Nietzsche's Role Of The Shaper In Grendel

677 Words2 Pages

John Gardner takes the English epic Beowulf and successfully changes the entire structure and style with his novel Grendel. In Gardner’s rendition, Grendel deviates from a pure monster with only a simple mind of evil, moving towards a being who is conscious of himself, his actions, and its consequential effects on the environment around him. Gardner consistently alludes to Nietzschean schools of thought, referencing concepts such as the role of God, His death, and existentialism itself. Grendel’s largely varying lines of thought not only incite his bizarre behavior, but also breeds catastrophe as a result.
The role of the Shaper is to, simply put, change the truth in the eyes of man. In other words, the Shaper plays the role of God in the microcosm of the world that is Grendel. As the Dragon so openly notes, the Shaper “provides an illusion of reality… He knows no more than [man does] about total reality - less, if anything” (Gardner 65). The Shaper’s role mirrors Nietzsche’s belief on God’s role in our world. That is, to create bliss through falsities. The Shaper, through his role as a scop, retells stories of untruth and lies, modifying what actually happened to …show more content…

Grendel sums up the entirety of the Shaper’s profound effect on him when he says: “Nihil ex nihilo, I always say” (Gardner 150). This translates to “nothing comes from nothing”, which clearly defines how Grendel feels at this point in the book. Without the Shaper, Grendel feels as the world did when God died: without his Creator. All of the conclusions Grendel draws, along with the despair he feels, parallels the writings of Nietzsche when he was faced with the death of god (Stromme). Grendel’s consequential state of mind is characterized by emptiness and loss. Not only does the meaning in his world die alongside the Shaper, Grendel begins to realize that this world now means

Open Document