Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The human condition in literature
Literature and humans
Cultural landscape canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
All the influences above shaped Never Cry Wolf into the work it became to be. Mowat conveys many themes in the book, but one central theme is conveyed throughout the entire book. The theme conveyed is how humans are not inherently superior to other animals even though it is a common perception made by humans (Never Cry Wolf). Many literary aspects are used to convey this central theme. Mowat uses a humorous tone, the description of the setting, and characters, to convey the theme of how humans are not inherently superior to other animals.
Farley Mowat uses a humorous tone to convey that humans are not always superior to animals, in this case, wolves (Simms). Throughout the book Mowat humorously admits how he is a fool for thinking that he
…show more content…
is smarter than the wolves. Early on in the book Mowat tells the readers about how he could not even find the wolves. Mowat assumes this task would be easy because of his intelligence, but this is not the case.
Much time passes before he even sights a single wolf. “After this dismaying tour of the boneyard it was three days before I found time for another trip…I went a quarter-mile on this second expedition- but saw no wolves” (51). Mowat with even all of his training is unable to locate the wolves and he is expected to observe them. The wolves, at this point, are smarter than Mowat without even trying to be. Later on, when Mowat sights his first wolf he foolishly admits that he was unprepared for how large and fierce the wolves appear. “… [T]he lean and sinewy motion and the overall impression of a beast the size of a small pony; an impression implicit with a feeling of lethal strength. Mowat had been slightly cautious about being around the wolves, but was not prepared for how the actual wolves were. Mowat had the common human perception that he was superior to the wolves and from his book research never felt as threatened by the wolves as he did now. The humorous tone in how Mowat describes these actions makes it seem as if he mocks the rest of the human population for doing the same thing on a daily basis. He isn’t ashamed by his astonishment and attempts to prove a …show more content…
point that many humans expect they are superior to animals without being truly educated on the animal. When Mowat finds the den that the wolves are living in his decides to visit and observe the wolves the next day. He spends his whole day waiting to see them, but the wolves never make an appearance. He turns around to relieve himself and right behind him sat the missing wolves. “To say I was chagrined to discover I was not alone would be an understatement; for sitting directly behind me, and not twenty yards away, were the missing wolves” (70). Instead of being in complete shock Mowat decided to yell at the wolves to go away. “‘Shoo!’ I screamed at them. ‘What the hell do you think you’re looking at, you…you…peeping Toms! Go away for heaven’s sake!’” (71). Mowat has grown up with this perception of superiority that it does not even occur to him how dangerous yelling at the wolves could be. Mowat admits all of his misconceptions humorously and shows how foolish humans can be when they have the perception that they are superior over animals. Mowat not only uses this unique tone to portray the theme, but also uses the setting to show how humans are not inherently superior.
The setting takes place in the Barren Land of northeast Canada (Simms). When Mowat arrives he is faced with the many challenges of this brutal climate. The wolves are already adapted to these circumstances and have evolved to endure the climate. Human’s on the other hand have not making them inferior to animals. This would be assumed as common knowledge but Mowat still makes the point to show this throughout his work. In the spring time when the weather changed the cabin was ruined by the flooding that washed in the ruins the fourteen huskies had built up all winter long. “… [T]he cabin had lost its charm, for the debris on the floor was a foot thick and somewhat repellent” (52). Mowat is then hindered by this for a while after it occurred. The wolves on the other hand never had this problem and lived much simpler. In the fight to survive easily in nature the wolves come out to be much more superior to humans. Humans assume with their complex brains and evolved technology they are better than animals. What Mowat was trying to make explicit was that wolves live an even easier life in nature without the help of
technology. The setting may help support Mowat’s theme of the perception of human superiority, but there is another literary aspect that really aides him in creating this certain theme. This literary aspect is his character descriptions. One character in particularly is influential and his name is Ootek. Ootek is an Eskimo and returns with Mike to the cabin. Ootek seems to have a special relationship with the wolves and seems to enjoy observing them just as Mowat does. “In fact, he conveyed to me the information that he too was keenly interested in wolves, partly because his personal totem, or helping spirit, was Amarok, the Wolf Being” (119). Ootek after this point helps educate Mowat on many aspects about the wolf population. One reason humans assume they are inherently more superior is because they have the ability to be educated formally. By having an education humans assume they are the experts on everything even though they are more ignorant than educated. Mowat realizes that just because he is educated does not mean he is superior to others. Ootek is not formally educated, but is self-educated (Thorton). And Ootek helps Mowat constantly. Without Ootek, Mowat would not have gotten the same information out of the Lupine Project. “Ootek had a great deal to add to my knowledge of wolves’ food habits” (121). Mowat consistently writes about the knowledge Ootek gave him about wolves. Therefore, Mowat shows that superiority does not only occur from being formally educated. Ootek is also more superior in wolf information because he is able to understand the wolf language and talk. Mike one day explained to Mowat that Ootek could converse with the wolves. “…[S]ome Eskimos, and Ootek in particular, could hear and understand so well that they could quite literally converse with wolves” (133). Without any formal education Ootek is able to understand the wolf population more in depth than Mowat. Farley Mowat proves that a formal education is not required to be superior. Animals do not have a formal education but a self-education, which in Ootek’s situation seems to be admirable than a formal education. Therefore, humans cannot be inherently superior over animals just because they have a formal education. The perception that humans are inherently superior is proved wrong in Mowat’s writing. The tone, setting and characters show that humans cannot expect to be more intelligent just because of their formal education. In the end, humans with this perception tend to become more ignorant because they feel no need to self-educate themselves because they are supposedly inherently superior.
