Critical Care Level 3 Pressure Ulcers

1388 Words3 Pages

As a result of Lily’s extensive hospitalisation period, a grade 3 pressure ulcers developed on her buttocks. A pressure ulcer is a localised injury to the skin which is usually located over a bony area as a result of pressure or pressure combined with friction (Willock et al., 2007). According to Sibbald et al., (2003) excreted bodily fluids are often common factors which contribute to the breakdown of skin, especially as a consequence of urinary or faecal incontinence. There were many factors which contributed to the breaking down of Lily’s skin, such as infrequent nappy changes and lack of mobilisation. Ensuring the maintenance of skin integrator within the critical care setting has its challenges. Often, patients are attached to multiple …show more content…

Stage 1- Non blanchable erythema of skin. The epidermis is still intact. Stage 2- partial loss of skin to the epidermis or the dermis. A superficial ulcer may be present. Stage 3- tissue loss, damaged or necrosis of tissue. Appears as a deep crater. Stage 4, full tissue loss with great destruction, Tissue necrosis or damaged muscle/bone (EPUAP, 2005). It has been argued that the identification of pressure ulcers is complex and patient specific. Often, nurses lack the expertise and education to identify the appropriate treatment of specific pressure ulcer stages and prevention. Nurses often show uncertainty in differentiating between grade two or grade three lesions. Diagnostic inaccuracies can have negative results in treatment and prevention interventions. Also, risk assessment tools should be considered (Suddaby et al., …show more content…

A study of both the Glamorgan scale and Branden Q scale found that there was a lack of variability regarding the Glamorgan scale. The study notes it was acceptable to use either the Branden Q or the Glamorgan scale within an ICU setting, however, the Branden Q scale proved to be far more superior to a general paediatric unit. However, the author noted that during the study there were few ulcers and therefore it’s premature to a draw a conclusion from this data (Willock et al., 2016). McGough (1999) undertook a study to systematically review the effectiveness of risk assessment tools. Findings from this study suggested that risk assessment tools may be useful as a memory aid for nursing staff, however, should not be used to replace clinical

More about Critical Care Level 3 Pressure Ulcers

Open Document