Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems faced by tsar nicholas 2nds government in ruling russia
First russian revolution
World history russian revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Romanovs were an imperial family residing in Russia for over 300 years.Even after all the turmoil and conflict the Romanovs still remained in power. After his brother Alexander III had passed away, Nicholas II, also called Nicholas the Great, took to the throne. After a while, he married the princess of Hesse, Alix, who later changed her name to Alexandra. Together they had five children, four girls, and one boy, named Olga, Tatiana, Anastasia, Maria, and the only heir to the throne, Alexei. Although Nicholas was the czar, he often had his advisors make decisions for him. This gave him a bad image as a weak and indecisive ruler. After events like Bloody Sunday and the 1905 Russian Revolution, the people of Russia had been increasingly dissatisfied with the leadership skills of the czar.
In an era of discord, chaos, and bloodlust, Russia had temporarily lost its position as an orderly country on the world map. Many events, like the unpopularity of
…show more content…
the czarina, all factored in to the bigger picture and lead up to the families execution. Many did not believe the family could rule any more and the Bolsheviks, a radical socialist group, thought they should be overthrown. Even with the supporters of the family there still was conflict over their rule. The Romanov family execution was quite the center of speculation from Russia and other parts of the world; many events had led to the execution of this family, and this execution had even caused internal problems within the Russians’ land. The czarina Alexandra was not popular with the people of Russia. This was only one of the factors that lead up to the family’s execution. She had a deep distaste for Russian culture. Not only did she dislike Russian culture, she also was from German descent. This only further added to her unpopularity. She was often characterized “...with a brusque demeanor and distaste for Russian culture—was unpopular with the Russian people. Her German ancestry and her devotion to Russian mystic Grigori Rasputin contributed to her unpopularity” (“Romanov Family: Execution and Facts” 12). Including her descent and distaste for Russian culture, she was devoted to Rasputin whom which most hated and thought he was corrupt. Adding on to the growing unpopularity of the czarina, people believed that czar Nicholas could no longer lead.
His advisors, one coincidently being Rasputin, made most of his decisions for him. In his decision to engage in World War I, he severely damaged the Russian economy and government corruption was said to be growing. Even “By 1917, most Russians had lost all faith in the leadership ability of the czar” (“The Romanov Family” 15). He also weakened his country and many lost faith in him. Even the Bolsheviks called for an overthrow of the government and the czar.
In 1917, Nicholas was forced to abdicate the throne and was imprisoned by the Bolsheviks. Due to this, the Bolsheviks took power and established the first communist state. Since there was still some who believed in the ability of Nicholas, the anti-Bolsheviks were formed. This caused a civil war between the Bolsheviks, the Red side, and the anti-Bolsheviks, the White side. This civil war and unrest was another main reason that the family was
executed. The White side was advancing on the place where the Romanovs were held. This frightened the Red side so they decided it would be best to execute the family. This plan came about due to the fact that the White side wanted the czar to rule again. The Red side strongly disagreed with this. In order to prevent this from happening, the Red side ordered to execute the family in November 1918. After they took the family and hid them in a mass grave, taking all their valuables so the White side could not get to them. Later on in 1991, five out of the seven of the Romanov family were found. The remains were tested and proven to be the Czar and Czarina with their daughters Olga, Tatiana, and either Maria or Anastasia. The testing done on the remains of either Maria or Anastasia could not prove to be one or the other this lead to many rumors and speculations that Anastasia escaped the cruel fate since there were still two family members missing. Due to the rumors, many women had stepped up and claimed to be her, leaving the Russian people confused by who was the true Romanov and if she truly did survive. Even after finding the other two missing members of the family, one of them being Alexei, many still stepped up. This was all due to the confusion of the executions results. The first five of the family that were found were taken to a church and buried. While later on the church refused the other two remains all because of rumors and a power grab for the newly formed church. In an article by Simon Montefiore he states that, Rejecting the findings of the international scientists was, of course, a power grab by the newly emboldened church, and it was supported by the growing anti-Western sentiment promoted by the Kremlin and shared by much of Russian society. By agreeing to the church's conditions, Putin was appeasing an important ally” (Montefiore). Even after proving the remains belonged to the family, the church refused to change positions. The remains had to be housed in a different place until finally the church accepted the bodies in 2015. Many events and situations factored into what led up to the execution of the family. Even the unpopularity of the czarina contributed to the fall of the Romanovs. Not only did many events contribute to the fall of their rule, but their execution left effects. Those effects even include a civil war between the people who executed the family and the people who wanted the Romanovs to stay in power. Overall, the people of Russia were often left confused due to the rumors, speculation, and the confusion of the identity of the remains. This left Russia as a country in disarray.
He was not popular with those who supported the Tsar because he made him look like a “weak autocrat unable to control his wife or hold onto his moral and political authority.” This weak, inept image of the Tsar created by Rasputin is supported by one of his ministers stating that “he did not like to send Rasputin away, for if Alexei died, in the eyes of the mother, he would have been the murderer of his own son.” This shows how great an impact Rasputin had over the Tsar and the
For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and population under sever economic and social conditions; consequently, during the late 19th century and early 20th century, various movements were staging demonstrations to overthrow the oppressive government. Poor involvement in WWI also added to the rising discontent against Nicholas as Russian armies suffered terrible casualties and defeats because of a lack of food and equipment; in addition, the country was industrially backward compared to countries such as Britain, France, Germany, and the USA. It had failed to modernize, this was to do with the tsars lack of effort for reforms. The country was undergoing tremendous hardships as industrial and agricultural output dropped. Famine and poor morale could be found in all aspects of Russian life. Furthermore, the tsar committed a fatal mistake when he appointed himself supreme commander of the armed forces because he was responsible for the armies constant string of defeats.
