“We have two victims,” he said. “The first is a Mr Nicholas Lambert, twenty-seven years of age, married with no children. It seemed that he ran a weaving business in London. The second is one Benjamin Sloan. He too ran his own business, a workhouse. Twice divorced and aged forty-four, he was. No mention of Hector Lajunas,” Eli said. He sounded disappointed. He turned the first sheet of paper over and read the second page, nodding as he did so. “Yes, I see,” he said to himself, before handing me the pages. “Tell me what you see, my dear.” I picked up the papers and read them for myself. Nicholas Lambert’s body had been found on February 17. It had been located just a short walk from his estate, at around half past four in the morning. The …show more content…
He had been found a few weeks after the first murder, on March 2. On that occasion, the body was not found out in the street, but in his home by his maid. The report indicated signs of forced entry, and the body had been discovered propped up in an armchair. The victims’ eyes had been removed, and his body disembowelled. The amount of blood at the scene had been restricted to the immediate vicinity of the chair. In both cases, the victims had been found with coins placed over their eyes. The report stated that the coins were copper halfpennies. Two per victim. Both victims had also been found with other money on their person. That was a miracle in the case of Nicholas Lambert. A tramp or prostitute would surely have raided any corpse lying on the ground. He remained untouched, …show more content…
I was waiting for Eli to make me fit Hector Lajunas into the equation. I was prepared to suggest that per chance Hector was the man who interrupted The Ferryman during his first murder. But that wouldn’t fit with the removal of his tongue, which was done far more recently. Alas, he did not ask. Eli would often quiz me, and I him. Don’t misunderstand, he wasn’t trying to be cruel to catch me out. This is how I learned about his trade, how to detect, how to suspect, and how to question. I like to think he took as much on-board from asking me questions, as I did from him. I did wonder just where Hector’s victim came into all of this. Were they linked? I scanned through the papers for some inkling. There was only a very brief report on that murder, immediately prior to Hector’s arrest. The report had a great deal of information about the condition they found Hector in, but precious little about the run-up to that event. All it said was that a man, Barnaby Downing was slain in the street. It was a rough murder, nothing as complex as the others. No coins were placed on the victim, although one halfpenny was found nearby. Downing owned a small fruit business, nothing too flashy. If my theory about The Ferryman learning to find somewhere quiet to do his murders was right, then something was out of place. This was a badly handled, you might even call it a botched murder. It didn’t have the finesse of the last killing. It wasn’t even as neat as the first one. Hector
When Virgil visited Jr he took pictures and realized that he did not look like an Ashbach. Slibe Jr has darker skin and looks like the man that Slibe’s wife was having an affair with. Another clue was that Slibe did not want his wife to leave. He was obsessed with her and they bought grave sites together when they were 30 years old. After Slibe’s wife left Nobody questioned his story. Slibe wrote letters fake letters from her to his kids. Hector car was never seen again in the town and they never talk to anyone from the town. Lastly Slibe had fake divorce papers that he would show people when they asked about her. Another question I have is how did Virgil know that Slibe and buried Hector’s car and where it was buried. The rental company could not find Mr. Windrow’s car even with a tracking device on it. The sheriff made a joke that the only way the tracker would not work is if the car was underground or in a lake somewhere. Also on the day that Slibe's wife left he started a large garden in the back
On a tedious Thursday afternoon, the body of an extrusive racketeer named Fannin was found at Ernie’s Lunchroom by police officers. In testimony of the only witness, the proprietor and the only employee, Ernie has said “The murderer had leaned against the wall while firing at point-blank range”. There is also an imprint of the supposed homicidal murderer on one of the walls and the cash register has just been rung up at $8.75. The police believe that person C is the murderer from the hand position of the utensils/hand positions, the relation among persons B, D, and E, and the identification of the Y and X footprints. The victim of this heinous crime is also controversial and the media are portraying Fannin as a criminal due to his reputation of racketeering.
Tragically, the butchered upper-torso of Winter’s once-robust body was stumbled upon by his father, who had noticed the absence of his son since Sunday, March 11 (Smith 2002, 25-26). Unsurprisingly, an investigation occurred to obtain the identity and whereabouts of the murderer. When the various pieces of the body are found in differing areas of the town, theory begins to formulate that the murder was conducted by one of the two butchers in town; Adolph Lewy, a Jew, and Gustav Hoffman, a Christian, due to the precision of the cuts made upon Winter’s body (Smith 28).
head was picked up by the executioner, and her body was eventually dumped right beside her
without risking life or limb had proved too tempting for several of the more barbarous resurrectionists” (Nuland). As the public became steadily more aggressive, surgeons and anatomists grew desperate; thus, enter the infamous duo of William Burke and William Hare. These two poor Irishmen employed an unconventional method to the typical body snatching: murder. In other words, they purposely killed people in order to sell the bodies to a renowned anatomist known as Dr. Robert Knox. Their ingenious process for obtaining victims was quite horrific. “Friendless people were enticed into their house, stupefied with drink and then smothered so that there would be no marks on the body to suggest a violent death” (Magee). Within a year’s time, “[a]t least sixteen people were dispatched in this way before the pair were apprehended in 1828, when the body of the last of these victims was found in Dr Knox’s rooms” (Magee). “Hare turned King's evidence against Burke, who was hanged in a riotous ceremony witnessed by more than twenty thousand...onlookers” (Nuland), and, in a twisted sense of karma, Burke’s body was ordered by the court to be publicly dissected by a professor of the University of Edinburgh. Interestingly, for their cooperation with the authorities ,“Burke’s accomplices...avoided punishment. Robert Knox... also went unpunished, although his reputation and career were damaged”
Twelve decades have passed since the killing of Jack the Ripper, and the culprit still hasn’t been found, making it one of the greatest mysteries in history. Only a year before The Ripper’s first strike, there were no records of murder in Whitechapel district. However, The Ripper got his name from the way he mutilated five prostitutes from August 31st to November 9th, 1888, each of them in or within a mile of Whitechapel. The district had the highest percentage of poverty at the time, a shocking 47%. There were approximately 1200 prostitutes in the area while the killings were going on.
