Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pro-life vs pro-choice persuasive essay
The argument between pro life or pro choice
Pro choice and pro life debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pro-life vs pro-choice persuasive essay
In contemporary politics, a hot topic that most people feel quite heated on is the pro-life or pro-choice debate. Abortion and women’s health rights are at the forefront of many people’s political views. These views are highly debated and this is not exempt from literature. Authors like Kazuo Ishiguro and Neal Shusterman write about this debate in their books Never Let Me Go and Unwind, respectively, but in a futuristic manner that is more discretely about pro-life or pro-choice. In both Unwind and Never Let Me Go, the author's manipulation and presentation of the key issue of organ donation and more largely life itself, they depict a stance on the pro-life or pro-choice decision. Unwind uses the idea of storking and the forced unwinding of many children to show a pro-life decision while Never Let Me Go adopts a pro-choice stance through the manipulation of the children at Hailsham. Through the carefully chosen voices of narrators like Connor and Risa, Shusterman manipulates the reader to show the lack of autonomy over their own lives and how therefore, the system or overarching government needs to be pro-life on the issue of unwinding and organ donation. Unwind is written from the perspective of several kids who are about to be unwound, two of which are Risa and Connor. …show more content…
By Shusterman using Unwind to be pro-choice and Ishiguro being pro-life, the authors present readers with an argument through their manipulation of the setting and events. These issues are increasingly relevant and having books that are critiques on them allow for readers to be more invested in the issues and care more. Involvement in new and pressing issues is paramount to society and books like Unwind and Never Let Me Go are important parts of conversation in larger discussion about rights to bodily autonomy and the right to life and/or
Untwine shows a family going through a tragic loss but eventually learning to accept that loss. This book sends the message that no matter how tragic an event is, there is always light at the end of the tunnel. Although Giselle faced many problems, she was able to continue on in life without her sister physically by her
This quote stood out to me because it offered a new perspective to the controversial issues on abortion. After reading this, I realized how abortion was always tied to the women, which not only isolates them in this problem but also unconsciously reduces them to their reproductive functions. The
In Hemingway’s “Hills like White Elephants” and Wallace’s “Good People,” both of the young females, Jig and Sheri, experience an unplanned pregnancy and must decide whether an abortion is the right choice. While the former story employs dialogue to depict the relationship of an adventurous, carefree couple in the 1920s, the latter uses third person limited point of view to show a faithful young couple whose religion is their source of morality. Thus, Wallace digs much deeper since both religion and love are a factor in Sheri’s ultimate decision. The enigmatic endings of both stories leave us questioning Jig and Sheri’s choice and its impact on the future of their relationship with their respective partners. The text suggests that Jig will not comply with the American’s wish of aborting the baby because of her vision and the indicative dialogue between her and the American, and Sheri will conform to her religious beliefs and carry the child. Whereas Jig will leave the American due to his lack of obligation, Lane Dean Jr. will marry Sheri in his effort to be a good person.
More often than not, people don’t recognize it, but every piece of their atmosphere leaves a prominent affect on them. This is proven true in Unwind by examining Connor’s conflicts and how his actions reflect the impact of conflict in his life. Early in the novel, Connor begins to feel remorseful even before his plan of action to run away has even begun. He uses his knowledge as a weapon to make h...
Page, Christina. How the Pro-Choice Movement Saved America: Freedom, Politics and the War on Sex. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
Thomson’s main idea is to show why Pro-Life Activists are wrong in their beliefs. She also wants to show that even if the fetus inside a women’s body had the right to life (as argued by Pro – Lifers), this right does not entail the fetus to have whatever it needs to survive – including usage of the woman’s body to stay alive.
...e essay she says “but I don’t feel all one way about abortion anymore, and I don’t think it serves a just cause to pretend that many of us do”(629). This quote lets the reader identify with it being okay to feel conflicted about abortion. It seems that often people feel they have to choose sides in the abortion debate. However, Quindlen allows her audience to find comfort and acceptance and not really knowing what they would do if ever faced with this decision. She uses a balance of real life examples that she has experienced and witnessed. Most of her examples touch the reader deep down inside so that they are left feeling as if they were a fly on the wall when these things were going on.
