Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discrimination in the hospitality industry
Problems relating to culture differences in hotels
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discrimination in the hospitality industry
How are luxury hotels, where guests with great wealth encounter staffs of service workers, sites for maintaining class differences? How do hotel workers and their customers understand class distinctions? For her book Class Acts, Rachel Sherman investigated two luxury hotels, both settings in which service employment means anticipating and responding to the demands of a clientele accustomed to personal attention. The disparities between these hotel guests and the workers who serve them make luxury hotels ideal sites for examining work relations along the socioeconomic fault lines of the service economy. Despite the potential for class antagonism, however, Sherman finds guests and workers employing elaborate strategies to normalize relations …show more content…
They recognized workers’ skill, affirmed their abilities, and participated in reciprocal relationships with individual workers. These strategies, too, obscured class relations. By establishing personal relationships, guests sought an individualized equality that contributed to the normalization of class cleavages. By enacting a reciprocity that rewarded a worker’s performance, guests actively participated in a labor process that supported inequality. Guests, therefore, played significant roles in the service theater. They behaved respectfully, tipped generously, and so upheld their part of an implicit contract that codified behavior and promoted …show more content…
Sherman provides ample evidence to support her findings and uses the two settings effectively to consider the effects of organizational stractures on strategies of interaction. Relying principally on participant observation, she makes only passing references to “back‐of‐the‐house” workers, those whose labor is more often invisible and whose social location is subordinate to other staff. Her project, therefore, is less an organizational ethnography than a study of class encounter, codified in organizational settings. Students of class inequality as well as work and organizations will therefore find this book useful. So might those concerned with labor relations in a service economy that has mostly resisted union organization. How, for example, might challenges to the relationship between workers and guests provide a critique of class‐based subordination? How might such a challenge inform broader political processes? Sherman can only speculate about the implications of her findings. Her microlevel focus, however, suggests some directions for analyses of class‐based entitlement in the service
Nickel And Dimed: Occupations Barbara Ehrenreich provides evidence in “Nickel and Dimed” that she’s an outstanding author with this book. Its engaging and compelling, no question about that. But it’s hard to get from side to side at times since of the authors attitudes. Her key summit is to carry concentration to the scrape of the working deprived, but she manages to be both abusive and divisive. Occupation on attacking our industrialist system, she fails to become aware of that the endurance of upper classes seems to be what motivates the poor, fairly than what dispirits them. She blames capitalism for the injustices of the world, slightly than easy bad management techniques. A company should be shown that would benefit from a union and it will be shown to all around that one that will promote even better from decent, gentle management decisions. Most irritating, she’s constantly negative about the whole lot, even the positive experiences she has. When one of her colleagues offers to allow her move in with her and her family, not only does Ehrenreich turn the propose down, but she still describes it sneeringly as a "touched by an angel moment." Does she have to dribble with irony yet when writing about an authentically type deed? She condemns "visible Christians," any and all organization, yuppies, anybody who hires and consequently exploits maids, welfare reform, and still tosses in a prod at people who study John Grisham. Is there someone she likes? Her logic is troublesome as well. She begins her research to see if the functioning poor have some financial endurance tactics that the center class don’t know regarding, and decides at the conclusion that no, they don’t, as if admitting that this would signify the poor are imp...
In “Scrubbing in Maine”by Barbara Ehrenreich. Ehrenreich decides to work at the Maids Franchise so she can observe how the system was made for the maids. During her time being a maid she became emotionally impacted by the way her and the women were treated. Ehrenreich experiences in the article”Scrubbing in Maine,’’are the ones I can relate to even though both jobs don’t seem the same, the fact is my time spent working at Jewel is remarkably and depressingly similar to the time spent by Ehrenreich as a maid. In both instances employees are not really human, but are parts of a bigger machine and only Blue collar workers are stereotypes as uneducated unthinking individuals. As Blue collar jobs emphasized the routines, dehumanization of the employee, and loss of control over a person’s time. Workers do not engage in cognitive skills, but physical
One of the most critical observations about the state of our sociological health is observed by MacGillis of the Atlantic’s article entitled “The Original Underclass”. That is that the social breakdown of low-income whites began to reflect trends that African American’s were primary subjects of decades ago such as unemployment, and drug addiction.
In today’s society you either have to work hard to live a good life, or just inherit a lump sum of cash, which is probably never going to happen. So instead a person has to work a usual nine to five just to put food on the table for their families, and in many cases that is not even enough. In the article, “Why We Work” by Andrew Curry, Curry examines the complexities of work and touches on the reasons why many workers feel unsatisfied with their jobs. Barbara Ehrenreich writes an essay called, “Serving in Florida” which is about the overlooked life of being a server and the struggles of working off low minimum wages. Curry’s standpoint on jobs is that workers are not satisfied, the job takes control of their whole life, and workers spend
Growing up in The United States, people are given this idea of an American Dream. Almost every child is raised to believe they can become and do anything they want to do, if one works hard enough. However, a majority of people believe that there is a separation of class in American society. Gregory Mantsios author of “Class in America-2009” believes that Americans do not exchange thoughts about class division, although most of people are placed in their own set cluster of wealth. Also political officials are trying to get followers by trying to try to appeal to the bulk of the population, or the middle class, in order to get more supporters. An interesting myth that Mantsios makes in his essay is how Americans don’t have equal opportunities.
A big disadvantage that the lower class has compared to the wealthy is a lack of quality education. While serving as a waitress, Ehrenriech learned about many different people. Some of these co-workers were immigrants who had recently come to this country. “I learn that he [George] is not paid by Jerry’s but the ‘agent’ who shipped him over--$5 an hour, with the agent getting the dollar or so difference between that and what Jerry’s pays dishwashers”(38). Their contracts lacked any benefits, and they were paid below minimum wage. People, like George, cannot read their contracts before they sign because they don’t understand the language. The critic would argue, “…They are baffled at the idea of fighting the class struggle of which…Ehrenriech appears to be the only person complaining about the situation…” In Georg...