The killer left. He ignored the watch with the silver chain. He never checked his victim's pockets. He took nothing but the old man's life. The body lay undisturbed
The narrator then meticulously describes the way he disposed of the body: "You should have seen how careful I was to put the body where no one could find it. First, I cut off the head, then the arms and the legs.... and then I put the pieces of the body under the floorboards. " For a reader of the time, this was written they would most likely have recoiled with shock and disgust, and this reaction comes down through the ages to even today's
While in the process of them digging they saw part of the victims clothing sticking out and dug around it discovering the body. Immediately following their discovery, they contacted the Fort Worth police department where they along with the coroner’s office and homicide detectives began working on the case. We were able to actually get in touch with the member of the landscaping crew that made the discovery in order to ask a few questions. Jesus Gonzales, the man who discovered the victims remains. When asked what his initial thoughts were when he first noticed the body he responded “I couldn’t believe what I was seeing, it was just a normal day of work and then I saw the clothing sticking out not thinking anything of it I dug around it and that’s when it came to my attention that this was indeed a
But that morning, as the police arrived on Argyle Road — not coincidentally, in minutes — the worst came to pass: the body of a young man was discovered in a driveway just outside a Queen Anne house toward the end of the block. He was lying facedown on a bloody
I cut off the head and the arms and the legs. I then took up three planks from the flooring of the chamber, and deposited all between the scantlings"(pg.). This quote is exemplifying that the narrator chopped up the old man's body in order to hide it in the floorboards on which he walked every day. There is little doubt that any normal person would commit such an atrocity without throwing up or becoming uneasy. In the article "Shocking! Man Discovers Dead Body Buried Under the Floor of His Room" Posted by Thandiani on The 05th May, 2016-tori.ng it states that: "A man has made a shocking discovery while inspecting his house. On Tuesday, the owner of the house while repairing the floor of a bedroom found a skull and a skeleton, as well as a bra and shoes! The stunned man had just found the remains of a decomposed body in the floor of his house." Based off this, clearly this man is surprised that he has found a dead body in his dwelling. He then goes on to state: “A tree root was growing from the floor in the bedroom and I decided to dig it out,” he said.“That’s when I made the terrifying discovery and called for help. It was too much for me to handle. I don’t know who did this. I had no idea I was living with a dead body.” This portrays the reaction of a normal person going about a normal life, when he suddenly found a whole skeleton of somebody underneath his house. He couldn't handle the situation,
She was found early one morning lying near the side of the road. Her throat had been cut from ear-to-ear. Not long after this, the body of Annie Chapman was found. The cut in her neck was so deep it almost severed her head. Three weeks passed with no signs from the Ripper, but on September 27, 1888, a letter arrived that was supposedly from the killer himself. He stated that they would soon hear from him again and he would claim another life. There were many doubts that it was a sincere letter, but three days later he struck. Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddowes were the unlucky victims. Elizabeth had been cut at the neck, but unlike any of the other victims, the Ripper was unable to attack her abdomen. Police assumed he had been interrupted somehow. The Rippers last victim was Mary Kelly. She was much younger and prettier than any of the other victims. The Ripper had taken his time to mutilate her entire body. Her hair and eyes were the only things recognizable left. Police described this as the “work of the devil” (Anderson 7). He mutilated his victim’s bodies in a way that indicated he had some knowledge of the human anatomy. He acted during the early morning, outside so there is no other way he could have been as precise and fast as he was if he was unaware of the human body
So he cuts the body up in pieces legs, arms, and head. He rips up the floor boards and places the body underneath the floors. The narrator tells himself ‘‘he heide the body well good enough not even a human eye could have detected anything wrong.’’ In all of the killing of the old man a neighbor heard the shrieks of the killing and had called the police. There came a knocking at the street door. The narrator went down to open it with a light heart he said to himself ‘‘for what had I now to fear.’’ There entered three men, who introduced themselves, with perfect suavity, as officers of the
The theory here is that Montague John Druitt is a suspect of being Jack the Ripper. It is said that when he was found, that his pockets were filled with stones. In Who was Jack the Ripper?: 6 tantalizing theories it states,” Investigators concluded that the cause of death was suicide and that the body had been at the bottom of the river for several weeks.”(www.history.com). He has been through crisis in the 1880s in which he was also dismissed for teaching at a boarding school.
Rather than produce the normal response of a ten-year-old girl who has just discovered a dead body by stepping in it such as scream or faint, she remains “unafraid” and bends down to release her foot. It is not until she sees the dead man’s “naked grin” that she becomes unnerved. Myop’s delayed response to the disturbing event emphasizes the grotesque element as well as her innocence. The man was dressed in overalls with buckles that had “turned green” which illustrated decay. His teeth had “crack[s]” and were “broken” suggesting that he had been beaten before dying. After looking, Myop notices a pretty flower that she would like to add to her collection. Once she picks it up, however, she notices the “rotted remains of a noose”. The man Myop found had been hung which explained why his head “lay beside him” rather than with his