Moss, W., 2014. A History of Russia Volume 2: Since 1855. 1st ed. London, England: Anthem Press London, pp.112-113.
Misunderstandings happen in our everyday lives, but when is one misunderstanding one too many that can ultimately leave a country in ruins? The Family Romanov written by Candace Fleming is a nonfiction piece set in the time span of 1903 to 1918 filled with the experience of life in the Russian autocracy under the Romanov rule as a peasant, royal and rebel. This story tells us about the downfall of the once greatly praised Russian autocracy, Fleming takes the reader on a journey featuring the rise, but more so the downfall of their rule. After centuries of reign, the Romanov line has a final ruler, Nicholas II, decisions are made and blood is spilled. But, how far would the people of Russia go for a fair government and how oblivious is not
Historically, Russia has always been a country of perplexing dualities. The reality of Dual Russia, the separation of the official culture from that of the common people, persisted after the Revolution of 1917 and the Civil War. The Czarist Russia was at once modernized and backward: St. Petersburg and Moscow stood as the highly developed industrial centers of the country and two of the capitals of Europe, yet the overwhelming majority of the population were subsistent farms who lived on mir; French was the official language and the elites were highly literate, yet 82% of the populati...
I can use this source in my research project to defend why Czar Nicholas II is innocent to the abuse of power of the office of Czar.It reveales to me that even thouch Nicholas struggled with being the new Czar he truly did a lot for Russia to improve in learning abilities.Above all else, Nicholas loved Russia first and then his family; He thought the fate of the two was inseparable. No one knew the fault of the Romanov Dynasty better than him. Czar Nicholas sincerely felt his responsibility for the country, He thought that his destiny was within the country he ruled. I think it was really difficult for him but it was the only way to admit his mistakes and to say "sorry" to his people.
New York, Replika Press Pvt. Ltd. Deutscher, Isaac, Ed 1967. The Unfinished Revolution Russia1917-1967. U.S.A. Oxford University Press. Fitzpatrick, Sheila, Ed 1982.The Russian Revolution.
On the other hand there were other problems that effected the Romanov dynasty. After Russia’s removal from Poland the Tsar took it upon himself to become the new commander-in-chief, even th...
While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”
The Romanov Empire had reign the Russian Empire for about 300 years before Nicholas II became the monarch. Unfortunately, the new Tsar of Russia was also advised by Konstantin Pobedonostsev, who promoted autocracy, condemned elections, representation and democracy, the jury system, the press, free education, charities, and social reforms; an outdated ideology by the turn of the twentieth century. Although Nicholas II possessed some skills that would have been advantageous as the leader but, overall he was not suitable to be the Tsar of Russia. Even though Czar Nicholas II implemented limited reform that were beneficial for the empire; there were more fiascos during his reign thus lies the collapse of the Romanov Empire on his political skill,
Czar Nicholas’ poor leadership forced him to abdicate and caused the Bolshevik takeover. One of the reasons I say that is because of the way he handled “Bloody Sunday”. “Bloody Sunday” was when troops killed over a thousand people in a peaceful worker assembly. After “Bloody Sunday”, workers all over Russia went on strike, and peasants caused uprisings that were suppressed by Nicholas II’s troops causing tensions to increase. Another reason was his disastrous involvement in World War I. In the beginning of the war, Russia’s armies did not do well. To fix this, Nicholas became the commander. Now under his command, their continued failure reflected the Czar himself, further decreasing his popularity. Lastly, civil unrest grew as food riots, chronic food shortages, and labor strikes continued to proceed. This eventually erupted into open revolt, and Czar Nicholas had no choice but to abdicate. Soon after, the new government was overthrown by the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin.
The government and reform; the actual character of Nicholas II hindered his time in office, for example his outlooks on situations meant he did not trust a lot of his advisors, he was also seen to have been very lazy with respects to making decisions, other observations included him being, weak, timid and lacked guts. This all adds up to a very weak leader that is vulnerable to opposition, due to his tunnel vision and un-ability to see the main needs of the country. The duma was another challenge to the tsar; after the 1905 revolution the tsar had set up an elected body called the duma, this was a way of showing the public that he could be open minded in that delegating decisions to other people, looking back in hindsight this would also be seen as a challenge to the tsar as he never gave the duma any real power, and were easily dissolved, this meant that people were further angered and he was receiving opposition from all sides, it did however hold off opposition for a small period of time in order for the tsar to retain his power. Other individuals had an influence to the challenges facing the tsar, Nicholas had brought some new people in to try and conquer some problems, these included Rasputin who he had originally appointed to become saviour of family, he managed to influence the tsar in many of his decisions, this inevitably caused there to be conflict as the he was relying on Rasputin to relay details of the state of the country, these were not accurate which meant that tsar could not act upon opposition. Other people did help the tsar for example stolypin and his reforms.
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.
Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords, while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite.