New identities caused by Diaspora

811 Words2 Pages

In the five texts by Rudnyckyj, And, Parrenas, Maher &Pahar, and Rushdie there is an overall theme of identity in diaspora. Regarding identity, Stuart Hall argues that, “instead of thinking of identity as an already accomplished fact, which the new cultural practices then represent, we should think, as a “'production', which is never complete, always in process, and always constituted within, not outside, representation.” (Hall 222) In other words, identity is not stagnant, but active and forever changing. Moreover, that cultural practices and people are not represented by a restrictive an innate personality or existence but instead represent a dynamic understanding that is constantly in motion. How these five articles all inter-relate is that they give a clear representation of how diaspora (a group of people who live outside the area in which they had lived for a long time or in which their ancestors lived) not only produces the transformation of identity, but also the production of new identity. In brief, diaspora is an impetus for the metamorphosis of identity. In the first article, written by Ien Ang, the main point of discussion is identity in diaspora in relationship with citizenship and national identity. The author, Ien Ang, came from a Pernanakan Chinese family in Indonesia. He not only went to school in the Netherlands, but also had resided in Australia in more than ten years. In the article he relates with how he struggled with the feeling of not having a concrete national identity. However, what Ien illustrates is how his identity has been transformed by diaspora. As the article enunciates, “It (diaspora) deconstructed dominant notions of identity, belonging, and citizenship” (Ang in Louie). Essentially, that the trad... ... middle of paper ... ...sive’ idea of identity without borders, intermittent through a plurality of cultures, and transcends the traditional, is best represented in the final article by Salman Rushdie. Especially in the article’s allegory, “the broken mirror may actually be as valuable as the one which is supposedly unflawed,” furthermore that, “the broken glass is not merely a mirror of nostalgia, it is also, a useful tool with which to work in the present.” identity that the matter of “'becoming' as well as of 'being; belongs to the future as much as to the past.” (Hall 225) Specifically, identity is not something, which is already fixed existence, but instead transcends time, history and culture, and is submitted to continuous transformation. Furthermore, Diaspora is just one of the areas in which, national identity, gender identity, family identity, are continually being reconstructed.

Open Document