Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the positive effects of nuclear power
Harmful effects of nuclear energy
Con and pros of nuclear energy essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the positive effects of nuclear power
Today’s world faces many problems. Hunger, war and pollution are some common problems that come to mind. Nuclear energy however, should not have to be one of these problems. Nuclear energy has been around since the early 1950s. Over the years, many have debated whether nuclear-produced energy is any better than other energies such as coal-produced energy. While both sides have their pros and cons, nuclear energy, is the overall worst out of the all the energies being produced.
Nuclear energy is not as beneficial to the environment as one may think. Nuclear energy does not burn anything in order to create energy. However, the problem is not in that aspect, but rather the fact that we do not have a way to get rid of the nuclear waste. According to Amanda Beckrich, there is currently no full proof solution to the long-term storage of the radioactive products used in the development of nuclear energy. Materials used in the nuclear process include isotopes of uranium, plutonium, iodine and strontium (Beckrich 10). All of these materials are radioactive and dangerous if exposed to society. When radioactive products are spilled or exposed into society, the consequences can be detrimental. People who are exposed to high doses of radiation will most likely face serious consequences. The United States Environmental Protection Agency states that people will likely face a number of different health problems varying on the amount they have been exposed to. Some possible major health effects include cancer, internal bleeding, damage to the central nervous system and death (“Radiation Protection: Health Effects”). With these outcomes being possible, there is not a justifiable answer to this problem.
However the opposition may offer the counte...
... middle of paper ...
...re. The objective should be to slowly phase out coal, natural gas and nuclear energy for energy that does not use up all the earth’s resources. Whether that’s wind energy, solar energy or hydro energy is not something I can answer.
Works Cited
Beckrich, Amanda. "The pros and cons of nuclear energy." The Science Teacher 80.3 (2013): 10.
Academic OneFile. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
Hammond, Allen. "Fission: The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power." Science. Vol. 178. N.p.:
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1972. 147-49. Print.
“Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What?" CNN. Cable News Network, 18 Dec. 2012. Web. 25
Mar. 2014.
"Radiation Protection: Health Effects." EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, 07 Aug. 2012.
Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
“The Economics of Nuclear Power." Nuclear Power Economics. N.p., 01 Feb. 2014. Web. 25
Mar. 2014.
Nuclear power has no place in having a safe, clean, sustainable future. Today, the manufacturing of nuclear power plants has become a critical topic throughout the world that many strongly believe should be stopped. Nuclear Power is not safe anywhere in the world nor is it environmentally friendly. Nuclear power plants are truly something that could cause mass destruction in the world and has the potential to wipe out a whole country with ease. Despite proponents’ that claim that nuclear power is safe, there is a history that proves otherwise and marks a number of disasters caused by nuclear power plants.
Central Idea: Nuclear energy only contributes a small amount to the world’s electricity yet it has hazards and dangers that far out-way its benefits. There are many other alternative power producing sources that can produce energy more efficiently and more safely than nuclear power plants can.
Our new leaders in Congress have vowed to do everything in their power to stop him” (Environment America, n.d.). It is statements like this that makes us think that political involvement could be paramount in the step to solving our global warming issues, at least a strong start. We are aware the renewable energy is the wave for a more sustainable future and to make this happen politics must be involved, we need our government to take a stand in producing energy that does not pollute the earth causing such catastrophic events as “tsunamis” that kill thousands of unsuspecting people. This article talks about what types of things our government can get in pace with such as, “renewable energy via solar, wind and energy efficiency” (Environment America, n.d.). In June 2014, the President has moved forward starting with the “clean power plan” per the article “Global Warming Solutions” (Environment America, n.d.) we need and must demand future political involvement for this
After the United States developed the atomic at the end of World War II, interest in nuclear technology increased exponentially. People soon realized that nuclear technology could be used for electricity, as another alternative to fossil fuels. Today, nuclear power has its place in the world, but there is still a lot of controversy over the use of nuclear energy. Things such as the containment of radiation and few nuclear power plant accidents have given nuclear power a bad image. However, nuclear power is a reliable source of energy because it has no carbon emissions, energy is available at any time, little fuel is needed for a lot of energy, and as time goes on, it is becoming safer and safer.
