Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Piracy in Music Industry
Essays on copyright law
Legal / ethical and moral issues about copyright
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Piracy in Music Industry
PH-Learning Journal Unit 2
In the case study “Pirates”, there is a debate of should copyrights been protected or not, or should illegal pirating been allowed? (Brusseau, 2012). One argument states that the copyright should be protected since it is an intellectual property. On the opposite, the argument argues that people who cloning the CDs may purchase the CDs themselves or given the original CDs by someone else, they own this property now, and they can do what they want with it.
These two arguments are based on different values, the advocates for copyright protection are saying that the CDs are private properties which belong to the companies that made them, “pirating” against the rights of the owners who had invested the work into the making
of CDs. Opponents argue that the people who had bought the CDs have the right to use them as they like since they are the property owners now, and they can do whatever they want with them. The argument raises a question of who owns the property. It apparent that these two arguments are disagree with each other about the property ownership. The advocates view the copyrights belongs to whoever made the CD, and opponents thinks that once the buyer bought the CD, the buyer gain the ownership of the CD. Let us take a look at the concept of “property” first, in John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, he states that everybody entitles with the work of his own labor or out of his own hands, and owns that property since “he had mixed his labor with and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property” (Locke, 2003). From this statement, we can say that copyright protectors have a solid foundation that based on this principle. The CD makers did put their labors and invested their money to it, thus, the property ownership had established. However, the opponents may argue from an egoism point of view that their personal rights have been violated since they cannot decide on what to do with the properties they own after they bought it. The debate on this topic is still going on, most people may support the copyrights protection that based on the intellectual property laws, and some people may still question it with the possible volitions to their personal rights. However, the debate between the copyrights protection and the illegal “pirating” has increased the awareness of the intellectual property ownership issues and raised many questions as well.
Singers and songwriters need to make a living somehow. They know that downloading music is a way to get their voice heard, but they also know that it is significantly hurting the business. "When your product is being regularly stolen, there comes a time when you have to take appropriate action," said RIAA president Cary Sherman (RIAA 1). There are a lot of people involved in the music scheme when it comes to who needs to get paid by the revenue. From the sale of one CD, singers get one small fraction of the cost, another fraction goes to song writers, musicians also get some of the profit along with retailers, engineers, technicians, warehouse working, and ever...
A database is for the most part utilized for putting away related, organized information, with all around characterized information positions, in a productive way for addition, redesign and/or recovery (contingent upon application). Then again, a record framework is a more unstructured information store for putting away discretionary, presumably disconnected information. The record framework is more broad, and databases are based on top of the general information stockpiling administrations gave by document frameworks. There are additionally contrasts in the normal level of administration gave by document frameworks and databases. While databases must act naturally reliable at any moment in time (consider banks following cash!), give confined exchanges and sturdy composes, a document framework gives much looser
Cecila, all great questions! Typically advisors may desire to add more notes when initially scheduling a call back to close the business. The protocol for SOM has the advisor add those notes to their Outlook as an appointment/task. Unfortunately, if the call was redirected to another advisor, the other advisor will not have access to the appointment created in the previous advisor’s Outlook.
The Operating System (OS) is the heart of computer server and client systems; therefore they are the pivotal components of the Information Technology (IT) architecture. The OS contains the crucial data, information, and applications, which are vulnerable, and can be infiltrated to cripple the entire IT architecture of the organization. Therefore, it becomes mandatory to properly safeguard the OS from an internal or external intrusion (Stallings & Brown, 2012). This critical thinking report will highlight the security concerns that may impact the OS. Further, the security guidelines and best practices for the OS in general, along with the specific fundamentals regarding the Windows and Linux OS are comprehensively illustrated.
In Charles W. Moore’s essay, “Is Music Piracy Stealing?” Moore uses great statistics of the people who are concerned and not concerned about music piracy. He gives many examples of the facts he has researched and gives an ethical appeal to his audience. “This week the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) launched an ad campaign using the slogan ‘copying is stealing,’ attempting to convey the message that digital copying is as serious and criminal as stealing a CD from a record shop or a DVD from a video shop” (Moore 242). However, throughout Moore’s entire essay he has a weak introduction and conclusion paragraph, repetitive examples, examples that do not apply to his topic and he uses many logical
In general, the reading and the AP textbook both contained the same economic concepts, but they sometimes used different terminology and economic models to explain them. One similarity was the concept that ‘everything is scarce and that all individual and firms seek to maximize their utility and benefits. Unit 3 started with an interesting historical overview of workdays and how it had decreased throughout the world due to technological factors and norms. The highlight of the Unit was explaining the interrelation between the concept of utility maximization and the feasible frontier, rather than separately. It explains how we can determine a person’s preferences of how much hours they want to work (or study) simply by setting the marginal
“Copyright is a fundamental right of ownership and protection common to all of the arts” (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 8). “It is a form of intellectual Property (IP)” and it gives the owner exclusive rights to the copyright (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 11).
Over the past decade the societal view of creative society has greatly changed due to advances in computer technology and the Internet. In 1995, aware of the beginning of this change, two authors wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing diametrically opposed views on how this technological change would take form, and how it would affect copyright law. In the article "The Emperor's Clothes Still Fit Just Fine" Lance Rose hypothesized that the criminal nature of copyright infringement would prevent it from developing into a socially acceptable practice. Thus, he wrote, we would not need to revise copyright law to prevent copyright infringement. In another article, Entitled "Intellectual Value", Esther Dyson presented a completely different view of the copyright issue. She based many her arguments on the belief that mainstream copyright infringement would proliferate in the following years, causing a radical revision of American ideas and laws towards intellectual property. What has happened since then? Who was right? This paper analyzes the situation then and now, with the knowledge that these trends are still in a state of transformation. As new software and hardware innovations make it easier to create, copy, alter, and disseminate original digital content, this discussion will be come even more critical.
Theodore Roosevelt once said, “ No people is wholly civilized where a distinction is drawn between stealing.” This quote can relate to the problem that has been going on against the piracy that has been occurring for many years. It has been occurring more now since it has been becoming easier to get access to certain files online. Personally, I think that people should be prosecuted for piracy because it is illegal, morally not right, and it causes many problems for composers.
It is first beneficial to know the definition of piracy. Piracy has been characterized multiple ways from multiple disciplines. For the purpose of this paper, I will apply the definition of piracy from the 1982 United ...
Intellectual property is property resulting from intellectual, creative processes. A product that was created because of someone’s individual thought process. Examples includes books, designs, music, art work, and computer files. (Miller R. J., 2011, p. 114) In the music industry a copyright is an important tool for artist to use to protect themselves from infringers. A copyright is the exclusive right of an author or originator of a literary or artistic production to publish, print, or sell that production for a statutory period of time. A copyright has the same monopolistic nature as a patent or trademark, but it differs in that it applies exclusively to works of art, literature, and other works of authorship (including computer programs). (Miller R. J., 2011, p. 125)
Piracy is primarily a problem for the entertainment and software industries, and therefore piracy most often involves violations of copyright law. Copyright is a legal right that protects creative works from being reproduced, performed, or disseminated without permission of the copyright owner. Essentially, a copyright gives its owner the exclusive right to make copies of the material in question.
Not only is downloading this media illegal, it is also morally wrong. It is our responsibility to know the difference between right and wrong - downloading this media is something that shouldn’t be done. The artists that create the CDs pay a lot of money to make the CDs for our pleasure, and in return they expect everyone to pay for their CDs (its how they make their money). In this respect, downloading illegal music through peer to peer networks is the equivalent to stealing a CD from an actual store.
Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement are two terms that mean different things yet are routinely mentioned as synonyms for each other. This is not the case. The underlying reasoning for people who choose to plagiarize and infringe on copyrights involve some of the same ethics and morals, but from a legal standpoint these terms mean different things. This paper will point out the similarities and differences between the two terms. It will first give some meaning and perspective behind each term then it will go into the details of what each term means. It will point out the types of plagiarism that routinely show in academia and what is covered under Copyright law protection. It will go on to compare and contrast the two concepts.
Technology today has changed immensely but still we find ourselves in the same habits of sharing. Friends can now burn CDs within 5 minutes and DVDs within an hour. The one thing that has changed is the ability to protect the media using encryption keys, water marks, and other Digital Rights Management (DRM) that prevents the media from being copied. The overall effect from this is the average person is left with the headache of not being able to do what they want with their own media, while the pirateer continues to hack and bypass security measures.