Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors that influence understanding nonverbal communication
Factors that influence understanding nonverbal communication
Verbal versus nonverbal communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
We, as humans, have the propensity to vary in how well we encode and decode messages that are both written and spoken. This is because people tend to range in a variety of highs and lows with regard to their verbal language abilities. This would a lot for differences in nonverbal communication as well. Nonverbal communication refers to the exchange of information between people and an explanation or establishment of the meaning of information by any means other than the use of spoken or written words. It includes message through a multitude of behaviors (expressive channels) such as facial expressions, bodily movements, vocal tone and pitch, and other channels that are comprised of a variety of cues related to the encoding and the decoding of messages. The communication and interpretation of nonverbal behavior draws on tacit, implicit knowledge that all human beings possess (Ambady and Rosenthal, 775).
There are a multitude of mechanisms that allows one to encode and decode messages: personality traits, self-monitoring, sex, and gender. Research has linked certain personality traits with the ability to encode and decode nonverbal behavior. Studies have found that “people who are extroverted are more skilled at portraying emotions through vocal and facial codes [whereas] introverts are less able to communicate emotions nonverbally, if for no other reason than they have not had as much practice due to their tendency to withdraw from people” (Infante, Rancer, and Avtgis, 219). According to sociological social psychologists such as Mead (1934), Goffman (1959), and Turner (1968), we continually play roles and manage the impressions of ourselves that we give off (Kraut, 380). “Although nonverbal communication can be controlled to ad...
... middle of paper ...
... Print.
Kraut, Robert E. "Verbal and Nonverbal Cues in the Perception of Lying." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36.4 (1978): 380-91. Print.
Sauter, Michael, Samuel Weigley, and Alexander E.M. Hess. "America’s Most Misleading Product Claims." 247wallst.com. Wordpress.com, 24 Jan. 2013. Web. 02 Dec. 2013. .
Vrij, Aldert, Katherine Edward, Kim P. Roberts, and Ray Bull. "Detecting Deceit Via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior." Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Winter 24.4 (2000): 239-63. Print.
Weinmann, Karlee, and Kim Basin. "14 False Advertising Scandals That Cost Brands Millions." 14 False Advertising Scandals That Cost Brands Millions. Business Insider, 16 Sept. 2011. Web. 02 Dec. 2013. .
“A good liar uses the truth.” This is a technique used by notorious imposters Frederic Bourdin, and Frank Abagnale. Although Bourdin posed as a child for a second chance at adolescence, Abagnale posed as an adult to gain financial means and respect. Bourdin and Abagnale’s success in deception can be primarily attributed to their careful observation of their surroundings, as well as their ability to detect the emotions of those around them.
The presence of nonverbal messages in our communication is very important. Following the text, researchers have estimated it is up to “65 percent of social meaning we convey in face-to-face interactions is a result of nonverbal behavior” (131). The movie “Mrs. Doubtfire” is a typical example about the interactions among characters, also with audience. Several scenes in this movie show us the effects of nonverbal messages in communication, especially through the character Daniel, who disguises himself as a middle-aged British nanny in order to be near his children.
As John Ruskin once said, “The essence of lying is in deception, not in words.” This essence is debated in “The Ways We Lie”, written by Stephanie Ericsson, and “Doubts about Doublespeak”, written by William Lutz. In “The Ways We Lie”, Ericsson talks about the different ways people lie on a day to day basis. By comparison, in “Doubts about Doublespeak”, Lutz discusses the different forms of doublespeak that many individuals frequently use. Lutz considers doublespeak as a language that distorts the meaning of words in order to deceive another person, and only “pretends to communicate” (83). Although both authors agree that lying is about the use of deceptive language, Ericsson describes this use of language as occasionally being necessary,
One of the last types of ways investigators are coached to detect deception is in the behavioral attitudes of a person being interviewed such as being unconcerned or over anxious (Kassin, 2005). The success rate of looking for these cues are very successful in telling if an individual is being deceitful and has surpassed any laboratory tests conducted on the subject. The laboratory test however did reveal some interesting facts. The research showed that people who had training and experience did not score better than the control group who received no training. In fact all individuals scored at the chance level with the people who had training scored just above chance or at the chance level. To check if special training in the detection of deception was more accurate a study ...
