Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Darwin theory natural selection and artificial selection
Charles Darwin theory of natural selection and social Darwinism
Darwins theory of evolution through natural selection vs creationist theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, the species of human and animal' differences came in degree, not in kind; if humans are able to be aware themselves, the animal also tends to exhibit the form of the same traits. Gallup and many other researchers already provided that several animals such as the great apes, dolphin, and elephants understood the different concept of self and others and therefore passed the MSR test. Even if the procedure of the MSR test is controversial whether the animals have a sense of self, the test helps to increase the understanding of animal’s level of intelligence. Gallup (1970) suggested that being self-awareness in the animal is indicative of the self-recognition and linked with advanced cognitive …show more content…
Whereas the monkeys that did not pass the MSR test, failed to show evidence of having the inner sense of self based on social strategies. Because the monkeys have no ability of considering what other individuals think due to lack of empathy (Cheney & Seyfarth, 1990). Another unique non-primate animal that shows foundations of empathy is the elephant. Plotnik and colleagues (2006) already proved that elephants are highly social animals that can recognize themselves as being separate from their environment. Their new study conducted to examine the elephants’ mental abilities on a cooperative task (Plotnik et al., 2011). The elephants were tested their understanding of cooperation with their complex empathy and sociality. The test showed that a pair of elephants coordinated with their partner by pulling the same rope simultaneously to get a reward. They even waited up to 45 seconds for a partner if the partner was delayed. Also, if the partner could not reach the rope, the elephants realized that they have to pull the rope. These social behaviors are based on helping, empathy, and compassion that requires flexibility in the behavior (Plotnik et al.,
Studies using chimpanzees, orangutans, and humans have shown displays of self-recognition with the introduction of a mirror. The display, exhibited by these animals, shows a certain cognitive level that's hard to achieve by other animals. The experiment tested by Marino, Reiss, and Gallup, Jr. built on the idea of self-recognition by testing cetaceans, particularly bottlenose dolphins.
This book presents the relationship between human and animal behaviors and the behavior that is now created by our modern day society. The mind has two main parts. There is the conscious mind and the unconscious mind. The unconscious mind is the better half, yet it is potentially threatening; therefore, the conscious mind is aware at all times. The unconscious mind influences your behavior in many ways. Pi experiences both of these minds. Pi is consciously planning his survival and how he was going to spend his food, so he didn’t run out. His conscious mind contributed to Pi surviving at sea. Consequently, when Pi`s father fed a goat to a tiger to prove a point, he was unaware that this event changed his personality brutally. He became more
Ever wonder how animals know so much? It’s simple. It’s all according to how they act and what they know. When an animal is born it has instincts. These instincts help the creature survive and cause them to behave certain ways. This is called Innate behaviors. Although, some things animals have been taught. Unlike Innate behaviors whereas it comes from the genes, other behaviors have to be learned. They are called Learned behaviors. Together, Innate and Learned behaviors can prove that animals are smarter then most people think.
So where is the middle ground in animals use in psychological research? In summary of all the information mentioned in this paper we are, in a way already at the middle ground. Since the majority of psychological research is conducted for comparative psychological gain, then it is in the best interest of animals to be used in the research. How can the use of animals in research are considered truly cruel to animals if it is in that species best interest. Along with the strict regulations out in place by the APA and the IACUC, I believe that the Rogerian style middle ground is achieved. I fully support the study of animals in psychology.
Within the first paragraph of the piece, Morell described, “That’s the conclusion of a new study that tested the cooperative skills of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Thailand and showed that the pachyderms understand that they will fail at a task without a partner’s assistance.” Morell stated that a recent study concluded that elephants comprehend the necessity of cooperation, strongly supporting the notion that these creatures possess superb collaborative skills. Also, Morell continued within the first paragraph, “The ability to recognize that you sometimes need a little help from your friends is a sign of higher social cognition. . .” Morell claims that the awareness of the beneficial aspects of cooperation is a rather uncommon characteristic among animals, and is therefore regarded as an indicator of superior cognitive capabilities, suggesting that the intelligence of elephants exceeds that of various other organisms. Undoubtedly, Virginia Morell justified the newfound intelligence and exceptional collaborative abilities of pachyderms throughout her
Bergmuller R. Animal Personality and Behavioural Syndromes. In: Kappeler P, editor. Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Germany: Springer, 2010. p. 587-621.
Large brain size in mammals has been related to the number and complexity of social relationships. Dolphins are highly social animals consistent with humans, great apes and other creatures displaying high levels of intelligence. They are frequently observed as having highly dynamic social relationships that intertwine fluidity, flexibility, and security. Although membership within a pod can be fluid and flexible in means to accomplish a common goal, other times strong bonds are formed. This can be witnessed through dolphins’ refusal to abandon injured or ill individuals. Within these pods, dolphins maintain security through their immediate social network—consisting of a few close companions and more casual relationships. In these groups the dolphins work together to survive while looking out for the well being of one another. Dolphin calves are among the few species that are taught survival skills as well as culture by their mothers. Mother dolphins teach their young to hunt through playful-looking movements, pointing gestures, and repetition— which often takes up to eight times longer to capture prey. This is done for learning purposes of calves in order to acquire knowledge through observation and repetition. This transfer of knowledge is commonly referred to as the ‘t...
