Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Plato allegory of the cave relates to reality
Plato's cave allegory summarized
Plato allegory of the cave relates to reality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Plato allegory of the cave relates to reality
In the documentary Night and Fog, Alain Resnais shows footage from the Nazi Germany execution camps. Throughout the film there are photos of individuals being dehumanized. Resnais wanted to expose the truth behind what occurred at these concentration camps. Humans seem to struggle to acknowledge the hellish world people lived through in Nazi Germany. In the documentary Thin Blue Line, Errol Morris’s wants to get the truth right when retelling the story of a man who was falsely convicted of a crime. Morris strives to find out the truth using multiple perspectives to try to ascertain what actually happened the night a police officer was murdered.
The struggle of accepting the truth is demonstrated in Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. In Plato’s Allegory of the Cave there are
…show more content…
prisoners who have lived in a cave their entire lives. The prisoners have been tied up and can only view the shadows presented in front of them. The shadows are made from puppets holding up statues, which the prisoners view as reality. One day a prisoner escapes the cave and is blinded by the light from the sun. This signifies how his eyes had to adjust and take in the new reality he has been exposed to. He then recognizes that what he was seeing in the cave was not real and feels an obligation to share this truth with the other prisoners. However, when he presents the prisoners with the news they do not believe him. After the prisoner had spent his entire life in the cave he has trouble looking into the light and accepting the truth, similar to what the class experienced while watching Night and Fog. Socrates equates accepting the truth to looking into the sun for the first time because it is threatening and painful; similar to how one feels watching Resnais’s film. Plato proclaims that knowledge of reality comes at the price of innocence. An individual has to be willing to accept the truth, even if it is painful like the graphic images showed in Resnais’s film. Resnais made this film as a cautionary sign to “puts its viewers on alert, in a position to defend themselves against any revivals of the spirit that made the camps possible” (Roth Power Point 223). Resnais wants his viewers to confront the atrocities of the past, in hopes that it will empower future generations to never let it occur again. Thin Blue Line by Errol Morris tells a story about two men who are convicted of the same crime; however, one man is falsely excused while the guilty man is set free.
In 1976 Randall Dale Adam’s car breaks down and he is offered a ride by another teenager, David Harris, who, unbeknownst to Adams, was driving a stolen vehicle. When they are stopped by a police officer, multiple shots are fired, killing the officer. When this case was sent to court the jury strongly believes Adam is guilty of the murder. However, Errol Morris exposes misleading witnesses’ testimonies and police misbehavior that led to the jury conviction of the wrong man.
The truth is discovered through language, not through pictures. Photos can be misleading and are subjected to one’s references in the world. Throughout the film Randall Dale Adams who was innocent was always photographed with messy frizzy hair, a thick mustache and in his late 20’s. However, David Harris, who was guilty of murdering a police officer, was photographed as an innocent, scared young white boy with no facial hair. However, Morris believes just looking at a photo will tell you nothing. Truth only comes from the relationship between language and
world. Morris studies the pursuit of truth and how people avoid it. He states “I wanted to make a movie about how truth is difficult to know, not how it is impossible to know” (Morris). Like in Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, the prisoner has a hard time facing the truth. Some people would argue that ambiguity is pleasing however; Morris would say the exact opposite. He believes that ambiguity is an excuse for seeking the truth and reprehensible.
On May 7th 2000, fifteen year old Brenton Butler was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens, who had been fatally shot in the head while walking down a breezeway of a hotel with her husband. Two and a half hours later, Butler is seen walking a mile away from where the incident occurred, and is picked up by the police because he fit the description of the individual who shot Mary Ann Stephens. However, the only characteristic of the description that Butler featured was the color of his skin. Police then brought Butler to the scene of the crime in order for Mary Ann Stephens’s husband, James Stephens, to confirm whether or not Butler was the individual who had shot his wife. Almost immediately, Stephens identifies Butler as his wife’s killer.
In society it is a person’s duty to teach others what they do not know. People do not need to tell others of their knowledge, but in order for society to function together people must all be taught the basics of reality. In the parable “Allegory of the Cave” the author and philosopher, Plato, uses hypothetical situation, rhetorical questions, and diction to tell his audience that a person’s reality depends on the environment they are raised in, and how it is the responsibility of the ones knowledgeable to teach others so society can thrive with most of the same beliefs.
In conclusion, Plato's story of the cave brings up many philosophical points and most importantly, addresses the issue of society's role in our lives. To some degree, we are all influenced by the thoughts and actions of others; however, at the same time, we have the ability to question, draw our own conclusions, and ultimately make our own choices.