Lisa Genova, the author of Still Alice, a heartbreaking book about a 50-year-old woman's sudden diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, graduated valedictorian from Bates College with a degree in Biopsychology and holds a Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Harvard University. She is a member of the Dementia Advocacy, Support Network International and Dementia USA and is an online columnist for the National Alzheimer's Association. Genova's work with Alzheimer's patients has given her an understanding of the disorder and its affect not only on the patient, but on their friends and family as well (Simon and Schuster, n.d.).
Melba Pattillo Beals book, Warriors Don’t Cry, is a memoir about her experience as one of the Little Rock Nine. From a very young age Melba sees the many problems with segregation. Throughout the book she recalls several memories involving the unfairness and struggles that her, her family, and other African Americans had to go through in the South during the time of segregation and the Civil Rights Movement.
I read the book Lonesome Howl, which is a drama book and a love story. The book was about two main character whose names are Jake and Lucy. They lived with their family in two different farms, but in the same community besides a mountain covered in a big wicked forest where many rumors took place. The farmers around the place lost many sheep’s since a feral beast. It was a quite small community and a lot of tales was told about it to make it even more interesting. Lucy was 16 years old and lived with her strict father and a coward of mom who didn’t dare to stand up for her daughter when she were being mistreated and slapped around by her father. Lucy was a retired and quite teenager because of that. She had a younger brother whose name was Peter. Peter was being bullied in school and couldn’t read since the education of Peter was different compare too Lucy’s. She helped him in school and stood up for the mean bullies, although all she got in return was him talking bullshit about her with their cruel dad which resulted with her getting thrash.
After a basketball game, four kids, Andrew Jackson, Tyrone Mills, Robert Washington and B.J. Carson, celebrate a win by going out drinking and driving. Andrew lost control of his car and crashed into a retaining wall on I-75. Andy, Tyrone, and B.J. escaped from the four-door Chevy right after the accident. Teen basketball star and Hazelwood high team captain was sitting in the passenger's side with his feet on the dashboard. When the crash happened, his feet went through the windshield and he was unable to escape. The gas tank then exploded and burned Robbie to death while the three unharmed kids tried to save him.
Speak, by Laurie Halse Anderson, is a story written in the first person about a young girl named Melinda Sordino. The title of the book, Speak, is ironically based on the fact that Melinda chooses not to speak. The book is written in the form of a monologue in the mind of Melinda, a teenage introvert. This story depicts the story of a very miserable freshman year of high school. Although there are several people in her high school, Melinda secludes herself from them all. There are several people in her school that used to be her friend in middle school, but not anymore. Not after what she did over the summer. What she did was call the cops on an end of summer party on of her friends was throwing. Although all her classmates think there was no reason to call, only Melinda knows the real reason. Even if they cared to know the real reason, there is no way she could tell them. A personal rape story is not something that flows freely off the tongue. Throughout the story Melinda describes the pain she is going through every day as a result of her rape. The rape of a teenage girl often leads to depression. Melinda is convinced that nobody understands her, nor would they even if they knew what happened that summer. Once a happy girl, Melinda is now depressed and withdrawn from the world. She hardly ever speaks, nor does she do well in school. She bites her lips and her nails until they bleed. Her parents seem to think she is just going through a faze, but little do they know, their daughter has undergone a life changing trauma that will affect her life forever.
