By considering obesity as a disease, their aim was to maximize researches and funding, which will focus on obesity from different medical and health approach levels. Their idea of classifying obesity as a disease was in accordance with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute’s declaration of 1995. The institute declared, “ Obesity is a complex multifactorial chronic disease developing from multiple interactive influences of numerous factors.” In 2012, the CDC data showed 34.9% of adults obese and 17% of obese children. These numbers are very alarming especially since the struggle to deter certain factors contributing into this condition is still a challenge. Among the struggles, there are the people’s rights versus health regulations to keep them as healthy as possible like the former mayor Bloomberg regulation on soft drinks size cut. During CNN’s show GPS of Sunday 2, 2014, the host Zacharia...
Society should consider the physical and emotional problems of obesity in our nation. “Obesity is defined as an excess proportion of total body fat (Mayo Clinic).” American society has become increasingly obese, “characterized by environments that promote increased food intake, unhealthy foods, and physical inactivity (cdcinfo@cdc.gov).” Our nation increasingly has become consumers of a fast food diet. It is so simple to just pick up food on the go and not deal with the hassle of cooking and cleaning up afterwards. What are nation needs to acknowledge is the health risks they will obtain if they do not acquire a healthy life style.