Nuclear power has grown to be a big percentage of the world’s energy. As of January 18, 2013 in 31 countries 437 nuclear power plant units with an installed electric net capacity of about 372 GW are in operation and 68 plants with an installed capacity of 65 GW are in 15 countries under construction. As of end 2011 the total electricity production since 1951 amounts to 69,760 billion kWh. The cumulative operating experience amounted to 15, 15,080 years by end of 2012. (European Nuclear Society) The change that nuclear power has brought to the world has led to benefits in today’s energy’s usage.
Carbon, Max W. Nuclear Power: Villain or Victim?: Our Most Misunderstood Source of Electricity. Second ed. Madison, WI: Pebble Beach, 1997.
You are watching the control panels and gages for rector two. Sitting comely you think about how easy your job is. It is a joke! All day you sit around and watch the gages for reactor number two just to make sure they maintain their settings. You don't even need to look at the gages either because a computer automatically regulates them without you.
Nuclear waste still remains radioactive when disposed, and takes 10,000 years to neutralize. The waste can also be turned into weapons or bombs, these bombs can do lots of destruction. Bombs and weapons can be used by terrorists to blow up places, the bombs are so powerful they could blow up most if not all of a state. Not only is nuclear energy dangerous, it is very costly too. It takes about $9 million dollars to build a power plant,and $2 billion dollars to operate it.
Nuclear fission is going to become more and more useful in worldwide power production for the foreseeable future. The reasons are numerous, but can be summarized by the relative ease of reliable power production that is provided. This does not go without having many disadvantages. But it is the fact that nuclear fission provides a massive amount of reliable electrical energy at a relatively low cost that has many countries investigating the possibilities of nuclear power generation. To understand why nuclear power would be the only option (at this time) for an alternative to fossil fuel burning for energy production is to understand its history, the world’s current power production from nuclear power, and where it is going in the foreseeable future.
Renewable Resources Coalition, 9 Dec. 2016, www.renewableresourcescoalition.org/nuclear-energy-pros-cons/. (Pros and Cons) “World Book Online Reference Center | Online Reference Book| Online Encyclopedia.” World Book,
The use of nuclear energy has increased in the United States since 1973. Nuclear energy's share of U.S. electricity generation has grown from 4 percent in 1973 to 19 percent in 1998. This is excellent news for the environment. Nuclear energy and hydropower are the cleanest large-scale means of electricity production. Since nuclear power plants do not burn fuel, they emit no combustion byproducts—like carbon dioxide—into the atmosphere (www.nei.org). Nuclear power can come from the fission of Uranium, plutonium or thorium or the fusion of hydrogen into helium. Today uranium (U-235 and U-238) is most commonly used in the production of nuclear energy. The expa...
Prevent dangerous climate change by phasing out fossil fuels (oil, coal, gas) and replacing them with clean renewable energy such as solar.
The greatest disadvantages of nuclear energy are the risks posed to mankind and the environment by radioactive materials. ‘On average a nuclear plant annually generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel cla...
Nuclear power, the use of exothermic nuclear processes to produce an enormous amount of electricity and heat for domestic, medical, military and industrial purposes i.e. “By the end of 2012 2346.3 kilowatt hours (KWh) of electricity was generated by nuclear reactors around the world” (International atomic energy agency Vienna, 2013, p.13). However, with that been said it is evident that the process of generating electricity from a nuclear reactor has numerous health and environmental safety issues.
To save words we not go into the basic details of these radiations but these radiations make the radioisotopes our friend or foe. These radiations revolve round the issue of their use and disposal. Interestingly, both use and disposal are issues of concern. Disposal is an issue because the waste is non-biodegradable and the harmful radiations from them could cause cancer and alter genes in the DNA etc. The use of radioactivity is by itself an issue. Is it safe to use? Where shall the nuclear power plant be located? Where will the waste go?