The section in the novel night that painted a dark and angry picture of human nature is when the Jews were fleeing Buna and hundreds of them were packed in a roofless cattle car. The Jews were only provided with a blanket that soon became soaked by the snowfall. They spent days in the bitter cold temperatures and all they ate was snow. For these reasons, many suffered and died. When they stopped in German towns, the people stared at that cattle cars filled with soulless bodies. “They would stop and look at [the Jews] without surprise.” It was a regular occasion for the German people to see suffering Jews and not feel pity. The dark and angry picture of human nature was when a German worker “took a piece of bread out of his bag and threw it
Guilty or not guilty? This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case. Therefore, how a person feels inside is reflected in his/her thoughts, opinions, and behavior.
Many different responses have occurred to readers after their perusal of this novel. Those that doubt the stories of the holocaust’s reality see Night as lies and propaganda designed to further the myth of the holocaust. Yet, for those people believing in the reality, the feelings proffered by the book are quite different. Many feel outrage at the extent of human maliciousness towards other humans. Others experience pity for the loss of family, friends, and self that is felt by the Holocaust victims.
In conclusion, the relevance of the “Allegory of the Cave” lies in the fact that its culmination continues to reoccur throughout history. Socrates, Galileo, and Martin Luther King Jr. are examples of important historical figures that have been condemned for their ability to make the journey out of the cave and return to deliver their community from the bonds that limit human growth. I believe the most important lessons to be found in Plato’s allegory are that we must learn to look beyond our immediate reality and that our actions should be geared toward unifying our communities. Only then will we arrive at the ultimate goal of living for the greater good.
July 15, 1999, was an ordinary night for Kristopher Lohrmeyer as he left work at the Colorado City Creamer, a popular ice cream parlor. Kristopher had no idea that his life was about to end. When Michael Brown, 17, Derrick Miller and Andrew (Andy) Medina, 15, approached Kristopher and demanded his money and his car keys. Before the boys knew it shots had been fired and Kristopher was dead. About an hour after the fatal shooting of Kristopher Lohrmeyer, all three men were in custody and telling their version of the night’s events. Michael and Derrick who had run away after the shooting confessed to police and named Andy as the shooter. According to the three boy’s testimony, they had only recently met and needed away to get some quick cash, so they developed a carjacking scheme and headed to Andy’s house to pick up 2 stolen handguns. The three boys were uneducated and had spent most of their time on the streets in search of drugs. The judge ruled that they would be held without bail and there was probable cause to charge them all with first-degree murder (Thrown Away, 2005).
"The Allegory of the Cave" and "The Apology" by Plato explore the methods in which people for themselves, usually through the cultivation of the soul. "The Allegory of the Cave" employs an allegory to highlight the importance of the soul, while "The Apology" focuses on Plato 's beloved mentor, Socrates, and his views on tur value of the soul. Both allegory and dialogue seek to stress the importance of the truth to caring for one 's self. The pursuit of the truth and the care of the self are intricately intertwined; one cannot do without the other. Additionally, both pieces challenge the reader from their complacency and forces them to re-evaluate their lives, calling for lives that better cultivate the soul and take care of the self. From
The Idols of the Cave represent the illusions of the individual. Everyone has their own "cave" which alters their opinions differently, depending upon their...
The philosopher Plato in his seminal work The Republic argues using Socrates as his vehicle in the allegory of the cave that knowledge and truth lead to freedom. Glaucon and Socrates enter into a discussion with a group of prisoners who can only see what is right in front of their faces. They are chained in a cave, unable to move. Behind them is a fire and a group of puppeteers, their keeps, who use props, vessels, statues, puppets, and other objects to cast shadows on the wall in front of the prisoners. This is all that they have ever seen.
Alain Renais’ documentary, Night and Fog, demonstrates the effect during and after, one of the darkest historical events- the Holocaust. The film, created ten years prior to the liberation of the camps, exposes the conditions in which the prisoners were forced to undertake. The film is a highly significant historical recollection. Renais is genius in utilizing the recurring mental contemplation of, “Who is responsible.” He never differentiates between who was responsible and who is the victim. One can easily refer to the prisoners of these camps as victims, but the wise absence of victimization, keeps the importance of knowledge of this time period, extremely relevant.
In book seven of ‘The Republic’, Plato presents possibly one of the most prominent metaphors in Western philosophy to date titled ‘Allegory of the Cave’.
We’re all trapped in a cave, being forced to see what is in front of us, and we believe it’s real, but it isn’t. We’re then forced out of our ‘cave’ and told that everything we know is a lie. We have to learn what is true, and what is an illusion. Then, we go back to tell the others. But we aren’t welcomed, instead, we’re persecuted. We are blind, immoral, wrong, harlots and witches. We see the world differently, and we want to share that with others, but we can’t, in fear of our death. That is Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”. The theme of the text could be that we as a people need to break out of our own comfort zones in order to better ourselves and learn other perspectives. He wants you to know that it can be a risk because when people do not understand something, they become violent. The point of view, plot events and characterization help best convey this.
In his Allegory of the Cave, Plato distinguishes between forms and ideas and imagines two distinct worlds : the sensible world and the intelligible world.