“She may be unmarried or in a bad marriage. She may consider herself too poor to raise a child. She may think her life is too unstable or unhappy, or she may think that her drinking or drug use will damage the baby’s health” (126). The emotional appeal in this paragraph could make the reader think they are pro-choice. Apart from their use of pathos, the authors do a great job using a mixture of both ethos and logos. Page 130 is an example of both, which were used expertly to help the reader understand their point of view and the
Three connections I made were one text to society and two text to world.One connection I made was that Unwinds sometimes think other people think they are not good enough to live. That’s how some kids feel in many schools. They don’t feel accepted into the community, and it hurts so much that some people can feel suicidal. In Unwind, some kids might feel like they deserve to be unwound. Both societies have people who think they are not good enough to live. One other connection I made was text to world. When I thought of the Heartland War, I immediately thought about World War Two. In the Heartland War, the “Bill of Life” was passed, saying that people could Unwind their children if they wanted to. In World War Two, if Adolf Hitler would’ve won, our society might have been similar to this, because Hitler wanted to take over the world. He would have gotten to bend people against their will, much like the parents and their children in Unwind. I believe this connection was especially important because if the Axis powers would have won, our society could have been similar to this one. The last connection is similar to the second one. In the story, they reference clappers a lot. Clappers are very similar to suicide bombers today. In the book, clappers try to explode along with thousands of people, kind of like bombers. One bomber incident is 9/11. The bombers killed themselves to hurt America,
The diverse, and often volatile, points of view associated with the abortion issue often incorporate raw emotion powerful enough to lead to violent behavior. The difficulty in defining the morality of the issue perhaps provides a breeding ground for immoderate thinking brought on by the all or nothing stands of the supporters and opponents of the issue. This intolerance of the "other side" has led t...
Anger and heated debate have long fueled the controversy over abortion. Whether pro-life or pro-choice, both sides of the argument are convinced of the righteousness of their beliefs. There is, however, some confusion surrounding the term “pro-choice” – it does not directly pertain to the spread and use of abortion, but rather, “pro-choicers” advocate the continued legalization of abortion in order to make the choice available and to ensure that women’s fundamental rights are not subjugated. The stance that abortion should be available has its roots in economic concerns, psychological evidence, moral dilemmas, and the Constitution.
Once upon a time, I was a student ignorant of the issues plaguing our nation; issues such as abortion and a frightening scarcity of organ donors meant little to me, who was neither pregnant nor in need of replacement body parts. Today, I fortunately remain a simple witness to these scenarios rather than a participant, but I have certainly established a new perspective since reading Neal Shusterman’s Unwind several years ago.
Over the course of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with regard to her reproductive rights.
One of the most controversial issues in this day and age is the stance people take on abortion. The two main positions that people take are either of pro-choice or pro-life; both sides, although polar opposites, tend to refer to both the issue of morality and logical rationale. The pro-life side of the debate believes that abortion is an utterly immoral practice that should be abolished. On the contrary, abortion should remain a legal procedure because it is a reproductive right; its eradication would not only take away the pregnant person’s autonomy, but would also put more children in financially unstable homes and the adoption system, and would cause an increase in potentially fatal, unsafe abortions.
One of the major controversial issues confronting the society today is abortion. I choose abortion as the topic of discussion since it contradicts my values and beliefs. Abortion is the extraction of the human fetus from the mother’s womb with an intention to end the life of that fetus prior to its natural birth. The controversy surrounding abortion is whether it should be legalized or not? In my opinion, abortion is morally and ethically wrong because it leads to violation of human rights. Life is precious and only it’s Creator has the right to take it away. I chose this issue for discussion to bring to light many of the hidden facts and arguments, of which people are unaware and not very sensitive today. Three of the many aspects of abortion can be taken into consideration 1) Motives behind abortion 2) Pro life v/s pro choice. 2) The growth of the “Dead Baby Industry.”