David Brody argues that the rise of contractual or collective bargaining relationships during the post WWII era formalized the relationship between employers and unions, but simultaneously began to put a break on shop floor activism. Explain Brody’s argument and, where relevant, incorporate Weber’s theory of bureaucracy.
The working class stays working and the middle class stays being middle. Author Nick Tingle, wrote “The vexation of class”, he argues that the working class and the middle class are separated educationally based on culture and the commonplace. Tingle uses his own personal experiences and Ethos, to effectively prove his point about the difference in class based on culture ; although, Tingle also falls short by adding unnecessary information throughout the article that weakens his belief entirely.
An article from the Atlantic, my life as a retail worker: Nasty, Brutish and poor, provides the inside details of the contemporary low-wage job. The author, Joseph Williams, goes through the challenges being a low-wage employee and the additional side jobs he has to perform. The low-wage workers, who earn little more than minimum wage, are treated unfairly by the upper management in today’s occupations. In the article, Williams have to do extra work after their shits without any overtime pay. Williams had to “mop the floors in the bathroom, replace the toilet paper and scrub the toilets if necessary” and also “Vacuum and Empty the garbage. Wipe down the glass front doors, every night, even if they don’t really need it. It was all part of the job, done after your shift has ended but without overtime pay” (Joseph Williams). The research shows people with higher position jobs take advantage of the low-wage workers. They recognize the low-wage employees need the job to survive and are less likely to quit the job. Therefore, they can force the low-wage employees to perform extra labor. Also, the management has problem trusting low-wage workers. Williams explains how the security “pats the retail workers down” and checks their “bottom of the backpack” before they leave the store for breaks (Williams). The managements recognize the low-wage salary can’t afford other things than paying for lodging and food, so they believe the employees will likely to steal from their work. Also, in down and out in London and Paris, George Orwell goes through same unfair labor practices and lack of trust when working as a “ploungers” in Hotel X. After each shifts, the security checked for stolen food, he says “Then he stepped out into the passage, made me take off my coat and carefully prodded me all over, searching for stolen food”
The white-collar union organizer affiliates in the case consist of: an office worker and the Office Employee International Union organizer, Nancy Rogers (Sloane & Witney, 2010). Base on Sloane & Witney (2010), “white-collar workers have long felt superior to their blue-collar-worker counterparts and tended to believe that joining a union decreases their occupational prestige” (p.13). It is synonymous to the office worker’s explanation to Rogers on the company’s culture as management’s influence toward nonunion workers to reframe from joining unions has resulted in paying them greater salaries, impose the idea of unions are only for manual workers and inappropriate for white-collar people to join (Sloane & Witney, 2010).This case provided a reference t...
The working class stay working and the middle class stay being middle. Author Nick Tingle, wrote “The vexation of class”, he argues that the working class and the middle class are separated based on culture and the commonplace. Tingle uses his own personal experiences and Ethos, to effectively prove his point about the difference in class; although, Tingle also falls short by adding unnecessary information throughout the article that weakens his belief entirely.
For the purpose of understanding and combating inequality in organizations, Joan Acker has produced an analysis towards a concern with the way gender intersects with other categories of identity such as race and class. In this paper, I introduce and analyze Acker’s theory of “inequality regimes” and how it produces organizing patterns of oppression and inequality in work organizations. First, I will define what are “inequality regimes” according to Acker and how the term relates to the concept of intersectionality. Secondly, the paper will adhere to the outstanding degree of inequalities and the level of severity they establish in a work setting. Lastly, I will include an interpretation of how inequality regimes can be challenged and why they
Social class has existed in our society since its foundation. Working class, middle class, upper middle class, or upper class, whatever your standing, social class can affect your place in society. Social class can be defined by where you live, who you talk to, where you get an education, even by the clothes you wear. These may not be definite determinants of social class, but categorization of people becomes easier when looking at these factors. In previous papers, I have claimed that social class is a result of capitalism. Though, I still believe this to be true, there are many factors that can affect social class and vice versa. Theorists have looked at different aspects of how these can affect social class. In my paper I am going to explore capitalism, stratification, racism, segregation, and education and their relationship with social class and how this can cause social conflict; I will have a primary focus of how Weber, DuBois, and Marx views this relationship.
This review can be seen in the example of someone who owns a small, local business not being seen as belonging to the same class as someone who owns a nationwide corporation, despite both people owning property. They are not seen as belonging to the same class because the large corporation makes a greater impact on society than the small, local business, and generates a larger income. Those who do not own property are differentiated in the same way by Weber, except this time he analyzes them based upon what kinds of services they offer and if they themselves participate in receiving services. In his final piece about class, Weber mentions class struggle. Class struggles are where people in the same class situation react, in large numbers, in ways that are an advantageous way to materialize and achieve their interests. Weber calls the factors that bring about class struggles, and determine class situations, markets. There are three types of markets that he mentions; the labor market, the commodities market, and the capitalistic market. The labor market is where people sell labor for money, the commodities
As time passes, there are a few things that have stayed constant since the beginning of time. One of those things is the inevitable creation of class and social structure. Class and social structure are constructed because of the inequality between classes. In “Workaday World – Crack Economy” written by Phillipe Bourgois, and the film People Like Us social inequality is present. In this paper, I will use the theories of Pierre Bourdieu and Leith Mullings to analyze and evaluate social equality while using the film and essay as a guideline.