There are some studies that do prove that animals are conscious though. In “Why Elephants Never Forget” elephants have remembered a drought from when they were young so they remember to not go to that area for water. Also many elephant herds have a better survival rate if the leader is an elder because they’ve been around longer and remember more places that aren’t safe. Lastly the only other piece of evidence of a conscious animal is Alex the parrot because he was able to communicate and know what he was saying it wasn't just nothing like “Polly wants a cracker” it was actual communication. This doesn't mean animals aren’t conscious it just means there isn’t enough evidence and studies to back it up. Next studies have shown that animals are compassionate and have showed in in different ways. In “What Your Pet Is Thinking” Grace is a elephant in her own herd but another elephant was in trouble in a different herd and Grace went out of her way to try and help
The ability to recognize that you sometimes need a little help from your friends is a sign of higher social cognition, psychologists say, and is rarely found in other species. Elephants now join an elite club of social cooperators: chimpanzees, hyenas, rooks, and humans.” As partially quoted before, this quote shows how experienced scientists are now labeling elephants as part of this elite group of social cooperators. Elephants know how to work together and when to lend a helping hand just as much as these animals, which includes humans. According to the article, “To find out if the elephants understood that they needed one another's assistance, the researchers upped the challenge by releasing the elephants at different times. Thus, one elephant would arrive at the table before the other and would have to wait for a partner to show up before pulling the rope. ‘They learned to do this faster than the chimpanzees,’ says Plotnik.” While this quote not only shows that elephants have the knowledge to be patient and wait for their partner, it also says that they learned to do this faster than chimpanzees did. The article also says, ‘These are clever experiments,’ says Karen McComb, a behavioral ecologist at the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom who studies social cognition in wild elephants. The findings
They were trained to pull the ropes, and then were split up into pairs, where they pulled the rope simultaneously to grab the corn sitting on a table. According to the article, “To find out if the elephants understood that they needed one another's assistance, the researchers upped the challenge by releasing the elephants at different times. Thus, one elephant would arrive at the table before the other and would have to wait for a partner to show up before pulling the rope.” In one trial, the elephant actually did wait for her partner, and this happened most of the time, except for one case, where one was too eager for corn. They understood. In an interview with behavioral psychologist Karen McComb, "It's particularly striking that the elephants were able to inhibit pulling". The result was unexpected is what she meant, but this also shows what more we can learn and what little we know about these spectacular animals. McComb also states “The study "adds to the growing body of evidence that elephants show some impressive cognitive abilities." Again, we need to know more about these animals, they may help us in the future, and we can gain more and more knowledge from
Did you know that elephants think of us as we think of puppies? They think we’re cute. The author's’ purpose for writing about the cognitive and strategic thought abilities of elephants. The main reason for the authors’ to write these articles is to inform us about elephants’ high cognition.
One of her more significant publications was The Animal Mind published in 1908. This was the first book specifically written regarding experimental studies on the psychology of animals. The Animal Mind covered a number of studies and experiments that attempted to describe the mental processes of animals. Her main focus was their attention span and learning processes. Thus, the book expanded the study of psychology and was commonly used in the study of comparative psychology for a number of years. (American Psychological Association )
Picture this. You're out in Thailand and see two elephants, you realize that one of the elephants has fallen over and is in trouble. When the first elephant falls, the second one instantly goes over and started trying to lift him with his tusks. Now. The question is, do elephants have higher social cognitions such as humans? Articles about the experiments like ‘Elephants Can Lend a Helping Trunk’ ‘Elephants Console Each Other’ and ‘Elephants Know When They Need a Helping Trunk in a Cooperative Task’ all go over this question. Their answer to the question is, yes, elephants have cognitive skills like humans do.
Miklosi, A., & TopaŁ, J.,& CsaŁny,V. (2007). Big Thoughts in Small Brains? Dogs as a model for Understanding Human Social Cognition. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 18(5), 467-469. Retrieved from http://www.mtapi.hu/userdirs/26/Publikaciok_Topal/MiklosietalNeuroRep2007.pdf
Epistemology is defined as the area of philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge and that considers various theories of knowledge. There are many paths to follow in epistemology, including skepticism, rationalism, empiricism, constructivism, and epistemological relativism, all of which offer very different views to explain how people know things. These views concern primarily human intelligence and largely ignore animal intelligence in creating their theories, but animal intelligence could play a pivotal role in the development of epistemological theories. This issue has been controversial, especially in recent years when research has revealed that animal’s thoughts very likely extend beyond instinct and conditioning as B.F. Skinner and Rene Descartes once thought. Today, the question of whether animals besides humans possess intelligence is a prevalent one and may help humans to understand better the intricate concept of epistemology.