It tells us how often we lie or tend to lie under different situations and scenarios by taking real world examples. Kornet explained and analyze the result of various studies by Bella DePaulo, a psychologist at the University of Virginia and her colleagues. As lying and deception becomes an integral part of every individual, it is important to know its impact and its results on our life. We are lying about one or the other thing at almost every moment of our life. It can be at workplace, in a relationship, or even friendship. Kornet concludes this article by saying, “The ubiquity of lying is clearly a problem, but would we want to will away all of our lies? Let’s be honest.” I completely agrees with the author as we have to take a step against lying and deception and to be honest in our lives. Kornet’s article provides really good studies and after analyzing those studies one can think of his/her lying habit and how often he lies in a day. I myself tried and thinking about how many times in a day I lie, and found that I lie a number of times in a day. This article is really interesting and I encourage everyone to read this article. After reading this article, you will come to know the actual truth about lying and its
(8) has suggested that the inhibition hypothesis is related to what is currently known about cognitive processes. Mainly, the limited cognitive resources the brain possesses can only be divided between so many tasks; as cognitive demand increases past a particular point [i.e. through high emotional intensity/complex lie] emotional leakage will occur while the individual attempts to be deceptive (8). It is this concept of emotional leakage, precipitated from the inhibition hypothesis, that has been of great interest to researchers as it offers a glimpse into the inner affective state of the subject (8). The applied applications of the concept have been particularly useful in fields concerned with deception detection - especially in regards to high stakes lies (8).
Vrij, Aldert, Lucy Akehurst, Stavroula Soukara, and Ray Bull. “Detecting Deceit Via Analyses of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior in Children and Adults.” January 2004. Ohiolink. 7 April, 2004. <http://journals.ohiolink.edu/local-cgi/send-pdf/040314132256522215.pdf>
However, there are four general categories of cues that people can use to detect both deception and scams, which include signs of nervousness, suppression, easily agitated or anxious, and idiosyncratic sources (von Hippel & Trivers, 2011). Sometimes it is easier to detect when something is a bit off. People who are familiar with each other 's habits can also detect deception via idiosyncratic signs of nervousness, suppression, and cognitive load, because different individuals reveal their mental states in different ways (von Hippel, & Trivers, 2011). For example, if a good friend, family or co-worker may all of a sudden start having behavioral changes or just start lying about something then that person will be able to tell something is
Sutliff, Usha. “‘Liars’ Brains Wired Differently.” USC News. USC University of Southern California. 19 Sept. 2005. Web. 11 December 2013.
Deceit is the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misleading the truth. Deception has always been a part of psychology and researchers have always determined that in the majority of cases the deceptions are harmless or minimal, yet they still exist. As a result of Mailgram’s experiment, deceptive research operations are now under harsh examination all across the discipline. It is obvious that Milgram’s intent was not to revol...
Have you ever desired to know what someone was thinking when you have had a conversation with them? That was the one fascination that I wanted to understand myself. I extended my search online to research everything that I could find about this topic. In my assessment I found numerous sources that have done a vastly beneficial job of interpretation about nonverbal communication.
Empirical research on deception has shown that people can compellingly fake feelings, personalities, and attitudes (DePaulo, 1992) but perceivers typically are not capable of recognizing the deception (Barrick and Mount, 1996; McFarland and Ryan, 2000; Furnahm, 1986; Sackett and Wanek, 1996; Torisand DePaulo, 1984). In fact it is well documented through years of deception detection experiments, that people are barely better than chance at identifying truth from lies. One meta-analysis (Bond and DePaulo, 2006) found that average accuracy in deception detection experiments was only 4% better than
Nonverbal communication is rich in meaning. Everyone communicates through nonverbal gestures and motions. I realized that you can decipher a lot from an individual or individuals by just paying close attention to what they do, and that words are not really necessary. Watching two people interacting, I figured that they are really close by their space communication, eye language, and body movements.
Nonverbal communication is defined by Floyd as “behaviors and characteristics that convey meaning without the use of words” (2011, pg. 179). From when we were young we have been taught to read the nonverbal cues that others give to us. When we are getting differing messages from someone’s verbal and nonverbal communication we tend to believe what people show us with their bodies compared to their verbal message (Floyd, 2011). The reason we tend to believe nonverbal signals over verbal messages is because “people have a harder time controlling nonverbal signals than verbal ones” (Floyd, 2011, pg. 182). A person’s nonverbal actions tend to “more accurately reflect what a person is really thinking or feeling” (Floyd, 2011, pg. 182). Nonverbal communication signals are more truthful and accurate to what the sender is feeling
One of the components of Reid approach is training the interrogators to establish whether a suspect is lying or telling the truth by evaluating the nonverbal and verbal behavior during the interview. Many people question the effectiveness of interrogation training in assisting to discern truth from suspects. According Professor Richard Leo, people are poor in drawing accurate judgments of deception and truth (Leo, 2013). The behavior prompts used police are not diagnostic of deception, the investigators cannot differentiate false from truth denials of guilt, and yet they maintain they draw accurate