In the poem pride, Dahlia Ravikovitch uses many poetic devices. She uses an analogy for the poem as a whole, and a few metaphors inside it, such as, “the rock has an open wound.” Ravikovitch also uses personification multiple times, for example: “Years pass over them as they wait.” and, “the seaweed whips around, the sea bursts forth and rolls back--” Ravikovitch also uses inclusive language such as when she says: “I’m telling you,” and “I told you.” She uses these phrases to make the reader feel apart of the poem, and to draw the reader in. She also uses repetition, for example, repetition of the word years.
of the wolves and finds that they are more than the savage and merciless hunters
A wolf pack is, at its foundation, simply a family, with the parents (alphas) guiding the activities of the group. Hence, it is easy to believe that dogs are able to bond with human families, especially when the alphas are already parents. The parents view the dog as one of their children, one who remains dependent and will never leave or criticize them (Rogers 1), and in the same manner, the dog views the human parents as if they were his actual parents and as a result, loves and trusts them with his life gladly following them, not once questioning their decisions or actions. For these reasons, humans have found release in the company of dogs because dogs do not judge. By way of example, Sigmund Freud was notably a bad singer and as a result, never sang in public, however he often hummed an aria while petting his dog (Rogers 2). In the presence of dogs, our need to self-censor our words and actions vanishes (Rogers 2). Ultimately, dogs and human beings are able to form such strong emotional bonds through love and
Michael MacDonald’S All Souls is a heart wrenching insider account of growing up in Old Country housing projects located in the south of Boston, also known as Southie to the locals. The memoir takes the reader deep inside the world of Southie through the eyes of MacDonald. MacDonald was one of 11 children to grow up and deal with the many tribulations of Southie, Boston. Southie is characterized by high levels of crime, racism, and violence; all things that fall under the category of social problem. Social problems can be defined as “societal induced conditions that harms any segment of the population. Social problems are also related to acts and conditions that violate the norms and values found in society” (Long). The social problems that are present in Southie are the very reasons why the living conditions are so bad as well as why Southie is considered one of the poorest towns in Boston. Macdonald’s along with his family have to overcome the presence of crime, racism, and violence in order to survive in the town they consider the best place in the world.
the novel has an unpleasant personality, looks frightening, and has revenge on the top of his mind. The antagonist of the novel is a wolf named Malumclaw. To begin with, Malumclaw’s personality is very unpleasant. In particular, he is very shrewd and short-tempered. In fact, it has been presented in the novel that he has “ exploded” on many people with his anger, and does not take ridiculous behavior from anyone. Also, the wolf is very serious. Meaning, he is a no- nonsense behavior person. Furthermore, he will snap at anyone quite easily, and will not tolerate a break in any deal he makes. Colfer states, “ Deal. But let me warn you, if you
“Wild Geese” is very different from many poems written. Oliver’s personal life, the free form of the poem along with the first line, “You do not have to be good,” and the imagery of nature contributes to Oliver’s intent to convince the audience that to be part of the world, a person does not need to aspire to civilization’s standards.
One of the evident drawbacks of having animals depict human characters, is that they are figuratively and literally dehumanized. Humans are more complex than their primitive desires, impulses, and needs; and this fact could very easily be lost in translation with this choice of illustration. For example, it could be interpreted that the Germans who were drawn as cats, were behaving like the carnivorous species that they are, and chasing mice, because it is encoded in their natural instincts and a part of their primitive behaviour. This exempts the perpetrators, since it implies their lack of free will was affecting their every decision. It also implies that since the Germans are another specie, the mass murder of millions of people could never have happened by any other nationality, and that evil actions are based upon ethnicity, rather than a human’s negligence from their moral standings. However, Spiegelman was able to slightly deter from this indiscretion by giving each character dynamic personalities and pragmatic
London implements his new view of life—“human beings are one and the same despite their class, creed, nationality or social status or colour of the skin and they differ only by their deeds”5—in his writings. “[London shows] his [view] in his novel 'Call of the Wild '. The protagonist of the novel is a dog-named Buck. The dog serves the master throughout its life and when there is no space among men, it goes back to its ancestors, wolfs.”6 Buck represents humanity in the novel. Buck’s deed is serving his master, but at the end of the day, Buck returns to his fellow beings, wolfs. These socialist undertones of uniformity in The Call of the Wild are the direct cause for its censorship in Nazi Germany, Italy, Yugoslavia, and the Soviet
The novel, Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other (2011) written by Sherry Turkle, presents many controversial views, and demonstrating numerous examples of how technology is replacing complex pieces and relationships in our life. The book is slightly divided into two parts with the first focused on social robots and their relationships with people. The second half is much different, focusing on the online world and it’s presence in society. Overall, Turkle makes many personally agreeable and disagreeable points in the book that bring it together as a whole.
A little girl has went to bring her grandmother some cookies, as she walks through the woods she meets a wolf and tells the wolf where she is headed. The wolf then beats the girl to her house, eats the grandmother, and dresses up as her to trick Little Red Riding Hood before she arrives. When she gets there she notices her Grandmother looks different. When she is close enough to recognize it is no her grandmother, the wolf eats her. In reality we all know that wolves cannot speak and are not intelligent enough to trick a human, but the moral behind the story is where the facts come in. In reality we all know we should not talk to strangers, its very dangerous. The wolf represents people who may be charming, polite or, sweet but are still strangers but in real life these are the people children should watch out for the