Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Art of negotiation essay
Strengths and weaknesses of the negotiation process
Strengths and weaknesses of the negotiation process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Art of negotiation essay
Negotiation
Negotiation is the process of two individuals or groups reaching joint agreement about differing needs or ideas. Oliver (1996) described negotiation as "negotiators jointly searching a multidimensional space and then agreeing to a single point in the space." Negotiation is a form of conflict resolution. When we negotiate, the first thing that needs to be established is whether we have two or more parties that have a common objective, but also differ in ideas when it comes to how they achieve the objective. The principle behind negotiating is to finding the middle ground that is suitable for both parties involved. Not all negotiation ends in satisfactory compromise, sometimes negotiations can take a long time to conclude because, there is no common ground, or no one is willing to compromise. When this happens we have what is called a standoff, and this can lead to an argument and in many cases "NO DEAL".
There are two main ways negotiations can be approached, cooperative or competitive. The cooperative approach to negotiating, calls for expertise in tolerance, each party must be willing to listen. All goals and priorities of both parties must be regarded equally important by all parties involved in order for there to be a "win-win" outcome. The Art of Negotiation, published by Gerard I. Nierenberg, states that the attitude of the negotiators decides the path a negotiation will take. Nierenberg's belief that "Everybody Wins" guarantees that all parties benefit from the negotiations, as opposed to the competitive approach. For example: a potential car buyer goes to a car lot to look at possible cars to buy, while on site, a relationship is developed with the sales person. During this time of selling the sales...
... middle of paper ...
...ways want to make sure all parties included clearly understands the terms of the agreements, and those terms are documented. And finally you always want to recap after the negotiation is final to monitor that the outcome is in line with what was agreed upon and also to learn where adjustments for future negotiations can be made.
References
Dictionary definition of negotiation. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2004, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Oliver, Jim R. (1996). "A Machine Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce." http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/-oliver27/papers/jmis.ps. July 31, 1996.
Gerard I. Nierenberg, The Art of Negotiating: Psychological strategies for Gaining Advantageous Bargains, Barnes and Noble, (1995),
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New
Fisher, R & Ury, W (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiation Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin: New York
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2006). Negotiation Readings, Exercises, and Cases Fifth Ed. Bill Brubaker, Mark Asher, A Power Play for Howard Negotiation (pp. 616-626). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill Irwin.
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
Negotiations are supposed to begin in a positive way in which the negotiators consider the needs and wants of the others involved and their shared interests and interdependencies.... ... middle of paper ... ... References Michael R. Carrell, C. H. (2008). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practice.
Negotiations styles are scholastically recognized as being broken down into two general categories and those are distributive bargaining styles and integrative negotiation styles. Distributive bargaining styles of negotiation are understood to be a competitive type of negotiation. “Distributive bargaining, also known as positional bargaining, negotiating zero-sum, competitive negotiation, or win-lose negotiation, is a type or style of negotiation in which the parties compete for the distribution of a fixed amount of value” (Business Blog Reviews, 2011). This type of negotiation skill or style approach might be best represented in professional areas such as the stock market where there is a fixed goal in mind or even in a garage sale negotiation where the owner would have a specific value of which he/she would not go below. In contrast, an integrative negotiation approach/style is that of cooperative bargaining, or win-win types ...
The first common theme is the importance of clear strategic intent and big picture thinking in negotiations. Before taking the Negotiation Behaviour unit, I always perceived negotiation as a fixed-pie, a zero-sum gain situation, where one party wins and the other party loses. This belief has often led me to a competitive behaviour in negotiation by trading the big picture thinking with the need to win, getting too detailed too quickly, leading to a positional approach instead of having a broad goal and explore for ways around problems to create value and get the best outcome.
Negotiation, as we’ve learned, is the process of communicating where parties can discuss problems and/or targets and attempt to solve them via dialogue in order to reach a resolution. While many individuals feel successful negotiations are due to a natural skill, the truth behind reaching a prime agreement is preparation. You need to know the issue, know yourself, and know your party. This type of preparation also includes knowing your needs and limits, understanding what the other party wants and anticipating their limits, asking the right questions, and being creative in your counteroffers.
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
Negotiation is "A big part of sense-making occurs between and among people as they influence one another 's perceptions and try to achieve a shared perspective."(Adler and Proctor 85). Negotiation usually starts up when two people are trying to exchange stories. People often believe that their reason is the best and that the other needs to come to an agreement that theirs is the right answer which can lead to heated arguments. A common example of negotiation is the fighting between siblings, for example, two twin boys got in a fight with each other, their mother ask both of them what had happen and both the boys will describe how the other is responsible for starting the
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Integrative negotiation is often referred to as ‘win-win’ and typically entails two or more issues to be negotiated. It often involves an agreement process that better integrates the aims and goals of all the involved negotiating parties through creative and collaborative problem solving. Relationship is usually more important, with more complex issues being negotiated than with Distributive Negotiation. Integrative negotiation is the process of defining these goals and engaging in a process that permits both parties to maximize their objectives.
Negotiation approaches are generally described as either distributive or integrative. At the heart of each strategy is a measurement of conflict between each party’s desired outcomes. Consider the following situation. Chris, an entrepreneur, is starting a new business that will occupy most of his free time for the near future. Living in a fancy new development, Chris is concerned that his new business will prevent him from taking care of his lawn, which has strict requirements under neighborhood rules. Not wanted to upset his neighbors, Chris decides to hire Matt to cut his grass.
Negotiation has been used as a vital communication tool not only in business but also in social intercourse. It helps people make common agreement and avoid conflict. So we need to use the tactics which we learned from this course and books to do more practice, only in this way we can gain advantages in negotiation.